Skip to main content

HYPOTHESIS AND THEORY article

Front. Psychol.
Sec. Sport Psychology
Volume 15 - 2024 | doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1498186
This article is part of the Research Topic Determinants of Achievement in Top Sport View all 6 articles

Conceptual framework of coaches' decision-making in conventional sports

Provisionally accepted
Edvard Kolar Edvard Kolar 1*Roberto Biloslavo Roberto Biloslavo 1Rado Pišot Rado Pišot 2Saša Veličković Saša Veličković 3Matej Maksimiljan Tusak Matej Maksimiljan Tusak 4
  • 1 Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Behaviour Economic, Koper, Slovenia
  • 2 Institute for Kinesiology Research, Scientific Research Center Koper, Koper, Slovenia
  • 3 Faculty of Sport and Physical Education, University of Nis, Nis, Serbia
  • 4 Faculty of Sports, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia

The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.

    Introduction: Coach's managerial and pedagogical tasks in a sports training process represent the content or substantive part of his work, while the basic method of his work is decisionmaking. Some coaches' decisions are result of deep thinking based on the effort invested in finding information, analysis and long discussions and others are again quick and sudden and prompted by various situations that occur in training and competition settings and require quick reactions. Therefore, is the purpose of this study to develop a conceptual framework of coaches decision-making behaviour in conventional sports, which will establish appropriate relationships between various decisions that coaches make in a training process and different theoretical concepts related to decision-making in general and coaches' decision-making in particular.To design the research, we used the methodology of a conceptual paper and a "model paper" approach which seeks to build a theoretical framework that predicts relationships between different research concepts and scientific disciplines.Results: Conceptual framework cover the most comprehensive range of situations that can arise in the training process and possible ways of dealing with them, which should result in different types of decisions and characteristic of coaches decision-making behaviour. For a better understanding of these decision-making processes of coaches, the conceptual framework uses various sport-specific and general theories related to decision-making theories and cognitive functioning in these processes.The developed conceptual framework foresees three types of decisions (strategic, tactical and operational), which should have a different role in the comprehensive process of sports training, should be carried out on the basis of different cognitive processes, manifested in the forms of different decision-making behaviour and should be enforced by using different leadership styles. The practical value of the presented framework lies primarily in the possibility of using it in the procedures of selecting relevant experts for various decision-making situations that arise in sport training process.

    Keywords: Sport training, Coaches, Decision-making behaviour, Types of decisions, Conceptual framework

    Received: 18 Sep 2024; Accepted: 23 Dec 2024.

    Copyright: © 2024 Kolar, Biloslavo, Pišot, Veličković and Tusak. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

    * Correspondence: Edvard Kolar, Science and Research Centre Koper, Institute for Behaviour Economic, Koper, Slovenia

    Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.