Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Psychol., 07 November 2023
Sec. Educational Psychology
This article is part of the Research Topic Research on Acculturation and Education: Current Methodological Approaches View all 7 articles

Editorial: Research on acculturation and education: current methodological approaches

  • 1Institute for Educational Sciences, University of Basel, Muttenz, Switzerland
  • 2Department of Education and Psychology, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany
  • 3Education Secondary Level I & Centre for Teaching Professions and Continuing Professional Development, Zurich University of Teacher Education, Zurich, Switzerland
  • 4School of Education and Human Development, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL, United States

Acculturation refers to the process of change that occurs when people of different cultural backgrounds are in enduring first-hand contact (Redfield et al., 1936). This process can manifest itself in a stronger or weaker orientation toward both cultures. Berry's (1997) conceptualization of four different patterns of acculturation orientation—integration, assimilation, separation/segregation, and marginalization—is well-established in the field of cross-cultural psychology and beyond.

Decades of acculturation research have led to an extensive body of literature on acculturation and its outcomes in terms of psychological and sociocultural adjustment. For children and youth, research has especially shown relationships of acculturation and different educational outcomes (e.g., Trickett and Birman, 2005; Makarova and Birman, 2015, 2016; Lilla et al., 2021; Makarova et al., 2021; Thürer et al., 2023). For teachers, research has shown that teachers' acculturation attitudes are related to their professional competencies and that teachers play key role in migrant students' school adjustment (e.g., Makarova and Herzog, 2013; Makarova et al., 2019). Furthermore, there is evidence suggesting, that (mis)matching constellations of acculturation orientations of immigrant students' and teachers' impact students' school adjustment (Birman and Tran, 2017; Haenni Hoti et al., 2019).

Acculturation research has also brought forward a variety of conceptual and methodological approaches for the empirical investigation of acculturation. In addition, a multitude of measures and analytical methods increases the various approaches to capturing the acculturation construct (Sam and Ward, 2021).

This Research Topic brings together a collection of six original papers that delve into the intricate relationship between acculturation processes and educational outcomes. The papers employ a range of methodologies, from quantitative analyses to mixed-methods approaches, offering a comprehensive view of the Research Topic. This methodological diversity enriches the broader understanding of acculturation and education. Moreover, this Research Topic spans research across multiple cultural contexts including Germany, Italy, Turkey, Switzerland, and South Korea. The aim of this editorial is to frame the objectives and findings of these papers within a broader academic discourse, thereby providing a cohesive understanding of the current state of research in this field.

The study by Ulbricht et al. focuses on the acculturation attitudes of teachers, primarily representing mainstream culture in culturally diverse schools. It argues that norms of cultural pluralism and equality are directly and positively associated with facets of teachers' intercultural self-efficacy. The study by Auer et al. also focuses on teachers' acculturation orientations and investigates its role in the transmission of values to primary school pupils. Although teachers' acculturation orientations did not play a role in predicting pupils' values, teachers were found to be crucial value transmission agents.

The study by Sidler focuses on mutual acculturation attitudes among adolescents in the school context. The study reveals three distinct acculturation profiles: mutual integration, multiculturalism, and cultural distancing. It finds that students in the cultural distancing profile are more likely to identify as not having a migration background compared to those in the mutual integration profile. In the same vein, the study by Lilla employs a person-centered approach and delves into the acculturation patterns of immigrant students and finds that the integration and marginalization profiles are the least common among immigrants, but the distribution varies for instance depending on the group of origin.

The study by Jin et al. focuses on international students and finds that bicultural self-efficacy fully mediates the relationship between acculturation to mainstream culture and career decision-making self-efficacy. Similarly, the study by Nazir and Özçiçek investigates the adjustment challenges of female international university students. It shows that these students experience challenges in academic, sociocultural, and personal dimensions of adjustment with the sociocultural domain as the most challenging one. It reveals that the students encountered various problems ranging from cultural differences to discrimination and often indicated maladaptive or dysfunctional coping strategies.

Overall, this Research Topic offers a multifaceted exploration of acculturation within educational contexts. The findings underscore that the acculturation process in educational settings involves minority and majority students and teachers alike highlighting that school itself functions as an acculturative agent.

Finally, this Research Topic points to several new directions for further research in the field of acculturation and education:

• Several papers employ different theoretical frameworks for understanding acculturation. Future research could aim to integrate these theoretical models to provide a more comprehensive understanding of acculturation in educational settings.

• While some papers focus on specific demographic groups, there is room for more research that considers intersectionality—how various social identities (e.g., race, gender, socioeconomic status) intersect to impact acculturation experiences in educational settings.

• Most of the papers employ cross-sectional designs. Longitudinal studies could provide insights into how acculturation attitudes and experiences evolve over time, especially in relation to educational outcomes.

• The papers focus on various geographical contexts. Comparative studies could provide insights into how cultural and national contexts influence acculturation processes in education.

• While the papers discuss individual and group experiences, there is a gap in the examination of how educational policies impact acculturation processes. Future research could explore the role of policies in facilitating or hindering acculturation in schools.

• In an increasingly digital world, the role of technology in acculturation within educational settings remains underexplored. Research could focus on how digital platforms and online education impact acculturation experiences.

In summary, while the current Research Topic provides valuable insights into the relationship between acculturation and education, it also opens up multiple avenues for further exploration. These new directions could significantly enrich the academic discourse and have practical implications for educators, policymakers, and researchers alike.

Author contributions

EM: Conceptualization, Writing—original draft. NL: Writing—review & editing. CW: Writing—review & editing. DB: Writing—review & editing.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

The author(s) declared that they were an editorial board member of Frontiers, at the time of submission. This had no impact on the peer review process and the final decision.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

Berry, J. W. (1997). Immigration, acculturation, and adaptation. Appl. Psychol. 46, 5–34. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-0597.1997.tb01087.x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Birman, D., and Tran, N. (2017). When worlds collide: adaptation of Somali Bantu students in a U.S. elementary school. Int. J. Interc. Relat. 60, 123–144. doi: 10.1016/j.ijintrel.2017.06.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haenni Hoti, A., Wolfgramm, C., Müller, M., Heinzmann, S., and Buholzer, A. (2019). Immigrant students and their teachers – exploring various constellations of acculturation orientations and their impact on school adjustment. Interc. Educ. 30, 478–494. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2019.1586214

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lilla, N., Thürer, S., Nieuwenboom, W., and Schüpbach, M. (2021). Exploring academic self-concepts depending on acculturation profile. Investigation of a possible factor for immigrant students' school success. Educ. Sci. 11, 432. doi: 10.3390/educsci11080432

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makarova, E., ‘t Gilde, J., and Birman, D. (2019). Teachers as risk and resource factors in minority students' school adjustment: an integrative review of qualitative research on acculturation. Interc. Educ. 30, 448–477. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2019.1586212

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makarova, E., and Birman, D. (2015). Cultural transition and academic achievement of students from ethnic minority backgrounds: a content analysis of empirical research on acculturation. Educ. Res. 57, 305–330. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2015.1058099

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makarova, E., and Birman, D. (2016). Minority students' psychological adjustment in the school context: an integrative review of qualitative research on acculturation. Interc. Educ. 27, 1–21. doi: 10.1080/14675986.2016.1144382

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makarova, E., Döring, A. K., Auer, P., ‘t Gilde, J., and Birman, D. (2021). School adjustment of ethnic minority youth: a qualitative and quantitative research synthesis of family-related risk and resource factors. Educ. Rev. 75, 324–347. doi: 10.1080/00131911.2021.1905610

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Makarova, E., and Herzog, W. (2013). Teachers' acculturation attitudes and their classroom management: an empirical study among fifth-grade primary school teachers in Switzerland. Eur. Educ. Res. J. 12, 256–269. doi: 10.2304/eerj.2013.12.2.256

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Redfield, R., Linton, R., and Herskovits, M. J. (1936). Memorandum for the study of acculturation. Am. Anthropol. 38, 149–152. doi: 10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Sam, D. L., and Ward, C. (2021). “Three generations of psychological acculturation research: theoretical advancements and methodological challenges,” in Methods and Assessment in Culture and Psychology, eds. M. Bender, and B. G. Adams (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 17–40. doi: 10.1017/9781108675475.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thürer, S., Nieuwenboom, W., Schüpbach, M., and Lilla, N. (2023). Immigrant students' acculturation profile and reading competence development in secondary school and beyond. Int. J. Educ. Res. 118, 102139. doi: 10.1016/j.ijer.2023.102139

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trickett, E. J., and Birman, D. (2005). Acculturation, school context, and school outcomes: adaptation of refugee adolescents from the Former Soviet Union. Psychol. Schools 42, 27–38. doi: 10.1002/pits.20024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: acculturation, school context, education, measurement, methods

Citation: Makarova E, Lilla N, Wolfgramm C and Birman D (2023) Editorial: Research on acculturation and education: current methodological approaches. Front. Psychol. 14:1321439. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1321439

Received: 14 October 2023; Accepted: 20 October 2023;
Published: 07 November 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Douglas F. Kauffman, Medical University of the Americas – Nevis, United States

Copyright © 2023 Makarova, Lilla, Wolfgramm and Birman. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Elena Makarova, ZWxlbmEubWFrYXJvdmEmI3gwMDA0MDt1bmliYXMuY2g=

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.