Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Teacher Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1435758

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Intervention Studies on Mathematics and Science Pedagogical Content Knowledge META-ANALYSIS OF PCK INTERVENTION

Provisionally accepted
  • Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, Japan

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) has been considered as professional knowledge that teachers need to effectively instruct students. Empirical studies have been conducted to enrich teachers' PCK through interventions such as professional development programs. In this study, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies about PCK interventions and their quantitative evaluation among mathematics or science teachers at the elementary and secondary education levels. We identified 101 effect sizes (42 for multiple group comparison designs and 59 for multiple time point comparison designs) and found that the interventions had a positive effect in both designs. The results of the meta-regression analysis showed that in the multiple group design, the effects differed by intervention target, with higher scores for the PCK intervention than for the CK-only intervention, and in the multiple time point design, the effects differed by subjects treated, with higher scores for the science materials than for the mathematics materials. These results not only demonstrate the average effectiveness of previous studies aimed at improving teachers' PCK but also provide insights into effective designs for professional development methods that promote PCK acquisition.

    Keywords: pedagogical content knowledge, intervention, Meta-analysis, Systematic review, meta-regression analysis potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45, 169-204

    Received: 21 May 2024; Accepted: 28 Aug 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Fukaya, Nakamura, Kitayama and Nakagoshi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Tatsushi Fukaya, Graduate School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Hiroshima University, Higashihiroshima, Japan

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.