Skip to main content

ORIGINAL RESEARCH article

Front. Vet. Sci. , 12 March 2025

Sec. Veterinary Imaging

Volume 12 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1521684

This article is part of the Research Topic The Integration of Clinical Veterinary Anatomy and Diagnostic Imaging View all 14 articles

Magnetisation transfer, T1 and T2* relaxation in canine menisci of elderly dogs—an ex vivo study in stifle joints

Lena Bunzendahl,
Lena Bunzendahl1,2*Amir Moussavi,Amir Moussavi2,3Martina BleyerMartina Bleyer4Stephan NeumannStephan Neumann1Susann Boretius
Susann Boretius2*
  • 1Small Animal Clinic, Institute of Veterinary Medicine, Georg-August University of Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
  • 2Functional Imaging Laboratory, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany
  • 3Fachhochschule Südwestfalen, University of Applied Sciences, Hagen, Germany
  • 4Pathology Unit, German Primate Center, Leibniz Institute for Primate Research, Göttingen, Germany

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used in human medicine, offering multiple contrast mechanisms to visualise different tissue types. It is also gaining importance in veterinary medicine, including diagnosing joint disorders. The menisci of the stifle joint play a crucial role in the development of osteoarthritis (OA), and multi-parameter MRI of the menisci may aid in early OA diagnosis, potentially improving therapeutic outcomes. In a previous ex vivo study, we measured T2 relaxation times in menisci of elderly dogs with mild histological signs of degeneration but no clinical symptoms of lameness. As no significant changes in T2 relaxation times were observed in relation to histological scores, the present study extends this investigation by exploring more advanced MR parameters—including T1 relaxation time, T2* relaxation time, magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR), and magnetisation transfer saturation (MTsat)—to assess their potential for detecting early microstructural changes in the menisci. While T2* relaxation times and MTR showed no significant variation across histological scores, MTsat values increased with higher proteoglycan staining. In contrast, the apparent T1 relaxation time (T1app) was lower in menisci with elevated proteoglycan scores and increased with higher cellularity scores. The correlation between MTsat and proteoglycan content suggests that MTsat, along with T1app, could be a promising parameter for characterising the extracellular matrix. However, further research is needed to validate these findings.

1 Introduction

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the canine stifle joint is a predominantly degenerative joint disease, especially common in older dogs. OA frequently develops in the context of cranial cruciate ligament disease (1) and is closely associated with damage or degeneration of the menisci. These fibrocartilaginous structures play a critical role in absorbing compressive loads and maintaining joint stability, which helps to protect the articular cartilage from excessive wear (24). As OA progresses, it leads to structural changes in all joint components, including the medial and lateral menisci, making meniscal degeneration a key factor in OA onset and progression.

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the gold standard for diagnosing knee disorders in humans, offering high-resolution, non-invasive imaging of soft tissues and bone structures. It is routinely employed to detect meniscal tears, ligament injuries, and cartilage degeneration (512). In veterinary medicine, although traditionally less common, the use of MRI is steadily increasing (13, 14). In addition to identifying macroscopic injuries (10, 11, 15), MRI is gaining importance in characterising tissue microstructures. Recent advances in quantitative and semi-quantitative techniques have proven particularly useful for assessing microscopic changes in humans (9, 1618) and animals (1, 1921).

The menisci are composed of fibrochondrocytes embedded in an extracellular matrix primarily consisting of water, collagen, and proteoglycans (2225). The collagen fibres, primarily type I with smaller amounts of type II and III, are arranged in radial and circumferential patterns, allowing the menisci to resist multidirectional stresses. Proteoglycans, mainly aggrecan, make up 1–2% of the meniscal dry weight and contain glycosaminoglycan (GAG) chains such as chondroitin sulphate and keratan sulphate (22).

In osteoarthritic menisci, alterations in the extracellular matrix commonly lead to increased water content and mobility, which in turn influences the T2 relaxation time. Elevated T2 relaxation times have been documented in human meniscus degeneration (9, 10). In a previous ex vivo study, we measured T2 relaxation times in menisci from elderly dogs with mild histological degeneration but without clinical signs of lameness. The results showed no significant changes in T2 relaxation times with higher histological scores, suggesting that these early degenerative changes did not markedly affect the T2 values (26). We have now expanded our investigation to include T1 and T2* relaxation times, as well as magnetisation transfer (MT) techniques and the derived parameters, including magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR) and magnetisation transfer saturation (MTsat).

These advanced MR parameters are not yet part of routine clinical diagnostics in human or veterinary medicine, partly due to longer acquisition times and the complexity of data interpretation (27, 28). However, these techniques are gaining significance in medical imaging (27), and post mortem studies may help to identify promising candidates for future clinical applications. In the following, we will briefly address the potential advantages and added value of these techniques for the microtissue characterization of the menisci.

Given the observed increase in water content during meniscal degeneration, T2* relaxation times may behave similarly to T2 relaxation times. Nebelung et al. reported higher T2* relaxation values correlating with increasing histological scores in humans, though primarily at the extreme ends of the spectrum (29). Furthermore, Lee et al. found a positive correlation between contact strain and T2* relaxation times in the articular cartilage of cattle (6). Although T2 and T2* are related, T2* is more sensitive to magnetic field inhomogeneities, potentially providing additional insights into subtle tissue changes such as variation in fiber density and orientation. However, this heightened sensitivity poses challenges for data acquisition and interpretation, limiting its current clinical use.

T1 relaxation time, another parameter sensitive to water content, is valuable for assessing cartilage and soft tissues (8, 18, 30, 31), but its application to the meniscus remains largely in the research phase.

MT techniques have been widely applied to indirectly assess macromolecular content in various biological tissues (3236). These methods exploit the interaction between free water protons and protons bound to macromolecules. By selectively saturating the bound protons, magnetisation is transferred to the free water protons, resulting in a reduction in signal intensity. The MTR quantifies the degree of this signal loss by comparing it to a data set acquired without the saturating radiofrequency pulse. Higher MTR values typically indicate denser macromolecular structures (12). Several studies have measured MTR in articular cartilage and menisci, reporting lower MTR values in tissues with reduced collagen and proteoglycan content (12, 30, 32).

A limitation of MTR is its lack of specificity. Various factors, such as inflammation and oedema, can influence the results. Additionally, MTR is susceptible to B0 (main magnetic field) and B1 (radiofrequency) field inhomogeneities and highly sensitive to acquisition parameters, such as the choice of saturation pulse, which can lead to inconsistent values and makes standardisation across different studies or clinical environments challenging. To address these limitations, quantitative magnetisation transfer (qMT) methods have been developed. These techniques provide more specific and reproducible macromolecular parameters, such as the macromolecular pool size fraction and the exchange rate between free and bound protons. However, the advantages of qMT come at the cost of longer acquisition times and more complex data processing, limiting its availability in clinical practice.

Helms et al. (37) introduced a technique called MTsat that bridges the gap between the simplicity of MTR and the complexity of full qMT imaging. MTsat incorporates corrections for B1 inhomogeneities and T1 relaxation times, providing more accurate data but with shorter acquisition times compared to full qMT. MTsat is increasingly used in research settings, particularly for studying neurological disorders (3841). To our knowledge, this technique has not yet been applied to examine musculoskeletal structures. We hypothesize that MTsat may be suitable for quantifying the macromolecular content of the meniscus, thereby offering more detailed insights into the remodeling processes of menisci during degeneration.

In this study, we determined the T1 and T2* relaxation times, along with MTR and MTsat, in menisci from elderly dogs as previously described. Our goal was to evaluate the sensitivity of these MR parameters in detecting relatively mild degenerative tissue changes in mostly normally aged menisci and to determine whether and how these parameters can identify specific types of tissue alterations. If successful, these early markers could enhance the understanding of osteoarthritis pathogenesis and pave the way for more effective treatment strategies.

2 Materials and methods

2.1 Study samples

The stifle joints used in this study have been described previously (26). One joint had to be excluded from the original cohort of 16 joints from 8 dogs due to image artefacts. In total, 30 menisci from 15 joints (15 medial, 15 lateral) were included. Only elderly dogs, aged between 10 and 17 years, were selected for the study. None of the dogs had a history of hindlimb lameness or stifle instability. The reasons for the required euthanasia were unrelated to this study. Additional patient information can be found in Bunzendahl et al. (26).

Based on the results of X-ray scoring using the modified Kellgren-Lawrence scale (42, 43), 29% of the joints showed no radiographic evidence of osteoarthritis (score 0). The remaining 71% exhibited mild signs of osteoarthritis, corresponding to a score of 1.

Histological scoring was based on a system adapted from Sun et al. (44) and Pauli et al. (45), which includes individual scores for meniscus cellularity (0 to 3), collagen content (0 to 2), collagen organisation (0 to 3), and proteoglycan content (0 to 2). Additionally, a total score was calculated by summing up all the individual scores, resulting in a maximum possible total score of 10. Among the 30 menisci, one was classified with a total score of 0, while the highest total score observed was 6 (n = 2).

2.2 MR imaging

Before MRI, the stifle joints were dissected from the surrounding tissue and fixed in 10% neutral-buffered formaldehyde. The joints, submerged in the formaldehyde solution were positioned in a flexible 16-channel receive-coil (Variety, NORAS MRI products GmbH, Höchberg, Germany). All MR measurements were performed using a 3 Tesla whole-body MR system (MAGNETOM Prisma, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany).

Maps of T2*-relaxation time were estimated from 3D multi-echo gradient echo (GRE) images acquired with the following parameters: TR = 75 ms, TE = 5–64.5 ms in 8.5 ms increments (8 echos), flip angle α = 25°, and an isotropic resolution of 300 μm. The total acquisition time was 1 h and 14 min. The T2*-maps were calculated using an in-house pixel-wise mono-exponential fitting routine (MATLAB R2021a, Math Works, Natick, MA, United States).

To estimate MTR and MTsat, 3D single-echo GRE images (TR = 27 ms, TE = 4 ms and 300 μm isotropic resolution) with varying weightings were acquired. Weightings were achieved by applying an off-resonance saturation pulse (MT-weighted: MT flip angle = 500° and MT offset = 1,500 Hz) or by modifying the flip angle α (proton density (PD)-weighted: α = 7°; T1-weighted: α = 20°). The total acquisition time was 27 min per acquisition. MTsat and T1 relaxation time were calculated as described in Helms et al. (37). Since the measured T1 relaxation time reflects both intrinsic tissue properties and the effects of the imaging technique, it is referred to as the apparent T1 relaxation time (T1app). T1app, T2*-relaxation time, MTR and MTsat were extracted from manually defined regions of interest (ROIs) that segmented the medial and lateral menisci. All segmentations were consistently performed by the same experienced observer on T2-weighted images using the software program ITK-SNAP.1 The segmentation process utilized sagittal, transverse, and coronal planes as previously described (26). An example of the segmentation is shown in Supplementary Figure 1.

2.3 Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were conducted using the Python libraries statsmodels (version 0.14.1, www.statsmodels.org), scipy (version 1.10.1, www.scipy.org), and scikit-learn (version 1.3.0, http://scikit-learn.org). To assess differences in MR parameters across the three values (0, 1, 2) of each histological score, a one-way ANOVA was performed using statsmodels.stats.anova. Given the limited sample size and deviations from normality assumptions for some parameters (scipy.stats.shapiro), the ANOVA results should be interpreted with caution and are presented here primarily for orientation purposes. To ensure transparency, individual data points are displayed in the corresponding figure, enabling readers to assess the data distribution and variability within and across groups.

Additionally, a linear regression analysis was conducted using sklearn.linear_model, and the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated with scipy.pearsonr. The normality of the residuals from the regression analysis was evaluated using scipy.stats.shapiro.

A paired t-test was applied to compare findings between the medial and lateral menisci using scipy.ttest_rel. A p-value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

3 Results

3.1 Delineation of menisci on differently weighted images and their derived maps

Figures 13 illustrate the achieved image quality, all derived from the same joint. The T2*-weighted images (Figure 1, GRE) clearly separate bone from softer tissues, including muscles and cartilage. As the echo time increases, the fibrous cartilage of the menisci (red arrow) becomes progressively better delineated from the hyaline articular cartilage (blue arrow), although the signal-to-noise ratio decreases. In the post mortem specimen, the best contrast was observed at TE = 22 ms. The improved delineation at longer TE is attributed to the shorter T2* relaxation time of fibrous cartilage compared to hyaline articular cartilage, as further confirmed by the calculated T2* relaxation time map (Figure 1, right).

Figure 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Orthogonal slices acquired with a 3D multi-gradient echo (GRE) sequence show the best contrast between the fibrous cartilage of the menisci (red arrow) and the hyaline articular cartilage (blue arrow) at an echo time (TE) of 22 ms. The corresponding T2* maps confirm the shorter T2* relaxation time of the menisci compared to the articular cartilage.

Figure 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. Comparison of images acquired with a 3D multi-gradient echo (GRE) proton-density weighted (PD) sequence with (MTw-GRE) and without (PDw-GRE) magnetisation transfer preparation, as well as the corresponding T1 weighted images (T1w-GRE). The macromolecule-based contrast of MTw-GRE provided the clearest delineation of fibrous and hyaline cartilage across all three orthogonal slices.

Figure 3
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 3. Maps of the magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR), apparent T1 relaxation time and magnetisation transfer saturation (MT saturation) calculated from the data sets shown in Figure 2. Both magnetisation transfer maps reveal differences between fibrous and hyaline cartilage, with the T1-corrected MTsat map offering enhanced contrast.

Interestingly, the macromolecule-based contrast of magnetisation transfer-weighted imaging also clearly delineates fibrous and hyaline cartilage, whereas proton density-weighted (PDw-GRE) and T1-weighted (T1w-GRE) images show very little difference (Figure 2). The higher MT in fibrous cartilage is particularly evident on the calculated maps of MTR and MTsat (Figure 3). Notably, the T1-corrected MTsat map provides even better results than MTR, offering enhanced contrast and more precise tissue delineation.

3.2 Relationship between histological scores and MR parameters

The menisci included in this study exhibited histological scores for cellularity, proteoglycan content, collagen content, and collagen organisation ranging from 0 to 2. To assess whether these mild histological alterations were reflected in the MR parameters, the measured values were initially categorised according to the corresponding histological scores for each staining (Figure 4). A one-way ANOVA was performed primarily as an exploratory tool to provide an initial overview of potential differences in the MR parameters across the three scores. Additionally, the Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to assess the relationship between each histological score and the corresponding MR parameter.

Figure 4
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 4. Boxplot of MRI parameters across different histological scores. The apparent T1 relaxation time (T1app) is shorter in menisci with increased proteoglycan staining and longer in those with increased cellularity score. In contrast, MTsat values (magnetisation transfer saturation) are higher in menisci with elevated proteoglycan scores.

While most MR parameters did not show significant differences across individual scores, T1app decreased with increasing proteoglycan staining (ANOVA: p < 0.003; Pearson correlation: r = −0.54, r < 0.003) and increased with higher cellularity scores (ANOVA, p < 0.05, r = 0.37, p < 0.05). In contrast, MTsat values were higher in menisci with elevated proteoglycan scores (ANOVA, p < 0.0003, Pearson correlation: r = 0.63, p < 0.0003).

Interestingly, collagen and proteoglycan content appeared to have opposite effects on MTsat. To explore this further, we calculated the ratio of the collagen and proteoglycan scores, adjusting all values by adding one to avoid division by zero. The results are shown in Figure 5, where MTsat significantly decreased with a higher collagen-to-proteoglycan ratio (r = −0.56, p < 0.002).

Figure 5
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 5. MTsat (magnetisation transfer saturation) values in relation to collagen and proteoglycan content. Collagen and proteoglycan scores appear to have opposite effects on MTsat. Specifically, MTsat tends to decrease with lower collagen content (r = −0.16, p = 0.43), while it increases with increased proteoglycan staining (r = 0.62, p < 0.0003). This relationship is further reflected in lower MTsat values associated with a reduced collagen-to-proteoglycan ratio (left, r = −0.56, p < 0.002).

To investigate a potential correlation between the severity of changes and the MRI parameters, we summarised, as previously described (26), all individual histological scores into a total score and performed a correlation analysis between the total score and the MRI parameters. When analysing the lateral and medial menisci together, none of the parameters showed a significant correlation with the total score. A separate analysis of the lateral and medial menisci indicated a potential mild negative correlation between MTR and the total score in the medial menisci, though this trend did not reach statistical significance (r = −0.48, p = 0.08, Supplementary Figure 2).

3.3 Comparison of lateral and medial menisci

Due to their restricted mobility, medial menisci are more prone to injury and may be more susceptible to degenerative changes over time (46). The histological analysis of the menisci included in this study revealed no statistically significant difference between the medial and lateral menisci (Supplementary Table 1), except for the proteoglycan score. On average, the medial menisci exhibited more intense proteoglycan staining (higher score), with greater variability between samples (paired t-test, p = 0.006) (Figure 6, left). To determine whether these histological differences are reflected in any of the MR parameters, the values for T2*, T1, MTR, and MTsat were analysed separately for lateral and medial menisci. None of the investigated parameters showed a significant difference, although MTR displayed a trend toward lower levels in the medial menisci (paired t-test, p = 0.059), as shown in Figure 6. The mean and standard deviation for each MR parameter, separated by lateral and medial menisci, are summarised in Table 1.

Figure 6
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 6. Comparison of lateral and medial menisci. The medial menisci exhibited more intense proteoglycan staining (higher score) and greater variability between the analysed samples. Among the quantitative MRI parameters, only the magnetisation transfer ratio (MTR) indicated a potential difference, showing a trend toward lower values in the medial menisci. T1app – apparent T1 relaxation time, MTsat – magnetisation transfer saturation.

Table 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Mean values and standard deviations (SD) of the respective magnetic resonance (MR) parameters (MTR – magnetisation transfer ratio, T1app – apparent T1 relaxation time, MTsat – magnetisation transfer saturation) in the medial and lateral menisci.

4 Discussion

In this ex vivo study, we evaluated the detectability of mild, histologically confirmed degeneration in the menisci of elderly dogs with no history of hindlimb lameness using MRI. None of the included dogs showed signs of meniscal tears or other macroscopically visible injuries. Therefore, the samples can be considered representative of canine menisci from essentially normally aged dogs. Building on our previous study, which primarily investigated T2 relaxation times (26), we broadened our analysis to include T2* and T1 relaxation times, MTR, and MTsat. Our aim was to explore the suitability of these MR parameters for identifying mild changes in tissue microstructure associated with age-related degradation. Previous MRI studies on dog stifles have mainly concentrated on T2 and T2* weighted images or the corresponding relaxation time maps (1, 20, 21). To our knowledge, this is the first study on canine menisci that has additionally incorporated magnetisation transfer techniques.

Compared to hyaline cartilage, MRI of the menisci can be more challenging. Their lower water content, dense collagen network, and restricted proton mobility lead to rapid signal attenuation due to their short T2 and T2* relaxation times (29, 47). This also applies to post mortem imaging, as demonstrated in this study. Increasing the echo time of a gradient echo sequence, thereby enhancing T2* weighting, improved the delineation between hyaline cartilage and the menisci. However, excessively long echo times resulted in insufficient signal intensity. Furthermore, the MTR and MTsat values of the menisci were higher than those of hyaline cartilage, likely due to their dense collagen structure, offering a promising contrast mechanism for improved delineation.

The menisci analysed in this study exhibited relatively mild degenerative changes. The highest score observed in any histological staining did not exceed 2, and the highest total score was 6 (in 2 out of 30 menisci), with 10 being the maximum possible score. Our goal was to determine whether any of the tested MR parameters could reflect these subtle structural alterations. In summary, T2* relaxation times and MTR showed no significant differences across histological scores, while T1app and MTsat correlated with certain scores. These findings will be discussed in more detail below.

T2* relaxation time has been reported to increase following meniscal tears and other injuries. For instance, Koff et al. (48) observed prolonged T2* and T2 values in menisci after surgical repair in an ovine model. However, in the case of milder alterations, the results are less clear.

Nebelung et al. (29), for example, found no significant correlation between T2* values and histological degeneration in human menisci using the Williams grading system, which considers properties such as cellularity, matrix organisation and matrix staining intensity—a finding that aligns with our observations. A relatively mild increase in extracellular water, as opposed to the pronounced changes seen in acute injuries, combined with almost preserved fiber density and orientation, may render T2* less sensitive to detecting mild, age-related alterations. Furthermore, T2* relaxation is highly susceptible to magnetic field inhomogeneities. For example, differences in tissue fixation post mortem may overlay the effects of mild degeneration, contributing to increased standard deviation.

Interestingly, Pownder et al. (47) reported longer T2* values in the caudal horn of the medial, histologically normal menisci of healthy beagles. We did not observe any significant differences between lateral and medial menisci, although we did not analyse the horns separately. A possible reason for these differing observations could be the MR sequences used. The ultrashort echo time (UTE) imaging employed by Pownder et al. is more prone to the magic angle effect. This effect occurs when collagen fibres are orientated at approximately 55 degrees to the main magnetic field (B0), resulting in an artificially increased signal due to the decreased dipolar interaction of protons in collagen-rich tissues. The longer echo times used in our study may have minimised this effect.

Degeneration of the menisci is often accompanied by changes in collagen content and collagen organisation, making MT techniques a promising candidate for early detection. Zhang et al. reported significantly decreased MTR values in menisci from human patients with severe osteoarthritis. However, quantitative MT techniques appear to be more effective in detecting milder alterations (12). MTR can be affected by several confounding factors, including B1 inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation. It reflects both the exchange rate between free and bound protons and the recovery of longitudinal magnetisation of saturated spins. Consequently, when T1 relaxation times are shorter, the MT effect—and thus the apparent macromolecular content—may be underestimated, and vice versa (49).

The absence of significant changes in MTR in our study may be due to the relatively mild alterations in tissue properties. Additionally, the observed changes in T1 relaxation time could counterbalance the MT effect, potentially masking any detectable variations. Quantitative MT techniques aim to separate the effects of T1 relaxation from the MT effect, enabling parameters that more accurately reflect macromolecular content, such as the macromolecular fraction (MMF) or bound proton fraction (BPF).

Interestingly, Li et al. reported an increase in BPF associated with higher GAG levels in engineered cartilage (32), which aligns with our findings. The toluidine blue, which we used in this study to assess the amount of proteoglycans semi-quantitively, binds to the acidic GAGs within the proteoglycans. We found that menisci with increased proteoglycan staining showed higher MTsat values, a marker for magnetisation transfer that is corrected for T1 relaxation (37).

The role of GAGs in the pathobiology of meniscal tissue remains debated, especially in dogs, with limited data available. Inflammatory processes may increase enzymes like matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) and aggrecanase, leading to a reduction in proteoglycan content. Conversely, there may be an initial rise in proteoglycan synthesis as the tissue attempts to repair, accompanied by the inhibition of degrading enzymes to support recovery (50, 51).

Notably, T1 relaxation time decreased with more intense proteoglycan staining and increased with higher cellularity scores, suggesting its potential for distinguishing between degenerative (reduced proteoglycan content, fibroblast-like cells) and regenerative processes (increased cellular activity and proteoglycan production) in the meniscus. Another promising diagnostic parameter may be the collagen-to-proteoglycan ratio, as a decrease in this ratio was linked to lower MTsat values. However, further studies involving menisci with a broader range of pathological lesions are needed to validate these findings. Future research should also compare MTsat and T1app directly with T1ρ in relation to the collagen-to-proteoglycan ratio, given T1ρ’s sensitivity to proteoglycan loss.

Besides the limitation of including only menisci with relatively mild changes and not having either healthy or severely affected menisci involved, the applied histological scoring system may also limit the correlation between MRI and histological findings. More quantitative, continuous readouts would be preferable. Further studies aim to address these limitations by including a broader range of pathological changes, a larger sample size, additional histological methods and separate analyses of the meniscal body and horns.

Another limitation of this study is that all measurements were conducted post mortem on formalin-fixed tissue. Formalin affects the tissue’s hydration state and thereby influences relaxation times (26, 29, 52). Additionally, measurements were performed at room temperature, which is lower than body temperature and impacts several MRI-relevant properties, such as exchange rate, diffusivity, and T1 relaxation time (53). On the other hand, post mortem MRI studies offer the advantage of longer measurement times, allowing for higher spatial resolution and the simultaneous use of multiple contrast mechanisms. So, this approach can be used to test a wide range of MR contrasts, with the most promising ones then applied and validated in vivo.

Finally, it should be noted that MR parameters are influenced by various factors, leading to limited overall specificity when detecting subtle or complex tissue changes. To achieve a more comprehensive characterization of meniscal degeneration—an essential factor in guiding therapeutic decisions—future studies should not only assess multiple MR parameters but also investigate their combined use. This integration could significantly enhance diagnostic specificity and precision. Based on our results, MTsat and T1app emerge as particularly promising parameters for future in vivo studies, which should encompass a broad spectrum of meniscal alterations, extending beyond age-related changes in canine menisci.

5 Conclusion

In summary, none of the investigated contrast mechanisms showed high sensitivity or specificity for detecting mild changes in the tissue microstructure of canine menisci, as assessed by histological analyses using the modified scoring systems of Pauli (45) and Sun (44). However, the observed correlation between MTsat and proteoglycan content may be a promising candidate for characterising the extracellular matrix, though further studies are needed to validate this effect.

Data availability statement

The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.

Ethics statement

Ethical approval was not required for this study involving animals in accordance with local legislation and institutional requirements, as only cadaver dogs were used. These dogs were euthanised in our clinic due to incurable diseases to prevent further suffering, not for scientific purposes. Written informed consent was not obtained as the dogs were provided by their owners for disposal.

Author contributions

LB: Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Resources. AM: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Validation. MB: Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Project administration. SN: Writing – review & editing, Project administration, Resources. SB: Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Investigation, Software, Supervision, Writing – review & editing, Resources.

Funding

The author(s) declare that financial support was received for the research and/or publication of this article. We acknowledge support for publication by the Open Access Publication Funds of the Göttingen University.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Generative AI statement

The author(s) declare that no Generative AI was used in the creation of this manuscript.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Supplementary material

The Supplementary material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fvets.2025.1521684/full#supplementary-material

Footnotes

References

1. Pownder, SL, Hayashi, K, Caserto, BG, Breighner, RE, Norman, ML, Potter, HG, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and histological comparison of Normal canine menisci. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. (2018) 31:452–7. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1668115

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

2. McDermott, I. Meniscal tears, repairs and replacement: their relevance to osteoarthritis of the knee. Br J Sports Med. (2011) 45:292–7. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.081257

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Hu, J, Xin, H, Chen, Z, Zhang, Q, Peng, Y, and Jin, Z. The role of menisci in knee contact mechanics and secondary kinematics during human walking. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon). (2019) 61:58–63. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.11.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Fox, AJS, Wanivenhaus, F, Burge, AJ, Warren, RF, and Rodeo, SA. The human meniscus: a review of anatomy, function, injury, and advances in treatment. Clin Anat. (2015) 28:269–87. doi: 10.1002/ca.22456

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Zarins, ZA, Bolbos, RI, Pialat, JB, Link, TM, Li, X, Souza, RB, et al. Cartilage and meniscus assessment using T1rho and T2 measurements in healthy subjects and patients with osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2010) 18:1408–16. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2010.07.012

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Lee, W, Miller, EY, Zhu, H, Luetkemeyer, CM, Schneider, SE, and Neu, CP. High frame rate deformation analysis of knee cartilage by spiral dualMRI and relaxation mapping. Magn Reson Med. (2023) 89:694–709. doi: 10.1002/mrm.29487

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Welsch, GH, Apprich, S, Zbyn, S, Mamisch, TC, Mlynarik, V, Scheffler, K, et al. Biochemical (T2, T2* and magnetisation transfer ratio) MRI of knee cartilage: feasibility at ultra-high field (7T) compared with high field (3T) strength. Eur Radiol. (2011) 21:1136–43. doi: 10.1007/s00330-010-2029-7

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Mittal, S, Pradhan, G, Singh, S, and Batra, R. T1 and T2 mapping of articular cartilage and menisci in early osteoarthritis of the knee using 3-tesla magnetic resonance imaging. Pol J Radiol. (2019) 84:549–e564. doi: 10.5114/pjr.2019.91375

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Eijgenraam, SM, Bovendeert, FAT, Verschueren, J, van Tiel, J, Bastiaansen-Jenniskens, YM, Wesdorp, MA, et al. T2 mapping of the meniscus is a biomarker for early osteoarthritis. Eur Radiol. (2019) 29:5664–72. doi: 10.1007/s00330-019-06091-1

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hofmann, FC, Neumann, J, Heilmeier, U, Joseph, GB, Nevitt, MC, McCulloch, CE, et al. Conservatively treated knee injury is associated with knee cartilage matrix degeneration measured with MRI-based T2 relaxation times: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Skeletal Radiol. (2018) 47:93–106. doi: 10.1007/s00256-017-2759-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Banjar, M, Horiuchi, S, Gedeon, DN, and Yoshioka, H. Review of quantitative knee articular cartilage MR imaging. Magn Reson Med Sci. (2022) 21:29–40. doi: 10.2463/mrms.rev.2021-0052

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Zhang, X, Ma, Y-J, Wei, Z, Wu, M, Ashir, A, Jerban, S, et al. Macromolecular fraction (MMF) from 3D ultrashort echo time cones magnetization transfer (3D UTE-cones-MT) imaging predicts meniscal degeneration and knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2021) 29:1173–80. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2021.04.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Labruyère, J, and Schwarz, T. CT and MRI in veterinary patients: an update on recent advances. In Pract. (2013) 35:546–63. doi: 10.1136/inp.f6720

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Gavin, PR. Growth of clinical veterinary magnetic resonance imaging. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2011) 52:S2–4. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2010.01779.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Arno, S, Bell, CP, Xia, D, Regatte, RR, Krasnokutsky, S, Samuels, J, et al. Relationship between meniscal integrity and risk factors for cartilage degeneration. Knee. (2016) 23:686–91. doi: 10.1016/j.knee.2015.11.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Mosher, TJ, Liu, Y, and Torok, CM. Functional cartilage MRI T2 mapping: evaluating the effect of age and training on knee cartilage response to running. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2010) 18:358–64. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2009.11.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Mamisch, TC, Hughes, T, Mosher, TJ, Mueller, C, Trattnig, S, Boesch, C, et al. T2 star relaxation times for assessment of articular cartilage at 3 T: a feasibility study. Skeletal Radiol. (2012) 41:287–92. doi: 10.1007/s00256-011-1171-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Li, X, Han, ET, Ma, CB, Link, TM, Newitt, DC, and Majumdar, S. In vivo 3T spiral imaging based multi-slice T(1rho) mapping of knee cartilage in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med. (2005) 54:929–36. doi: 10.1002/mrm.20609

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Hontoir, F, Pirson, R, Simon, V, Clegg, P, Nisolle, J-F, Kirschvink, N, et al. Age-related morphometric changes of the tidemark in the ovine stifle. Anat Histol Embryol. (2019) 48:366–74. doi: 10.1111/ahe.12449

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Pownder, SL, Hayashi, K, Caserto, BG, Norman, ML, Potter, HG, and Koff, MF. Magnetic resonance imaging T2 values of stifle articular cartilage in Normal beagles. Vet Comp Orthop Traumatol. (2018) 31:108–13. doi: 10.3415/VCOT-17-03-0093

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Harper, TAM, Jones, JC, Saunders, GK, Daniel, GB, Leroith, T, and Rossmeissl, E. Sensitivity of low-field T2 images for detecting the presence and severity of histopathologic meniscal lesions in dogs. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. (2011) 52:428–35. doi: 10.1111/j.1740-8261.2011.01818.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

22. McDevitt, CA, and Webber, RJ. The ultrastructure and biochemistry of meniscal cartilage. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (1990) 252:8???18. doi: 10.1097/00003086-199003000-00003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

23. AufderHeide, AC, and Athanasiou, KA. Mechanical stimulation toward tissue engineering of the knee meniscus. Ann Biomed Eng. (2004) 32:1163–76. doi: 10.1114/b:abme.0000036652.31658.f3

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Aidos, L, Modina, SC, Millar, VRH, Peretti, GM, Mangiavini, L, Ferroni, M, et al. Meniscus matrix structural and biomechanical evaluation: age-dependent properties in a swine model. Bioengineering (Basel). (2022) 9:117. doi: 10.3390/bioengineering9030117

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Abraham, AC, Edwards, CR, Odegard, GM, and Donahue, TLH. Regional and fiber orientation dependent shear properties and anisotropy of bovine meniscus. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. (2011) 4:2024–30. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.06.022

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Bunzendahl, L, Moussavi, A, Bleyer, M, Dehnert, J, Boretius, S, and Neumann, S. Histological findings and T2 relaxation time in canine menisci of elderly dogs-an ex vivo study in stifle joints. Vet Sci. (2023) 10:182. doi: 10.3390/vetsci10030182

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Berg, RC, Leutritz, T, Weiskopf, N, and Preibisch, C. Multi-parameter quantitative mapping of R1, R2*, PD, and MTsat is reproducible when accelerated with compressed SENSE. NeuroImage. (2022) 253:119092. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2022.119092

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Tofts, P. Quantitative MRI of the brain: measuring changes caused by disease. John Wiley & Sons (2003) doi: 10.1002/0470869526

Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Nebelung, S, Tingart, M, Pufe, T, Kuhl, C, Jahr, H, and Truhn, D. Ex vivo quantitative multiparametric MRI mapping of human meniscus degeneration. Skeletal Radiol. (2016) 45:1649–60. doi: 10.1007/s00256-016-2480-x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Regatte, RR, Akella, SVS, Wheaton, AJ, Lech, G, Borthakur, A, Kneeland, JB, et al. 3D-T1rho-relaxation mapping of articular cartilage: in vivo assessment of early degenerative changes in symptomatic osteoarthritic subjects. Acad Radiol. (2004) 11:741–9. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2004.03.051

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Brandt, KD, Radin, EL, Dieppe, PA, and van de Putte, L. Yet more evidence that osteoarthritis is not a cartilage disease. Ann Rheum Dis. (2006) 65:1261–4. doi: 10.1136/ard.2006.058347

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Li, W, Hong, L, Hu, L, and Magin, RL. Magnetization transfer imaging provides a quantitative measure of chondrogenic differentiation and tissue development. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. (2010) 16:1407–15. doi: 10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0777

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Mehta, RC, Pike, GB, and Enzmann, DR. Improved detection of enhancing and nonenhancing lesions of multiple sclerosis with magnetization transfer. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. (1995) 16:1771–8.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

34. Ropele, S, and Fazekas, F. Magnetization transfer MR imaging in multiple sclerosis. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. (2009) 19:27–36. doi: 10.1016/j.nic.2008.09.004

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Gray, ML, Burstein, D, Lesperance, LM, and Gehrke, L. Magnetization transfer in cartilage and its constituent macromolecules. Magn Reson Med. (1995) 34:319–25. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910340307

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Olsson, H, Andersen, M, Wirestam, R, and Helms, G. Mapping magnetization transfer saturation (MTsat) in human brain at 7T: protocol optimization under specific absorption rate constraints. Magn Reson Med. (2021) 86:2562–76. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28899

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Helms, G, Dathe, H, Kallenberg, K, and Dechent, P. High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI. Magn Reson Med. (2008) 60:1396–407. doi: 10.1002/mrm.21732

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Grabher, P, Callaghan, MF, Ashburner, J, Weiskopf, N, Thompson, AJ, Curt, A, et al. Tracking sensory system atrophy and outcome prediction in spinal cord injury. Ann Neurol. (2015) 78:751–61. doi: 10.1002/ana.24508

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Lema, A, Bishop, C, Malik, O, Mattoscio, M, Ali, R, Nicholas, R, et al. A comparison of magnetization transfer methods to assess brain and cervical cord microstructure in multiple sclerosis. J Neuroimaging. (2017) 27:221–6. doi: 10.1111/jon.12377

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Leutritz, T, Seif, M, Helms, G, Samson, RS, Curt, A, Freund, P, et al. Multiparameter mapping of relaxation (R1, R2 *), proton density and magnetization transfer saturation at 3 T: a multicenter dual-vendor reproducibility and repeatability study. Hum Brain Mapp. (2020) 41:4232–47. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25122

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Weiskopf, N, Suckling, J, Williams, G, Correia, MM, Inkster, B, Tait, R, et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front Neurosci. (2013) 7:95. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2013.00095

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Diekmann, H.U. Analysis of the pathogenesis and progression of osteoarthritis in canine stifle joints considering three bone healing markers [Internet]. [Hannover]: Tierärztliche Hochschule Hannover. (2018) Available at: https://nbn-resolving.org/urn:nbn:de:gbv:95-111906.

Google Scholar

43. Kellgren, JH, and Lawrence, JS. Radiological assessment of osteo-arthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. (1957) 16:494–502. doi: 10.1136/ard.16.4.494

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Sun, Y, Mauerhan, DR, Kneisl, JS, James Norton, H, Zinchenko, N, Ingram, J, et al. Histological examination of collagen and proteoglycan changes in osteoarthritic menisci. Open Rheumatol J. (2012) 6:24–32. doi: 10.2174/1874312901206010024

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Pauli, C, Grogan, SP, Patil, S, Otsuki, S, Hasegawa, A, Koziol, J, et al. Macroscopic and histopathologic analysis of human knee menisci in aging and osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2011) 19:1132–41. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.05.008

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Flo, GL. Meniscal injuries. Vet Clin North Am Small Anim Pract. (1993) 23:831–43. doi: 10.1016/s0195-5616(93)50085-2

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Williams, A, Qian, Y, Golla, S, and Chu, CR. UTE-T2∗ mapping detects sub-clinical meniscus injury after anterior cruciate ligament tear. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2012) 20:486–94. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2012.01.009

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Koff, MF, Shah, P, Pownder, S, Romero, B, Williams, R, Gilbert, S, et al. Correlation of meniscal T2* with multiphoton microscopy, and change of articular cartilage T2 in an ovine model of meniscal repair. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2013) 21:1083–91. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.04.020

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Henkelman, RM, Stanisz, GJ, and Graham, SJ. Magnetization transfer in MRI: a review. NMR Biomed. (2001) 14:57–64. doi: 10.1002/nbm.683

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

50. López-Franco, M, and Gómez-Barrena, E. Cellular and molecular meniscal changes in the degenerative knee: a review. J Exp Orthop. (2018) 5:11. doi: 10.1186/s40634-018-0126-8

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Krupkova, O, Smolders, L, Wuertz-Kozak, K, Cook, J, and Pozzi, A. The pathobiology of the Meniscus: a comparison between the human and dog. Front Vet Sci. (2018) 5:73. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2018.00073

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

52. Son, M, Goodman, SB, Chen, W, Hargreaves, BA, Gold, GE, and Levenston, ME. Regional variation in T1ρ and T2 times in osteoarthritic human menisci: correlation with mechanical properties and matrix composition. Osteoarthr Cartil. (2013) 21:796–805. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.002

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

53. Noeske, R. Anwendung der Hochfeld-(3-Tesla)-NMR-Tomographie Freie Universität Berlin (2000). Available at: http://www.diss.fu-berlin.de/2000/126/index.html

Google Scholar

Keywords: multi-parameter MRI, T2* mapping, T1 mapping, magnetisation transfer, canine menisci, osteoarthritis, stifle joint, proteoglycans

Citation: Bunzendahl L, Moussavi A, Bleyer M, Neumann S and Boretius S (2025) Magnetisation transfer, T1 and T2* relaxation in canine menisci of elderly dogs—an ex vivo study in stifle joints. Front. Vet. Sci. 12:1521684. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1521684

Received: 02 November 2024; Accepted: 10 February 2025;
Published: 12 March 2025.

Edited by:

Sokol Duro, Agricultural University of Tirana, Albania

Reviewed by:

Howard Dobson, Invicro, United States
Germain Arribarat, INSERM U1214 Centre d’Imagerie Neuro Toulouse (ToNIC), France

Copyright © 2025 Bunzendahl, Moussavi, Bleyer, Neumann and Boretius. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Lena Bunzendahl, bGVuYS5idW56ZW5kYWhsQHVuaS1nb2V0dGluZ2VuLmRl; Susann Boretius, c2JvcmV0aXVzQGRwei5ldQ==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more