Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Allergy
Sec. Food Allergy
Volume 5 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1395834
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Food Processing to Reduce/Eliminate Protein Allergenicity View all articles

Peanut Allergen Characterization and Allergenicity Throughout Development

Provisionally accepted
  • 1 Research Institute, McGill University Health Center, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
  • 2 Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Central District, Israel
  • 3 Center for Autoimmune Diseases, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv District, Israel
  • 4 Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv District, Israel
  • 5 Institute for Drug Research, School of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 6 School of Medicine, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Peanut allergy (PA) in children is a major concern. There is a need for better biological material for both diagnosis and oral immunotherapy (OIT) treatments. The unique state of seeds at early reproductive stages may affect the allergenicity of storage proteins, and impact clinical diagnostic and OIT protocols. The objective of this study was to evaluate the major allergen content in sequential seed developmental stages and monitor allergenicity via specific IgE binding quantification and skin prick testing. Seeds were collected from peanut plants and sorted into five developmental stages: initial (S1), developing (S2), full-size without coloration (S3), full-size with coloration (S4), and fully mature (S5) seeds. Samples were characterized by RNA-Seq, ELISA, and immunohistochemistry. Lyophilized, ground preparations were used for evaluation of skin test responses in sixty challenge-proven PA children. Gene expression, protein content, and specific IgE binding of allergenic proteins increased throughout seed maturation and development. An expression bias towards the less allergenic Agenome copy of the major allergen Ara h 2 was found in earlier stages, especially in stage S2. Immunohistochemical staining showed that Ara h 2 is more dispersed in the cell and less accumulated within organized bodies at stage S2 versus stage S4. Significant differences were found in mean wheal responses between the commercial peanut extract (equivalent to stage S5) and stages S1 and S2, but not with stage S4, upon skin prick testing in subjects with PA. The observed decrease in peanut-specific IgE binding of immature peanut seeds may be a result not only of decreased amounts of allergenic proteins, but also of profound changes in seed composition and conformation. This may be significant for developing a safer and more effective peanut OIT protocol.

    Keywords: peanut, food allergy, seed development, Storage proteins, Skin prick test (SPT)

    Received: 04 Mar 2024; Accepted: 02 Jul 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Cohen, Levy, Manasherova, Agmon-Levin, Kenett, Jean-claude, Mazer, Hovav and Kidon. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence:
    Yael Levy, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Central District, Israel
    Ran Hovav, Institute of Plant Sciences, Agricultural Research Organization, Volcani Center, Rishon LeZion, Central District, Israel
    Mona I. Kidon, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Tel Aviv District, Israel

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.