The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
REVIEW article
Front. Cognit.
Sec. Memory
Volume 3 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fcogn.2024.1505549
This article is part of the Research Topic Synthesizing Memory: Integrating Across Fields and Levels of Scale View all 3 articles
Expanded Taxonomies of Human Memory
Provisionally accepted- Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, United States
What is human memory? Evidence from cognitive psychology and neuroscience supports the view that human memory is composed of multiple subsystems. Atkinson and Shiffrin’s influential “modal model” (1968) proposed a sensory register, short-term store, and long-term store. Refinements and expansions to this taxonomy followed. Baddeley and Hitch (1974) proposed working memory, itself with several components, to replace earlier simpler ideas of short-term memory. Long-term memory appears to also consist of several subsystems, which can be broadly divided into explicit (declarative) versus implicit (nondeclarative; Anderson, 1976). Explicit long-term memory can be further subdivided into episodic versus semantic (Tulving, 1972, 1985), and implicit long-term memory includes subtypes such as procedural memory, priming, classical conditioning, and habituation. All of the above take place in the human brain, driven by neurons and the processes of long-term potentiation and depression. In a first expansion, Finley et al. (2018) proposed a new taxonomy that included external memory, which is information stored outside of an individual’s brain, subdivided into social (information stored in other people) and technological (information stored in the human-made environment, either low-tech such as paper, or high-tech such as computers). In this manuscript, I propose even further expanded taxonomies of human memory, based on my view that memory is the transmission of information across time. The second expansion encompasses numerous biological systems beside the brain, including the immune system, genetics (DNA and epigenetics), and traces of the past stored elsewhere in the body (skin, hair, body modification, nails, bones and teeth, muscles and movement, voice, digestion and excretion, blood, reproductive systems, fat, lungs, and body-based numerical representation). The third expansion distinguishes between individual and collective memory (shared memory of a social group), revisits the other systems using the lens of collective memory, and adds natural external memory. Fruitful insights are possible from considering these expanded taxonomies using traditional ideas from cognitive psychology (e.g., encoding, storage, retrieval, forgetting). I explore numerous parallels, distinctions, and interplays.
Keywords: Memory, Taxonomy, Internal memory, External memory, collective memory, information storage, body memory
Received: 03 Oct 2024; Accepted: 04 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Finley. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Jason R Finley, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Edwardsville, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.