Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Astron. Space Sci., 24 October 2023
Sec. Space Physics

Corrigendum: Magnetic field reconstruction for a realistic multi-point, multi-scale spacecraft observatory

  • 1Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
  • 2Lunar and Planetary Laboratory, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States
  • 3Department of Astrophysical Sciences, Peyton Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States
  • 4Space Research Institute, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Graz, Austria
  • 5Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Surrey, United Kingdom
  • 6Space Science Center, University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH, United States

A Corrigendum on
Magnetic field reconstruction for a realistic multi-point, multi-scale spacecraft observatory

by Broeren T, Klein KG, TenBarge JM, Dors I, Roberts OW and Verscharen D (2021). Front. Astron. Space Sci. 8:727076. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2021.727076

In the published article, there was an error in Figures 810. The word “Turbulence” was misspelled in all these figures titles as “Trubulance”. Additionally in Figure 8, in this six-panel figure, the bottom-left panel was a duplicate of the top-right panel. The correct bottom-left panel has the title “M1.4 Reconstruction”.

FIGURE 8
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 8. Computation error (defined in Eq. 7) at all points on the z = 0 plane of the turbulent magnetic field (from the Gkeyll Simulation), using the swarm configuration at hour 94 of the HelioSwarm DRM. The layout is identical to Figure 4.

FIGURE 9
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 9. Computation error (defined in Eq. 7) at all points on the z = 0 plane of the turbulent magnetic field (from the Gkeyll Simulation), using the swarm configuration at hour 144 of the HelioSwarm DRM. The layout is identical to Figure 4.

FIGURE 10
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 10. Computation error (defined in Eq. 7) at all points on the z = 0 plane of the turbulent magnetic field (from the Gkeyll Simulation), using the swarm configuration at hour 205 of the HelioSwarm DRM. The layout is identical to Figure 4.

In the published article, there was an error in Figure 2 as published. The data that was used to generate this figure was slightly mismatched with the data that was used throughout the rest of the paper to carry out the calculations.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

FIGURE 2. Elongation and planarity of the 126 tetrahedron associated with the three nine-spacecraft configurations under consideration, with characteristic lengths shown in color.

The corrected figures appear below.

In the published article, there was a typo in the second paragraph of Section 2.3.2 there is a typo in one of the inline equations (the definition of proton thermal velocity). The correct equation is below:

vtp=2Tp/mp.

Subsequently, a correction has been made to Section 2.3.2, paragraph 2.

The corrected sentence appears below:

“Lengths are normalized to the proton gyroradius ρp=vtp/Ωp, the ratio of the proton thermal speed vtp=2Tp/mp and the proton cyclotron frequency Ωp=qpB/mp.”

The authors apologize for these errors and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: plasma physics, magnetic fields, spacecraft, vector field reconstruction, space physics, curlometer, space mission analysis, multi-spacecraft analysis

Citation: Broeren T, Klein KG, TenBarge JM, Dors I, Roberts OW and Verscharen D (2023) Corrigendum: Magnetic field reconstruction for a realistic multi-point, multi-scale spacecraft observatory. Front. Astron. Space Sci. 10:1197352. doi: 10.3389/fspas.2023.1197352

Received: 30 March 2023; Accepted: 02 August 2023;
Published: 24 October 2023.

Edited and reviewed by:

Georgios Balasis, National Observatory of Athens, Greece

Copyright © 2023 Broeren, Klein, TenBarge, Dors, Roberts and Verscharen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: T. Broeren, broeren@email.arizona.edu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.