Wen Jun Fu
Fei Gao1†
Bo Dong
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
- 1School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
- 2School of Education, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu, China
- 3Suqian High Speed Railway Construction and Development Co., Ltd., Suqian, Jiangsu, China
A corrigendum on
Tree–shrub–grass composite woodland better facilitates emotional recovery in college students emotion better than other plant communities
by Fu, W. J., Gao, F., Zhang, X., Dong, B., Chen, X. L., Xu, X., Yang, Z. Y., and Liu, Y. (2024). Front. Psychol. 15:1285792. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1285792
In the published article, there was an error. One of the plant names in the paper was misspelled. A correction has been made to 2. Materials and methods, 2.1. Stimulus materials, Paragraph 1.
This sentence previously stated:
Consequently, the plant communities studied in this experiment included single-layer grassland (Festuca elata Keng ex E. B. Alexeev), single-layer woodland [Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.], tree–grass composite woodland [Osmanthus fragrans (Thunb.) Lour. and Festuca elata Keng ex E. B. Alexeev], and tree–shrub–grass composite woodland [Cinnamomum camphora (L.) J. Presl, Rhododendron × pulchrum Sweet and Festuca elata Keng ex E. B. Alexeev].
The corrected sentence appears below:
Consequently, the plant communities studied in this experiment included single-layer grassland (Festuca elata Keng ex E. B. Alexeev), single-layer woodland [Taxodium distichum (L.) Rich.], tree–grass composite woodland [Osmanthus fragrans (Thunb.) Lour. and Festuca elata Keng ex E. B. Alexeev], and tree–shrub–grass composite woodland [Celtis sinensis Pers., Rhododendron × pulchrum Sweet and Festuca elata Keng ex E. B. Alexeev].
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: plant community, restorative landscape, positive emotions, negative emotions, EEG
Citation: Fu WJ, Gao F, Zhang X, Dong B, Chen XL, Xu X, Yang ZY and Liu Y (2024) Corrigendum: Tree–shrub–grass composite woodland better facilitates emotional recovery in college students emotion better than other plant communities. Front. Psychol. 15:1386406. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1386406
Received: 15 February 2024; Accepted: 25 March 2024;
Published: 09 April 2024.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2024 Fu, Gao, Zhang, Dong, Chen, Xu, Yang and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Xing Zhang, MjYwNUB1c3RzLmVkdS5jbg==; Bo Dong, ZG9uZ2IyODNAMTI2LmNvbQ==
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship