- 1Johns Hopkins Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, MD, United States
- 2Institut de Recherche en Astrophysique et Planétologie, CNRS, UPS, CNES, Toulouse, France
- 3Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States
- 4National Institute for Astrophysics, Astrophysical Observatory of Torino, Turin, Italy
Editorial on the Research Topic
Kinetic plasma dynamics in the light of novel in situ heliospheric observations: synergistic view with theories and simulations
The solar wind, a plasma stream emanating from the Sun, consists of various ion species, primarily protons
Each plasma species often exhibits complex distribution functions that deviate from a simple Maxwellian profile, displaying non-Maxwellian features that are critical to understanding their kinetic behavior. These non-Maxwellian distributions are sources of free energy that can drive various kinetic instabilities and wave-particle interactions, processes essential to the heating and acceleration of solar wind ions. Understanding how the solar wind and energetic PUIs react, particularly in relation to turbulence, collisional processing, and large-scale heliospheric dynamics, is key to advancing our knowledge of solar wind behavior and its interactions across different regions of the heliosphere. Space missions such as Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter (near the Sun), IBEX, WIND, and STEREO (at 1 AU), and New Horizons (currently in the outer heliosphere) have opened new windows into these processes, offering unprecedented in situ and remote measurements from the Sun’s vicinity to the far reaches of the heliosphere.
The primary aim of this Research Topic was to expand our understanding of the science questions related to the heating and acceleration of solar wind ions and energetic PUIs, particularly through non-Maxwellian velocity distributions, wave-particle interactions, and turbulence in both the inner and outer heliosphere. This Research Topic hosts four significant contributions that enhance our understanding of these effects in the solar wind.
Previous observations revealed that solar wind ions exhibit distinct kinetic non-thermal features such as the differential flows that suggest preferential acceleration of alpha particles compared to protons (Ryan and Axford, 1975; Marsch et al., 1982; Ďurovcová et al., 2019; Mostafavi et al., 2022). Additionally, Coulomb collisions during a transit time of a particle can be crucial in reducing the ion non-thermal features (Kasper et al., 2008; Mostafavi et al., 2022; Ran et al., 2024). In this Research Topic, Johnson et al. introduce an application of collisional analysis to the alpha-proton differential flow. By comparing in situ observations from the Parker Solar Probe and the Wind spacecraft, they find strong evidence that Coulomb collisions play significant roles in shaping the differential flow through the inner heliosphere. These results underscore the importance of considering collisional processes in models of solar wind acceleration and heating.
While the role of Coulomb collisions in shaping ion dynamics is crucial, understanding the mechanisms of energy dissipation and turbulence in collisionless plasmas is equally important (Bourouaine et al., 2013). Here, Guerrero Guio et al. advance this understanding through a detailed investigation into the probability distribution functions of magnetic field increments, employing both single-spacecraft and multi-spacecraft approaches. Their study reveals a transition from Gaussian to non-Gaussian distributions at smaller scales, indicating the presence of intermittency within the turbulent cascade. Moreover, they demonstrate that the multi-point approach tends to underestimate intermittency due to its focus on larger scales, highlighting the needs for high-resolution measurements in capturing the true nature of heliospheric turbulence. This finding is particularly relevant to the upcoming Helioswarm mission (Klein et al., 2023).
In the outer heliosphere, beyond the ionization cavity which is about 4 au from the Sun, PUIs become an important source of turbulence (Zank et al., 1996; Isenberg et al., 2023; Adhikari et al., 2023). In this Research Topic, Wang et al. explore the temporal and latitudinal dependence of turbulence driven by PUIs in the outer heliosphere. Utilizing a latitude-dependent solar wind speed model and an advanced ionization rate model, this study provides a comprehensive analysis of the temporal and spatial variation in the strength of low-frequency turbulence driven by PUIs from 1998 to 2020. They highlight the significant variability in turbulence driving rates with solar activity and latitude, emphasizing the need for turbulence transport models to incorporate these dynamic factors to accurately predict solar wind heating and cosmic ray modulation.
Finally, Odstrcil advances the field of predictive modeling for space weather events, with a particular focus on multi-CME interactions within the heliosphere. This paper enhances our understanding of how multiple coronal mass ejections interact as they propagate through the heliosphere, a complex process that can lead to significant space weather impacts on Earth and throughout the solar system. While this paper primarily addresses space weather forecasting, its relevance to kinetic plasma dynamics cannot be understated. The improved modeling tools and interpretations presented are crucial for understanding how large-scale heliospheric disturbances affect the solar wind’s kinetic properties, thereby linking space weather events to the broader theme of solar wind dynamics.
Together, these papers illustrate the significant advancements in the study of plasma dynamics within the heliosphere, from inner to outer regions. They reflect a growing synergy between observational data, theoretical models, and numerical simulations, offering a more integrated understanding of the solar wind ions, turbulence, non-thermal energetic PUIs, and space weather phenomena. As we continue to explore the heliosphere with the current and future missions and advanced models, the insights from these studies will be instrumental in guiding future research and improving predictive models of space physics.
Author contributions
PM: Writing–original draft, Writing–review and editing. RK: Writing–review and editing. TB: Writing–review and editing. DT: Writing–review and editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. PM acknowledges the partial support by NASA HGIO grant 80NSSC23K0419, NASA HTMS grant 80NSSC24K0724, and the NSF SHINE award 2401162. We also acknowledge the support by NASA SHIELD DRIVE Science Center. RK acknowledges the support by the French Space Agency (CNES: Centre national d’études spatiales). PM and RK acknowledge the support by the International Space Science Institute (ISSI) in Bern, through ISSI International Team project 563 (Ion Kinetic Instabilities in the Solar Wind in Light of Parker Solar Probe and Solar Orbiter Observations). TB acknowledges NASA grant No. 80NSSC24K0272.
Acknowledgments
We sincerely thank all the authors, reviewers and editors who have participated in this Research Topic.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Adhikari, L., Zank, G. P., Wang, B., Zhao, L., Telloni, D., Pitna, A., et al. (2023). Theory and transport of nearly incompressible magnetohydrodynamic turbulence: Theory and Transport of Nearly Incompressible Magnetohydrodynamic Turbulence: High Plasma Beta Regimeigh plasma beta regime. Astrophys. J. 953, 44. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acde57
Bourouaine, S., Verscharen, D., Chandran, B. D. G., Maruca, B. A., and Kasper, J. C. (2013). Limits on alpha particle temperature anisotropy and differential flow from kinetic instabilities: solar wind observations. Astrophys. J. 777, L3. doi:10.1088/2041-8205/777/1/l31/l3
Burlaga, L. F., Ness, N. F., Belcher, J. W., and Whang, Y. C. (1996). Pickup protons and pressure-balanced structures from 39 to 43 au: Voyager 2 observations during 1993 and 1994. J. Geophys. Res. Space Phys. 101, 15523–15532. doi:10.1029/96ja01076
Ďurovcová, T., Šafránková, J., and Němeček, Z. (2019). Evolution of relative drifts in the expanding solar wind: Evolution of Relative Drifts in the Expanding Solar Wind: Helios Observationselios observations. Sol. Phys. 294, 97. doi:10.1007/s11207-019-1490-y
Isenberg, P. A., Vasquez, B. J., and Smith, C. W. (2023). Turbulence driving by interstellar pickup ions in the outer solar wind. Astrophys. J. 944, 84. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/acb3371538-4357/acb337
Kasper, J. C., Lazarus, A. J., and Gary, S. P. (2008). Hot solar-wind helium: Hot Solar-Wind Helium: Direct Evidence for Local Heating by Alfvén-Cyclotron Dissipationirect evidence for local heating by alfvén-cyclotron dissipation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 261103. doi:10.1103/physrevlett.101.261103
Klein, K., Spence, H., Kunz, M., Arzamasskiy, L., Whittlesey, P., Chen, L.-J., et al. (2023). HelioSwarm: a multipoint, multiscale mission to characterize turbulence. Bull. Am. Astron. Soc. 55, 207. doi:10.3847/25c2cfeb.84e839d7
Marsch, E. (2010). Helios: Helios: Evolution of Distribution Functions 0.3–1 AUvolution of distribution functions 0.3–1 AU. Space Sci. Rev. 172, 23–39. doi:10.1007/s11214-010-9734-zs11214-010-9734-z
Marsch, E., Mühlhäuser, K.-H., Rosenbauer, H., Schwenn, R., and Neubauer, F. M. (1982). Solar wind helium ions: Solar wind helium ions: Observations of the Helios solar probes between 0.3 and 1 AUbservations of the helios solar probes between 0.3 and 1 AU. J. Geophys. Res. 87, 35–51. doi:10.1029/ja087ia01p00035ja087ia01p00035
McComas, D. J., Zirnstein, E. J., Bzowski, M., Elliott, H. A., Randol, B., Schwadron, N. A., et al. (2017). Interstellar Pickup Ion Observations to 38 au. ApJS 233, 8. doi:10.3847/1538-4365/aa91d2
Mostafavi, P., Allen, R. C., Jagarlamudi, V. K., Bourouaine, S., Badman, S. T., Ho, G. C., et al. (2024) Parker Solar Probe observations of collisional effects on thermalizing the young solar wind, 682, A152. doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202347134
Mostafavi, P., Allen, R. C., McManus, M. D., Ho, G. C., Raouafi, N. E., Larson, D. E., et al. (2022). Alpha–proton differential flow of the young solar wind: Parker solar probe observations. Astrophys. J. Lett. 926, L38. doi:10.3847/2041-8213/ac51e1
Ran, H., Liu, Y. D., Chen, C., and Mostafavi, P. (2024). The alpha-proton differential flow in the alfvénic young solar wind: from sub-alfvénic to super-alfvénic. Astrophys. J. 963, 82. doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad2069ad2069
Robbins, D. E., Hundhausen, A. J., and Bame, S. J. (1970). Helium in the solar wind. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 1178–1187. doi:10.1029/ja075i007p01178
Ryan, J. M., and Axford, W. I. (1975). The behaviour of minor species in the solar wind. Z. für Geophys. 41, 21–232.
Semar, C. L. (1970). Effect of interstellar neutral hydrogen on the termination of the solar wind. J. Geophys. Res. 75, 6892–6898. doi:10.1029/ja075i034p06892
Verscharen, D., Klein, K. G., and Maruca, B. A. (2019). The multi-scale nature of the solar wind. Living Rev. Sol. Phys. 16, 5. doi:10.1007/s41116-019-0021-0
von Steiger, R., Geiss, J., Gloeckler, G., and Galvin, A. B. (1995). Kinetic properties of heavy ions in the solar wind from SWICS/ulysses. Space Sci. Rev. 72, 71–76. doi:10.1007/bf00768756
Zank, G. P. (2015). Transport Processes in space Physics and Astrophysics, vol. 877 of Lecture Notes in physics. Berlin Springer Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-8480-6
Keywords: heliosphere, space plasma, turbulence, solar wind, pickup ions, numerical simulation, space missions, collisions
Citation: Mostafavi P, Kieokaew R, Bowen T and Telloni D (2024) Editorial: Kinetic plasma dynamics in the light of novel in situ heliospheric observations: synergistic view with theories and simulations. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 11:1491455. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2024.1491455
Received: 04 September 2024; Accepted: 17 September 2024;
Published: 26 September 2024.
Edited and reviewed by:
Scott William McIntosh, National Center for Atmospheric Research (UCAR), United StatesCopyright © 2024 Mostafavi, Kieokaew, Bowen and Telloni. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Parisa Mostafavi, parisa.mostafavi@jhuapl.edu