This article is a correction to:
Bringing Forth Within: Enhabiting at the Intersection Between Enaction and Ecological Psychology
Mark M. JamesA corrigendum on
Bringing forth within: Enhabiting at the intersection between enaction and ecological psychology
by James, M. M. (2020). Front. Psychol. 11:1348. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01348
In the published article, there was a mistake in the Abstract as published. The Abstract previously stated, “In part two these compatibilities are brought together with the that these compatibilities can be brought together with the philosophy of Gilbert Simondon to develop the notion of enhabiting.” This should be, “In part two these compatibilities are brought together with the philosophy of Gilbert Simondon to develop the notion of enhabiting.” The corrected abstract appears below:
Baggs and Chemero (2018) propose that certain tensions between enaction and ecological psychology arise due different interpretations about what is meant by the “environment.” In the enactive approach the emphasis is on the umwelt, which describes the environment as the “meaningful, lived surroundings of a given individual.” The ecological approach, on the other hand, emphasises what they refer to as the habitat “the environment as a set of resources for a typical, or ideal, member of a species.” By making this distinction, these authors claim they are able to retain the best of both the ecological and the enactive approaches. Herein I propose an account of the individuation of habits that straddles this distinction, what I call a compatabilist account. This is done in two parts. The first part teases out a host of compatibilities that exist between the enactive account as developed by Di Paolo et al. (2017) and the skilled intentionality framework as developed by Bruineberg and Rietveld (2014) and Rietveld and Kiverstein (2014). In part two these compatibilities are brought together with the philosophy of Gilbert Simondon to develop the notion of enhabiting. Enhabiting describes a set of ongoing processes by which an umwelt emerges from and is reproduced within the relationship between an embodied subject and their habitat. Thus, enhabiting points toward a point of intersection between enaction and ecological psychology. To enhabit is bring forth (to enact), within (to inhabit).
The author apologizes for this error and states that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Baggs, E., and Chemero, A. (2018). Radical embodiment in two directions. Synthese 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s11229-018-02020-9
Bruineberg, J., and Rietveld, E. (2014). Self-organization, free energy minimization, and optimal grip on a field of affordances. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 8:599. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00599
Di Paolo, E., Buhrmann, T., and Barandiaran, X. (2017). Sensorimotor Life: An Enactive Proposal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Keywords: enaction, ecological psychology, sense-making, umwelt, enhabiting, Simondon, individuation
Citation: James MM (2023) Corrigendum: Bringing forth within: Enhabiting at the intersection between enaction and ecological psychology. Front. Psychol. 14:1141273. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1141273
Received: 10 January 2023; Accepted: 02 February 2023;
Published: 03 March 2023.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2023 James. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mark M. James, bWFya21pY2hhZWxqYW1lcyYjeDAwMDQwO2dtYWlsLmNvbQ==