Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Psychol., 15 November 2023
Sec. Psychology for Clinical Settings

Corrigendum: “Beyond laughter”: a systematic review to understand how interventions utilise comedy for individuals experiencing mental health problems

\r\nEshika Kafle,Eshika Kafle1,2Cat Papastavrou Brooks,Cat Papastavrou Brooks2,3Dave ChawnerDave Chawner2Una FoyeUna Foye4Dieter Declercq
&#x;Dieter Declercq1*Helen Brooks&#x;Helen Brooks5
  • 1School of Arts, University of Kent, Canterbury, United Kingdom
  • 2Sussex Partnership Innovation and Research in Eating Disorders (SPIRED) Clinic, Sussex Partnership Foundation Trust, Sussex, United Kingdom
  • 3Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
  • 4Department of Mental Health Nursing, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
  • 5Mental Health Research Group, Division of Nursing, Midwifery and Social Work, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom

A corrigendum on
“Beyond laughter”: a systematic review to understand how interventions utilise comedy for individuals experiencing mental health problems

by Kafle, E., Papastavrou Brooks, C., Chawner, D., Foye, U., Declercq, D., and Brooks, H. (2023). Front. Psychol. 14:1161703. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1161703

In the published article, there was an error. A study which was a mixed methods RCT was only noted as a mixed methods study. This was requested to be changed by the author of the original study.

A correction has been made to Section 3. Results, “3.1 Description of studies”, paragraph 1. The incorrect sentence previously stated:

“One study used qualitative methodology (Belcher, 2022, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 6), one study was an RCT (Cai et al., 2014), nine studies used a quantitative non-RCT design (Gelkopf et al., 1993, 1994, 2006; Walter et al., 2007; Hirsch et al., 2010; Falkenberg et al., 2011; Konradt et al., 2013; Barker and Winship, 2016; Malhotra et al., 2020) and six studies used mixed methods (Biggs and Stevenson, 2011, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 3; Rudnick et al., 2014; Palmer, 2017, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 4; Tagalidou et al., 2018, 2019; Farrants, 2019, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 5).”

The corrected paragraph appears below.

Study characteristics are presented in Table 3. Overall, 17 studies were included in the systematic review, of which 13 were published studies (Gelkopf et al., 1993, 1994, 2006; Walter et al., 2007; Hirsch et al., 2010; Falkenberg et al., 2011; Konradt et al., 2013; Cai et al., 2014; Rudnick et al., 2014; Barker and Winship, 2016; Tagalidou et al., 2018, 2019; Malhotra et al., 2020) and four were unpublished, grey literature (Biggs and Stevenson, 2011, Unpublished manuscript2; Palmer, 2017, Unpublished manuscript3; Farrants, 2019, Unpublished manuscript4; Belcher, 2022, Unpublished manuscript5). 15 studies were unique studies and two studies utilised the same intervention and participant group, but utilised different outcome measures (Gelkopf et al., 1993, 1994). One study used qualitative methodology (Belcher, 2022, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 5), one study was an RCT (Cai et al., 2014), nine studies used a quantitative non-RCT design (Gelkopf et al., 1993, 1994, 2006; Walter et al., 2007; Hirsch et al., 2010; Falkenberg et al., 2011; Konradt et al., 2013; Barker and Winship, 2016; Malhotra et al., 2020) and six studies used mixed methods (Biggs and Stevenson, 2011, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 2; Rudnick et al., 2014; Palmer, 2017, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 3; Tagalidou et al., 2018, 2019; Farrants, 2019, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 4). One of these mixed methods studies was a mixed methods RCT (Rudnick et al., 2014). Of the studies which included a qualitative component, one used thematic analysis (Rudnick et al., 2014). It was unclear how other studies analysed qualitative data (Biggs and Stevenson, 2011, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 2; Palmer, 2017, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 3; Tagalidou et al., 2018, 2019; Farrants, 2019, Unpublished manuscript, see footnote 4).

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Barker, A. B., and Winship, G. (2016). Recovery is no laughing matter–or is it? Ment. Health Soc. Incl. 20, 167–173. doi: 10.1108/MHSI-02-2016-0006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cai, C., Yu, L., Rong, L., and Zhong, H. (2014). Effectiveness of humor intervention for patients with schizophrenia: a randomized controlled trial. J. Psychiatr. Res. 59, 174–178. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2014.09.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Falkenberg, I., Buchkremer, G., Bartels, M., and Wild, B. (2011). Implementation of a manual-based training of humor abilities in patients with depression: a pilot study. Psychiatry Res. 186, 454–457. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2010.10.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gelkopf, M., Gonen, B., Kurs, R., Melamed, Y., and Bleich, A. (2006). The effect of humorous movies on inpatients with chronic schizophrenia. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 194, 880–883. doi: 10.1097/01.nmd.0000243811.29997.f7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gelkopf, M., Kreitler, S., and Sigal, M. (1993). Laughter in a psychiatric ward: somatic, emotional, social, and clinical influences on schizophrenic patients. J. Nerv. Ment. Dis. 181, 283–289. doi: 10.1097/00005053-199305000-00002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gelkopf, M., Sigal, M., and Kramer, R. (1994). Therapeutic use of humor to improve social support in an institutionalized schizophrenic inpatient community. J. Soc. Psychol. 134, 175–182. doi: 10.1080/00224545.1994.9711380

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirsch, R. D., Junglas, K., Konradt, B., and Jonitz, M. F. (2010). Humor therapy in the depressed elderly: results of an empirical study. Z. Gerontol. Geriatr. 43, 42–52. doi: 10.1007/s00391-009-0086-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Konradt, B., Hirsch, R. D., Jonitz, M. F., and Junglas, K. (2013). Evaluation of a standardized humor group in a clinical setting: a feasibility study for older patients with depression. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 28, 850–857. doi: 10.1002/gps.3893

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Malhotra, N., Gupta, N., and Arora, R. (2020). Movie watching as a ‘therapeutic Humour'Intervention in severe mental illness: can we develop a “service” based on patient feedback? J. Psychosoc. Rehabil. Mental Health 7, 73–76. doi: 10.1007/s40737-020-00159-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rudnick, A., Kohn, P. M., Edwards, K. R., Podnar, D., Caird, S., and Martin, R. (2014). Humour-related interventions for people with mental illness: a randomized controlled pilot study. Community Ment. Health J. 50, 737–742. doi: 10.1007/s10597-013-9685-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tagalidou, N., Distlberger, E., Loderer, V., and Laireiter, A.-R. (2019). Efficacy and feasibility of a humor training for people suffering from depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Psychiatry 19, 1–13. doi: 10.1186/s12888-019-2075-x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tagalidou, N., Loderer, V., Distlberger, E., and Laireiter, A.-R. (2018). Feasibility of a humor training to promote humor and decrease stress in a subclinical sample: a single-arm pilot study. Front. Psychol. 9:577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00577

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Walter, M., Hänni, B., Haug, M., Amrhein, I., Krebs-Roubicek, E., Müller-Spahn, F., et al. (2007). Humour therapy in patients with late-life depression or Alzheimer's disease: a pilot study. Int. J. Geriatr. Psychiatry 22, 77–83. doi: 10.1002/gps.1658

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: mental health, mental illness, recovery, CHIME, comedy, humour, comedy intervention, humour intervention

Citation: Kafle E, Papastavrou Brooks C, Chawner D, Foye U, Declercq D and Brooks H (2023) Corrigendum: “Beyond laughter”: a systematic review to understand how interventions utilise comedy for individuals experiencing mental health problems. Front. Psychol. 14:1328423. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1328423

Received: 26 October 2023; Accepted: 27 October 2023;
Published: 15 November 2023.

Approved by:

Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, Switzerland

Copyright © 2023 Kafle, Papastavrou Brooks, Chawner, Foye, Declercq and Brooks. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Dieter Declercq, ZC5kZWNsZXJjcS0zMjQmI3gwMDA0MDtrZW50LmFjLnVr

These authors have contributed equally to this work and share last authorship

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.