Manuela M. Marin
Bruno Gingras- 1Department of Cognition, Emotion and Methods in Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- 2Austrian Research Institute of Empirical Aesthetics, Innsbruck, Austria
- 3Department of Cognitive Biology, Faculty of Life Sciences, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
More than a century ago, Darwin proposed a putative role for music in sexual attraction (i.e., sex appeal), a hypothesis that has recently gained traction in the field of music psychology. In his writings, Darwin particularly emphasized the charming aspects of music. Across a broad range of cultures, music has a profound impact on humans’ feelings, thoughts and behavior. Human mate choice is determined by the interplay of several factors. A number of studies have shown that music and musicality (i.e., the ability to produce and enjoy music) exert a positive influence on the evaluation of potential sexual partners. Here, we critically review the latest empirical literature on how and why music and musicality affect sexual attraction by considering the role of music-induced emotion and arousal in listeners as well as other socio-biological mechanisms. Following a short overview of current theories about the origins of musicality, we present studies that examine the impact of music and musicality on sexual attraction in different social settings. We differentiate between emotion-based influences related to the subjective experience of music as sound and effects associated with perceived musical ability or creativity in a potential partner. By integrating studies using various behavioral methods, we link current research strands that investigate how music influences sexual attraction and suggest promising avenues for future research.
1 Introduction
Music, besides language, is one of the main distinctive characteristics of the human species (Benítez-Burraco and Nikolsky, 2023). Whereas language is primarily a means to communicate semantic meaning, music is a powerful elicitor of emotions (e.g., Juslin and Sloboda, 2011; Marin and Bhattacharya, 2011). Music fulfills a myriad of functions in our daily lives (Clayton, 2016) that go beyond pure entertainment and music-induced pleasure (Pinker, 1997). Abundant empirical evidence for a socio-biological basis of music has accumulated over the recent years, which suggests that music may have evolved through sexual and/or natural selection (Huron, 2001; Wallin et al., 2001; Honing and Ploeger, 2012), though the exact selection mechanism has been a longstanding topic of debate (Kleinman, 2015). In this review, we present evidence suggesting that music may have evolved through sexual selection as proposed by Darwin (1871). In our discussion on the putative role of music in mate choice, particular emphasis will be placed on underlying psychological mechanisms based on music-induced emotions in listeners.
2 Origins of musicality
One difficulty encountered when studying the origins of music is that, although music is a phenomenon observable in most, if not all, cultures (Blacking, 1973), it turns out to be difficult to define according to universally observable characteristics such as rhythm or pitch (Savage et al., 2015). Some musical genres have no underlying isochronous pulse (e.g., Tibetan monotone chanting, Bispham, 2009), whereas others do not make use of discrete pitches (e.g., some compositions by Xenakis). Thus, from an evolutionary perspective, it may prove more useful to study the origins of musicality, defined as the set of traits associated with the capacity to produce and enjoy music, defined as the cultural end-product of musicality (Honing et al., 2015).
Another difficulty is that musical practice leaves only few artifacts such as recordings or fossilized vocal organs (Killin, 2018). Consequently, accounts of the origins of music remain in large part interpretative: scientists attempt to reconstitute the past based on scant pre-historical evidence, such as bone flutes that are at least 35,000 years old in Homo Sapiens (Conard et al., 2009) and Neanderthals (Turk et al., 2020), but musical behavior such as singing, drumming and dancing cannot be traced back to fossils. One could tentatively speculate, based on the existence of these bone flutes, that the common ancestor of both species was to some extent already musical 631-789 k years ago (Beerli and Edwards, 2002). However, both species were interbreeding for a while in Europe (Nigst et al., 2014; Vidal-Cordasco et al., 2023), which weakens such speculations. The current archeological evidence is augmented by complementary comparative evidence such as cross-cultural studies, which look for common features or universals (Brown and Jordania, 2013), or cross-species comparisons, which are used to draw inferences about ancestral forms and putative adaptive functions associated with musicality.
Among the current accounts of the origins of music, a broad dichotomy can first be observed between adaptationist and non-adaptationist theories. Whereas the former propose that musicality, as a trait, plays a role in the survival of the human species, the latter consider music to be either a “technology” or a byproduct of other adaptations which plays no evolutionary role (Pinker, 1997). Adaptationist accounts can be further subdivided according to the principal function they ascribe to musicality, or to the mode of selection (natural versus sexual). Sexual selection itself comprises two pathways, namely intrasexual competition, involving dominance and prestige (Fisher and Candea, 2012; Varella et al., 2017), and intersexual selection, associated with fitness indicators as well as aesthetic aspects (see Prum, 2012; Davis and Arnocky, 2022). Modern sexual selection theory discusses several intersexual processes, such as good taste (Davis and Arnocky, 2022), good genes, good partners, and good providers (Buss and Shackelford, 2008), good parents (Kreutz and Feldhaus, 2023) and good relationship maintenance (Evans et al., 2022). Crucially, adaptationist accounts are not necessarily mutually exclusive: although various theories emphasize distinct, and possibly complementary, functions for musicality, they broadly agree that evolutionary pressures played a defining role in the origins of musicality.
In aesthetics, one frequently discussed account is Darwin’s sexual selection hypothesis (Darwin, 1871; Prum, 2012; Renoult, 2016; Kalinowski et al., 2021), according to which music acts as a courtship display in reproductive mate choice. Darwin’s hypothesis, which states that trait-preference covariation may occur without necessarily having a biological function, was revived by Miller (1999, 2000, 2001), who emphasizes the fitness indicator role of the sexually selected trait (see also Sluming and Manning, 2000) and regards music as an honest signal. Supporting this hypothesis, Miller noticed that interest for music peaks in adolescence and that young male musicians produce more music than female musicians (see also Savage et al., 2015). Musicality was also reported to be a preferred trait in romantic partners (Kaufman et al., 2016).
Another longstanding theory is based on the idea that music and language have a common origin (Darwin, 1871), with language subsequently specializing in the communication of semantic meaning, and music primarily conveying emotions (Ma et al., 2019). This account, recently revisited by researchers such as Brown (2000a) and Mithen (1998), has been strengthened by neuroimaging evidence showing that music and language processing share neural resources (Koelsch et al., 2004; Patel, 2008). Language itself may be a product of sexual selection (Worden, 2022), and since both communication systems may have co-evolved (Benítez-Burraco and Nikolsky, 2023), positive effects of music on sexual attraction are probably not a recent phenomenon. Other theories suggest a role for music in promoting group cohesion (Dunbar, 2004; Savage et al., 2021), mood-regulation (Sloboda and O'Neill, 2001), mother-infant bonding (Trehub, 2003; Dissanayake, 2008; Mehr et al., 2021), territorial defense (Hagen and Hammerstein, 2009), or cognitive and social development (Cross, 2001). Future studies should aim to show which aspects of musicality can solidly be ascribed to either natural or sexual selection and which ones cannot. In this process, as long as they are all grounded in natural selection, distinct theories may be easier to subsume under an overarching theory (Savage et al., 2021), but as soon as sexual and natural selection mechanisms both play a role, theory building becomes more challenging (Keller et al., 2023). Another related challenge will be to develop explanatory theories that describe the specific evolutionary mechanisms involved in the emergence of musicality, along with their respective time-scales (see also Novaes and Natividade, 2023).
To be logically consistent with evolutionary theory, adaptive accounts require evidence of the heritability of at least some components of musicality, as well as evidence of the presence of a selectively acquired function (Justus and Hutsler, 2005; McDermott and Hauser, 2005; Croston et al., 2015). While it is difficult to assess the selective pressures faced by our ancestors with respect to musicality (Honing et al., 2015), studies have shown a large phenotypic variability in musicality among humans (Müllensiefen et al., 2014), which is at least partly heritable (Gingras et al., 2015a; Mosing et al., 2015; Wesseldijk et al., 2023). Thus, currently available evidence suggests that adaptationist accounts of the origins of musicality have cleared this initial hurdle, although much work remains to be done.
With respect to Darwin’s sexual selection hypothesis, Mosing et al. (2015) reported that, although some components of musicality, such as pitch, melody, and rhythm perception (as measured by test batteries, see Ullén et al., 2014), were moderately heritable in a sample of over 10,000 Swedish twins, musical ability and mating success were negatively associated. Moreover, Harrison and Hughes (2017) reported similar sexual activity for musicians and non-musicians (but see Lange and Euler, 2014). However, recent experimental studies have provided support for Darwin’s hypothesis (see Section 4).
3 Music-induced emotions
The study of emotions expressed or induced by music has a long history (e.g., Juslin and Sloboda, 2011). Music has repeatedly been shown to induce the expressive, psychophysiological and subjective feeling components of an emotion episode (Krumhansl, 1997; Ogg et al., 2017; Fuentes-Sanchez et al., 2021), as proposed by Scherer (2009) in his component process model of emotion. Indeed, music can induce intense pleasure and chills (Blood and Zatorre, 2001; Grewe et al., 2007) and emotional lacrimation (Wassiliwizky et al., 2017; Mori and Iwanaga, 2021). These strong pleasurable responses are mostly due to music’s ability to activate the human reward system (Ferreri et al., 2019; Fasano et al., 2023) and to induce emotional arousal responses in listeners (Schafer and Sedlmeier, 2011; Gingras et al., 2015b). Arousal has also been found to be a correlate of perceived musical complexity, which is central to Berlyne’s psychobiological model of aesthetic responses (Berlyne, 1960; Marin, 2022). Another key finding is that similar acoustical cues convey emotion communication in speech and music (Juslin and Laukka, 2003), which supports the hypothesis of a common origin of music and speech (see Section 2).
The psychological mechanisms through which music induces emotions are manifold and involve various brain functions. They can be described as brain stem reflex, rhythmic entrainment, emotional contagion, musical expectancy, evaluative conditioning, visual imagery, episodic memory and aesthetic judgment (Juslin, 2013). Each mechanism is hypothesized to have a specific adaptive value and to be associated with specific types of affective responses. Music has been documented to induce emotions and moods in various social and situational contexts, ranging from live music concerts to self-selected music listening in private and public spaces (Sloboda and O'Neill, 2001; Juslin and Laukka, 2004; North and Hargreaves, 2008). In these various contexts, music can consciously or unconsciously influence people’s feelings and behavior (North and Hargreaves, 2008). For example, background music can affect eating behavior as well as time and money spent in restaurants (Stroebele and de Castro, 2006; Beer and Greitemeyer, 2019). Film music is a prominent example of how the processing of visual information can be altered by musical emotions (Steffens, 2020; Herget, 2021), and musical arousal even impacts driving behavior (van der Zwaag et al., 2013; Navarro et al., 2019). Music listening is also an excellent means of regulating one’s emotions in a wide range of everyday situations outside the therapeutic context (Cook et al., 2019; Bachman et al., 2022; Garrido et al., 2022). Positive effects of emotion regulation by music have also been reported in the context of child care, parent-infant communication and social bonding (Persico et al., 2017; Cirelli et al., 2020; Whittall et al., 2023).
4 Musicality and its role in sexual attraction
Following Miller’s (2001) revival of Darwin’s sexual selection hypothesis, Charlton et al. (2012) and Charlton (2014) experimentally tested the idea that females may be more sensitive to musical cues signalling genetic quality during peak fertility (Gangestad and Thornhill, 2008). The 2012 study used simple computer-generated melodies that varied in complexity. One group of females rated the complexity of the musical stimuli, whereas a second group gave liking ratings for the same stimuli at two points during the menstrual cycle (fertile versus infertile). The results did not reveal a significant effect of conception risk on liking ratings. In Charlton’s (2014) follow-up study, one group of female participants listened to pairs of laboratory-generated musical excerpts, allegedly from different composers, and was asked to choose which composer sounded the most complex. A second group was asked to indicate which composer they preferred as a sexual partner in either a short-term or a committed long-term relationship. Conception risk affected preference ratings for a short-term relationship, with females in the fertile phase of their cycle preferring composers of complex melodies, but not for a long-term one. These findings suggest that musical creativity could be an indicator of “good genes” and were interpreted as evidence for sexual selection (see also Miller, 2001; Haselton and Miller, 2006; Varella et al., 2022).
Although Charlton’s studies did not test males, they introduced elegant experimental paradigms demonstrating that musical creativity and complexity may influence female mate choice. However, because complexity is associated with higher arousal (see Section 3), it is unclear whether participants based their decisions purely on the quality of the musical compositions and their complexity (as an indicator of creativity) or whether the reported effects may be explained by arousal induction. Moreover, Charlton focused on the effects of musical sound in isolation, without accounting for other potential mating cues.
To circumvent these limitations, Marin et al. (2017) and Marin and Rathgeber (2022) developed a crossmodal priming paradigm to examine whether music and musicality affect sexual attraction in females and males. This research strand builds upon a body of studies suggesting that music-induced emotions can alter visually-induced emotions (e.g., Jeong et al., 2011), with arousal and pleasantness showing differential effects (Marin et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2017). Moreover, Marin et al. (2017) and Marin and Rathgeber (2022) employed facial targets because facial attractiveness is an important biological cue in mate choice (Currie and Little, 2009), in which overall sexual attraction is determined by a complex interplay of several physical, cognitive and social cues (Buss and Schmitt, 2019).
Misattribution of arousal (i.e., excitation transfer, Zillmann, 1983, see also Dutton and Aron, 1974; Foster et al., 1998) was identified by Marin et al. (2017) as a potential psychological mechanism through which music can affect mate choice (see also May and Hamilton, 1980). Musical primes varying in arousal and pleasantness were selected from the 19th-century piano repertoire. High-arousing musical excerpts were also more complex than low-arousing excerpts. Compared to a silent control condition, females gave higher facial attractiveness and dating desirability ratings in response to opposite-sex faces after musical priming, with high-arousing excerpts showing the largest effects. Conception risk did not significantly affect these ratings (but see Charlton, 2014). There were no significant effects in males. In their follow-up study, Marin and Rathgeber (2022) focused on musicality and modified the instructions accordingly. Participants were told that the musical excerpts were performed by the people shown on the photographs. A significant increase in facial attractiveness and dating desirability after musical priming was found in females, but no specific arousal/complexity effect. In males, dating desirability (but not attractiveness) ratings increased after musical priming. Ideally, studies on music and sexual selection should include only singles (as in Marin and Rathgeber, 2022, but unlike Marin et al., 2017) and only females that are not using hormonal contraception (as in both studies led by Marin).
Marin et al. (2017) and Marin and Rathgeber (2022) offered some insights into the psychological mechanisms by which instrumental music may affect sexual attraction in listeners. In both studies, a crossmodal priming paradigm was employed with the same stimulus materials but different instructions. One can thus conclude that excitation-transfer effects are clearly observable when musical primes and facial targets are not explicitly linked by the instructions, but not when primes and targets are linked. This suggests two possible (partly interwoven?) pathways by which music(ality) may affect partner choice: one route that is rather affect-based, and another that showcases the musician as someone having advanced motoric and expressive skills (Miller, 2000). Since arousal (affective route) and complexity (honest signal) are often interrelated in music (see Marin and Leder, 2013), further studies using different musical styles and experimental paradigms are necessary. Studies should also incorporate a wider range of physical mate cues (Groyecka et al., 2017), such as the human voice, and examine performer-listener interactions given recent observations suggesting intrasexual competition in human chorusing (Keller et al., 2023). Overall, Marin’s findings are in agreement with Darwin’s (1871, p. 880) claim that “the progenitors of man, either the males or females or both sexes, […] endeavoured to charm each other with musical notes and rhythm”.
Focusing on musical creativity as a fitness indicator, Madison et al. (2018) studied multiple cues in mate choice and combined faces of three levels of attractiveness with musical excerpts of three levels of performance quality. The authors framed their research in the context of Darwin’s sexual selection hypothesis and parental investment theory (Trivers, 1996). They tested female and male participants who looked at an opposite-sex face while listening to musical improvisations which were all played at the same tempo and in major mode. This minimized affective differences between the performance quality levels and thus facilitated the interpretability of the effects. Participants were asked to rate mate value (intelligence, health, social status and parenting skill) and mate preference scales (date, intercourse, short- and long-term relationship) as well as attractiveness. In general, improvisation skills increased all types of ratings with a few exceptions; however, facial attractiveness had a much larger effect than performance quality, and exerted a smaller influence on ratings among females than among males. Altogether, the results do not falsify the sexual selection hypothesis of music evolution.
Darwin (1871, p. 332) observed that in “most of the lower classes [non-mammals] the sounds produced by the males, serve not only to call but to excite or allure the female”. At that time, evidence for Darwin’s observation was lacking among mammals. Kreutz (1997) hypothesized that music may affect erotic relationships by intensifying perceptions and emotions in humans. Indeed, there is now empirical evidence for music’s role in sexual arousal (Wan and Lalumière, 2017; van Bohemen et al., 2018; Tikka et al., 2022; but see Grewe et al., 2009) and sexual fantasies (Lehmiller, 2018). These findings may be interpreted as supporting the view that sexual selection plays a role in the evolution of musicality. In this context, one may be inclined to take the existence of love songs and its role in romantic pair bonding (Dukes et al., 2003; Hobbs and Gallup, 2011) as further evidence for sexual selection. However, romantic relationships (and pair bonding) between men and women, as we understand it nowadays, presumably did not exist in hunter-gatherer tribes and were probably not expressed in songs. Monogamous relationships only became the dominant model late in our history (perhaps around 10,000 years ago) when the development of agriculture considerably changed mating behavior (see Miller, 1998). Moreover, Brown (2000b) has argued that interactions between music and language, such as in songs with lyrics, appeared after music and language evolved as two distinct communication systems out of one common hominid referential emotive vocalization system. Therefore, we consider the study of love songs to be secondary when trying to address the possible roots of human musicality.
Other supportive evidence for music’s role in sexual attraction stems from simulation studies (Werner and Todd, 1997; Van den Broek and Todd, 2009), studies investigating the influence of depicting musical instruments on men’s profile pictures in social media (Tifferet et al., 2012, but see Wassiliwizky et al., 2023) and the role of music and musicianship in self-descriptions in the context of online dating (Lee et al., 2019). However, Bongard et al. (2019) reported that verbal profiles of musicians were not rated as more attractive than those of non-musicians, but raters who were musically interested found musicians attractive in private settings (see also Montoya et al., 2008). Chang et al. (2021) studied the effect of body sway in a speed dating paradigm with groovy background music and found that, compared to low-groove music, high-groove music led to an increased interest in meeting the partner again, suggesting that social bonding mechanisms based on groove and entrainment may be another route through which music may increase sexual attraction (see Savage et al., 2021). Interestingly, groovy music has been associated with heightened arousal (Bowling et al., 2019), implying a potential arousal-based mechanism. Another recent study suggests that the practice behavior of heavy metal guitarists may be related to status seeking and mate attraction (DeLecce et al., 2022).
5 Discussion
This review has shown that empirical evidence for music’s role in sexual attraction has accumulated in the last decade, mostly stemming from behavioral studies focusing on listeners’ perceptions and subjective responses. First, musicality, including mere visual indication of musical proficiency (Tifferet et al., 2012; Lee et al., 2019), has been demonstrated to be an attractive trait, especially among female listeners (Charlton, 2014; Madison et al., 2018; Marin and Rathgeber, 2022). Second, the emotional impact of music seems to enhance perceived attractiveness (Marin et al., 2017; Chang et al., 2021) and sexual arousal (Tikka et al., 2022) in listeners. However, a fully convincing argument for sexual selection based on behavioral measures would require demonstrating greater mating success among musically skilled individuals (Ravignani, 2018; see also Section 2), or at least, more frequent (and perhaps risky) sexual behavior. On the other hand, the role of sexual selection will only be completely refuted if the best available evidence (for instance, obtained from a cross-cultural meta-analysis) refutes every plausible sub-mechanism of sexual selection in both performers and listeners. It is possible that only a few mechanisms of sexual selection have significant explanatory power in the evolution of musicality.
The issue of sexual dimorphism in relation to sexual selection warrants further research (Varella et al., 2010, 2017, 2022). For instance, studies employing both female and male participants and depictions of opposite-sex faces have shown that males’ ratings of female facial attractiveness are nearly impervious to music or cues of musicality, whereas females appear to be more sensitive to such cues (Marin et al., 2017; Madison et al., 2018; Marin and Rathgeber, 2022; see also Kaufman et al., 2016). The mutual mate choice model, which argues that sexual dimorphism is low among humans, although some sex differences remain, may help explain these results (Miller, 2013). Thus, the absence of significant sex differences in basic music perception skills (Bertolo et al., 2023) does not provide convincing evidence against sexual selection, since both sexes need to be able to perceive and evaluate aesthetic displays (Miller, 2001; Varella, 2023). In general, the current empirical evidence seems to be in line with Darwin (1871), who did not regard music as a sexual dimorphic trait.
Future challenges include the study of other facets of musicality besides instrumental music, such as singing (Grewe et al., 2009; Valentova et al., 2019; Keller et al., 2023), dance (Weege et al., 2015; Garfinkel, 2018; Fink et al., 2021), and beat synchronization (Ravignani, 2018). Different sexual selection mechanisms may have shaped these various aspects of musicality to different degrees. In this regard, it may be fruitful to work closely together with ethnomusicologists to collect meaningful cross-cultural data in laboratories as well as in the field. A strictly Western perspective will not be sufficient when studying the origins of music.
Another strand of research should explore in greater depth the underlying mechanisms by which music and musicality affect mate choice, with a particular emphasis on music-induced emotions. In the long term, this will offer insights into how affect and cognition interact in decision-making processes related to sexual behavior, which will be of interest to fields outside music psychology. At the moment, affective arousal appears to be the key player explaining how music affects sexual attraction. Arousal-based theories such as “misattribution of arousal” (Schachter and Singer, 1962), “excitation-transfer” (Zillmann, 1983) or the “arousal-as-information” framework (Storbeck and Clore, 2008) are helpful to explain some of the observed effects. Motivational theories, such as Berlyne’s (1960) psychobiological model, which is still frequently cited in the field of empirical aesthetics (Marin, 2022), also consider arousal as vital in determining hedonic responses to different kinds of artworks including music. Nevertheless, the role of valence and more complex emotions (Clore, 1992; Angie et al., 2011; DeWall et al., 2016) in social judgments and decision-making regarding musicality and sexual attraction has yet to be explored in depth. When studying these decision-making processes during music listening, it will also be important to disentangle effects that are based on evaluations of musical abilities (performance quality or musical creativity) from emotion-based influences on sexual attraction.
Furthermore, the impact of musicality and music on different types of mate preferences (Buss and Schmitt, 2019) has not been sufficiently studied so far (but see Charlton, 2014; Madison et al., 2018). Although short-term mating behavior is most relevant for the theory of sexual selection, music activities may increase the quality of long-term relationships by creating intimacy between partners (see Kreutz and Feldhaus, 2023). Moreover, a broader spectrum of mate cues needs to be studied to get a better understanding of the relative importance of music-related cues, as well as other cues of human artisticality (Varella, 2021), creativity (Kaufman et al., 2016; Novaes and Natividade, 2023) and humor (Kaufman et al., 2008). Finally, future studies should account for cultural stereotypes related to musical styles (Zillmann and Azra, 1989), and consider music preferences and different types of musical proficiency in their research designs (Bongard et al., 2019).
Author contributions
MM: Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing, Writing – original draft. BG: Conceptualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing.
Funding
The author(s) declare financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Open access funding provided by University of Vienna.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Angie, A. A., Connelly, S., Waples, E. P., and Kligyte, V. (2011). The influence of discrete emotions on judgement and decision-making: a meta-analytic review. Cognit. Emot. 25, 1393–1422. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.550751
Bachman, N., Palgi, Y., and Bodner, E. (2022). Emotion regulation through music and mindfulness are associated with positive solitude differently at the second half of life. Int. J. Behav. Develop. 46, 520–527. doi: 10.1177/01650254221131304
Beer, A., and Greitemeyer, T. (2019). The effects of background music on tipping behavior in a restaurant: a field study. Psychol. Music 47, 444–450. doi: 10.1177/0305735618755887
Beerli, P., and Edwards, S. V. (2002). When did Neanderthals and modern humans diverge? Evol. Anthropol. 11, 60–63. doi: 10.1002/evan.10058
Benítez-Burraco, A., and Nikolsky, A. (2023). The (co)evolution of language and music under human self-domestication. Hum. Nat. 34, 229–275. doi: 10.1007/s12110-023-09447-1
Bertolo, M., Müllensiefen, D., Peretz, I., Woolley, S. C., Sakata, J., and Mehr, S. (2023). "Human music perception ability is not a sexually dimorphic trait." In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, eds. M. Goldwater, F. K. Anggoro, B. K. Hayes, and D. C. Ong (Vol. 45), 1823–31.
Bispham, J. C. (2009). Music's “design features”: musical motivation, musical pulse, and musical pitch. Music. Sci. 13, 41–61. doi: 10.1177/1029864909013002041
Blood, A. J., and Zatorre, R. J. (2001). Intensely pleasurable responses to music correlate with activity in brain regions implicated in reward and emotion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 11818–11823. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191355898
Bongard, S., Schulz, I., Studenroth, K. U., and Frankenberg, E. (2019). Attractiveness ratings for musicians and non-musicians: an evolutionary-psychology perspective. Front. Psychol. 10:2627. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02627
Bowling, D. L., Ancochea, P. G., Hove, M. J., and Fitch, W. T. (2019). Pupillometry of groove: evidence for noradrenergic arousal in the link between music and movement. Front. Neurosci. 12:1039. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2018.01039
Brown, S. (2000a). “Evolutionary models of music: from sexual selection to group selection” in Perspectives in ethology: Evolution, culture, and behavior. eds. F. Tonneau and N. S. Thompson (Boston, MA: Springer US), 231–281.
Brown, S., and Jordania, J. (2013). Universals in the world’s musics. Psychol. Music 41, 229–248. doi: 10.1177/0305735611425896
Brown, S. (2000b). “The "Musilanguage" model of music evolution” in The origins of music. eds. N. J. Wallin, B. Merker, and S. Brown (Cambridge, MA: A Bradford Book, MIT Press), 271–300.
Buss, D. M., and Schmitt, D. P. (2019). Mate preferences and their behavioral manifestations. Ann. Rev. Psychol. 70, 77–110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-103408
Buss, D. M., and Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evol. Psychol. 6, 147470490800600–147470490800146. doi: 10.1177/147470490800600116
Chang, A., Kragness, H. E., Tsou, W., Bosnyak, D. J., Thiede, A., and Trainor, L. J. (2021). Body sway predicts romantic interest in speed dating. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 16, 185–192. doi: 10.1093/scan/nsaa093
Charlton, B. D. (2014). Menstrual cycle phase alters women's sexual preferences for composers of more complex music. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 281:20140403. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0403
Charlton, B. D., Filippi, P., and Fitch, W. T. (2012). Do women prefer more complex music around ovulation? PLoS One 7:e35626. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035626
Cirelli, L. K., Jurewicz, Z. B., and Trehub, S. E. (2020). Effects of maternal singing style on mother-infant arousal and behavior. J. Cogn. Neurosc. 32, 1213–1220. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01402
Clayton, M. (2016). “The social and personal functions of music in cross-cultural perspective” in The Oxford handbook of music psychology. eds. S. Hallam, I. Cross, and M. Thaut (New York: Oxford University Press), 47–59.
Clore, G. L. (1992). “Cognitive phenomenology: feelings and the construction of judgment” in The construction of social judgements. eds. L. L. Martin and A. Tesser (Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum), 133–163.
Conard, N. J., Malina, M., and Münzel, S. C. (2009). New flutes document the earliest musical tradition in southwestern Germany. Nature 460, 737–740. doi: 10.1038/nature08169
Cook, T., Roy, A. R. K., and Welker, K. M. (2019). Music as an emotion regulation strategy: an examination of genres of music and their roles in emotion regulation. Psychol. Music 47, 144–154. doi: 10.1177/0305735617734627
Cross, I. (2001). Music, cognition, culture, and evolution. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 930, 28–42. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05723.x
Croston, R., Branch, C. L., Kozlovsky, D. Y., Dukas, R., and Pravosudov, V. V. (2015). Heritability and the evolution of cognitive traits. Behav. Ecol. 26, 1447–1459. doi: 10.1093/beheco/arv088
Currie, T. E., and Little, A. C. (2009). The relative importance of the face and body in judgments of human physical attractiveness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 30, 409–416. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.06.005
Davis, A. C., and Arnocky, S. (2022). Darwin versus Wallace: esthetic evolution and preferential mate choice. Front. Psychol. 13:862385. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.862385
DeLecce, T., Pazhoohi, F., Szala, A., and Shackelford, T. K. (2022). Extreme metal guitar skill: a case of male–male status seeking, mate attraction, or byproduct? Evol. Behav. Sci. 18, 54–66. doi: 10.1037/ebs0000304
DeWall, C. N., Baumeister, R. F., Chester, D. S., and Bushman, B. J. (2016). How often does currently felt emotion predict social behavior and judgment? A meta-analytic test of two theories. Emot. Rev. 8, 136–143. doi: 10.1177/1754073915572690
Dissanayake, E. (2008). If music is the food of love, what about survival and reproductive success? Music. Sci. 12, 169–195. doi: 10.1177/1029864908012001081
Dukes, R. L., Bisel, T. M., Borega, K. N., Lobato, E. A., and Owens, M. D. (2003). Expressions of love, sex, and hurt in popular songs: a content analysis of all-time greatest hits. Soc. Sci. J. 40, 643–650. doi: 10.1016/S0362-3319(03)00075-2
Dunbar, R. (2004). “Language, music, and laughter in evolutionary perspective” in Evolution of communication systems: A comparative approach. eds. D. K. Oller and U. Griebel (Cambridge: MIT Press), 257–273.
Dutton, D. G., and Aron, A. P. (1974). Some evidence for heightened sexual attraction under conditions of high anxiety. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 30, 510–517. doi: 10.1037/h0037031
Evans, N. D., Juhl, J., Hepper, E. G., Wildschut, T., Sedikides, C., and Fetterman, A. K. (2022). Romantic nostalgia as a resource for healthy relationships. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 39, 2181–2206. doi: 10.1177/02654075221075773
Fasano, M. C., Cabral, J., Stevner, A., Vuust, P., Cantou, P., Brattico, E., et al. (2023). The early adolescent brain on music: analysis of functional dynamics reveals engagement of orbitofrontal cortex reward system. Hum. Brain Map. 44, 429–446. doi: 10.1002/hbm.26060
Ferreri, L., Mas-Herrero, E., Zatorre, R. J., Ripolles, P., Gomez-Andres, A., Alicart, H., et al. (2019). Dopamine modulates the reward experiences elicited by music. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 3793–3798. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811878116
Fink, B., Bläsing, B., Ravignani, A., and Shackelford, T. K. (2021). Evolution and functions of human dance. Evol. Hum. Behav. 42, 351–360. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2021.01.003
Fisher, M. L., and Candea, C. (2012). You ain’t woman enough to take my man: female intrasexual competition as portrayed in songs. J. Soc. Evol. Cult. Psychol. 6, 480–493. doi: 10.1037/h0099238
Foster, C. A., Witcher, B. S., Campbell, W. K., and Green, J. D. (1998). Arousal and attraction: evidence for automatic and controlled processes. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 74, 86–101. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.86
Fuentes-Sanchez, N., Pastor, R., Escrig, M. A., Elipe-Miravet, M., and Pastor, M. C. (2021). Emotion elicitation during music listening: subjective self-reports, facial expression, and autonomic reactivity. Psychophysiology 58:e13884. doi: 10.1111/psyp.13884
Gangestad, S. W., and Thornhill, R. (2008). Human oestrus. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 275, 991–1000. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2007.1425
Garfinkel, Y. (2018). The evolution of human dance: courtship, rites of passage, trance, calendrical ceremonies and the professional dancer. Camb. Archaeol. J. 28, 283–298. doi: 10.1017/S0959774317000865
Garrido, S., du Toit, M., and Meade, T. (2022). Music listening and emotion regulation: young people's perspectives on strategies, outcomes, and intervening factors. Psychomusicology 32, 7–14. doi: 10.1037/pmu0000285
Gingras, B., Honing, H., Peretz, I., Trainor, L. J., and Fisher, S. E. (2015a). Defining the biological bases of individual differences in musicality. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 370, 20140092–20140090. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0092
Gingras, B., Marin, M. M., Puig-Waldmuller, E., and Fitch, W. T. (2015b). The eye is listening: music-induced arousal and individual differences predict pupillary responses. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 9:619. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2015.00619
Grewe, O., Nagel, F., Altenmüller, E., and Kopiez, R. (2009). Individual emotional reactions towards music: evolutionary-based universals? Music. Sci. 13, 261–287. doi: 10.1177/1029864909013002121
Grewe, O., Nagel, F., Kopiez, R., and Altenmuller, E. (2007). Listening to music as a re-creative process: physiological, psychological, and psychoacoustical correlates of chills and strong emotions. Music. Percept. 24, 297–314. doi: 10.1525/mp.2007.24.3.297
Groyecka, A., Pisanski, K., Sorokowska, A., Havlicek, J., Karwowski, M., Puts, D., et al. (2017). Attractiveness is multimodal: beauty is also in the nose and ear of the beholder. Front. Psychol. 8:778. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00778
Hagen, E. H., and Hammerstein, P. (2009). Did Neanderthals and other early humans sing? Seeking the biological roots of music in the territorial advertisements of primates, lions, hyenas, and wolves. Music. Sci. 13, 291–320. doi: 10.1177/1029864909013002131
Harrison, M. A., and Hughes, S. M. (2017). Sex drugs and rock and roll: evidence supporting the storied trilogy. Hum. Ethol. Bull. 32, 63–84. doi: 10.22330/heb/323/63-84
Haselton, M. G., and Miller, G. F. (2006). Women’s fertility across the cycle increases the short-term attractiveness of creative intelligence. Hum. Nat. 17, 50–73. doi: 10.1007/s12110-006-1020-0
Herget, A. K. (2021). On music's potential to convey meaning in film: a systematic review of empirical evidence. Psychol. Music 49, 21–49. doi: 10.1177/0305735619835019
Hobbs, D. R., and Gallup, G. G. Jr. (2011). Songs as a medium for embedded reproductive messages. Evol. Psychol. 9, 390–416. doi: 10.1177/147470491100900309
Honing, H., and Ploeger, A. (2012). Cognition and the evolution of music: pitfalls and prospects. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4, 513–524. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01210.x
Honing, H., ten Cate, C., Peretz, I., and Trehub, S. E. (2015). Without it no music: cognition, biology and evolution of musicality. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 370:20140088. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2014.0088
Huron, D. (2001). Is music an evolutionary adaptation? Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 930, 43–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2001.tb05724.x
Jeong, J. W., Diwadkar, V. A., Chugani, C. D., Sinsoongsud, P., Muzik, O., Behen, M. E., et al. (2011). Congruence of happy and sad emotion in music and faces modifies cortical audiovisual activation. NeuroImage 54, 2973–2982. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.017
Juslin, P. N. (2013). From everyday emotions to aesthetic emotions: towards a unified theory of musical emotions. Phys Life Rev 10, 235–266. doi: 10.1016/j.plrev.2013.05.008
Juslin, P. N., and Laukka, P. (2003). Communication of emotions in vocal expression and music performance: different channels, same code? Psychol. Bull. 129, 770–814. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.5.770
Juslin, P. N., and Laukka, P. (2004). Expression, perception, and induction of musical emotions: a review and a questionnaire study of everyday listening. J. New Music Res. 33, 217–238. doi: 10.1080/0929821042000317813
Juslin, P. N., and Sloboda, J. (eds.). (2011). Handbook of music and emotion: theory, research, applications. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Justus, T., and Hutsler, J. J. (2005). Fundamental issues in the evolutionary psychology of music: assessing innateness and domain specificity. Music. Percept. 23, 1–27. doi: 10.1525/mp.2005.23.1.1
Kalinowski, K., Kozłowska, A., Malesza, M., and Dariusz, P. D. (2021). Evolutionary origins of music. Classical and recent hypotheses. Anthropol. Rev. 84, 213–231. doi: 10.2478/anre-2021-0011
Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Bromley, M. L., and Miller, G. R. (2008). “The role of creativity and humor in human mate selection” in Mating intelligence: sex, relationships, and the mind’s reproductive system. eds. G. Geher and G. Miller (Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum), 227–262.
Kaufman, S. B., Kozbelt, A., Silvia, P., Kaufman, J. C., Ramesh, S., and Feist, G. J. (2016). Who finds bill gates sexy? Creative mate preferences as a function of cognitive ability, personality, and creative achievement. J. Creat. Behav. 50, 294–307. doi: 10.1002/jocb.78
Keller, P. E., Lee, J., König, R., and Novembre, G. (2023). Sex-related communicative functions of voice spectral energy in human chorusing. Biol. Lett. 19:20230326. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2023.0326
Killin, A. (2018). The origins of music: evidence, theory, and prospects. Music Sci. 1:205920431775197. doi: 10.1177/2059204317751971
Kleinman, K. (2015). Darwin and Spencer on the origin of music: is music the food of love? Prog. Brain Res. 217, 3–15. doi: 10.1016/bs.pbr.2014.11.018
Koelsch, S., Kasper, E., Sammler, D., Schulze, K., Gunter, T., and Friederici, A. D. (2004). Music, language and meaning: brain signatures of semantic processing. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 302–307. doi: 10.1038/nn1197
Kreutz, G. (1997). Musikrezeption zwischen Liebestraum und Love-Parade. Sexualität und Sinnlichkeit im Erleben von Musik. Z. Medienpsychologie 9, 293–311.
Kreutz, G., and Feldhaus, M. (2023). The influence of parent-child relationships on musical activity in the family: findings from a longitudinal panel study. Music Sci. 6:205920432211493. doi: 10.1177/20592043221149351
Krumhansl, C. L. (1997). An exploratory study of musical emotions and psychophysiology. Can. J. Exp. Psychol. 51, 336–353. doi: 10.1037/1196-1961.51.4.336
Lange, B. P., and Euler, H. A. (2014). Writers have groupies, too: high quality literature production and mating success. Evol. Behav. Sci. 8, 20–30. doi: 10.1037/h0097246
Lee, A. J., Jones, B. C., and Debruine, L. M. (2019). Investigating the association between mating-relevant self-concepts and mate preferences through a data-driven analysis of online personal descriptions. Evol. Hum. Behav. 40, 325–335. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2019.01.005
Lee, I. E., Latchoumane, C. F. V., and Jeong, J. (2017). Arousal rules: an empirical investigation into the aesthetic experience of cross-modal perception with emotional visual music. Front. Psychol. 8:440. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00440
Lehmiller, J. J. (2018). Tell me what you want: The science of sexual desire and how it can help you improve your sex life. New York, NY: Da Capo Press.
Madison, G., Holmquist, J., and Vestin, M. (2018). Musical improvisation skill in a prospective partner is associated with mate value and preferences, consistent with sexual selection and parental investment theory: implications for the origin of music. Evol. Hum. Behav. 39, 120–129. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2017.10.005
Marin, M. M., and Bhattacharya, J. (2011). “Music induced emotions: some current issues and cross-modal comparisons” in Music education. eds. J. Hermida and M. Ferrero (Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers), 1–38.
Marin, M. M., Gingras, B., and Bhattacharya, J. (2012). Crossmodal transfer of arousal, but not pleasantness from the musical to the visual domain. Emotion 12, 618–631. doi: 10.1037/a0025020
Marin, M. M., and Leder, H. (2013). Examining complexity across domains: relating subjective and objective measures of affective environmental scenes, paintings and music. PLoS One 8:e72412. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072412
Marin, M. M. (2022). “The role of collative variables in aesthetic experiences” in The Oxford handbook of empirical aesthetics. eds. M. Nadal and O. Vartanian (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 385–429.
Marin, M. M., and Rathgeber, I. (2022). Darwin’s sexual selection hypothesis revisited: musicality increases sexual attraction in both sexes. Front. Psychol. 13:971988. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971988
Marin, M. M., Schober, R., Gingras, B., and Leder, H. (2017). Misattribution of musical arousal increases sexual attraction towards opposite-sex faces in females. PLoS One 12:e0183531. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0183531
Ma, W., Fiveash, A., and Thompson, W. F. (2019). Spontaneous emergence of language-like and music-like vocalizations from an artificial protolanguage. Semiotica 2019, 1–23. doi: 10.1515/sem-2018-0139
May, J. L., and Hamilton, P. A. (1980). Effects of musically evoked affect on women’s interpersonal attraction toward and perceptual judgments of physical attractiveness of men. Motiv. Emot. 4, 217–228. doi: 10.1007/BF00995420
McDermott, J., and Hauser, M. (2005). The origins of music: innateness, uniqueness, and evolution. Music. Percept. 23, 29–59. doi: 10.1525/mp.2005.23.1.29
Mehr, S. A., Krasnow, M. M., Bryant, G. A., and Hagen, E. H. (2021). Origins of music in credible signaling. Behav. Brain Sci. 44:e60. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x20000345
Miller, G. F. (2001). Aesthetic fitness: how sexual selection shaped artistic virtuosity as a fitness indicator and aesthetic preferences as mate choice criteria. Bull. Psychol. Arts 2, 20–25.
Miller, G. F. (2013). Mutual mate choice models as the red pill in evolutionary psychology: long delayed, much needed, ideologically challenging, and hard to swallow. Psychol. Inq. 24, 207–210. doi: 10.1080/1047840X.2013.817937
Miller, G. F. (1998). “How mate choice shaped human nature: a review of sexual selection and human evolution” in Handbook of evolutionary psychology: Ideas, issues, and applications. eds. C. Crawford and D. L. Krebs (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates), 87–129.
Miller, G. F. (1999). “Sexual selection for cultural displays” in The evolution of culture. ed. C. Power (Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press), 71–91.
Miller, G. F. (2000). “Evolution of human music through sexual selection” in The origins of music. eds. N. Wallin, B. Merker, and S. Brown (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), 329–360.
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., and Kirchner, J. (2008). Is actual similarity necessary for attraction? A meta-analysis of actual and perceived similarity. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 25, 889–922. doi: 10.1177/0265407508096700
Mori, K., and Iwanaga, M. (2021). Being emotionally moved is associated with phasic physiological calming during tonic physiological arousal from pleasant tears. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 159, 47–59. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2020.11.006
Mosing, M. A., Vervveij, K. J. H., Madison, G., Pedersen, N. L., Zietsch, B. P., and Ullen, F. (2015). Did sexual selection shape human music? Testing predictions from the sexual selection hypothesis of music evolution using a large genetically informative sample of over 10,000 twins. Evol. Hum. Behav. 36, 359–366. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2015.02.004
Müllensiefen, D., Gingras, B., Musil, J., and Stewart, L. (2014). The musicality of non-musicians: an index for assessing musical sophistication in the general population. PLoS One 9:e89642. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089642
Navarro, J., Osiurak, F., Gaujoux, V., Ouimet, M. C., and Reynaud, E. (2019). Driving under the influence: how music listening affects driving behaviors. Jove 145:e58342. doi: 10.3791/58342
Nigst, P. R., Haesaerts, P., Damblon, F., Frank-Fellner, C., Mallol, C., Viola, B., et al. (2014). Early modern human settlement of Europe north of the Alps occurred 43,500 years ago in a cold steppe-type environment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14394–14399. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412201111
North, A., and Hargreaves, D. (2008). The social and applied psychology of music. New York: Oxford University Press
Novaes, F. C., and Natividade, J. C. (2023). The sexual selection of creativity: a nomological approach. Front. Psychol. 13:874261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.874261
Ogg, M., Sears, D. R. W., Marin, M. M., and McAdams, S. (2017). Psychophysiological indices of music-evoked emotions in musicians. Music. Percept. 35, 38–59. doi: 10.1525/mp.2017.35.1.38
Persico, G., Antolini, L., Vergani, P., Costantini, W., Nardi, M. T., and Bellotti, L. (2017). Maternal singing of lullabies during pregnancy and after birth: effects on mother-infant bonding and on newborns' behaviour. Concurrent cohort study. Women Birth 30, e214–e220. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.01.007
Prum, R. O. (2012). Esthetic evolution by mate choice: Darwin's really dangerous idea. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B Biol. Sci. 367, 2253–2265. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0285
Ravignani, A. (2018). Darwin, sexual selection, and the origins of music. Trends Ecol. Evol. 33, 716–719. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2018.07.006
Renoult, J. P. (2016). “The evolution of aesthetics: a review of models” in Aesthetics and neuroscience: scientific and artistic perspectives. eds. Z. Kapoula and M. Vernet (Cham: Springer), 271–300.
Savage, P. E., Brown, S., Sakai, E., and Currie, T. E. (2015). Statistical universals reveal the structures and functions of human music. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 112, 8987–8992. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414495112
Savage, P. E., Loui, P., Tarr, B., Schachner, A., Glowacki, L., Mithen, S., et al. (2021). Music as a coevolved system for social bonding. Behav. Brain Sci. 44:e59. doi: 10.1017/s0140525x20000333
Schachter, S., and Singer, J. (1962). Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state. Psychol. Rev. 69, 379–399. doi: 10.1037/h0046234
Schafer, T., and Sedlmeier, P. (2011). Does the body move the soul? The impact of arousal on music preference. Music. Percept. 29, 37–50. doi: 10.1525/mp.2011.29.1.37
Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: evidence for the component process model. Cognit. Emot. 23, 1307–1351. doi: 10.1080/02699930902928969
Sloboda, J. A., and O'Neill, S. A. (2001). “Emotions in everyday listening to music” in Music and emotion: Theory and research. eds. P. N. Juslin and J. A. Sloboda (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 415–429.
Sluming, V. A., and Manning, J. T. (2000). Second to fourth digit ratio in elite musicians: evidence for musical ability as an honest signal of male fitness. Evol. Hum. Behav. 21, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(99)00026-4
Steffens, J. (2020). The influence of film music on moral judgments of movie scenes and felt emotions. Psychol. Music 48, 3–17. doi: 10.1177/0305735618779443
Storbeck, J., and Clore, G. L. (2008). Affective arousal as information: how affective arousal influences judgments, learning, and memory. Soc. Personal. Psychol. Compass 2, 1824–1843. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00138.x
Stroebele, N., and de Castro, J. M. (2006). Listening to music while eating is related to increases in people's food intake and meal duration. Appetite 47, 285–289. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2006.04.001
Tifferet, S., Gaziel, O., and Baram, Y. (2012). Guitar increases male Facebook attractiveness: preliminary support for the sexual selection theory of music. Lett. Evolut. Behav. Sci. 3, 4–6. doi: 10.5178/lebs.2012.18
Tikka, S. K., Garg, S., Pattojoshi, A., and Tikka, D. L. (2022). “Sax for sex”: a brief narrative review exploring the music-sex connect. J. Psychosexual Health 4, 138–142. doi: 10.1177/26318318221088935
Trehub, S. E. (2003). The developmental origins of musicality. Nat. Neurosci. 6, 669–673. doi: 10.1038/nn1084
Trivers, R. L. (1996). Parental investment and sexual selection. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Turk, M., Turk, I., and Otte, M. (2020). The Neanderthal musical instrument from Divje babe I cave (Slovenia): a critical review of the discussion. Appl. Sci. 10:1226. doi: 10.3390/app10041226
Ullén, F., Mosing, M. A., Holm, L., Eriksson, H., and Madison, G. (2014). Psychometric properties and heritability of a new online test for musicality, the Swedish musical discrimination test. Pers. Individ. Dif. 63, 87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.057
Valentova, J. V., Tureček, P., Varella, M. A. C., Šebesta, P., Mendes, F. D. C., Pereira, K. J., et al. (2019). Vocal parameters of speech and singing covary and are related to vocal attractiveness, body measures, and sociosexuality: a cross-cultural study. Front. Psychol. 10:2029. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02029
Van Bohemen, S., Den Hertog, L., and van Zoonen, L. (2018). Music as a resource for the sexual self: an exploration of how young people in the Netherlands use music for good sex. Poetics 66, 19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.poetic.2017.12.001
Van Den Broek, E. M., and Todd, P. M. (2009). Evolution of rhythm as an indicator of mate quality. Music. Sci. 13, 369–386. doi: 10.1177/10298649090130021
van der Zwaag, M. D., Janssen, J. H., Nass, C., Westerink, J., Chowdhury, S., and de Waard, D. (2013). Using music to change mood while driving. Ergonomics 56, 1504–1514. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.825013
Varella, M. A. C. (2021). Evolved features of artistic motivation: analyzing a Brazilian database spanning three decades. Front. Psychol. 12:769915. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.769915
Varella, M. A. C. (2023). Nocturnal selective pressures on the evolution of human musicality as a missing piece of the adaptationist puzzle. Front. Psychol. 14:1215481. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1215481
Varella, M. A. C., Ferreira, J. H. B. P., Cosentino, L. A. M., Ottoni, E., and Bussab, V. S. R. (2010). Sex differences in aspects of musicality in a Brazilian sample: adaptative hypotheses. Cogn. Music. Arts 4, 10–16.
Varella, M. A. C., Sterbova, Z., Bartova, K., Fisher, M. L., and Valentova, J. V. (2022). Evolution of artistic and athletic propensities: testing of intersexual selection and intrasexual competition. Front. Psychol. 13:925862. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.925862
Varella, M. A. C., Valentova, J. V., and Fernández, A. M. (2017). “Evolution of artistic and aesthetic propensities through female competitive ornamentation” in The Oxford handbook of female competition. ed. M. L. Fisher (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 757–783.
Vidal-Cordasco, M., Terlato, G., Ocio, D., and Marín-Arroyo, A. B. (2023). Neanderthal coexistence with Homo sapiens in Europe was affected by herbivore carrying capacity. Sci. Adv. 9:eadi4099. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.adi4099
Wan, C., and Lalumière, M. L. (2017). Can music cue sexual arousal? Can. J. Hum. Sex. 26, 238–248. doi: 10.3138/cjhs.2017-0011
Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., Heinrich, J., Schneiderbauer, M., and Menninghaus, W. (2017). Tears falling on goosebumps: co-occurrence of emotional lacrimation and emotional piloerection indicates a psychophysiological climax in emotional arousal. Front. Psychol. 8:41. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00041
Wassiliwizky, E., Wontorra, P., and Ullén, F. (2023). How being perceived to be an artist boosts feelings of attraction in others. Sci. Rep. 13:18747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45952-0
Weege, B., Pham, M. N., Shackelford, T. K., and Fink, B. (2015). Physical strength and dance attractiveness: further evidence for an association in men, but not in women. Am. J. Hum. Biol. 27, 728–730. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.22703
Werner, G. M., and Todd, P. M. (1997). “Too many love songs: sexual selection and the evolution of communication” in Fourth European conference on artificial life. eds. P. Husbands and I. Harvey (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press/Bradford Books), 434–443.
Wesseldijk, L. W., Lu, Y., Karlsson, R., Ullen, F., and Mosing, M. A. (2023). A comprehensive investigation into the genetic relationship between music engagement and mental health. Transl. Psychiatry 13:15. doi: 10.1038/s41398-023-02308-6
Whittall, H., Gradisar, M., Fitton, J., Pillion, M., and Kahn, M. (2023). Can cry tolerance be increased in mothers of infants with sleep problems, and why does it matter? A quasi-experimental study. Sleep Med. 107, 64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.sleep.2023.04.018
Worden, R. (2022). The evolution of language by sexual selection. Front. Psychol. 13:1060510. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1060510
Zillmann, D., and Azra, B. (1989). Effects of associating with musical genres on heterosexual attraction. Com. Res. 16, 263–288. doi: 10.1177/009365089016002005
Keywords: origins of music, mate choice, sex appeal, sexual selection, arousal transfer, social bonding, evolution of musicality, dating
Citation: Marin MM and Gingras B (2024) How music-induced emotions affect sexual attraction: evolutionary implications. Front. Psychol. 15:1269820. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1269820
Edited by:
Florin Dolcos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United StatesReviewed by:
Gunter Kreutz, University of Oldenburg, GermanyMarco Antonio Correa Varella, Federal University of Pernambuco, Brazil
Copyright © 2024 Marin and Gingras. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Manuela M. Marin, YTA5ODExNzU3QHVuZXQudW5pdmllLmFjLmF0; bWFudWVsYS5tYXJpbkBmaC1rcmVtcy5hYy5hdA==