Corrigendum: Development of a multi-scale monitoring programme: approaches for the Arctic and lessons learned from the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme 2002-2022

A Corrigendum on:
Development of a multi-scale monitoring programme: approaches for the Arctic and lessons learned from the Circumpolar Biodiversity Monitoring Programme 2002-2022

by Barry T, Christensen T, Behe C, Coon C, Culp JM, Vongraven D, Fletcher S, Gill M, Goedkoop W, Hindrum R, Jacobson C, Jones T, Lárusson KF, Lento J, Marissink M, McLennan D, Price C, Rönkä M, Svoboda M, Thaulow I, Taylor J, Wegeberg S, Schmidt NM, Smith R, and Petersen Æ (2023) Front. Conserv. Sci. 4:1220521. doi: 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1220521

Error in author list

In the published article, there was an error in the author list, and authors Dag Vongraven and Ævar Petersen were erroneously excluded. The corrected author list appears below.

[Tom Barry^1,2*, Tom Christensen³, Carolina Behe⁴, Catherine Coon⁵, Joseph M. Culp⁶, Dag Vongraven⁷, Sierra Fletcher⁸, Micheal Gill⁹, Willem Goedkoop¹⁰, Reidar Hindrum¹¹, Cynthia Jacobson¹², Tahzay Jones¹³, Kári Fannar Lárusson¹⁴, Jennifer Lento¹⁵, Mark Marissink¹⁶, Donald McLennan¹⁷, Courtney Price¹⁴, Mia Rönkä¹⁸, Michael Svoboda¹⁹, Inge Thaulow²⁰, Jason Taylor²¹, Susse Wegeberg³, Niels Martin Schmidt³, Risa Smith²² Ævar Petersen²³],

● ¹Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Akureyri, Akureyri, Iceland

● ²Stefansson Arctic Institute, Akureyri, Iceland

● ³Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, Roskilde, Denmark

● ⁴Independent researcher, Seattle, Washington, DC, United States

● ⁵Bureau of Ocean Energy Management - Alaska Regional Office, Department of the Interior Region, Anchorage, AK, United States

● ⁶Department of Biology, and Geography and Environmental Studies, Wilfrid Laurier University, Waterloo, ON, Canada

● ⁷ Norwegian Polar Institute, Tromso, Norway

● ⁸Nuka Research and Planning Group, Seldovia, AK, United States

● ⁹Biodiversity Indicators Program, NatureServe, Arlington, VA, United States

● ¹⁰Department of Aquatic Sciences and Assessment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden

● ¹¹Independent researcher, Trondheim, Norway

● ¹²Innovative Outcomes, Carbondale, CO, United States

● ¹³National Park Service, Anchorage, AK, United States

● ¹⁴Conservation of Arctic Flora and Fauna (CAFF), Akureyri, Iceland

● ¹⁵Canadian Rivers Institute and Department of Biology, University of New Brunswick, Fredericton, NB, Canada

● ¹⁶Swedish Species Information Centre, The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU) Artdatabanken, Uppsala, Sweden

● ¹⁷COENOSIS, Martins Brook, NS, Canada

● ¹⁸Biodiversity Unit, Faculty of Science, University of Turku, Turku, Finland

● ¹⁹Environment and Climate Change, Whitehorse, YT, Canada

● ²⁰Enviromental Affairs, Government of Greenland, Greenland Representation, Copenhagen, Denmark

● ²¹Aldo Leopold Wilderness Research Institute, University of Montana, Missoula, MT, United States

● ²²The International Union for Nature Conservation (IUCN), World Commission on Protected Areas, Gland, Switzerland

● ²³ Independent, Researcher, Reykjavík, Iceland

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.