
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Allergy
Sec. Mechanisms in Allergy
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1568475
This article is part of the Research TopicAllergies in Focus, Tales from the Less Explored World: Prevalence, Allergens, and Treatment Strategies in Latin America and Africa.View all 3 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
Select one of your emails
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Notify me on publication
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Shrimp allergy has emerged as a growing health concern in Tunisia, likely due to changing dietary habits. This study aimed to characterize the clinical features of shrimp-allergic patients and investigate potential cross-reactivity with house dust mites (HDMs) and snails using in vitro diagnostic methods. Thirty-one patients with a self-reported history of shrimp allergy were referred to the Clinical Immunology Department of the Pasteur Institute of Tunis. Total IgE and Serumspecific IgE (sIgE) levels to shrimp, snail, and HDMs, as well as recombinant allergens rPen a1 and rDer p10, were measured using the ImmunoCAP® immunoassay. The study population consisted mainly of young adults (mean age: 15.5 years [10-27.2]), with a male-to-female ratio of 1.4. The most common symptoms were oropharyngeal pruritus and urticaria. Shrimp allergy was confirmed in 54.8% of patients, with a median sIgE titer of 0.18 [0.03-28.8] kUA/L. Among these patients, 58.8% exhibited cross-reactivity, predominantly with snails (median sIgE: 3.07 [0.04-16.85] kUA/L). Among shrimp-allergic patients, 70.5% tested positive for rPen a1 ] kUA/L), while 58.8% were positive for rDer p10 (median sIgE: 0.56 [5 × 10⁻⁵ -87.95] kUA/L). The median total IgE level was 297 [158.6-475] IU/mL, significantly higher in shrimp-allergic patients (p = 0.005). The median shrimp sIgE/total IgE ratio was 0.001 [0-0.069], also significantly elevated in shrimp-sensitized individuals (p = 0.005). Multivariable analysis showed significant correlations between total IgE and shrimp sIgE, rPen a1, and rDer p10 levels (p = 0.043, p = 0.045, p = 0.043, respectively), while no correlation was found with d1 or snail sIgE after adjusting for age. rDer p10 and f24 were the strongest predictors of sIgE to snail, with standardized coefficients of 8.785 and -5.028, respectively. However, these associations did not reach statistical significance. This study underscores the critical role of tropomyosin as a primary allergen in shrimp allergy in Tunisia, highlighting its importance in immunodiagnosis and its strong association with HDMs and snail sensitization. Further research is needed to explore HDMs sensitization in patients who are negative for rPen a1 and rDer p10.
Keywords: Shrimp allergy, Molecular allergen, specific IgE, cross-reactivity, Tropomyosin
Received: 29 Jan 2025; Accepted: 08 Apr 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Krir, Zamali, Galai, Ben Hmid, Ben sghaier, Nasri, Ben Kebaier, Hechmi, Bouaffif and Samoud. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence: Samar Samoud, Department of Clinical Immunology, Pasteur Institute of Tunis, Tunisia, Tunis, Tunisia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.