Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Leadership in Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1392920
This article is part of the Research Topic Education for the Future: Learning and Teaching for Sustainable Development in Education View all 6 articles

A Comparative Study of Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC) National Documents between China and Finland

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
  • 2 University of Turku, Turku, Southwest Finland, Finland
  • 3 University of Oulu, Oulu, Northern Ostrobothnia, Finland
  • 4 Beijing Normal University, Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Early childhood education and care (ECEC) serves as a crucial foundation for children's holistic growth and lifelong learning (OECD, 2021). Despite its significance, comparative analyses of leading ECEC documents across cultures remain limited. To address this gap, our study conducts a comparative analysis to identify key aspects and examine similarities and differences in national ECEC documents from China and Finland. Methodologically, we used a triangle of researchers from China and Finland. We employed qualitative content analysis to systematically identify, examine, and compare the key aspects in these two countries from the leading ECEC documents, i.e. the Chinese national ECEC guidelines and the Finnish ECEC national core curriculum.The findings reveal numerous similarities alongside notable differences. Both countries place a high value on ECEC, emphasizing principles that shape the learning environment and use diverse pedagogical methods. However, nuanced variations exist in the approaches. The Chinese documents feature more specific guidelines tailored to different age groups, accompanied by detailed pedagogical suggestions, while the Finnish national core curriculum offers general guidelines for all preschool age groups, complemented by the unique feature of individual development plans for each child. The findings have significant implications for policymakers, ECEC educators, and practitioners in international contexts. Future studies are needed to further explore the specific pedagogies in ECEC between these two nations and to analyze how the curriculum and educational guidelines are implemented in pedagogical practices.

    Keywords: Early Childhood Education and Care (ECEC), Comparative research, national education documents, Curriculum, Children, Finland, China

    Received: 28 Feb 2024; Accepted: 09 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Niu, Malinen, Ruokonen, Melasalmi, Siklander, Wang, Zhang, Hurme, Moilanen, Li and Wang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Shuanghong Jenny Niu, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.