Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Educ.
Sec. Higher Education
Volume 9 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/feduc.2024.1181616

Relationships between self-efficacy and learning approaches as perceived by computer science students

Provisionally accepted
  • University of Turku, Turku, Finland

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Optimising learning outcomes in university students necessitates an understanding of the processes that drive high-quality learning outcomes. This study investigates the motivational factors and learning methodologies perceived by computer science students during an introductory course. A crosssectional study was conducted with 171 computer science students asked to complete a psychometric instrument ("Study Skills Inventory for Students") during the first year of their university studies. Two major theoretical frameworks in educational psychology, namely students' self-efficacy and learning approaches were tested relative to a factor structure obtained from learning situations. The findings supported self-efficacy and three learning approaches among computer science students. Models for deep, surface, and strategic learning approaches suggest that students with higher self-efficacy tend to adopt a deeper approach to learning. Conversely, students with lower self-efficacy were more inclined toward surface learning methods. Furthermore, a link was identified between strategic learning approaches and students' experiences within their learning environments. The results substantiate earlier research and align with learning approach theories. The findings indicated that, in higher education settings, focus should be directed toward understanding the motivational factors influencing students and their learning approaches for educational outcomes.

    Keywords: Motivation, Learning approaches, Computer science students, higher education, Behavior

    Received: 07 Mar 2023; Accepted: 04 Oct 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Laitinen, Christopoulos, Laitinen and Nieminen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Satu Laitinen, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.