Frontiers in Audiology and Otology | Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Original Research

Published on 08 Jan 2025

Investigating the implementation of a new protocol and clinical tool designed to assess the audiological needs of individuals with hearing loss in clinical settings

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Mathieu Hotton
Loonan Chauvette
Sandie Poulin
Jean-Pierre Gagné

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1520014

246 views

Original Research

Published on 30 Oct 2024

Over the counter hearing aids self-fitting using the Gaussian Process Classification

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Christopher Boven
Joseph Turek
Kathleen Dunckley
Claus-Peter Richter

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1437469

660 views

Original Research

Published on 09 Oct 2024

Hearing aid benefit in daily life: a qualitative ecological momentary assessment study

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Chané Fourie
Faheema Mahomed-Asmail
Ilze Oosthuizen
Vinaya Manchaiah
Charlotte Vercammen
De Wet Swanepoel

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1397822

634 views

Original Research

Published on 06 Sep 2024

Enhancing speech perception in challenging acoustic scenarios for cochlear implant users through automatic signal processing

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Andreas Buechner
Michael Bardt
Sven Kliesch
Thomas Lenarz
Martina Brendel

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1456413

856 views

Original Research

Published on 27 Aug 2024

Consonant and vowel production in children with cochlear implants: acoustic measures and multiple factor analysis

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Sophie Fagniart
Brigitte Charlier
Véronique Delvaux
Anne Huberlant
Bernard Georges Harmegnies
Myriam Piccaluga
Kathy Huet

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1425959

616 views

Correction

Published on 07 Aug 2024

Corrigendum: Middle ear anatomy and implant sizes: correlates and the need for uniform implant dimensions

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Thomas Lenarz
Moritz Becker
Athanasia Warnecke
Anja Giesemann
Nils Kristian Prenzler
Uwe Steinhardt
Daniel Schurzig

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1469723

266 views

Original Research

Published on 29 Jul 2024

Auditory listening effort and reaction time: a comparative study between single sided deaf cochlear implant users and normal hearing controls

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Marcus Windsor Rao Voola
Dayse Tavora-Vieira
Andre Wedekind
Caris Bogdanov
Aanand Acharya

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1369812

877 views

Original Research

Published on 25 Jun 2024

Middle ear anatomy and implant sizes: correlates and the need for uniform implant dimensions

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Thomas Lenarz
Moritz Becker
Athanasia Warnecke
Anja Giesemann
Nils Kristian Prenzler
Uwe Steinhardt
Daniel Schurzig

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1418921

1,454 views

Original Research

Published on 17 Jun 2024

Greater working memory in cochlear implant users is related to higher subjective quality of life

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Priyanka Prince
Joseph Chen
Trung Le
Vincent Lin
Andrew Dimitrijevic

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1421767

1,462 views

Original Research

Published on 12 Jun 2024

Examining the psychometric properties of the Columbia Speech Quality Instrument in cochlear implant users

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Anil K. Lalwani
Michael B. Chun
Tiffany P. Hwa
Alexander Chern
Likun Tian
Stephanie Y. Chen
Michael G. Stewart
Dean Mancuso
Ilana P. Cellum

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1362810

642 views
1 citation

Systematic Review

Published on 07 May 2024

Systematic review of patient and service outcome measures of remote digital technologies for cochlear implant and hearing aid users

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Emma Laird
Cathy Sucher
Kento Nakano
Melanie Ferguson

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1403814

1,017 views

Original Research

Published on 11 Mar 2024

Successful hearing preservation and improved subjective sound quality with the flexible 28-mm electrode array

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Miryam Calvino
Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado
Elena Muñoz
Javier Gavilán
Luis Lassaletta

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1357306

665 views

Original Research

Published on 16 Feb 2024

Pros and cons of a bone-conduction device implanted in the worse hearing ear of patients with asymmetric hearing loss

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Sho Kurihara
Akira Ganaha
Takeshi Nakamura
Kan Kubuki
Emi Saruwatari
Koudai Matsui
Kuniyuki Takahashi
Tetsuya Tono

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1362443

2,016 views
1 citation

Original Research

Published on 15 Feb 2024

Improving the sensitivity of cochlear implant integrity testing by recording electrode voltages with surface electrodes

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Mary Grasmeder
Katrine Rogers
Ziya Aydin
Kate Hough
Carl Verschuur
Tracey Newman

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2024.1342263

1,155 views

Original Research

Published on 29 Jan 2024

The effect of surgeon experience and insertion speed on intracochlear pressures during in-vitro cochlear implantation

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

William Crohan
Dayse Tavora-Vieira
Marcus Voola
Aanand Acharya
Gunesh P. Rajan

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2023.1325749

745 views
1 citation

Original Research

Published on 28 Nov 2023

Does it make any sense to fit cochlear implants according to the anatomy-based fitting? Our experience with the first series of patients

in Clinical Research in Auditory Implants and Hearing Aids

Luis Lassaletta
Miryam Calvino
Isabel Sánchez-Cuadrado
Javier Gavilán

Frontiers in Audiology and Otology

doi 10.3389/fauot.2023.1298538

1,713 views
3 citations

Navigation group

Articles

Investigating the implementation of a new protocol and clinical tool designed to assess the audiological needs of individuals with hearing loss in clinical settings

Over the counter hearing aids self-fitting using the Gaussian Process Classification

Hearing aid benefit in daily life: a qualitative ecological momentary assessment study

Enhancing speech perception in challenging acoustic scenarios for cochlear implant users through automatic signal processing

Consonant and vowel production in children with cochlear implants: acoustic measures and multiple factor analysis

Corrigendum: Middle ear anatomy and implant sizes: correlates and the need for uniform implant dimensions

Auditory listening effort and reaction time: a comparative study between single sided deaf cochlear implant users and normal hearing controls

Middle ear anatomy and implant sizes: correlates and the need for uniform implant dimensions

Greater working memory in cochlear implant users is related to higher subjective quality of life

Examining the psychometric properties of the Columbia Speech Quality Instrument in cochlear implant users

Systematic review of patient and service outcome measures of remote digital technologies for cochlear implant and hearing aid users

Successful hearing preservation and improved subjective sound quality with the flexible 28-mm electrode array

Pros and cons of a bone-conduction device implanted in the worse hearing ear of patients with asymmetric hearing loss

Improving the sensitivity of cochlear implant integrity testing by recording electrode voltages with surface electrodes

The effect of surgeon experience and insertion speed on intracochlear pressures during in-vitro cochlear implantation

Does it make any sense to fit cochlear implants according to the anatomy-based fitting? Our experience with the first series of patients