Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Agron.
Sec. Climate-Smart Agronomy
Volume 6 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fagro.2024.1419479
This article is part of the Research Topic Innovative Technologies and Applications of UAV in Precision Agriculture to Mitigate Climate Change View all articles

Application of UAV and satellite technologies for assessing Phytophthora Root Rot (PRR) severity in avocado orchards

Provisionally accepted
Sally Duncan Sally Duncan 1Adele Mcleod Adele Mcleod 2Carlos Poblete-Echeverría Carlos Poblete-Echeverría 1*
  • 1 South African Grape and Wine Research Institute (SAGWRI), Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa
  • 2 Department of Plant Pathology, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape, South Africa

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Avocado production faces a substantial global threat in the form of Phytophthora root rot (PRR). When trees succumb to PRR, their canopy health deteriorates, leading to adverse impacts on production. To effectively implement remedial strategies, infected trees need to be identified, evaluated, and located within the field. The current commercially accepted method for determining PRR severity in canopies consists of a visual estimation using the 'Ciba-Geigy' rating scale. This rating scale incorporates a numerical severity ranking system based on a visual approach conducted by trained personnel. However, tracking tree health using visual ratings is a time-consuming process, fraught with practical challenges arising from gradual visual changes, spatial variation, and dimensions of the orchards. To address these limitations, the integration of remote sensor-based methods is proposed as a viable alternative to the visual severity ranking. A field experiment was conducted in two avocado blocks to investigate the effect of spatial resolution, phenological stages, and canopy conditions on the mapping of PRR severity. The results of this study showed that canopy management practices revealed a pronounced influence in the determination of the severity ranking using remote sensing (RS) methods and that these methods can be used as an alternative to visual estimations. Additionally, the spatial resolution of the images emerged as a significant factor, improving the estimation of severity when more detailed spatial data were incorporated into the analysis. In the most favourable scenario, an R 2 determination coefficient of 0.80 was achieved. In summary, RS approaches can provide valuable information to mitigate the effect of PRR in avocado production. However, the image characteristics and particular canopy conditions need to be carefully considered in order to deliver a reliable method that can be used for informed decision-making. Nonetheless, the results were promising and could open doors to further investigate RS methods as a subjective and efficient means of PRR severity rankings.

    Keywords: remote sensing, Avocado, disease severity detection, RGB imaging, plant projective cover, Multispectral imaging, UAV, Satellite

    Received: 18 Apr 2024; Accepted: 15 Nov 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Duncan, Mcleod and Poblete-Echeverría. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Carlos Poblete-Echeverría, South African Grape and Wine Research Institute (SAGWRI), Faculty of AgriSciences, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, 7602, Western Cape, South Africa

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.