Skip to main content

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Special Educational Needs
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1422139

Educational practices for the language development of students with Intellectual Developmental Disorder in the school setting: A systematic review

Provisionally accepted
  • EA7273 Centre de Recherche en Psychologie Cognition, Psychisme et Organisations, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Background: Intellectual development disorder (IDD) is a challenging disorder that professionals, most notably teachers, are confronted with daily. Supporting oral language in the classroom is a complex challenge as teachers are expected to implement effective methods to support students' language. However, they face a persistent scarcity of scientific evidence to draw upon in their practice. Aims:This research provides a first overview of instructional methods and their effectiveness in this population. Method: Our search was conducted through various databases, generating a total of 931 articles. Data from the 14 selected studies were analyzed. Outcomes & Results: The results reveal limited, heterogenous, and hardly comparable studies in terms of their characteristics (samples, language area, strategies, and effectiveness measures) suggesting a low level of evidence regarding the effectiveness of these practices. Conclusion & Implications: We discuss the implications of these findings in light of the different factors contributing to the interventions' effectiveness, as well as considering the issue of transfer and generalization of acquired skills in IDD. We also reveal the urgent need for developing methods addressing cognitive load limitations such as implicit learning approaches, to enhances effectiveness and compensate the gap of available resources tailored to improve oral language outcomes in the IDD population.

    Keywords: Intellectual developmental disorder, Language, Educational practices, School setting, Systematic review

    Received: 24 Apr 2024; Accepted: 02 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Janho Dit Hreich, Ibernon and Bourdin. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Céline Janho Dit Hreich, EA7273 Centre de Recherche en Psychologie Cognition, Psychisme et Organisations, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.