Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Aging Neurosci.
Sec. Parkinson’s Disease and Aging-related Movement Disorders
Volume 17 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2025.1504733
This article is part of the Research Topic Frontier Research on Artificial Intelligence and Radiomics in Neurodegenerative Diseases View all 5 articles

Individualized diagnosis of Parkinson's disease Based on multivariate Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Radiomics and clinical indexes

Provisionally accepted
Qianqian Ye Qianqian Ye 1Chenhui Lin Chenhui Lin 1Fangyi Xiao Fangyi Xiao 2Tao Jiang Tao Jiang 1Jialong Hou Jialong Hou 1Yi Zheng Yi Zheng 1Jiaxue Xu Jiaxue Xu 1Jiani Huang Jiani Huang 1Keke Chen Keke Chen 1Jinlai Cai Jinlai Cai 1Jingjing Qian Jingjing Qian 1Weiwei Quan Weiwei Quan 1Yanyan Chen Yanyan Chen 1*
  • 1 Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China
  • 2 Department of Cardiology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, China

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Objective To explore MRI-based radiomics models, integrating clinical characteristics, for differential diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) to evaluate their diagnostic performance Methods A total of 256 participants (153 PD, 103 healthy controls (HCs)) from the First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical Hospital, were enrolled as the training set, and 120 subjects (74 PD, 46 HCs) from the PPMI dataset served as the test set. Radiomics features were extracted from structural MRI (T1WI and T2-FLair). Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers were developed using MRI radiomics data from both monomodal and multimodal radiomics models. The clinical-radiomics model was constructed by integrating clinical variables, including UPDRS, Hoehn-Yahr stage, age, sex, and MMSE scores. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated to evaluate the performance of the models. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was performed to access the clinical usefulness of the models. Results In the training set, the T2-FLair and T1WI radiomics model achieved an AUC of 0.896 (95% CI, 0.812-0.900) and 0.899 (95% CI, 0.818-0.908), respectively. The double-sequence radiomics model demonstrated superior diagnostic performance, with an AUC of 0.965 (95% CI, 0.885-0.978) in the training set and an AUC of 0.852 (95% CI, 0.748-0.910) in the test set. The integrated clinical-radiomics model showed enhanced diagnostic accuracy, with AUC=0.983 (95% CI, 0.897-0.996) in the training set and AUC=0.837 (95% CI, 0.786-0.902) in the test set. Rad-scores derived from the radiomics model were significantly correlated with diagnostic outcomes (P<0.001). DCA confirmed the substantial clinical usefulness of the clinical-radiomics integrated model. Conclusions The integrated clinical-radiomics model offered superior diagnostic performance compared to models based relying solely on imaging or clinical data, underscoring its potential as a non-invasive and effective tool in routine clinical practice for the early diagnosis of PD.

    Keywords: Parkinson's disease, MRI radiomics, T1-weighted imaging, T2-FLAIR, machine learning, Clinical-radiomics model

    Received: 01 Oct 2024; Accepted: 13 Jan 2025.

    Copyright: © 2025 Ye, Lin, Xiao, Jiang, Hou, Zheng, Xu, Huang, Chen, Cai, Qian, Quan and Chen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Yanyan Chen, Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.