Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.
Sec. STEM Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1371216
This article is part of the Research Topic Engineering Technology and Engineering: Incorporating the Humanities Into the Classroom View all 3 articles

Power Over and Power With: Integrating the Concept of Power into Design Team and Stakeholder Interactions

Provisionally accepted
Corey Schimpf Corey Schimpf *Jessica Swenson Jessica Swenson Courtney Burris Courtney Burris
  • University at Buffalo, Buffalo, United States

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    As professionals in the workplace, engineers often have high levels of power or social influence over other people or groups they work with, including in decision-making, project planning, and other professional activities. The concept of power has received considerable attention in the social sciences and humanities but has received less attention in engineering education. Despite this, power is a crucial topic for engineers to understand as they are constantly navigating power dynamics across many groups of stakeholders. In this space we introduce the concepts of power over and power with into a two-semester senior engineering design capstone course through a series of activities and project scaffolds. Briefly, power over involves an actor being able to constrain the actions of another whereas power with involves an actor being able to empower or enable another actor to take new actions. Students were taught a framework that combines the concepts of power over and power with to reconsider and transform their interactions with stakeholders. We employ a case study to show how these concepts were integrated into the class and use directed content analysis of students’ final design reports to analyze the degree to which students were able to apply this framework. The results first highlight how activities over the semesters helped students learn the framework and later apply them. Next, the results of content analysis indicate that students were able to share power with several stakeholders and recognize some instances or risks of power over, although some gaps remained with how power was reported or recognized. This work extends and adapts concepts of power from the social sciences and humanities to the field of engineering education, argues for the importance of covering both power over and power with in classes and provides some evidence of the productive beginnings of engineering students using these concepts. We close with implications for other engineering classes and future research.

    Keywords: Human-centered design, Engineering Education, power, empowerment, engineering design

    Received: 16 Jan 2024; Accepted: 20 Jun 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Schimpf, Swenson and Burris. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Corey Schimpf, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, United States

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.