data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7e1e6/7e1e61f01d233b91960c61442e748a5609c80a7c" alt="Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset"
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
PERSPECTIVE article
Front. Allergy
Sec. Asthma
Volume 6 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/falgy.2025.1528526
This article is part of the Research Topic Gaps in Asthma Care View all 6 articles
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
Asthma is a common and complex syndrome, and a major cause of morbidity and healthcare costs. Clinicians have an array of evidence-based investigations and effective interventions at their disposal, but outcomes have not improved as much as trial evidence would suggest they could. This article discusses drivers behind this discrepancy using illustrative examples to highlight information gaps and barriers that impair the delivery of community and emergency asthma care and appropriate referral to specialist asthma services. It highlights organizational issues in the current system that lead to disjointed care that varies in quality. It also explores problems such as the adequacy of training for healthcare professionals, divergence from best practice guidance, and an acceptance amongst patients and practitioners of poor asthma control. This, along with inherent problems in the diagnosis of this heterogeneous disease, facilitates and perpetuates suboptimal care and outcomes. To help address the outcome gap, we discuss the potential for relatively simple, achievable and costeffective actions that could potentially be taken by clinicians together with commissioners and managers of healthcare systems.
Keywords: Asthma, health system, quality of care, Best practice, Model of care
Received: 15 Nov 2024; Accepted: 16 Jan 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Crawford, Jones, Scullion, Ryan and Blakey. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
John Blakey, Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Perth, Australia
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.