![Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset](https://d2csxpduxe849s.cloudfront.net/media/E32629C6-9347-4F84-81FEAEF7BFA342B3/0B4B1380-42EB-4FD5-9D7E2DBC603E79F8/webimage-C4875379-1478-416F-B03DF68FE3D8DBB5.png)
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
ERRATUM article
Front. Sustain. , 22 November 2023
Sec. Sustainable Consumption
Volume 4 - 2023 | https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2023.1335077
This article is an erratum on:
Political economy of protein transition: Battles of power, framings and narratives around a false wicked problem
An Erratum on
Political economy of protein transition: battles of power, framings and narratives around a false wicked problem
by Béné, C., and Lundy, M. (2023). Front. Sustain. 4:1098011. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1098011
Due to a production error, the reference for Adesogan et al., 2020 was incorrectly cited as Afshin et al., 2019 in two places.
A correction has been made to the section “Protein transition: wicked problem or strawman argument?”, subsection “Discursive practices around protein transition,” paragraph 8:
“Animal source food production contributes meaningfully to goals for a sustainable food system by converting millions of tons of agro-industrial by-products that cannot be consumed by humans into livestock feeds, concomitantly reducing waste and environmental pollution and increasing human-consumable food” (Adesogan et al., 2020, p. 4–our emphasis).
A correction has been made to the section “Protein transition: wicked problem or strawman argument?” subsection “Discursive practices around protein transition,” paragraph 9:
“Sustainable intensification of livestock production, which involves improved resource use efficiency with environmental stewardship can foster a reduction of greenhouse gas emissions” (Adesogan et al., 2020, p. 4–our emphasis).
The publisher apologizes for this mistake. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: food system transformation, political economy, protein transition, narrative analysis, discursive practices
Citation: Frontiers Production Office (2023) Erratum: Political economy of protein transition: battles of power, framings, and narratives around a false wicked problem. Front. Sustain. 4:1335077. doi: 10.3389/frsus.2023.1335077
Received: 08 November 2023; Accepted: 08 November 2023;
Published: 22 November 2023.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2023 Frontiers Production Office. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Frontiers Production Office, cHJvZHVjdGlvbi5vZmZpY2VAZnJvbnRpZXJzaW4ub3Jn
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.