Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol. , 28 February 2025

Sec. Pediatric Psychology

Volume 16 - 2025 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572801

This article is part of the Research Topic Psychological Implications of Preterm Birth View all 12 articles

Editorial: Psychological implications of preterm birth

  • 1Department of Brain and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
  • 2Developmental Psychobiology Lab, IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
  • 3Neonatal Service, University Hospitals Dorset, Poole, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand
  • 5Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
  • 6School of Nursing and Midwifery, Edith Cowan University, Joondalup, WA, Australia
  • 7School of Nursing, University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan

Editorial on the Research Topic
Psychological implications of preterm birth

Too early. And then?

Preterm birth, which occurs in approximately 10% of births worldwide (Ohuma et al., 2023), has far-reaching implications for the child, parents, and extended family members. While the physical health challenges associated with preterm birth are extensively documented (Camerota et al., 2023; Crump, 2020), the psychological repercussions—both short- and long-term—remain partially underexplored. This gap in knowledge is concerning, as preterm birth not only presents significant physical and mental health burdens but also imposes substantial economic costs on society (Frey and Klebanoff, 2016). Understanding the psychological implications of preterm birth is essential for developing effective interventions and support systems for affected individuals and families.

The experience of preterm birth and the subsequent hospitalization in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) can be extraordinarily distressing for both infants (Cong et al., 2017) and parents (Caporali et al., 2020). In the NICU, the infant is often exposed to an environment filled with overwhelming sensory stimuli, such as bright lights (Aita et al., 2013), loud noises (Casavant et al., 2017), and frequent medical procedures (Carbajal et al., 2008). These stressors, compounded by the painful separation from their parents, may have a profound impact on the infant's socio-emotional and cognitive development (McLean et al., 2022a), partly through epigenetic modifications of genes critical for stress regulation (Provenzi et al., 2015, 2020). Additionally, the psychological strain on parents during this critical period cannot be understated. The uncertainty surrounding their infant's health, coupled with the stress of navigating the NICU environment, can lead to significant mental health challenges for parents, including anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) (Axelin et al., 2022; McLean et al., 2022b; Persson et al., 2023).

Moreover, the psychological effects of early interventions, both during and after the NICU stay, are a critical area of concern. Since medical advancements have improved the survival rates of preterm infants, the focus of NICU professionals needs to shift beyond survival, to quality of life and optimizing long term health outcomes through family-centered care programs (Aita and Snider, 2003; Alberts et al., 2024). Yet, the potential long-term psychological consequences of early medical care and hospitalizations are not fully understood. As infants transition from the NICU to home and beyond, the quality of the parent-child relationship emerges as one of the most important protective factors in supporting healthy developmental trajectories (Provenzi et al., 2015; Toole et al., 2024). Research suggests that early parent-infant interactions, from the NICU to the early years of life, play a crucial role in promoting emotional and cognitive resilience in preterm infants (Arwehed et al., 2024; Spence et al., 2023). However, the influence of these interactions on long-term psychological outcomes warrants further investigation.

This Research Topic seeks to address these important gaps in knowledge, bringing together interdisciplinary perspectives on the psychological implications of preterm birth for both infants and parents. We aim to explore the complex interplay between early medical experiences, parental wellbeing, and child development, with a focus on the psychological mechanisms at play. By advancing our understanding in this area, we hope to contribute to the development of targeted interventions that can mitigate the psychological challenges faced by preterm infants and their families, ultimately improving their quality of life and long-term outcomes.

What can you find in this article collection?

The present Research Topic features contribution from interdisciplinary groups coming from many different countries: from New Zealand to Ukraine, from Spain to China, from France to US, from Italy to Germany, from Switzerland to Finland. The contributions can be clustered into three main areas: psychological outcomes of preterm birth and NICU stay in preterm-born individuals and their parents; promoting early interventions for preterm infants and their parents matters; innovative approaches to study the psychological implications of preterm birth.

Psychological outcomes of preterm birth and NICU stay in preterm-born individuals and their parents

Lee et al. assessed executive functioning (EF) in adolescents born very preterm (VPT, < 32 weeks) at age 17. The results showed that VPT adolescents performed worse than full-term (FT) peers in areas such as working memory, planning, and cognitive flexibility, with the most significant deficits seen in those born before 28 weeks. The relationship between gestational age and EF was mediated by neonatal medical complexity and white matter abnormalities. These findings emphasize the need for continued cognitive support, especially for those with higher medical and neurological risks.

Another contribution (Pavlyshyn et al.) explored the connection between stress markers in preterm infants during their NICU stay and developmental outcomes at 24–30 months. The study found positive correlations between melatonin levels and communication and problem-solving skills, while cortisol levels were negatively correlated with these abilities. Longer NICU stays and mechanical ventilation were also predictive of developmental delays. This highlights the critical impact of neonatal stress on later development and the importance of addressing medical factors during early life.

In the study by Martinez-Shaw et al., the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of 8-year-old children born preterm with very low birth weight (VLBW) was examined. The study revealed that VLBW children reported better HRQoL than the general population, with maternal stress and social support acting as key mediators between perinatal factors and child HRQoL. This underscores the importance of considering maternal wellbeing in interventions aimed at improving the quality of life for families with VLBW children.

Jean-Dit-Pannel et al. focused on the emotional and psychological challenges fathers face when navigating the complexities of having a preterm infant in the NICU during the COVID-19 pandemic. COVID-19 restrictions led to separations, affecting fathers' perceived paternal identity. Additionally, concerns about the infant's development and COVID-19 health risks heightened fathers' vulnerability to postpartum depression. This highlights the compounded psychological stress fathers experience during this period, underlining the need for targeted mental health support.

Huang et al. conducted a study on the needs of grandparents of preterm infants in the NICU and how demographic factors influence these needs. The study identified that grandparents primarily sought reassurance regarding the quality of care, followed by information and proximity to the infant. Addressing these needs is crucial for alleviating the emotional burden on families, particularly grandparents, of preterm infants.

Promoting early interventions for preterm infants and their parents matters

Filippa et al. studied the effects of maternal singing and speaking on the general movements (GMs) of preterm infants in the NICU. The intervention group engaged in maternal vocalizations three times per week for 2 weeks, and GMs were assessed at term-equivalent and 3 months corrected age. Results showed significant improvements in GMs for the intervention group. Maternal vocal interaction could enhance neurobehavioral development in preterm infants and should be integrated into NICU care routines.

Ludwig et al. present the results from two randomized controlled trials compared standard care (SC) with SC plus Family Nurture Intervention (FNI) in level-4 NICUs. The FNI program focused on mother-infant interactions to foster autonomic emotional connection. The trials demonstrated significant long-term benefits for infant neurobehavior, development, and the autonomic health of both mother and child. These findings support the integration of FNI into preterm care and provide a new perspective on emotional co-regulation between mother and infant.

Trautmann-Villalba et al. explored the impact of skin-to-skin contact (SSC) on emotional and behavioral outcomes in children born preterm. The study, part of the Deisy Study, assessed 33 children aged 6–8 years and found that parental stress 6 months post-discharge was the main predictor of emotional and behavioral issues. However, SSC immediately after birth did not significantly influence these outcomes. This highlights the importance of addressing parental stress in the care of preterm infants.

In another review of the literature, Leppänen et al. revised psychosocial parent-infant interventions for preterm infants, analyzing 22 studies published from 2000 to 2024. Most interventions focused on counseling and emotional support, and the majority showed positive effects on the parent-child relationship. The findings emphasize the need for more standardized, long-term research to better support families with preterm infants, particularly those at higher risk.

Innovative approaches to study the psychological implications of preterm birth

In the paper by Billeci et al. a study protocol investigating the impact of early video-feedback (VF) intervention on brain-to-brain co-regulation between very preterm (VPT) infants and their mothers is anticipated. The study uses EEG hyperscanning to assess brain synchronization during mother-infant interactions, comparing VPT and full-term (FT) dyads. VPT dyads will receive the VF intervention post-discharge, and outcomes such as mother-infant interaction and maternal mental state will be measured at 3, 6, and 9 months. The study aims to enhance understanding of VF interventions and their impact on infant development and maternal wellbeing.

Sadjadpour et al. compared the performance of logistic regression with machine learning (ML) models in identifying parents at risk for depression after their infant's NICU admission. Data from 300 parents of NICU infants was analyzed using eight ML algorithms to predict depression risk. Results showed that all models, including logistic regression, had high performance in identifying at-risk parents. Logistic regression provided a reliable tool for targeted depression screening in NICU parents.

Conclusion

In summary, this Research Topic highlights the importance of considering both the medical and psychological aspects of preterm birth and not just for the infant but for the whole family and larger society and healthcare policy makers and providers. To improve the quality of life and long-term outcomes for preterm-born children and their families, it is crucial to integrate emotional support with medical care. By advancing our understanding of these complex dynamics, we can develop more effective and comprehensive care strategies for this vulnerable population.

Author contributions

LP: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MK: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. MM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing. EM: Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Aita, M., Johnston, C., Goulet, C., Oberlander, T. F., and Snider, L. (2013). Intervention minimizing preterm infants' exposure to NICU light and noise. Clin. Nurs. Res. 22, 337–358. doi: 10.1177/1054773812469223

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Aita, M., and Snider, L. (2003). The art of developmental care in the NICU: a concept analysis. J. Adv. Nurs. 41, 223–232. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2003.02526.x

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Alberts, J., Ahlqvist-Björkroth, S., Lehtonen, L., and Montirosso, R. (2024). Interventions to foster connections and interactions. Acta Paediatr. 23:17333. doi: 10.1111/apa.17553

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Arwehed, S., Axelin, A., Ågren, J., and Blomqvist, Y. T. (2024). Discharge criteria, practices, and decision-making in the transition of preterm infants to home. Pediatr. Res. 2024, 1–8. doi: 10.1038/s41390-024-03752-w

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Axelin, A., Feeley, N., Campbell-Yeo, M., Silnes Tandberg, B., Szczapa, T., Wielenga, J., et al. (2022). Symptoms of depression in parents after discharge from NICU associated with family-centred care. J. Adv. Nurs. 78, 1676–1687. doi: 10.1111/jan.15128

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Camerota, M., McGowan, E. C., Carter, B. S., Check, J., Dansereau, L. M., DellaGrotta, S. A., et al. (2023). Maternal prenatal risk phenotypes and neurobehavioral outcomes among infants born very preterm. J. Pediatr. 260:113521. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2023.113521

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Caporali, C., Pisoni, C., Gasparini, L., Ballante, E., Zecca, M., Orcesi, S., et al. (2020). A global perspective on parental stress in the neonatal intensive care unit: a meta-analytic study. J. Perinatol, 40, 1739–1752. doi: 10.1038/s41372-020-00798-6

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Carbajal, R., Rousset, A., Danan, C., Coquery, S., Nolent, P., Ducrocq, S., et al. (2008). Epidemiology and treatment of painful procedures in neonates in intensive care units. JAMA 300, 60–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.300.1.60

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Casavant, S. G., Bernier, K., Andrews, S., and Bourgoin, A. (2017). Noise in the neonatal intensive care unit: what does the evidence tell us? Adv. Neonatal Care 17, 265–273. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000000402

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Cong, X., Wu, J., Vittner, D., Xu, W., Hussain, N., Galvin, S., et al. (2017). The impact of cumulative pain/stress on neurobehavioral development of preterm infants in the NICU. Early Hum. Dev. 108, 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2017.03.003

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Crump, C. (2020). An overview of adult health outcomes after preterm birth. Early Hum. Dev. 150:105187. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105187

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Frey, H. A., and Klebanoff, M. A. (2016). “The epidemiology, etiology, and costs of preterm birth,” in Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine (WB Saunders), 68–73. doi: 10.1016/j.siny.2015.12.011

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McLean, M. A., Scoten, O. C., Chau, C. M. Y., Synnes, A., Miller, S. P., and Grunau, R. E. (2022a). Association of neonatal pain-related stress and parent interaction with internalizing behaviors across 1.5, 3.0, 4.5, and 8.0 years in children born very preterm. JAMA Netw. Open 5:e2238088. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38088

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

McLean, M. A., Scoten, O. C., Yu, W., Ye, X. Y., Petrie, J., Church, P. T., et al. (2022b). Lower maternal chronic physiological stress and better child behavior at 18 months: follow-up of a cluster randomized trial of neonatal intensive care unit family integrated care. J. Pediatr. 243, 107–115.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2021.12.055

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Ohuma, E. O., Moller, A. B., Bradley, E., Chakwera, S., Hussain-Alkhateeb, L., Lewin, A., et al. (2023). National, regional, and global estimates of preterm birth in 2020, with trends from 2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet 402, 1261–1271. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00878-4

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Persson, C., Ericson, J., Salari, R., Eriksson, M. H., and Flacking, R. (2023). NICU parents' mental health: a comparative study with parents of term and healthy infants. Acta Paediatr. 112, 954–966. doi: 10.1111/apa.16735

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Provenzi, L., Fumagalli, M., Scotto di Minico, G., Giorda, R., Morandi, F., Sirgiovanni, I., et al. (2020). Pain-related increase in serotonin transporter gene methylation associates with emotional regulation in 4.5-year-old preterm-born children. Acta Paediatr. 109, 1166–1174. doi: 10.1111/apa.15077

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Provenzi, L., Fumagalli, M., Sirgiovanni, I., Giorda, R., Pozzoli, U., Morandi, F., et al. (2015). Pain-related stress during the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit stay and SLC6A4 methylation in very preterm infants. Front. Behav. Neurosci. 9:99. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2015.00099

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Spence, C. M., Stuyvenberg, C. L., Kane, A. E., Burnsed, J., and Dusing, S. C. (2023). Parent experiences in the NICU and transition to home. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 20:6050. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20116050

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Toole, C., DeGrazia, M., Andrews, T. M., Bouve, M. E., Pezanowski, R., Cole, A., et al. (2024). No Place Like home: improving the transition from NICU to home through the NICU to nursery program. Adv. Neonatal Care 24, 46–57. doi: 10.1097/ANC.0000000000001134

PubMed Abstract | Crossref Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: preterm birth, stress, parenting, Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), developmental care, nurturing care

Citation: Provenzi L, Khashu M, McLean M and Morelius E (2025) Editorial: Psychological implications of preterm birth. Front. Psychol. 16:1572801. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1572801

Received: 07 February 2025; Accepted: 18 February 2025;
Published: 28 February 2025.

Edited and reviewed by: Leonardo De Pascalis, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom

Copyright © 2025 Provenzi, Khashu, McLean and Morelius. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Livio Provenzi, bGl2aW8ucHJvdmVuemlAdW5pcHYuaXQ=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Research integrity at Frontiers

Man ultramarathon runner in the mountains he trains at sunset

94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good

Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.


Find out more