
95% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 16 - 2025 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1581706
This article is a correction to:
Psychological needs, self-efficacy, motivation, and resistance training outcomes in a 16-week barbell training program for adults
The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
You have multiple emails registered with Frontiers:
Please enter your email address:
If you already have an account, please login
You don't have a Frontiers account ? You can register here
In the published article "McAuley E, Mihalko SL. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement: measuring exercise-related self-efficacy. Fitness Information Technology: Morgantown, WV, 1998" was not listed as a citation in the article.Additionally, the citation "Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Times Books, 1997" was not cited in the correct section of the article. Both citations have now been inserted within Methods under the heading Measures, specifically under sub-heading Self-efficacy, Paragraph # 7 within the Methods section and should read as citation #11 and #19 within the reference section of the corrected article: "Self-efficacy was assessed using the Resistance Training Self-Efficacy scale (RT-SE) (Bandura, 1997;McAuley & Mihalko, 1998) to assess participants' beliefs related to mastery experiences, physical capability, and resilience. The RT-SE scale considers a wider range of factors related to overall self-efficacy in resistance training, including exercise-specific confidence, belief in program adherence, managing fatigue, progressing in exercises, and overcoming barriers."The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.In the published article, the reference for " Jones et al. (2016). The development and preliminary validation of a resistance training self-efficacy scale. J. Strength Cond. Res. 30, 779-788." was incorrectly included in the published article. This incorrect reference can be found within the currently published article in the Methods section under the heading Measures, specifically under sub-heading Self-efficacy, also identified as paragraph # 7 within the Methods section. The correct reference should be "McAuley E, Mihalko SL. Advances in sport and exercise psychology measurement: measuring exercise-related self-efficacy. Fitness Information Technology: Morgantown, WV, 1998" and "Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Times Books, 1997".The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Keywords: affective responses, Barbell training, inclusion, strength training, Women's Health
Received: 22 Feb 2025; Accepted: 17 Mar 2025.
Copyright: © 2025 Martinez Kercher, Hynes, Goss, Phillips, Roy, Blades, Dobson and Kercher. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Vanessa M. Martinez Kercher, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, United States
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.