Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Anim. Sci., 05 January 2023
Sec. Animal Welfare and Policy
Volume 3 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fanim.2022.1102029

Corrigendum: A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare

This article is a correction to:

  1. A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare

    1. Read original article
Sarina Michaelis*Sarina Michaelis1*Antje SchubbertAntje Schubbert2Daniel GiesekeDaniel Gieseke1Kornel CimerKornel Cimer3Rita ZapfRita Zapf4Sally LühkenSally Lühken2Solveig MarchSolveig March3Jan BrinkmannJan Brinkmann3Ute SchultheißUte Schultheiß4Ute KnierimUte Knierim1
  • 1Farm Animal Behavior and Husbandry Section, University of Kassel, Kassel, Germany
  • 2Friedrich- Loeffler Institute of Animal Welfare and Animal Husbandry, Celle, Germany
  • 3Thünen Institute of Organic Farming, Westerau, Germany
  • 4Association for Technology and Structures in Agriculture, Darmstadt, Germany

A corrigendum on
A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare

by Michaelis S, Schubbert A, Gieseke D, Cimer K, Zapf R, Lühken S, March S, Brinkmann J, Schultheiß U and Knierim U (2022) . 3:915708. doi: .10.3389/fanim.2022.915708

In the published article, there was an error. In Table 3 the first row of the table was set as the header.

The corrected Table 3 and its caption appear below.

TABLE 3
www.frontiersin.org

Table 3 Comparison of the farmers´ professional background between the online and live trained groups.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: animal welfare, training, animal-based indicators, self-assessment, reliability, feasibility

Citation: Michaelis S, Schubbert A, Gieseke D, Cimer K, Zapf R, Lühken S, March S, Brinkmann J, Schultheiß U and Knierim U (2023) Corrigendum: A comparison of online and live training of livestock farmers for an on-farm self-assessment of animal welfare. Front. Anim. Sci. 3:1102029. doi: 10.3389/fanim.2022.1102029

Received: 18 November 2022; Accepted: 01 December 2022;
Published: 05 January 2023.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Michaelis, Schubbert, Gieseke, Cimer, Zapf, Lühken, March, Brinkmann, Schultheiß and Knierim. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Sarina Michaelis, bWljaGFlbGlzQHVuaS1rYXNzZWwuZGU=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.