COVID-19 and the Heart: Could Transient Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy Be Related to the Pandemic by Incidence and Mechanisms?

Typical emergency hospital care during the COVID-19 pandemic has centered on pulmonary-focused services. Nonetheless, patients with COVID-19 frequently develop complications associated with the dysfunction of other organs, which may greatly affect prognosis. Preliminary evidence suggests that cardiovascular involvement is relatively frequent in COVID-19 and that it correlates with significant worsening of clinical status and mortality in infected patients. In this article, we summarize current knowledge on the cardiovascular effects of COVID-19. In particular, we focus on the association between COVID-19 and transient takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC)—two conditions that preliminarily seem epidemiologically associated—and we highlight cardiovascular changes that may help guide future investigations toward full discovery of this new, complex disease entity. We hypothesize that coronary endothelial dysfunction, along with septic state, inflammatory storm, hypercoagulability, endothelial necrosis, and small-vessel clotting, may represent a fundamental hidden link between COVID-19 and TTC. Furthermore, given the likelihood that new genetic mutations of coronaviruses or other organisms will cause similar pandemics and endemics in the future, we must be better prepared so that a substantial complication such as TTC can be more accurately recognized, its pathophysiology better understood, and its treatment made more justifiable, timely, and effective.

Introduction

At the time of this writing, the world population has endured more than 2 years of devastating consequences from the pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus and its resulting clinical disease, COVID-19 (1–7). As is well known, the term coronavirus comes from the characteristic crown-like arrangement of spike proteins on the viral unit’s capsule (Figure 1A). Two other recent, milder pandemics (severe acute respiratory syndrome in 2002 and Middle East respiratory syndrome in 2012) were caused by similar coronaviruses. Despite the immunity resulting from millions of infections and the various strategic plans for infection control—including implementation of effective medical treatment and systematic vaccination across most nations—the number of affected individuals and the mortality rate have continued to rise: According to Johns Hopkins University and Medicine as of March 15, 2022, almost 461 million persons worldwide have had confirmed COVID-19, and more than 6 million have died; in the United States alone, more than 79 million are known to have been infected, and more than 966,000 have died (8).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Schematic structure and early invasion of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. (A) This simplified outline of the viral unit shows its two essential components: “A” indicates the outer spikes (S protein, main antigen units) and “B” indicates the inner single-stranded RNA (the genetic viral genome). (B) Electron microscopy imaging showing coronavirus invasion (multiple round units, in blue) inside the pulmonary alveolar spaces and interstitial cells. Source: (A) Design Cells/Shutterstock and (B) Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Image Library. ID# 23354; Hannah A. Bullock; Azaibi Tamin (2020); https://phil.cdc.gov/Details.aspx?pid=23354.

Coronaviruses enter a cell’s cytoplasm by binding their spike S protein to the angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE)2 receptor, present on the outside membrane of most host cells (2, 5, 9–11). The resulting disease first affects the respiratory system, initially at the nasopharynx but eventually in varying degrees at the pulmonary alveolar level (Figure 1B). Almost all other organs can be secondarily affected (3–5, 12–16): Microscopic and molecular examinations have detected SARS-CoV-2 not only in the lungs, but also in the heart, blood vessels, brain, kidneys, bone marrow, eyes, skin, and skeletal muscles (1, 17). Preliminary evidence suggests that cardiovascular involvement is relatively frequent in COVID-19, occurring late in its clinical course, and that it correlates with significant worsening of clinical status and mortality (2, 4, 5, 7, 18–20).

Incidentally, the effects of ACE inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers on ACE2-related viral contagion and virulence modulation have not been clearly established; the current practical recommendation for patients with COVID-19 is to continue to take them (2, 4, 5, 17, 21). One recent anatomical, metabolic, and functional study by Bryce et al. (22) found that ACE2 immunochemical H-score expression was depressed in COVID-19 patients compared with controls.

Here, we summarize the current literature-based knowledge on the effects of COVID-19 on the cardiovascular system and highlight cardiovascular changes that may help guide future investigation toward full discovery of this complex disease entity, especially when it precedes the onset of transient takotsubo cardiomyopathy (TTC).¹ We especially underline that endothelial dysfunction is frequent and extensive in this disease and may represent a fundamental hidden link between COVID-19 and TTC, conditions that seem epidemiologically associated.

The Virion

Evidently, SARS-CoV-2 was not identified—either by electron microscopy imaging, antibody studies, or nucleotide sequencing—until December 2019 (4, 23–25). The new virus appeared to be the product of a de novo mutation in a well-known class of viruses, possibly in bats, that permitted exceptional human-to-human transmission, thereby greatly facilitating global spread from its seeming origin in China (3–5, 17). Other than monkeys and rats, few animal species can be experimentally infected with SARS coronaviruses (5, 6, 17). Interestingly, SARS-CoV-2 is a Hazard Group 3 pathogen, as are the coronaviruses that cause certain colds, rabies, polio, dengue, hepatitis B, and HIV1 and 2B, among others (2, 4, 17, 23).

The Heart in COVID-19

The cardiovascular system is particularly vulnerable to COVID-19 through various, primarily hematogenic, mechanisms:

• Direct viral invasion of the myocardium or interstitial cells, leading to myofiber injury manifested by troponin release into the extracellular space or serum; this may result in myocarditis—either diffuse cardiomyopathy or spotty invasion by inflammatory cells (e.g., lymphocytes, macrophages, and T-cells) and apoptosis (2, 5, 6, 12, 18–21, 23, 26);

• Toxic effects from septic state and inflammatory overdrive (especially as mediated by immune and chemoattractant cytokines) evidenced by fever, tachycardia, hypoxia, and elevation of serum inflammatory markers (10, 12, 13, 17, 19, 22, 27, 28);

• De novo hypercoagulability, resulting in vessel thrombosis and occasional patchy ischemic damage to multiple parenchymal tissues (9, 12, 13, 15–17, 22, 26, 28, 29);

• Secondary changes in intercellular signaling mechanisms—for example, coronary endothelial dysfunction (CED), as evidenced primarily by nitric oxide deprivation (Figure 2)—which can lead to spontaneous coronary spastic syndromes (7, 22, 26, 28, 30–35); and

FIGURE 2

Figure 2. Possible mechanisms of coronary endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19 (31). ACE2, angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. Source: Evans et al. (31). Used with permission.

• Worsening of preexisting cardiovascular conditions and risk factors, including destabilization of atherosclerotic plaques with ulcerations and thrombosis, QTc interval prolongation, electrolyte imbalance, diabetes exacerbation, hypertension exacerbation, and variable levels of systemic catecholamine activation.

Preliminary evidence suggests that the onset of cardiac involvement in patients with COVID-19 generally correlates with significant worsening of clinical status and more frequent onset of heart failure (as evidenced by rise in brain natriuretic peptide [BNP], a marker of fluid retention), heightened need for tracheal intubation or mechanical artificial respiration, and greater mortality (2, 5, 7, 18–20, 26).

In this context, the present essay aims specifically to promote investigation of the pathophysiological mechanisms of TTC and its possible relation to virosis-related CED. It may be that the COVID-19 epidemic provides a convenient epidemiological moment in which to clarify the true incidence, clinical consequences, and pathophysiology of TTC, which could then inform the clinical care of this rare disease. We must admit that current large assessments of the cardiac effects of COVID-19 usually do not even mention TTC (36).

Pulmonary-To-Myocardial Cell Invasion and Humoral Repercussions

In COVID-19, both electron microscopy and molecular identification of the virus in the upper airways or lungs are done frequently and may be pathognomonic (Figure 1B), whereas this evidence is rarely available from postmortem cardiac studies (5, 7, 12, 14, 16, 19, 22, 26, 32, 37). In a breakthrough pilot study by Ackermann et al. (12), pulmonary autopsy tissues of patients who died from COVID-19 (n = 7) were explored in depth by using classic histology, immunohistochemical assay, electron microscopy with microcomputer tomographic imaging, corrosion 3-dimensional casting, and direct multiplexed measurement of gene expression. Findings included:

• Direct infection of endothelial and epithelial cells (type II pneumocytes) with frequent intravascular fibrin-rich thrombi of small perialveolar vessels (Figure 3A) (12);

FIGURE 3

Figure 3. Histological findings in patients with COVID-19. (A) Microthrombi (arrowheads) in the pulmonary perialveolar small vessels (12). Hematoxylin-eosin staining; the scale bar corresponds to 50 μm. (B) Megakaryocyte-related (arrow) small vessels in the myocardium of a patient with a small myocardial necrotic injury. Fibrin thrombosis in a perforating vein associated with a myocardial infarction shows transmural myocardial necrosis and neutrophilic infiltrates (15). Source: (A) Ackermann et al. (12). Used with permission. (B) Rapkiewicz et al. (15). Reproduced under Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC-ND. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

• Severe intra-alveolar changes, including cellular membrane rupture, epithelial defoliation, and alveolar obliteration by cellular debris and inflammatory T-cells, with hyaline membrane formation;

• Vascular changes, including signs of COVID-19–related pathognomonic neovascularization activity with small-vessel intussusception and prong generation, probably representing failed attempts at reparative neoformation at sites of vascular obliteration in the lungs; and

• Extensive perialveolar vascular endothelial disruption and clotting (Figure 3) (12, 15).

The authors also noted microvascular changes in the cutaneous lesions of some patients, suggesting that similar changes could be systemic (and possibly cardiac). Endothelialitis, as detected in histological studies of the lungs, could lead to luminal thrombosis related to damaged endothelium in both the lungs and other organs (12, 26, 28).

Being able to more extensively describe such changes in the heart could enable histological and biological documentation of widespread systemic endothelial injury. Whether these changes are systemic and could lead to secondary CED manifestations that might affect the heart is a nebulous but widely discussed possibility in human pathology. Local viral presence was found to be low on ultramicroscopy and on droplet digital polymerase chain reaction in heart studies (12, 28). Similarly, a Brener et al. (32) postmortem investigation of 69 COVID-19 decedents found, on the basis of immunohistology and single-cell nuclei RNA sequencing, that viral load was low in the myocardium but that endothelial damage and cardiac microthrombosis were common (seen in 80% of cases). Whereas inflammatory activity was greatly increased, typical myocardial ischemic necrosis (i.e., incidence of contraction-band necrosis) was rare, even in the presence of troponin leak (38). Both fibroblasts and macrophages were upregulated and correlated with the immune-activation markers.

Our own preliminary experience in the field of TTC leads us to hypothesize that CED is generally a necessary predisposing condition for the occurrence of spontaneous coronary spasticity (and hence for inducing TTC) in patients during COVID-19 (34, 35, 39–41). Specifically, our group theorizes the following sequence of processes in TTC:

• A typical patient with normal cardiac endothelial function (i.e., no innate or preexisting CED or other predisposing factors) becomes infected with SARS-CoV-2 and develops COVID-19.

• Approximately 1 week after onset of COVID-19, some coronary vessels are affected by direct viral invasion (uncommon) or by hyperactive immune or inflammatory reaction of the endothelium (more likely).

• Various factors—potentially, stress and/or catecholamine surge (either naturally produced or administered for hypotension or shock)—can precipitate acute TTC episodes in the presence of CED; TTC onset follows spontaneous reperfusion as a myocardial stunning event (possibly by a factor of metabolic fatigue or nitric oxide exhaustion).

• The initial spasm can be suppressed by nitroglycerin administration within a few minutes of onset in spontaneous TTC or at acetylcholine (ACh) testing; in patients destined to have delayed spontaneous recurrence, recurrent spasm can be reproduced by early ACh testing (or it may occur spontaneously as recurrent clinical TTC), even a week or more after the initial TTC episode (42).

• After the first 15 min or so of severe spasm, critical ischemia normally induces segmental akinesia and eventual persistent stunning of the dependent myocardium (35); spasm typically resolves spontaneously before the time of hospital admission (60–90 min of TTC), usually leading to a clinical indication for emergency coronary angiography (ST-elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] protocol) that is typically negative for CAD but positive for TTC; however, only ACh testing can prove increased spasticity.

• The TTC spontaneously resolves within a few days in survivors of the acute event (43); gradually, increased spasticity related to CED gradually dissolves (unknown cause), and after approximately 1 week, TTC generally is no longer reproducible by ACh testing, and recurrent clinical TTC is extremely rare.

If the “CED-to-spastic ischemic spell to myocardial stunning” theory is correct, it is reasonable to propose that CED could underlie the reported increases in the incidence of TTC during the current COVID-19 pandemic (discussed more extensively below) (24, 44, 45). On that basis, the pursuit of associated histological, molecular biology, gene-expression, and functional validation of potential pathophysiological mechanisms is justified, both in animal experimental models and in humans (10).

Microvascular dysfunction in TTC is an unproven hypothesis occasionally postulated by some (9, 25, 46). Although capillaries [the primary location of endothelial disruption and luminal clotting in the lungs (12, 15)] do not have a muscular media or demonstrable spastic capacity (Figure 3) (26), diffuse small-vessel thrombosis in the pulmonary circulation could explain the frequent development of moderate pulmonary hypertension and long-term pulmonary dysfunction in COVID-19 survivors (4, 5, 12, 13, 16, 22, 47). Pulmonary embolism, also related to de novo onset of prothrombotic state in COVID-19, has been widely reported (12, 26, 33).

Clinical Cardiac Manifestations of COVID-19

New-onset, sustained precordial chest pain, electrocardiogram (ECG) ST wave changes, and, especially, elevated serum cardiac markers are factors that frequently indicate SARS-CoV-2 myocardial involvement. Potential mechanisms of myocardial damage in COVID-19 (Figure 4) (48) can be summarized as follows.

FIGURE 4

Figure 4. Various mechanisms involved in myocardial injury caused by SARS-CoV-2 viral invasion in humans (48). cTn, cardiac troponin I or T; MI, myocardial infarction; RV, right ventricle; VTE, venous thromboembolism. Source: Jaffe et al. (48). Used with permission.

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI), although generally rare, is caused by epicardial coronary artery thrombosis (probably induced by sudden progression of preexisting unstable, atherosclerotic soft plaques activated by systemic inflammation, hypercoagulable state, endothelial damage, or hypertensive spells) (29, 33). Localized segmental hypokinesia (more than 1 cm² in echocardiographic area) correlates with ECG changes and, although rare, makes a strong clinical case for AMI (26). Urgent heart catheterization (and potential coronary angioplasty or percutaneous coronary intervention) for unstable angina or AMI in similar, critically ill patients with COVID-19 is mainly indicated by asymmetrical myocardial areas relatable to a single coronary branch (mostly AMI due to coronary occlusive atherosclerotic disease [CAD] rather than to TTC).

Surgical intervention is generally avoided in active COVID-19 cases. Only early diagnosis of AMI at a large coronary branch and in the presence of congestive heart failure or shock is a potential indication for percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with COVID-19. The need for antiplatelet medication should not create a major concern in these patients if stenting is needed, but current experience is minimal. According to recent autopsy investigations by the CVPath Institute (26), the most frequent myocardial necrosis, called focal myocyte necrosis (histologically defined as 0.05 mm²–1.0 cm² in area), is probably caused by microthrombi in the myocardial arteriolar network (present in 73% of COVID-19 cases).

Elevated Brain Natriuretic Peptide:Troponin Ratio

Troponin elevation in COVID-19 is frequent (although variable in degree) and only occasionally related to direct myocardial viral invasion, yet it is clearly associated with higher mortality: The peak troponin level is about 12-fold higher in COVID-19 patients who have died than in survivors, who on average have only minimal elevations (2, 5–7, 18–21). A prominent rise in BNP in the presence of only mild troponin elevation (a seemingly paradoxical event, given the extent of left ventricular dysfunction) is an important parameter in favor of a diagnosis of TTC versus AMI (49, 50). A BNP:troponin ratio—calculated as N-terminal prohormone-BNP (ng/L)/hs-troponin T (μg/L)—higher than 2,889 differentiated TTC from STEMI (sensitivity: 91%; specificity: 95%), and a BNP:troponin ratio higher than 5,000 differentiated well between TTC and non-STEMI (sensitivity: 83%; specificity: 95%). The dissociation between myocardial area and troponin elevation seems to be pathognomonic of stunning or reversible myocardial dysfunction. Although transient ECG ST changes are non-specific, they support the diagnosis of coronary spastic occlusion versus toxic effects from catecholamine surge.

Takotsubo Cardiomyopathy

A TTC diagnosis is unlikely to be made in patients who are not under a cardiologist’s care. Nonetheless, the incidence of TTC has been reported as ranging from 4–8% during the COVID-19 pandemic, higher than the expected 1.7–2.0% seen before the pandemic in patients with acute coronary syndrome (24). Clinical diagnosis is based primarily on the appearance of precordial chest pain (in 80–90% of cases), ECG ST and T wave acute ischemic changes (95%), and the pathognomonic echocardiographic evidence of large symmetrical areas of apical and/or midventricular akinesia or dyskinesia along the longitudinal axis of the left ventricle (Figure 5) (34, 35, 51–53). It is fundamental to determine the reversible nature of such event within 30 days of the initial episode. Prolonged persistence of hypokinesia would suggest subclinical relapsing TTC episodes or wrong diagnosis. In the presence of severe pulmonary decompensation, a computed tomography angiogram (CTA) showing no critical obstruction of proximal major coronary arteries would be all that is needed to exclude CAD in low-risk clinical presentations (54). In this regard, it is now clear that CTA is equal to or better than invasive coronary angiography for guiding treatment in intermediate-risk clinical presentations (55, 56). Importantly, adding left ventricular end-systolic and end-diastolic imaging to coronary CTA would provide critical information for establishing the TTC diagnosis. If done at the time of emergency room admission, CTAs will in some cases be able to identify coronary spasm. The addition of sublingual nitroglycerin could provide further valuable information.

FIGURE 5

Figure 5. Diagrammatic depiction of the most frequent patterns of transient takotsubo cardiomyopathy (52). Note that more than 95% of the cases in several large registry databases were apical or mid-ventricular. TTS, transient takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Source: Okura (52). Used with permission.

Early, firm TTC diagnosis (ideally made within 15–60 min of onset) is potentially life-saving and can be subsequently confirmed by ACh testing during coronary angiography (Figures 6, 7). In the absence of ACh testing, final diagnosis of TTC will depend on determining its transient nature (51, 53, 57). Strangely, recurrent TTC after COVID-19 has not yet been mentioned in the literature, even though CED and stress likely remain for long periods (weeks or months) in most TTC cases, especially the serious ones.

FIGURE 6

Figure 6. Typical angiographic imaging of the coronary arteries in a patient with a dobutamine-related 4 mm ST-elevation acute ischemic event. (A) At baseline, mild diffuse narrowing of all left coronary artery branches was observed. (B) After intracoronary acetylcholine infusion, severe and diffuse narrowing appeared, with almost total occlusion of all left coronary artery branches (with chest pain, electrocardiogram changes, and recurrent cardiomyopathy on echocardiography; not shown). (C) Immediately after intracoronary nitroglycerin administration, the spasm was relieved. We concluded that coronary endothelial dysfunction was present at baseline and that spasm was stimulated by initial dobutamine testing (outside our hospital) as well as after acetylcholine testing.

FIGURE 7

Figure 7. Diagrammatic representation of the processes leading to TTC in patients with COVID-19 over time. In this depiction of our current theory, the y-axis represents the approximate percent change in the maximal possible dysfunction of various parameters, including viral infection, coronary endothelial dysfunction, myocardial dysfunction (TTC), coronary spasm, and ACh testing done during early recovery after TTC. Ach, acetylcholine; ED, endothelial dysfunction; NTG, nitroglycerin; TTC, transient takotsubo cardiomyopathy. The x-axis indicates the number of days since contagion (Day 1).

Interestingly, catecholamine surge alone is often claimed to cause TTC, but no definite proof has been presented in humans (currently, serum testing is not routinely done), and the use of catecholamines to treat cardiogenic shock in COVID-19 would clearly be contraindicated, as it could cause recurrence. Prospective surveys of catecholamine levels in large continuous series of COVID-19 patients both with and without TTC would be of great interest for correlating catecholamine increase with TTC onset, and experimental provocative catecholamine challenge could be useful for identifying the mechanism(s) of TTC. Generally, if catecholamines should surge before TTC onset, one would not expect a rapid drop in their serum levels after onset of a stressful complication like TTC; more likely, the surge is secondary to TTC occurrence.

Coronary Arteritis

Coronary arteritis, or Kawasaki-like arteriopathy, has been reported as a possible complication of COVID-19 (58). However, such a theory is still poorly delineated in its essential presentation and implications: Early findings in children with classic Kawasaki arteritis include pathognomonic coronary aneurysms that can be visualized even by echocardiography, but these have not been reported in COVID-19. Other typical Kawasaki-associated physical (cutaneous, oral mucosa) findings and blood testing (increased inflammatory state) are non-specific (59). Currently, typical Kawasaki disease is usually considered an arteritis of infants and children younger than 5 years of age that is frequently relatable to some previous viral infection and seemingly due to a subacute autoimmune reaction (i.e., not an early viral infection complication) that leads to coronary media necrosis and arterial wall degeneration (59).

Myocarditis and Pericarditis

Recent pathology reports have confirmed that direct viral myocarditis (the main alternative to AMI, in the presence of troponin elevation) is rare, found in only 4.5% of COVID-19 autopsies or biopsies. Histologically, fulminant myocarditis is characterized by lymphocytic infiltration around areas of myofiber degeneration and edema (26, 60). In severe COVID-19, myocarditis generally displays low degrees of activity, but whether it leads to significant long-term myocardiopathy from multiple small scars in COVID-19 survivors is not clear. More likely, subacute myocardial damage is caused by inflammatory or immunopathological factors (11, 17, 23, 33, 51).

Still, the difference between AMI and myocarditis is often difficult to define clinically. Late gadolinium enhancement is unlikely to detect myocardial microscarring or interstitial fibrosis during an acute COVID-19 episode; however, it might possibly be used late after an episode. This finding is potentially important, especially for athletes who may develop effort-related arrhythmias or sudden cardiac arrest during strenuous exertion (47, 60, 61).

Pericarditis is rare in COVID-19 (4, 5) and differs from pleuritis that occurs frequently, especially in the presence of pneumonia.

Conclusive Comments

Typical hospital emergency and critical care during the COVID-19 pandemic has correctly centered on pulmonary-focused services. Nonetheless, patients with COVID-19 frequently develop complications associated with dysfunction of other organs, which could greatly affect prognosis and which often can be effectively treated (such as spastic episodes). Extrapulmonary complications prominently include cardiological issues.

We strongly recommend that at least some TTC-specialized interventional cardiologists be specifically educated and trained to handle pandemic-related emergencies and be called more frequently for consultation and involvement in acute care (even if such care is provided remotely, due to contagion risk). Such specialists could also take part in prospective, coordinated multicenter studies of this rare, still nebulous pathology. Especially given the probability that new genetic mutations of coronaviruses or other organisms will eventually cause future pandemics, we must better prepare for the possibility that a substantial complication such as TTC will reappear (62). Whether or not within the context of COVID-19 or some future viral pandemic, the real incidence and pathophysiological mechanisms of TTC must be understood, and rational, effective approaches to treatment must be developed.

Data Availability Statement

The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author.

Author Contributions

PA contributed to the conception, design, statistical analysis, interpretation, and writing of the manuscript. CU contributed to the design of the manuscript and image creation. All authors contributed to manuscript revision and have read and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

We thank Jeanie F. Woodruff, BS, ELS, of the Department of Scientific Publications at the Texas Heart Institute, for her editorial contributions.

Footnotes

1. ^ The term transient takotsubo cardiomyopathy was initially used descriptively (absent knowledge of the condition’s cause) as a visual characterization of the two primary features of this new entity: the shape of territorial dysfunction (Figure 5) and its transient occurrence. Since then, no real improvement in the understanding of TTC has been conclusively achieved, but some association between TTC and various factors (e.g., catecholamines, stress, others) suggested to some authors that introducing a new term, transient takotsubo syndrome, might express a deeper understanding of its pathophysiology. However, no syndromic causative factors have been successfully shown to be consistently included in the minimal common denominator for this entity. Thus, we prefer to continue using the historical term TTC (which indicates the truly minimal common denominator: a transient cardiomyopathy) while promoting continuous, open-minded investigation into this matter.

References

1. Minhas AS, Scheel P, Garibaldi B, Liu G, Horton M, Jennings M, et al. Takotsubo syndrome in the setting of COVID-19. J Am Coll Cardiol Case Rep. (2020) 2:1321–5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccas.2020.04.023

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Madjid M, Safavi-Naeini P, Solomon SD, Vardeny O. Potential effects of coronaviruses on the cardiovascular system: a review. JAMA Cardiol. (2020) 5:831–40. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1286

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Wiersinga WJ, Rhodes A, Cheng AC, Peacock SJ, Prescott HC. Pathophysiology, transmission, diagnosis, and treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a review. JAMA. (2020) 324:782–93. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.12839

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Wu Z, McGoogan JM. Characteristics of and important lessons from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak in China: summary of a report of 72314 cases from the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention. JAMA. (2020) 323:1239–42. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.2648

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Pinney SP, Giustino G, Halperin JL, Mechanick JI, Neibart E, Olin JW, et al. Coronavirus historical perspective, disease mechanisms, and clinical outcomes: JACC focus seminar. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:1999–2010. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.08.058

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Babapoor-Farrokhran S, Gill D, Walker J, Rasekhi RT, Bozorgnia B, Amanullah A. Myocardial injury and COVID-19: possible mechanisms. Life Sci. (2020) 253:117723. doi: 10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117723

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lala A, Johnson KW, Januzzi JL, Russak AJ, Paranjpe I, Richter F, et al. Prevalence and impact of myocardial injury in patients hospitalized with COVID-19 infection. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:533–46. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.007

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Johns Hopkins University & Medicine. Coronavirus Resource Center Baltimore MD. (2022). Available online at: https://coronavirus.jhu.edu/ (accessed February 4, 2022).

Google Scholar

9. Ky B, Mann DL. COVID-19 clinical trials: a primer for the cardiovascular and cardio-oncology communities. J Am Coll Cardiol CardioOncol (2020) 2:254–69. doi: 10.1016/j.jaccao.2020.04.002

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Libby P. The heart in COVID-19: primary target or secondary bystander? J Am Coll Cardiol Basic Transl Sci. (2020) 5:537–42. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2020.04.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Sakamoto A, Kawakami R, Kawai K, Gianatti A, Pellegrini D, Kutys R, et al. ACE2 (angiotensin-converting enzyme 2) and TMPRSS2 (transmembrane serine protease 2) expression and localization of SARS-CoV-2 infection in the human heart. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. (2021) 41:542–4. doi: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.120.315229

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Ackermann M, Verleden SE, Kuehnel M, Haverich A, Welte T, Laenger F, et al. Pulmonary vascular endothelialitis, thrombosis, and angiogenesis in COVID-19. N Engl J Med. (2020) 383:120–8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2015432

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Bradley BT, Maioli H, Johnston R, Chaudhry I, Fink SL, Xu H, et al. Histopathology and ultrastructural findings of fatal COVID-19 infections in Washington State: a case series. Lancet. (2020) 396:320–32. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)31305-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Duarte-Neto AN, Monteiro RAA, da Silva LFF, Malheiros DMAC, de Oliveira EP, Theodoro-Filho J, et al. Pulmonary and systemic involvement in COVID-19 patients assessed with ultrasound-guided minimally invasive autopsy. Histopathology. (2020) 77:186–97. doi: 10.1111/his.14160

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Rapkiewicz AV, Mai X, Carsons SE, Pittaluga S, Kleiner DE, Berger JS, et al. Megakaryocytes and platelet-fibrin thrombi characterize multi-organ thrombosis at autopsy in COVID-19: a case series. EClinicalMedicine. (2020) 24:100434. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2020.100434

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Wichmann D, Sperhake JP, Lütgehetmann M, Steurer S, Edler C, Heinemann A, et al. Autopsy findings and venous thromboembolism in patients with COVID-19: a prospective cohort study. Ann Intern Med. (2020) 173:268–77. doi: 10.7326/M20-2003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Calabrese LH. Cytokine storm and the prospects for immunotherapy with COVID-19. Cleve Clin J Med. (2020) 87:389–93. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.87a.ccc008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Guo T, Fan Y, Chen M, Wu X, Zhang L, He T, et al. Cardiovascular implications of fatal outcomes of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. (2020) 5:811–8. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.1017

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Sandoval Y, Januzzi JL Jr, Jaffe AS. Cardiac troponin for assessment of myocardial injury in COVID-19: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:1244–58. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.06.068

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Xiong TY, Redwood S, Prendergast B, Chen M. Coronaviruses and the cardiovascular system: acute and long-term implications. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:1798–800. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Amraei R, Rahimi N. COVID-19, renin-angiotensin system and endothelial dysfunction. Cells. (2020) 9:1652. doi: 10.3390/cells9071652

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Bryce C, Grimes Z, Pujadas E, Ahuja S, Beasley MB, Albrecht R, et al. Pathophysiology of SARS-CoV-2: the Mount Sinai COVID-19 autopsy experience. Mod Pathol. (2021) 34:1456–67. doi: 10.1038/s41379-021-00793-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Nishiga M, Wang DW, Han Y, Lewis DB, Wu JC. COVID-19 and cardiovascular disease: from basic mechanisms to clinical perspectives. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2020) 17:543–58. doi: 10.1038/s41569-020-0413-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Jabri A, Kalra A, Kumar A, Alameh A, Adroja S, Bashir H, et al. Incidence of stress cardiomyopathy during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3:e2014780. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.14780

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Ghadri JR, Wittstein IS, Prasad A, Sharkey S, Dote K, Akashi YJ, et al. International expert consensus document on takotsubo syndrome (part I): clinical characteristics, diagnostic criteria, and pathophysiology. Eur Heart J. (2018) 39:2032–46. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehy076

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Pellegrini D, Kawakami R, Guagliumi G, Sakamoto A, Kawai K, Gianatti A, et al. Microthrombi as a major cause of cardiac injury in COVID-19: a pathologic study. Circulation. (2021) 143:1031–42. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.051828

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Abu-Raya B, Migliori GB, O’Ryan M, Edwards K, Torres A, Alffenaar JW, et al. Coronavirus disease-19: an interim evidence synthesis of the World Association for Infectious Diseases and Immunological Disorders (Waidid). Front Med (Lausanne). (2020) 7:572485. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2020.572485

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Varga Z, Flammer AJ, Steiger P, Haberecker M, Andermatt R, Zinkernagel AS, et al. Endothelial cell infection and endotheliitis in COVID-19. Lancet. (2020) 395:1417–8. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30937-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Alvarez Villela MA, Alkhalil A, Weinreich MA, Koslowsky J, Aoi S, Latib MA. Atypical ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction presentation in patients with COVID-19 at a high-volume center in New York City. Tex Heart Inst J. (2021) 48:e207446. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-20-7446

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Cugno M, Meroni PL, Gualtierotti R, Griffini S, Grovetti E, Torri A, et al. Complement activation and endothelial perturbation parallel COVID-19 severity and activity. J Autoimmun. (2021) 116:102560. doi: 10.1016/j.jaut.2020.102560

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Evans PC, Rainger GE, Mason JC, Guzik TJ, Osto E, Stamataki Z, et al. Endothelial dysfunction in COVID-19: a position paper of the ESC Working Group for Atherosclerosis and Vascular Biology, and the ESC Council of Basic Cardiovascular Science. Cardiovasc Res. (2020) 116:2177–84. doi: 10.1093/cvr/cvaa230

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Brener MI, Hulke ML, Fukuma N, Golob S, Zilinyi RS, Zhou Z, et al. Clinico-histopathologic and single-nuclei RNA-sequencing insights into cardiac injury and microthrombi in critical COVID-19. JCI Insight. (2022) 7:e154633. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.154633

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Halushka MK, Vander Heide RS. Myocarditis is rare in COVID-19 autopsies: cardiovascular findings across 277 postmortem examinations. Cardiovasc Pathol. (2021) 50:107300. doi: 10.1016/j.carpath.2020.107300

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Angelini P, Uribe C. Is transient takotsubo syndrome associated with cancer? Why, and with what implications for oncocardiology? J Am Heart Assoc. (2019) 8:e013201. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013201

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Angelini P, Uribe C, Tobis JM. Pathophysiology of takotsubo cardiomyopathy: reopened debate. Tex Heart Inst J. (2021) 48:e207490. doi: 10.14503/THIJ-20-7490

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Abbasi J. The COVID heart-one year after SARS-CoV-2 infection, patients have an array of increased cardiovascular risks. JAMA. (2022) 327:1113–4. doi: 10.1001/jama.2022.2411

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Kawakami R, Sakamoto A, Kawai K, Gianatti A, Pellegrini D, Nasr A, et al. Pathological evidence for SARS-CoV-2 as a cause of myocarditis: JACC review topic of the week. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2021) 77:314–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.031

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Kotecha T, Knight DS, Razvi Y, Kumar K, Vimalesvaran K, Thornton G, et al. Patterns of myocardial injury in recovered troponin-positive COVID-19 patients assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. (2021) 42:1866–78. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab075

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Angelini P. Transient left ventricular apical ballooning: a unifying pathophysiologic theory at the edge of Prinzmetal angina. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2008) 71:342–52. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21338

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Angelini P. Transient takotsubo syndrome and its recurrence: Why does it happen, why does it end, and why does it rarely reappear? Int J Cardiol. (2021) 330:142–4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.02.033

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Angelini P, Gamero MT. What can we learn from animal models of takotsubo syndrome? Int J Cardiol. (2019) 281:105–6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2019.01.064

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Jin Y, Li Q, Guo X. Alternate recurrent coronary artery spasm and stress cardiomyopathy: a case report. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. (2020) 20:476. doi: 10.1186/s12872-020-01760-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Angelini P. Do pathologists agree on how to diagnose takotsubo cardiomyopathy? Forensic Sci Med Pathol. (2016) 12:226. doi: 10.1007/s12024-015-9739-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Hegde S, Khan R, Zordok M, Maysky M. Characteristics and outcome of patients with COVID-19 complicated by takotsubo cardiomyopathy: case series with literature review. Open Heart. (2020) 7:e001360. doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2020-001360

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Madias JE. COVID-19, POCUS, and takotsubo. Am J Cardiol. (2021) 141:157. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.12.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Galiuto L, De Caterina AR, Porfidia A, Paraggio L, Barchetta S, Locorotondo G, et al. Reversible coronary microvascular dysfunction: a common pathogenetic mechanism in apical ballooning or tako-tsubo syndrome. Eur Heart J. (2010) 31:1319–27. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehq039

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Daniels CJ, Rajpal S, Greenshields JT, Rosenthal GL, Chung EH, Terrin M, et al. Prevalence of clinical and subclinical myocarditis in competitive athletes with recent SARS-CoV-2 infection: results from the Big Ten COVID-19 Cardiac Registry. JAMA Cardiol. (2021) 6:1078–87. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.2065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Jaffe AS, Cleland JGF, Katus HA. Myocardial injury in severe COVID-19 infection. Eur Heart J. (2020) 41:2080–2. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Fröhlich GM, Schoch B, Schmid F, Keller P, Sudano I, Lüscher TF, et al. Takotsubo cardiomyopathy has a unique cardiac biomarker profile: NT-proBNP/myoglobin and NT-proBNP/troponin T ratios for the differential diagnosis of acute coronary syndromes and stress induced cardiomyopathy. Int J Cardiol. (2012) 154:328–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.09.077

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. Scantlebury DC, Prasad A. Diagnosis of takotsubo cardiomyopathy. Circ J. (2014) 78:2129–39. doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-14-0859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Dweck MR, Bularga A, Hahn RT, Bing R, Lee KK, Chapman AR, et al. Global evaluation of echocardiography in patients with COVID-19. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. (2020) 21:949–58. doi: 10.1093/ehjci/jeaa178

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Okura H. Update of takotsubo syndrome in the era of COVID-19. J Cardiol. (2021) 77:361–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2020.10.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Templin C, Ghadri JR, Diekmann J, Napp LC, Bataiosu DR, Jaguszewski M, et al. Clinical features and outcomes of takotsubo (stress) cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. (2015) 373:929–38. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1406761

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

54. Secco GG, Tarantini G, Mazzarotto P, Garbo R, Parisi R, Maggio S, et al. Invasive strategy for COVID patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome: the first multicenter Italian experience. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. (2021) 97:195–8. doi: 10.1002/ccd.28959

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

55. Gulati M, Levy PD, Mukherjee D, Amsterdam E, Bhatt DL, Birtcher KK, et al. 2021 AHA/ACC/ASE/CHEST/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR guideline for the evaluation and diagnosis of chest pain: executive summary: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. (2021) 144:e368–454. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000001030

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

56. Maurovich-Horvat P, Bosserdt M, Kofoed KF, Rieckmann N, Benedek T, Donnelly P, et al. CT or invasive coronary angiography in stable chest pain. N Engl J Med. (2022) 386:1591–602. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2200963

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

57. Templin C, Manka R, Cammann VL, Szawan KA, Gotschy A, Karolyi M, et al. Takotsubo syndrome in coronavirus disease 2019. Am J Cardiol. (2021) 138:118–20. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2020.10.005

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

58. Ouldali N, Pouletty M, Mariani P, Beyler C, Blachier A, Bonacorsi S, et al. Emergence of Kawasaki disease related to SARS-CoV-2 infection in an epicentre of the French COVID-19 epidemic: a time-series analysis. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. (2020) 4:662–8. doi: 10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30175-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

59. McCrindle BW, Rowley AH, Newburger JW, Burns JC, Bolger AF, Gewitz M, et al. Diagnosis, treatment, and long-term management of Kawasaki disease: a scientific statement for health professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation. (2017) 135:e927–99. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000484

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

60. Kim JH, Levine BD, Phelan D, Emery MS, Martinez MW, Chung EH, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 and the athletic heart: emerging perspectives on pathology, risks, and return to play. JAMA Cardiol. (2021) 6:219–27. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.5890

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

61. Starekova J, Bluemke DA, Bradham WS, Eckhardt LL, Grist TM, Kusmirek JE, et al. Evaluation for myocarditis in competitive student athletes recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. JAMA Cardiol. (2021) 6:945–50. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7444

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

62. Chang A, Wang YG, Jayanna MB, Wu X, Cadaret LM, Liu K. Mortality correlates in patients with takotsubo syndrome during the COVID-19 pandemic. Mayo Clin Proc Innov Qual Outcomes. (2021) 5:1050–5. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocpiqo.2021.09.008

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar