Lihong Zhang
Wei Gu1*
Shihan Zhi
Nan Zhou
Wenru Wang- 1School of Nursing, Health Science Center, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- 2Gynecologic & Reproductive Ward, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- 3Medical College, Xijing University, Xi’an, Shaanxi, China
- 4Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Background: The population of infertile couples receiving in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in China is increasing gradually. The association of self-esteem and dyadic coping of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer has not been reported. This investigation aimed to examine the predictive effect of self-esteem of infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer on coping strategies at the dyadic level.
Methods: A cross-sectional study involving 283 infertile couples was conducted at the Reproductive Center of Northwest Women and Children’s Hospital in China. Participants were asked to complete two self-administered questionnaires, to assess self-esteem (Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale) and dyadic coping (Dyadic Coping Inventory). Paired t-test and Pearson correlation were used to analyze the difference and correlation of variables between wife and husband. The actor-partner interdependence model was used to test the predictive effect of each individual’s self-esteem on their own and their partners’ dyadic coping.
Results: Infertile couples’ self-esteem and dyadic coping are in the medium range. The self-esteem of wives and husbands can fully predict their own dyadic coping. Meanwhile, the husband’s self-esteem can predict the wife’s stress communication (β = 0.135, p = 0.025), support dyadic coping (β = 0.142, p = 0.019), and negative dyadic coping (β = 0.133, p = 0.024), and the wife’s perceived partners’ supportive dyadic coping (β = 0.147, p = 0.014) and negative dyadic coping (β = 0.144, p = 0.016). Similarly, the wife’s self-esteem can predict the husband’s supportive dyadic coping (β = 0.195, p < 0.001), and the husband’s perceived partners’ stress communication (β = 0.184, p = 0.003) and supportive dyadic coping (β = 0.180, p = 0.002).
Conclusion: The actor-partner analyses revealed insight into how infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer interact and highlighted the importance of self-esteem in dyadic coping styles. Future psychological interventions can enhance self-esteem as an effective way to improve dyadic coping of infertile couples.
1. Introduction
Infertility is the inability to achieve a viable pregnancy after 12 months of regular, unprotected sex or as a result of the impaired reproductive capacity of the individual or partner (American Society for Reproductive Medicine, 2020). Worldwide, about 15% of couples of childbearing age have infertility problems (Sun et al., 2019). In China, the proportion has reached as high as 25% and is rising (Zhou et al., 2018). With the advent of human-assisted reproductive technology (ART), a growing number of infertile couples are opting for in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer (IVF-ET) to fulfill their fertility wishes (Chen and Heilbronn, 2017). However, high costs, extensive testing and continual monitoring, uncontrollable outcomes, and alternating feelings of hope and disappointment throughout IVF-ET are everyday stressors for both the wife and the husband (Koert and Daniluk, 2017; Casu et al., 2018). These stresses lead to repeated feelings of tension, anxiety, and depression in infertile couples, which seriously affect their quality of life (Fallahzadeh et al., 2019; Dadhwal et al., 2022). Furthermore, chronic stress and adverse mood swings may reduce the chances of a successful outcome through psychobiological mechanisms (Ebbesen et al., 2009; Purewal et al., 2018). Hence, the couple must learn to cope with the range of psychological and physical distress accompanying this transition.
According to Lazarus and Folkman’s (1984) transactional model of stress and coping, coping is a self-regulatory process used to alleviate stress. It consists of intentional cognitive and physical efforts to manage internal or external demands that have been appraised as straining a person’s resources. Studies have shown that women were more likely to adopt emotion-focused strategies than men when coping with the stress of infertility. They reported greater use of self-blame and avoidance, which were associated with higher levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. They also made more effort to seek information and emotional support (Bayley et al., 2009). Partner communication difficulties and active-avoidance coping were predictors of high fertility stress. Men who reported frequently use of active-confronting coping and women who reported moderately or frequently use of meaning-based coping were significantly associated with low fertility stress (Schmidt et al., 2005). Moreover, the coping styles adopted by the partner were related to the personal, marital, and social distress of both men and women (Peterson et al., 2008). In intimate relationships, coping with stress includes individual efforts and mutual cooperation between the two partners.
Bodenmann (1995) further argued that the stress-coping model should not be viewed as an interaction based solely on the individual, but that both partners should perceive stress, evaluate stress, communicate stress, and manage stress together, and therefore proposed the systematic-transaction model (STM). The STM demonstrated that when a couple faces stress from both or one of them, the stress may be transformed into dyadic stress, which then activates dyadic coping due to the interdependence of the two sides. Dyadic coping is a couple’s response and strategy when dealing with dyadic stress. Dyadic coping can be either positive or negative, including stress communication, supportive, delegated, negative, and common dyadic coping (Bodenmann, 1995). Dyadic coping was initially used to highlight the influence of daily stressors on couples and then gradually has been used for cancer patients, chronic disease patients, infertile patients, and their spouses (Vaske et al., 2015; An et al., 2019; Bodenmann et al., 2019; Tang et al., 2022). In the infertile population, infertility and IVF-ET treatment affect both husband and wife as dyadic stressors. Therefore, dyadic coping plays an essential role in determining the outcomes of infertile couples (Casu et al., 2019). Positive dyadic coping strategies can release psychological distress (Patel et al., 2018) and contribute to better marital adaptation and greater relationship satisfaction (Facchin et al., 2021). While there are many benefits to positive dyadic coping, it is important to understand it in infertile people undergoing IVF-ET and find effective ways to improve it. Studies have also found that several factors, including religion, number of miscarriages, family relationships, family intimacy, and adaptability, may influence dyadic coping (Tang et al., 2022).
Self-esteem is the core of self-evaluation, an individual’s positive or negative attitude towards themselves based on self-cognition (Rosenberg, 1965). Self-esteem is an expression of intrinsic value, but it can be influenced by external factors, including physical and psychological conditions (Ucar et al., 2021; Cui C. et al., 2021). Family relationships, psychosocial stress, and physical pain caused by their infertility and treatment are the risk factors that affect the self-esteem of couples undergoing IVF-ET (Zurlo et al., 2020; Jing et al., 2021; Liu et al., 2021; Zhang et al., 2022). Many studies in the past have shown that one of the most prominent problems in the infertile population is stigma, which leads to varying degrees of reduced self-esteem (Cizmeli et al., 2013; Çavdar and Coşkun, 2018; Ruth and Akintayo, 2021; Cui C. et al., 2021). The level of self-esteem has an impact on coping strategies. A high level of self-esteem promotes positive coping behavior. People tend to use problem-focused strategies when they have a higher level of self-esteem. In comparison, they are more likely to use emotional-focused strategies when they have a lower level of self-esteem (Cui S. et al., 2021; Skwirczyńska et al., 2022). That self-esteem, as an expression of an overall sense of self-worth, is related to stress and coping styles (Bodenmann, 1995). Most existing studies have used self-esteem as a mediating variable to explore its protective effect on health outcomes in the context of various stressors from infertility (Kissi et al., 2013; Cui C. et al., 2021). However, little is known about the association between self-esteem and coping strategies among the infertile population undergoing IVF-ET, especially in intimate dyadic relationships. Therefore, we planned to explore the relationship between self-esteem and dyadic coping by providing theoretical evidence for future interventions aimed at improving dyadic coping.
In the dyadic relationship, many variables of the two individuals are interdependent and interact. Actor-partner interdependent model (APIM) is a method to analyze pairwise data (Olsen and Kenny, 2006). The APIM points out that individual dependent variables are affected not only by individual independent variables, that is, actor effects, but also by specific partners’ variables within a certain range, namely partner effects (Kenny et al., 2006; Kenny, 2011). The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between self-esteem and coping in the dyadic interaction of infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET. Self-esteem was the independent variable and dyadic coping was the dependent variable. We hypothesized that the wife’s and the husband’s self-esteem would predict their own dyadic coping styles and, to some extent, those of their partner’s.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Study design and setting
This cross-sectional study was conducted in the Assisted Reproductive Medicine Center Clinic of the Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital in Shaanxi Province, China. Infertile couples who were undergoing IVF-ET were recruited between May and July 2022. Data collection took place immediately after obtaining the consent of the participants at the recruitment site.
2.2. Participants
Participant recruitment was based on the following criteria. The inclusion criteria were couples who (1) met the WHO definition for infertility diagnosis, that is, one of or both husband and wife are diagnosed as infertile; (2) were receiving IVF-ET treatment; (3) were 20–45 years old; (4) were able to understand and communicate in Chinese. We excluded patients with cognitive and psychiatric illness through interviews. Participants were asked whether they had had ever visited a psychiatric clinic, and if not, included; if so, ask for a specific diagnosis and rule it out if the diagnosis is considered cognitive disorders or psychiatric illness. Diagnostic criteria was based on the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition criteria, including anxiety disorders, depressive disorders, eating disorders, obsessive–compulsive disorders, personality disorders, etc.
2.3. Sample size
The sample size was estimated using the formula for the cross-sectional study: (α = 0.05, =1.96; Li and Liu, 2012). Before the formal study, we selected 50 couples for pre-survey, and the average dyadic coping score was 127.958 ± 19.66. With a σ of 19.66 and a δ of 2% of the average dyadic coping score (127.958), n = 227 were obtained by calculation. Considering 20% of invalid samples, 272 dyads couples, consisting of 544 participants, would be adequate. In addition, this study complied with the requirement that the sample size of the structural equation model is at least 200 (Byrne, 2016).
2.4. Procedure
The study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Reproductive Medicine Center of Northwest Women and Children’s Hospital (2022007). Participants were recruited in the waiting room of the outpatient department of the Reproductive Medicine Center and were assessed on the day of the IVF-ET appointment. Patients were screened and invited by researchers according to uniform inclusion criteria. All participants were informed of the purpose of the study and the method of participation. If one or both husband and wife refused to participate in the study, the couple was excluded. Only couples who agreed to participate in the study were taken to a separate conversation room. Written informed consent was obtained before data collection. After obtaining informed consent, the researcher delivered the questionnaire to the couples, who completed it independently under the supervision of the researchers. The questionnaire was self-administered and generally took between 20 and 30 min to complete. Sharing and discussion of questionnaire content between husband and wife were not allowed. If there was something unclear, researchers were always available to help and guide. The confidentiality of the data collected and the information of all participants were assured. As a token of appreciation, participants who had completed the questionnaire were asked if they had any needs and we could provide free psychological consultations or IVF-ET treatment-related information consultations if they needed.
2.5. Measures
2.5.1. Social demographic characteristics and infertility-related information
The general data collected in this study include age, year of marriage, religion, place of residence, education, occupation and monthly family income. Information related to infertility includes the duration of infertility, whether or not already have a child, the cause of infertility, the length of treatment, and the times of IVF-ET.
2.5.2. Self-esteem scale
Self-esteem is measured by Rosenberg self-esteem scale (RSES) (Rosenberg, 1965; Schmitt and Allik, 2005), which has been widely used in the world. It consists of 10 items ranging from 1 to 4 on a Likert-type scale. The higher the total score, the higher the degree of self-esteem. The total scores below 25 represent low self-esteem, 26–32 represent medium level, and those above 33 represent high self-esteem. The Chinese version of RSES was used in this study, which had a Cronbach’ α between 0.83–0.89 (Chen, 2015). Cronbach’ α in the present study was 0.812 for women and 0.743 for men.
2.5.3. Dyadic coping inventory
The Dyadic Coping Inventory (DCI) (Ledermann et al., 2010) was developed by Bodenmann (2008) based on the systematic-transaction model, which aims to assess dyadic coping and perceived communication of couples under stress. The DCI measures each member’s own dyadic coping behavior and the perceived dyadic coping behavior of the partner through the following five-parts: stress communication, supportive, delegated, negative and common dyadic coping. The DCI is a 37-item instrument and items are rated on a 5-point scale from 1(“very rarely”) to 5(“very often”). The total score of the DCI is the sum from item 1 to item 35 (items 36 and 37 are evaluation items and not included in the total score), in which the negative items are scored in reverse. The scoring standards for DCI are as follows: DCI total score <111, dyadic coping below average; between 111 and 145, dyadic coping in the normal range; >145, dyadic coping above average. In this study, the Chinese version of DCI was used, with Cronbach’ α of 0.51–0.80 of subscales (Xu et al., 2016). Cronbach’α of the DCI in women and men of the present study were 0.920 and 0.939, respectively.
2.6. Data analysis
Questionnaires were screened prior to data entry and incomplete and invalid questionnaires (such as all questions that have been selected with the same answer, although some of the questions require reverse answer) would be excluded. The Epidata software (version 3.1; The EpiData Association, Odense, Denmark) was used to input the data and set up the database, the data were analyzed by IBM SPSS software (version 25.0; IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, United States). Descriptive statistics, such as mean, standard deviation was used to describe continuous variables, while frequency and percentage were used to describe categorical variables. Paired t-test was used to analyze the differences between husband and wife in the outcome variables. Bivariate correlation analysis was conducted for all the outcome variables.
In this study, the non-independence of the pairwise data was tested by calculating the correlation of variables between husband and wife. Significant variables in the bivariate correlation analysis were selected as predictive variables to further analyze actor and partner effect in APIM using AMOS software (Version 28.0; IBM Corporation, Meadville, PA, USA). Specifically, taking self-esteem as a predictive variable (W for Wife, H for Husband) and dyadic coping as an outcome variable (W for Wife, H for Husband), the two W variables and the variances of H variables are allowed to be correlated. The paths from W self-esteem to W dyadic coping and H self-esteem to H dyadic coping are called actor effect, and the paths from W self-esteem to H dyadic coping and H self-esteem to W dyadic coping are called partner effect. Gender interaction effects has been investigated before APIM analysis; if there was a significant interaction effect, separate regression analyses were performed for husbands and wives; ultimately, we found no gender differences.
3. Results
3.1. Demographic data description
We invited 300 couples and 292 of them accepted, with a response rate of 97.3%. After screening, nine pairs of unqualified questionnaires were eliminated, and finally 283 couples consisting of 566 participants were included in the data analysis. The average ages of wives and husbands were 33.43 years old (SD = 4.475) and 32.12 years old (SD = 3.975) respectively. Of these, 67.1% of wives and 73.5% of husbands were between the ages of 30 and 39. More than 50% of couples have been married for less than 5 years. Most of wives and husbands (95%) had no religious beliefs. Nearly 60% of couples lived in cities. Over half of the wives and husbands had college degrees or above. While about 28% of wives were unemployed, only 6% of the husbands were. More than 60% of the couples had a monthly family income between 4,000 and 10,000 RMB (568 to 1,420 USD).
In terms of infertility, more than 86% of couples have been infertile for less than 5 years. The female factor (43.1%) was the most common cause of infertility, followed by unknown factors (26.1%), both factors (16.6%) and male factor (14.1%). About 19% of wives and 15% of husbands already have a child before they were diagnosed with infertility. 74.9% of wives and 65.0% of husbands have undergone different treatments, including medication, surgery, assisted reproduction technology, etc. Approximately 80% of couples were getting IVF-ET treatment for the first time.
3.2. Differences in self-esteem and dyadic coping between the husband and wife
The descriptive statistics of the couples’ self-esteem and dyadic coping are presented in Table 1. The means RSES scores reported by both the wives and husbands were within the normal range. Similarly, the means DCI total scores reported by both the wives and husbands were within the normal range.
Table 1. Descriptive statistics of self-esteem and dyadic coping scores and results of the paired t-test between wives and husbands (n = 283 couples).
3.3. Actor-partner interdependence model of self-esteem and dyadic coping
As Table 2 shows, there is a significant correlation in self-esteem and subscales of dyadic coping except for wife-reported self-esteem score and husband-reported score of “negative dyadic coping by partner” (r = 0.103, p > 0.05), husband-reported self-esteem score and wife-reported score of “delegated dyadic coping by oneself” (r = 0.096, p > 0.05).
Table 2. Analysis of the correlation between subscale scores of dyadic coping and self-esteem.
The actor and partner effects of self-esteem and dyadic coping are shown in Table 3, the results indicated that the self-esteem of wives and husbands has significant actor effects on their own individual dyadic coping (wife-reported: p < 0.01, husband-reported: p < 0.001). There are partner effects of the husband’s self-esteem on the wife’s individual dyadic coping (p < 0.05), expect for “delegated dyadic coping by oneself” (p = 0.601). The partner effect of wife’s self-esteem on husband’s individual dyadic coping existed in “supportive dyadic coping by oneself” (p < 0.001) and “delegated dyadic coping by oneself” (p = 0.05). Similarly, the self-esteem of wives and husbands have significant actor effects on their own perceived partners’ dyadic coping (wife-reported: p < 0.001, husband-reported: p < 0.01). The husband’s self-esteem has a partner effect on the wife’s perceived “supportive dyadic coping of the partner” (p = 0.014) and “negative dyadic coping by partner” (p = 0.016). The wife’s self-esteem has a partner effect on the husband’s perceived “stress communication of the partner” (p = 0.003) and “supportive dyadic coping of the partner” (p = 0.002). Additionally, the wife’s and husband’s self-esteem not only have an actor effect on their own common dyadic coping (wife-reported: p < 0.001, husband-reported: p < 0.001), but also have a partner effect on their partners’ common dyadic coping (wife-reported: p = 0.006, husband-reported: p = 0.019).
Table 3. APIM analysis predicts wife’s and husband’s individual dyadic coping, perceived partners’ dyadic coping and common dyadic coping from individual self-esteem.
4. Discussion
This study examined the association between self-esteem and dyadic coping among infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET. We adopted the APIM to explore the interdependence of the couples’ self-esteem and their dyadic coping. Overall, our findings supported our hypothesis that the couples’ self-esteem could significantly predict to their own and their partners’ dyadic coping.
Similar to previous surveys in Northeast and Southeast China, we found that the self-esteem of infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET is at the middle level (Cui C. et al., 2021; Wang et al., 2022). In contrast, infertile couples in Turkey (Çavdar and Coşkun, 2018), Athens (Ruth and Akintayo, 2021), and Egypt (Zayed and El-Hadidy, 2020) had low self-esteem and those in western countries such as American, had a higher self-esteem than the general population (Cizmeli et al., 2013). These differences could be the result of socioeconomic and cultural heterogeneity. In general, people of childbearing age in China are more open and receptive to infertility and ART treatment as education, social, economic, and cultural development have improved and knowledge has become more readily available in recent decades. However, there was still a difference in self-esteem between husbands and wives. Previous studies reported that self-esteem is tied to the stress and psychological distress of infertility, and women, as the main body of fertility, face greater reproductive pressure and psychological distress than their husbands, and therefore their self-esteem is more likely to be affected (Cui C. et al., 2021).
The analysis of dyadic coping in our study indicated that wives engaged in more stressful communication than their husbands. Such finding is consistent with earlier studies (Staff et al., 2017; Molgora et al., 2019). As a normal emotional expression, women are more prone to vent their stress to their spouse through words and behaviors in order to receive care and assistance. Conversely, men play a strong and rational role and are typically more emotionally restrained (Bodenmann et al., 2015; Fang et al., 2021). In the current study, husbands reported a better delegated dyadic coping than their wives. The result suggested that although husbands make an effort to assist wives in sharing household duties and to reduce their stress, their efforts may go unrecognized because of the difference between how support is perceived by recipients and how it is perceived by providers (Tang et al., 2022). The better individual dyadic coping in husbands may also reflect men’s socially expected roles as protectors and supporters of their families (Chaves et al., 2021).
The study also found a significant correlation between husbands and wives in self-esteem and dyadic coping, suggesting that individuals’ emotions and behaviors were affected by their partners in the intimate relationship, which supports the findings of Wang et al. (2022). There is a positive predictive effect between self-esteem and dyadic coping, higher self-esteem is associated with more positive dyadic coping of the couple. People with higher self-esteem tend to have better social acceptance, interpersonal relationships and even social resources, so they are more likely to deal with stress positively and provide support to their partner (Alirezaei et al., 2018). On the other hand, research also showed that providing support to the partner could enhance an individual’s sense of self-esteem and well-being, it is one of the effective ways to realize self-worth (Poulin et al., 2010). Getting support is beneficial to enhance self-worth and happiness, as well as adapt to different stressors (Ying et al., 2015). These findings suggested that while self-esteem is associated with a more positive dyadic coping, dyadic coping may also reinforce a person’s self-esteem.
Besides, we found that husband’s self-esteem had a more extensive influence on wife’s dyadic coping. Women are relatively more sensitive and perceptual, which makes their dyadic coping behavior easier to be affected by their husband’s self-esteem (Wang et al., 2022). As the main undertaker of treatment, women bear more psychological pressure and physical pain, and they are eager to get the support and care of their husbands, so they may pay more attention to their husbands’ reactions (Kim et al., 2020). Influenced by Chinese traditional wisdom, women in infertile couples tend to experience more psychological pressure from family and society than men, and are more likely to experience stigma, which persists during fertility treatment (Kong et al., 2019; Zhang et al., 2021). Studies have shown that men are more likely than women to accept childlessness, and the role of motherhood is very important for women, who have a greater sense of responsibility for childbearing (Nagorska et al., 2019). Especially in this study, female factors accounted for a large proportion of infertility, and about 30% of women were unemployed, and the uncertainty of treatment outcomes and financial burden maybe made them feel deeper guilt and sensitivity, and therefore care more about their husbands’ attitudes.
Limitation
A limitation of the study is related to the design of cross-sectional that could not provide evidence based on causation. However, Crocker et al. (2010) described that cross-sectional research is required when little is known about a phenomenon to guide experimental or prospective research, so it is necessary and interesting to examine the predictive effect of self-esteem on dyadic coping of infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET. An additional limitation is that we focused on the dyadic interaction process of self-esteem and dyadic coping without considering the confounding factors, for example, whether or not already have children, education level, family income etc. Further research can stratify couples undergoing IVF-ET according to different characteristics and explore the dyadic relationship among variables of couples separately. Furthermore, our data collection was conducted on the day of IVF-ET appointment, while studies have confirmed that these variables may change as treatment progresses (Swift and Liu, 2014; Jamil et al., 2020). Hence, longitudinal studies are needed to track the dynamic changes of self-esteem and dyadic coping in the whole IVF-ET process.
Clinical implication
Findings from the current study highlight the significance of self-esteem as a potential mental resource for infertile couples to manage stress during IVF-ET treatment. Self-esteem may facilitate stress communication and positive dyadic coping in infertile individuals and their partners. Therefore, practitioners working with IVF-ET couples are encouraged to conduct a baseline assessment and help patients in need with psychological counseling. Additionally, the study presented evidence for psychological intervention to infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET that can start with enhancing self-esteem to improving dyadic coping. Based on the fact that infertility and IVF-ET treatment affect couples rather than individuals, as well as the interaction effects between the husband and wife, couple interventions to enhance self-esteem may be effective in improving couples’ ability to cope with stress.
5. Conclusion
In summary, this study contributes to the understanding of the relationship of self-esteem and dyadic coping of infertile couples undergoing IVF-ET. Individual’s self-esteem is positively associated with their own dyadic coping and have an impact on their partners’ dyadic coping. Future psychological interventions should focus on enhancing self-esteem to assist infertile couples in positively coping dyadic stress.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Reproductive Medicine Center of Northwest Women and Children’s Hospital (2022007). The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
LiZ contributed to developing the study design, analyzing data and writing the entire manuscript. WG contributed to developing the study design, reviewing and revising the manuscript. XJ, SZ, NZ, and LuZ contributed to data collection. WW and YJ contributed to revising the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Funding
This study received funding from Shaanxi Provincial Department of Science and Technology (2022SF-438), Teaching Reform Project of Postgraduate Innovation and Entrepreneurship Course of Xi’an Jiaotong University, and Shaanxi Maitian IoT Information Technology Co., Ltd. (SKH2022215). The funders were not involved in the study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, the writing of this article or the decision to submit it for publication.
Acknowledgments
We are grateful to the Reproductive Medicine Center of Northwestern Women and Children’s Hospital for supporting this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alirezaei, S., Ozgoli, G., and Majd, H. A. (2018). Evaluation of factors associated with sexual function in infertile women. Int. J. Fertility Sterility 12, 125–129. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2018.5193
American Society for Reproductive Medicine (2020). Definitions of infertility and recurrent pregnancy loss: a committee opinion. Fertil. Steril. 113, 533–535. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.11.025
An, H., Chen, C., Wang, P., Li, S., and Hou, X. (2019). Research Progress of dyadic coping in cancer patients and their spouse Chinese. Nurs. Manag. 19, 1064–1069. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-1756.2019.07.022
Bayley, T. M., Slade, P., and Lashen, H. (2009). Relationships between attachment, appraisal, coping and adjustment in men and women experiencing infertility concerns. Hum. Reprod. 24, 2827–2837. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep235
Bodenmann, G. (1995). A systemic-transactional conceptualization of stress and coping in couples. Swiss J. Psychol. 54, 34–49.
Bodenmann, G. (2008). Dyadisches Coping Inventar: Test manual [Dyadic Coping Inventory: Test Manual], (Bern, Switzerland, Huber).
Bodenmann, G., Falconier, M. K., and Randall, A. K. (2019). Editorial: dyadic coping. Front. Psychol. 10:1498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01498
Bodenmann, G., Meuwly, N., Germann, J., Nussbeck, F. W., Heinrichs, M., and Bradbury, T. N. (2015). Effects of stress on the social support provided by men and women in intimate relationships. Psychol. Sci. 26, 1584–1594. doi: 10.1177/0956797615594616
Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with Amos: Basic concepts, (Applications And Programming: New York, Routledge).
Casu, G., Ulivi, G., Zaia, V., Martins, M. D. C. F., Barbosa, C. P., and Gremigni, P. (2018). Spirituality, infertility-related stress, and quality of life in Brazilian infertile couples: analysis using the actor-partner interdependence mediation model. Res. Nurs. Health 41, 156–165. doi: 10.1002/nur.21860
Casu, G., Zaia, V., Martins, M. D. C. F., Barbosa, C. P., and Gremigni, P. (2019). A dyadic mediation study on social support, coping, and stress among couples starting fertility treatment. J. Fam. Psychol. 33, 315–326. doi: 10.1037/fam0000502
Çavdar, N. K., and Coşkun, A. M. (2018). The effect of infertility upon quality of life and self-esteem. Moj Women's Health 7, 89–94. doi: 10.15406/mojwh.2018.07.00176
Chaves, C., Canavarro, M. C., and Moura-Ramos, M. (2021). The role of dyadic coping on the marital and emotional adjustment of couples with infertility. Fam. Process. 58, 509–523. doi: 10.1111/famp.12364
Chen, F. (2015). The reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the revised-positive version of Rosenberg self-esteem scale. Adv. Psychol. 5, 531–535. doi: 10.12677/AP.2015.59068
Chen, M., and Heilbronn, L. K. (2017). The health outcomes of human offspring conceived by assisted reproductive technologies (art). J. Dev. Orig. Health Dis. 8, 388–402. doi: 10.1017/S2040174417000228
Cizmeli, C., Lobel, M., Franasiak, J., and Pastore, L. M. (2013). Levels and associations among self-esteem, fertility distress, coping, and reaction to potentially being a genetic carrier in women with diminished ovarian reserve. Fertil. Steril. 99, 2037–2044.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.02.033
Crocker, P. R. E., Mosewich, A. D., Kowalski, K. C., and Besenski, L. J. (2010). “Coping: research design and analysis issues” in Coping in Sport: Theory, Methods, and Related Constructs. ed. A. R. Nicholls (New York: Nova Sciencepublishers)
Cui, S., Cheng, F., Zhang, L., Zhang, C., Yuan, Q., Huang, C., et al. (2021). Self-esteem, social support and coping strategies of left-behind children in rural China, and the intermediary role of subjective support:a cross-sectional survey. BMC Psychiatry 21:158. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03160-y
Cui, C., Wang, L., and Wang, X. (2021). Effects of self-esteem on the associations between infertility-related stress and psychological distress among infertile Chinese women: a cross-sectional study. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 14, 1245–1255. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S326994
Dadhwal, V., Choudhary, V., Perumal, V., and Bhattacharya, D. (2022). Depression, anxiety, quality of life and coping in women with infertility: a cross-sectional study from India. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 158, 671–678. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14084
Ebbesen, S. M. S., Zachariae, R., Mehlsen, M. Y., Thomsen, D., Hojgaard, A., Ottosen, L., et al. (2009). Stressful life events are associated with a poor in-vitro fertilization (Ivf) outcome: a prospective study. Hum. Reprod. 24, 2173–2182. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep185
Facchin, F., Buggio, L., Vercellini, P., Frassineti, A., Beltrami, S., and Saita, E. (2021). Quality of intimate relationships, dyadic coping, and psychological health in women with endometriosis: results from An online survey. J. Psychosom. Res. 146:110502. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110502
Fallahzadeh, H., Zareei Mahmood Abadi, H., Momayyezi, M., Malaki Moghadam, H., and Keyghobadi, N. (2019). The comparison of depression and anxiety between fertile and infertile couples: a meta-analysis study. Int. J. Reprod. Biomed. 17, 153–162. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v17i3.4514
Fang, M., Li, G., Kang, X., Hou, F., Lv, G., Xu, X., et al. (2021). The role of gender and self-esteem as moderators of the relationship between stigma and psychological distress among infertile couples. Psychol. Health Med. 26, 1181–1194. doi: 10.1080/13548506.2020.1808233
Jamil, S., Shoaib, M., Aziz, W., and Ather, M. H. (2020). Does male factor infertility impact on self-esteem and sexual relationship? Andrologia. 52:e13460. doi: 10.1111/and.13460
Jing, X., Gu, W., Zhang, L., Miao, R., Xu, X., Wang, M., et al. (2021). Coping strategies mediate the association between stigma and fertility quality of life in infertile women undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. BMC Womens Health 21:386. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01525-9
Kenny, D. A. (2011). Commentary: dyadic analyses of family data. J. Pediatr. Psychol. 36, 630–633. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsq124
Kenny, D. A., Kashy, D. A., and Cook, W. L. (2006). Dyadic data analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
Kim, M., Yi, S. J., and Hong, J. E. (2020). Experiences of women with male factor infertility under in vitro fertilization. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:7809. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17217809
Kissi, Y. E., Romdhane, A. B., Hidar, S., Bannour, S., Idrissi, K. A., Khairi, H., et al. (2013). General psychopathology, anxiety, depression and self-esteem in couples undergoing infertility treatment: a comparative study between men and women. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reproductive Biol. 167, 185–189. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2012.12.014
Koert, E., and Daniluk, J. C. (2017). When time runs out: reconciling permanent childlessness after delayed childbearing. J. Reprod. Infant Psychol. 35, 342–352. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2017.1320363
Kong, L., Shao, Y., Xia, J., Han, J., Zhan, Y., Liu, G., et al. (2019). Quantitative and qualitative analyses of psychological experience and adjustment of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer patients. Med. Sci. Monit. 25, 8069–8077. doi: 10.12659/MSM.916627
Ledermann, T., Bodenmann, G., Gagliardi, S., Charvoz, L., Verardi, S., Rossier, J., et al. (2010). Psychometrics of the dyadic coping inventory in three language groups. Swiss J. Psychol. 69, 201–212. doi: 10.1024/1421-0185/a000024
Liu, Y., Fu, Z., Chen, S., He, X., and Fan, L. (2021). The analysis of anxiety and depression in different stages of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in couples in China. Neuropsychiatr. Dis. Treat. 17, 649–657. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S287198
Molgora, S., Baldini, M. P., Fenaroli, V., Acquati, C., and Saita, E. (2019). Examining the role of dyadic coping on the marital adjustment of couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology (art). Front. Psychol. 10:415. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00415
Nagorska, M., Bartosiewicz, A., Obrzut, B., and Darmochwal-Kolarz, D. (2019). Gender differences in the experience of infertility concerning polish couples: preliminary research. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 16:2337. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16132337
Olsen, J. A., and Kenny, D. A. (2006). Structural equation modeling with interchangeable dyads. Psychol. Methods 11, 127–141. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.11.2.127
Patel, A., Sharma, P. S. V. N., Kumar, P., and Binu, V. S. (2018). Illness cognitions, anxiety, and depression in men and women undergoing fertility treatments: a dyadic approach. J. Human Reproductive Sci. 11, 180–189. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_119_17
Peterson, B. D., Pirritano, M., Christensen, U., and Schmidt, L. (2008). The impact of partner coping in couples experiencing infertility. Hum. Reprod. 23, 1128–1137. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den067
Poulin, M. J., Brown, S. L., Ubel, P. A., Smith, D. M., Jankovic, A., and Langa, K. M. (2010). Does a helping hand mean a heavy heart? Helping behavior and well-being among spouse caregivers. Psychol. Aging. 25, 108–117. doi: 10.1037/a0018064
Purewal, S., Chapman, S. C., and Akker, O. B. V. D. (2018). Depression and state anxiety scores during assisted reproductive treatment are associated with outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod. BioMed. Online 36, 646–657. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.010
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the Adolescent Self-Image, Princeton, Nj Princeton University Press
Ruth, A., and Akintayo, A. (2021). Comparison of self-esteem and depression among fertile and infertile women. Bjpsych. Open 7:S48. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.176
Schmidt, L., Holstein, B. E., Christensen, U., and Boivin, J. (2005). Communication and coping as predictors of fertility problem stress: cohort study of 816 participants who did not achieve a delivery after 12 months of fertility treatment. Hum. Reprod. 20, 3248–3256. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei193
Schmitt, D. P., and Allik, J. (2005). Simultaneous administration of the Rosenberg self-esteem scale in 53 nations: exploring the universal and culture-specific features of global self-esteem. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 89, 623–642. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.89.4.623
Skwirczyńska, E., Wróblewski, O., Tejchman, K., Ostrowski, P., and Serwin, N. (2022). Prostate cancer eligible for radical prostatectomy: self-esteem of patients and forms of coping with stress. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:6928. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19116928
Staff, H. R., H. R., Didymus, F. F., and Backhouse, S. H. (2017). The antecedents and outcomes of dyadic coping in close personal relationships: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Anxiety Stress Coping, 30, 498–520, doi: 10.1080/10615806.2017.1329931
Sun, H., Gong, T., Jiang, Y., Zhang, S., Zhao, Y., and Wu, Q. (2019). Global, regional, and National Prevalence and Disability-Adjusted Lifeyears for Infertility in 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: results from a global burden of disease study, 2017. Aging 11, 10952–10991. doi: 10.18632/aging.102497
Swift, B. E., and Liu, K. E. (2014). The effect of age, ethnicity, and level of education on fertility awareness and duration of infertility. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Can. 36, 990–996. doi: 10.1016/S1701-2163(15)30412-6
Tang, N., Han, L., Huangfu, C., Jia, Y., Zhao, Q., Liu, H., et al. (2022). Influencing factors of dyadic coping among infertile women: a path analysis. Front. Psychol. 13:830039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.830039
Ucar, H., Tekin, E., and Tekin, U. (2021). Pain severity and psychosocial quality of life in adolescents with migraine and tension-type headache: mediation by perceived expressed emotion and self-esteem. J. Oral Facial Pain Headache 35, 62–71. doi: 10.11607/ofph.2768
Vaske, I., Thone, M. F., Kuhl, K., Keil, D. C., Schurmann, W., Rief, W., et al. (2015). For better or for worse: a longitudinal study on dyadic coping and quality of life among couples with a partner suffering from Copd. J. Behav. Med. 38, 851–862. doi: 10.1007/s10865-015-9657-y
Wang, J., Lv, X., Wu, J., Tang, W., Luo, G., Liang, C., et al. (2022). Sexual function, self-esteem, and quality of life in infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization: a dyadic approach. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 15, 2449–2459. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S378496
Xu, F., Hilpert, P., Randall, A. K., Li, Q., and Bodenmann, G. (2016). Validation of the dyadic coping inventory with Chinese couples: factorial structure, measurement invariance, and construct validity. Psychol. Assess. 28, E127–E140. doi: 10.1037/pas0000329
Ying, L., Wu, L., and Loke, A. Y. (2015). The experience of Chinese couples undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: perception of the treatment process and partner support. PLoS One 10:E0139691. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0139691
Zayed, A. A., and El-Hadidy, M. A. (2020). Sexual satisfaction and self-esteem in women with primary infertility. Middle East Fertility Soc. J. 25:13. doi: 10.1186/s43043-020-00024-5
Zhang, F., Lv, Y., Wang, Y., Cheng, X., Yan, Y., Zhang, Y., et al. (2021). The social stigma of infertile women in Zhejiang Province, China: a questionnaire-based study. BMC Womens Health 21:97. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01246-z
Zhang, L., Shao, H., Huo, M., Chen, J., Tao, M., and Liu, Z. (2022). Prevalence and associated risk factors for anxiety and depression in infertile couples of art treatment: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry 22:616. doi: 10.1186/s12888-022-04256-9
Zhou, Z., Zheng, D., Wu, H., Li, R., Xu, S., Kang, Y., et al. (2018). Epidemiology of infertility in China: a population-based study. BJOG 125, 432–441. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14966
Keywords: self-esteem, dyadic coping, infertility, in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer, couples, APIM
Citation: Zhang L, Gu W, Jing X, Zhi S, Zhou N, Zhang L, Wang W and Jiang Y (2023) Predicting the dyadic coping through self-esteem among infertile couples undergoing in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer: An actor-partner interdependence model. Front. Psychol. 14:1127464. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1127464
Edited by:
Tânia Brandão, University Institute of Psychological, Social and Life Sciences (ISPA), PortugalReviewed by:
Tamás Martos, University of Szeged, HungaryJuliana Pedro, University of Porto, Portugal
Sara Filipa Martins Ribeiro, Centre for Reproductive Genetics A. Barros, Portugal, in collaboration with reviewer JP
Copyright © 2023 Zhang, Gu, Jing, Zhi, Zhou, Zhang, Wang and Jiang. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Wei Gu, MjMyZ3V3ZWlAeGp0dS5lZHUuY24=