Rubinia Celeste Bonfanti
Maria Garro
Gioacchino Lavanco1
Stefano Ruggieri- 1Department of Psychology, Educational Science and Human Movement, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
- 2Faculty of Human and Social Sciences, Kore University of Enna, Enna, Italy
The social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic had an impact on the sexuality and quality of life of people around the world. A particularly negative effect was detected on women’s sexual health. As a consequence, many women began to use social media not only to stay in touch with their social networks, but as a way of maintaining sexual contact. The main aim of this research is to observe the positive effects of sexting in women’s wellbeing as a strategy to manage the negative effects of a condition of forced isolation. We collected all our data between November 2020 and March 2021 during a period of strict restrictions in Italy due to the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. In Study 1, the relationship between loneliness, sexting behaviors, and sexual satisfaction was tested on 312 adult women. The results showed the mediator role of motivation for sexting in the relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction. In Study 2, 342 adult women were organized into two groups (women who had sexting at least once during the second wave of the pandemic = 203, and women who did not have sexting during the pandemic = 139) and were assessed on a couple’s wellbeing (intimacy, passion, commitment, and couple satisfaction) and electronic surveillance. The results show that women who had sexting during isolation had higher scores on intimacy, passion, couple satisfaction, and electronic surveillance. These findings suggest the important role of sexting as an adaptive coping strategy during particular conditions of social isolation.
Introduction
Over the last few years, due to the coronavirus disease (COVID-19), the subjective wellbeing of many citizens around the world has been severely threatened. Actually, this condition is not strictly connected with the health problems associated with the pandemic or the fear of contracting the virus, but rather with the restrictions on individual freedom that all governments of the world adopted to minimize the spread of the virus. Many of these strategies were based on social distancing and limiting the mobility of the population.
A growing number of studies have been analyzing the negative psychological consequences of social isolation on the individual’s wellbeing and the impact of separation on social life, with particular reference to community, friends and couples’ relationships (Sikali, 2020; Gan and Best, 2021; Pietromonaco and Overall, 2022). Researchers have also found that social isolation increases level of stress (Fitzpatrick et al., 2020; Sterina et al., 2022), social anxiety (Wang et al., 2020), depression (Fischer et al., 2020), loneliness (Ruggieri et al., 2021a), and causes low levels of life satisfaction and psychological wellbeing (Satici et al., 2020; Zhang et al., 2020).
The experience of isolation due COVID-19 drove people to remain more socially connected via information and communication technology than before (Statista, 2022). This is not surprising because social media offered a unique opportunity to keep in touch with one’s own social network (Boursier et al., 2020). In this situation, many people have been driven online also in order to preserve their emotional relationships (Lindberg et al., 2020; Pietromonaco and Overall, 2022). Moving intimate relationships online has been a trend that has been going on for some time, but which has taken on much more significant tones and dimensions with the pandemic (Ruggieri et al., 2013; Burleson et al., 2022; Maes and Vandenbosch, 2022).
Existing research has found that traumatic events might lead to the deterioration of relationship quality and intimacy (Cohan and Cole, 2002; Marshall and Kuijer, 2017). For example, during the pandemic, a fear of COVID-19 infection generated distress with regard to couple intimacy, which altered sexual dynamics, especially for partners who did not live in the same home. Consequently, the intimacy and sexual life relationship of non-cohabiting couples was affected by isolation and went through a sharp change due to the pandemic. Isolation had a negative impact in terms of couple and sexual relationships, due to the difficulty of finding moments for intimacy (Lehmiller et al., 2020; de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). This situation has an impact on the increase in autoerotic sexuality, cybersex, cyber-pornography use, and sexting (Ibarra et al., 2020; Li et al., 2020). All these alternative sexual activities helped in managing the stress arising in a couple’s daily life, during the pandemic, representing a possible strategy of relief or compensation for the sense of loneliness (Uzieblo and Prescott, 2020).
Research has shown that the pandemic has had a particularly negative effect on women’s sexual health (Carvalho and Pascoal, 2020). A systematic review conducted during COVID-19 outbreak showed a deterioration of their sexual function, with a decline in sexual satisfaction (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). Eleuteri et al. (2022) found that anxiety, stress and depressive symptoms due to the pandemic influenced a decrease in sexual desire for women. Previous studies also indicated that psychological distress had a negative impact, mostly on women’s sexuality (Dèttore et al., 2013; Kalmbach et al., 2014). An increase in household chores, the impossibility of having family support (for example nannies or housekeepers), and the little time devoted to the sexual sphere might also explain the decrease in sexual satisfaction for women during the COVID-19 pandemic (Craig and Churchill, 2020; Collins et al., 2021; De Rose et al., 2021).
In the wake of these literature suggestions, the main aim of the present research is to understand the role of sexting in women’s wellbeing and sexual satisfaction during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Sexting and sexual satisfaction during COVID-19 pandemic
Several researchers have studied the relationship between the inhibition of sexual desire and specific negative mood states emerging from the pandemic, such as anxiety, sense of loneliness, and the decrease in personal sexual satisfaction (Pascoal et al., 2021). This is probably one of the reasons why a decrease in sexual activity was found in research into couples in the United States (Hensel et al., 2020) and the United Kingdom (Jacob et al., 2020). If on the one hand psychological implications due to COVID-19 rendered the implementation of the sexual act less desirable, on the other hand government rules also reduced the possibility of maintaining sexual relationships because of enforced isolation.
Many studies have shown the effects of the pandemic and social isolation in women’s sexual satisfaction (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). One of the difficulties faced by woman during confinement was that sexual wellbeing was considered non-essential, and sexual medication services were reduced, affecting women disproportionately (Hussein, 2020; Shindel and Rowen, 2020). For example, Endler et al. (2020) highlighted the fact that sexual and reproductive health care in various countries was at risk during the pandemic, placing women in a particularly vulnerable situation. Moreover, pre-existing differences in sexual pleasure (Andrejek and Fetner, 2019; Mahar et al., 2020), a higher susceptibility to affective disorders (Jalnapurkar et al., 2018) and to sexual dysfunction (Peixoto and Nobre, 2015), might have interacted with social isolation to decrease sexual health among women during this period. Most of all, changes in daily life, limitations on one’s own independence, and feelings of worthlessness, may have caused in women a sense of helplessness and loss (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). The downturn in sexual satisfaction could not be avoided because of these COVID-19 prevention measures, which could lead to unrequited sexual needs, whilst also having a negative impact on one’s life satisfaction, especially for those who are sexually active, but not in a domestic partnership or marital relationship.
It is clear that many individuals’ sex lives have undergone a change, in which many have expanded their sexual repertoires to safeguard the own sexual satisfaction. Erwinda et al. (2020), found that changes with regard to sexual activity have prompted some people to compensate the non-fulfilment of their sexual needs, by, for example, accessing pornographic sites, by using dating apps and by entering into online sexual communication in order to express and satisfy their sexual desires.
Various studies observed that women reported a greater frequency of use of novel sexual activities for increasing sexual desire, sexual satisfaction and an increasing number of sexual outlets to cope with emotionally negative events (Cyranowski et al., 2004; de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2020; Lehmiller et al., 2020; Yuksel and Ozgor, 2020). These sexual outlets included activities such as trying out new sexual positions and sharing sexual fantasies with a partner, masturbation, reacting to erotic cues, cybersex, sexting (Lehmiller et al., 2020).
Sexting can be described as the creation and sharing of images or text messages in the personal sexual sphere, through the use of mobile phones or apps (Hasinoff, 2015), including Whatsapp, Facebook, Tinder, Snapchat, and other virtual applications. This has now become a basic element in most relationships, being helpful in beginning and maintaining a romantic connection (Albury et al., 2013; Cooper et al., 2016).
A growing number of studies have shown how sexting increased during the pandemic (Cocci et al., 2020; Lehmiller et al., 2020; Yuksel and Ozgor, 2020). About 15% of emerging adults started to engage in sexting during quarantine, as a result reporting greater satisfaction from their sex life (Lehmiller et al., 2020). The main benefit of sexting was to mitigate physical distancing (Fox and Potocki, 2014), because it allowed people to temporarily replace face-to-face interaction and satisfy their own needs in the sphere of sex. In fact, sexting represented an opportunity for maintaining intimacy and improving sexual satisfaction in a relationship (McDaniel and Drouin, 2015; Drouin et al., 2017).
The most widely reported reasons for sexting are connected with sexual and social aims (Bianchi et al., 2016, 2017). Within a relationship, people could “sext” with their own partners, by flirting, starting sexual activity or preserving a state of intimacy and passion (Temple and Choi, 2014; Van Ouytsel et al., 2017). Differently, for single people sexting could also be used as an excuse for attracting the interest of potential partners (Albury and Crawford, 2012). However, some studies found that sexting is a risk behavior. It can affect the physical and psychological health of people involved as well as trigger symptoms of psychological distress (Medrano et al., 2018). It could be associated to some risk behaviors, such as cyberpornography (Morelli et al., 2017), and online victimization which are associated to negative emotional impact (Slonje et al., 2017).
Garrido-Macías et al. (2021) examined some predictors that could be associated with sexting and they found that loneliness could lead to engagement in sexting by emerging adults. Other research demonstrates that high-stress conditions could negatively influence the functioning of a relationship (Burleson et al., 2007; Hamilton and Meston, 2013; De Witte et al., 2015; Lehmiller et al., 2020). Frequent engagement in various sexual activities has been associated with greater couple satisfaction among those in relationships; this effect may change in accordance with varying type and frequency of sexual activities, also influencing the intimacy and commitment of the couple (McNulty et al., 2016; Muise et al., 2016; Kort, 2020; Rosenberg et al., 2021). Furthermore, diverse studies indicate that couple intimacy, passion, and commitment with one’s own partner could reduce psychological distress and, thus, provide some relief in particular conditions, such as the current pandemic and its associated restrictions (De Witte et al., 2015; McNulty et al., 2016; Meston et al., 2020).
The current research
As we have observed, sexual health is essential for one’s wellbeing. Some researchers observed how during the pandemic, activity linked to sexting provided psychological and emotional benefits (Erwinda et al., 2020; Lehmiller et al., 2020; Pennanen-Iire et al., 2021). Considering the difficulties women experienced in the sexual sphere during the pandemic, such as feelings of worthlessness and helplessness due social isolation (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021) emphasized by their higher susceptibility to affective disorders (Jalnapurkar et al., 2018) and to sexual dysfunctions (Peixoto and Nobre, 2015), it is very important to understand whether sexting could be a protective factor in women’s sexual and couple satisfaction. Obviously, these considerations are also important above and beyond the pandemic period.
The general aims of the present studies are: (1) to investigate the use of sexting among adult women during the isolation period of the second wave of COVID-19 pandemic, and exploring its coping function in the relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction, and (2) to analyze aspects of couple wellbeing of women who had engaged in sexting compared to those who had not.
Study 1
To date, the importance of sexting in sexual satisfaction in women during the COVID-19 crisis, but not only, has received little research attention, whereas it should be a research priority (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). In the current investigation, we tested our hypothesized research model (Figure 1), in order to examine the relationship between loneliness, motivation for sexting and sexual satisfaction in women.
Figure 1. The hypothesized research model.
The relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction
Loneliness and isolation might potentially prompt more sexual-negative-mood states, affecting sexual satisfaction and increasing relationship conflict (Lehmiller et al., 2020). Accordingly, quarantine situations may have exacerbated the worsening of sexual issues (Pennanen-Iire et al., 2021). Findings suggested that many women experienced a decrease in sexual satisfaction during the pandemic, due to the vulnerability factors that characterize the female population, including the consequences of forced isolation: cohabitation, a greater commitment to bringing up children, lower access to sexual health services (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). In accordance with these studies, we hypothesize that:
H1: Loneliness was negatively related to sexual satisfaction for women during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The relationship between sexting and sexual satisfaction
Sexual satisfaction is considered the affective response resulting from an individual’s subjective estimation of the positive and negative dimensions in his/her own sexual sphere (Lawrance and Byers, 1995). Past research has shown that there is a relationship between sexting and sexual satisfaction, considering sexting as a way of sexual communication and also as sexual behavior (Stasko and Geller, 2015; Galovan et al., 2018). Specifically, it has been seen that sexual satisfaction increases as the frequency of sexting with one’s sexual partner increases. Thus, it has been shown how sexual satisfaction can be enhanced through sexting as it can function both as a strategy of communication and activity linked to the sexual sphere (Oriza and Hanipraja, 2020). Starting from this literature, we hypothesize that:
H2: Motivation for sexting was positively related to sexual satisfaction for women during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The mediating role of motivation for sexting
Previous studies noted a decrease in actual live communication with other people; an increase in isolation and loneliness have been linked with greater use of the Internet for sexual purposes (Kraut et al., 1998; Barak and Fisher, 2002). Specifically, prior research showed that loneliness could lead to engagement in sexting by emerging adults (Garrido-Macías et al., 2021). During confinement due to the pandemic, it was shown how loneliness and isolation could potentially prompt increased sexual adaptation in order to fulfill sexual needs or relieve negative mood states, affecting sexual satisfaction (Lehmiller et al., 2020). Engaging in sexting may therefore reflect a coping strategy to combat a sense of isolation or an intentional strategy for preventing further sexual restrictions, so we hypothesize that:
H3: Motivation for sexting mediated the negative effects of loneliness and sexual satisfaction for women during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Method
Participants and procedure
A convenient sample of university students took part in the study for a credit course. The only condition was: (a) that they were women; (b) that they had been involved in a romantic relationship (but not cohabiting) for at least a year; (c) that they declare that they had been sexting during the pandemic. In the end, three hundred and twelve women (mean age = 26.98, SD = 6.98; age range = 20–51) participated in the study. The administration of the questionnaire took place online between 15 November 2020 and 15 March 2021 (during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Italy). The questionnaire was anonymous and took approximately 10–15 min to be completed. The research was conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Italian Psychological Association (AIP), as well as the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants completed statements of informed consent to participate in the study.
Measures
The following measures were used to achieve the objective of the study.
Information about relationship status and sexting
Participants were asked to answer three questions regarding relationship status and sexting. Particularly, the questions explored the following: (1) being in a couple relationship for at least 1 year; (2) the type of relationship (homosexual or heterosexual); (3) after a brief introduction on sexting behavior, if she had practiced sexting with her partner at least once during the last 6 months of restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Loneliness
Measured using the UCLA Loneliness Scale–Version 3 (Russell, 1996), a global loneliness self-report measure composed of 20 items (e.g., “How often do you feel alone?”, “How often do you feel that people are around you but not with you?”). The scale is evaluated on a 4-point Likert-type scale, from 1 = Never to 4 = Often with higher scores indicating greater tendencies to feel lonely (α = 0.90).
Motivation for sexting
Assessed with the 13-item self-report Sexting Motivations Questionnaire (SMQ; Bianchi et al., 2016), which measures the frequency of three motivations for sexting: body image reinforcement (3 items; e.g., “Sometimes I send sexts to test whether I am attractive enough”), sexual purposes (5 items; e.g., “Sometimes I send sexts to increase passion in my dating relationship”), and instrumental/aggravated reasons (5 items; e.g., “Sometimes I send sexts in exchange for money or gifts”). Answers included a 5-point scale (from 1 = Never to 5 = Always) (α = 0.91). In the present study, we used an indicator of motivation for sexting that included only the dimensions of body image reinforcement and sexual purposes, excluding instrumental/aggravated for theoretical reasons connected with the objectives of the study that considers sexting as a coping strategy.
Sexual satisfaction
Measured using the New Sexual Satisfaction Scale short form (NSSS-S; Brouillard et al., 2019), 12 items were rated on a 5-point Likert scale, from 1 = Not at all Satisfied to 4 = Extremely Satisfied with higher scores indicating higher levels of sexual satisfaction. As an example of items there was “The way I sexually react to my partner” and “My partner’s emotional opening up during sex” (α = 0.94).
Results
Preliminary analyses revealed no substantial violation of normality regarding data distribution. Means and standard deviations are listed in Table 1.
Table 1. Means, standard deviation and correlations between loneliness, motivation for sexting and sexual satisfaction.
Analyzing correlation patterns, we can see how loneliness and sexual satisfaction are negatively correlated as we hypnotized in H1. Motivation for sexting is also positively related with sexual satisfaction: those who scored higher in motivation for sexting were also more sexually satisfied, as previously assumed (H2) (Table 1).
In order to test the third hypothesis, we tested the role of the mediator of motivation for sexting in the relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction. To test our hypothesis we used PROCESS model 4 (5,000 resampling; see Figure 1).
The overall equation was significant, R2 = 0.10, [F(1,310) = 33.93, p < 0.001]. As we can see in Figure 2, loneliness significantly predicted both motivation for sexting and sexual satisfaction in a negative way. Sexual satisfaction is also predicted by motivation for sexting. It is also possible to observe how the indirect effect of the outcome of loneliness on sexual satisfaction through motivation for sexting was significant.
Figure 2. The effects of loneliness on sexual satisfaction via motivation for sexting.
Discussion
Study 1 shed light on the use of sexting among adult women during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic and explored its coping function in the relationships between loneliness and sexual satisfaction.
As regards gender, past literature suggests that women would be less prepared to engage in sexting behavior, due to prevailing sexual mores, according to which women feared much heavier social consequences than men (Ringrose et al., 2013; Salter, 2016; Setty, 2019), but it was shown that, during the pandemic, this bias was not found in the female sample. For example, Thomas et al. (2022) found no effect of gender on willingness to engage in sexting, probably due to sexual needs that had arisen in the wake of COVID-19 restrictions. Recent studies indicated an increase in sexting activities during the first phase of the pandemic (Gabster et al., 2022), suggesting that it could have had a role in coping with pandemic difficulties, such as sexual and couple satisfaction. However, to our knowledge, this research provides the first evidence about the role of sexting in tackling pandemic-related loneliness and its influence on sexual satisfaction.
The results of this study showed that the model of the links between loneliness and sexual satisfaction (through the mediating role of motivation for sexting) has a good fit, underlining the predicting role of sexting and loneliness in sexual satisfaction. The study also emphasized the role of motivation for sexting as a mediator in the relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction. In detail, we observed a negative relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction, which is consistent with the results of research by Van Ouytsel et al. (2017) and Abedi et al. (2020). These previous results emphasize that higher levels of loneliness are predictive of lower sexual satisfaction. When we introduced motivation for sexting as a mediator we found an indirect relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction; specifically, loneliness negatively predicted motivation for sexting, which in turn positively predicted sexual satisfaction. Indeed, during the pandemic, it was seen how having a steady partner and, therefore, not feeling lonely was a good predictor of engagement in sexting, used as a coping strategy aimed to reduce perceived distance and increase sexual satisfaction (Caponnetto et al., 2022). It is plausible that the increase in the use of technology-based sexual activity such as sexting, during the pandemic, was a temporary coping strategy that would subsequently be replaced in favor of future in-person interaction with one’s own partner at the end of the pandemic (Lehmiller et al., 2020).
Sexting has been shown to be an adaptive coping response to pandemic sexual difficulties in other recent research (Bianchi et al., 2021a), suggesting that sexual satisfaction was the result of sexting applied as an antidote to pandemic worries. Caponnetto et al. (2022) also found that during the pandemic the perceptions of sexting changed, and this modification seems to be linked to the pandemic socio-sanitary situation and related restrictions. These results are in disagreement with some previous findings, which indicated that cybersex activities like sexting, were significantly connected with a decrease in marital sexual satisfaction and intimacy (Whitty, 2003), probably because under normal conditions people perceived online sexual activity as menacing couple fidelity (Cooper et al., 2006).
In fact, a pandemic study on adults by Lehmiller et al. (2020) showed that 20.3% of the sample reported new sexual activities in their sexual life during the pandemic, e.g., sharing nude photos, sexting, having cybersex, filming oneself masturbating, and using advanced sexual technology such as virtual reality porn. In addition, using sexting behavior as a coping strategy during COVID-19 affected the sexuality of people in different ways (Bianchi et al., 2021a), because some people found themselves reinventing their ways of experiencing their own sexuality (Eleuteri et al., 2022). For these reasons, it becomes critical to explore people’s sexual lives at the time of COVID-19 by investigating changes in sexual behavior patterns since the pandemic began until its current evolution.
Study 2
Results from Study 1 showed how sexting played an important role in the mediation of the relationship between loneliness and sexual satisfaction in conditions of social isolation due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The women who engaged in sexting in conditions of isolation from their partner also showed higher levels of sexual satisfaction, confirming other research that found that sexual interest was enhanced by trying out new fantasies, modes of foreplay, sexual positions, and digital sex, leading to probable improvements in their sex lives (Lehmiller et al., 2020).
Other research showed how changes due to social isolation during COVID-19 generated many changes, all over the world, in the couple relationship, especially in terms of couple stability (Schmid et al., 2021), well-functioning intimate relationships (Luetke et al., 2020), couple wellbeing (Oriza and Hanipraja, 2020), and general satisfaction (Bolesławska et al., 2021).
Considering that sexual satisfaction is an extremely important component of a couple’s life (Sánchez-Fuentes et al., 2014; Flynn et al., 2016), it is possible then that sexting might also influence other aspects of the relationship, generating levels of general satisfaction. Study 2 sought to investigate these aspects in more detail.
Following these considerations, we looked more deeply at the relationship analyzed in Study 1 and observed other aspects of couple wellbeing (intimacy, passion, commitment, and general couple satisfaction) in women who had been sexting during the pandemic compared to those who had not. Therefore, we hypothesize that:
H1: Couple wellbeing (intimacy, passion, commitment, and couple satisfaction) is greater among women who had been sexting during the pandemic compared to those who had not.
Also, previous research observed how women are more preoccupied than men about chatting freely with another person, and as a result they feel more jealous of their own partner (Weinstein et al., 2015). These results were also confirmed during the pandemic period, in which Shafer et al. (2022) found that COVID-related health concerns predicted greater social media surveillance of a romantic partner during the COVID quarantine. Surveillance is characterized of jealousy and it is typical of people who try to safeguard themselves from potential threatening circumstances (Tokunaga, 2016). In the Internet context, surveillance is easier and it is related to supervise romantic partners’ wall updates, postings, friends and followers lists, videos, photos, and even invitations, because the supervising behavior could help oneself to diminish relational uncertainty (Marshall et al., 2013). Starting from this literature, we also hypothesize that:
H2: Electronic surveillance is greater among women who had been sexting during the pandemic compared to those who had not.
Method
Participants and procedure
Three hundred and forty-two women (M = 23.05; SD = 3.20; age range = 19–34) who had been involved in a romantic relationship for at least 1 year were recruited in order to complete an online survey. Participants were university students and did not receive any compensation for their participation. The administration took place between 15 February 2021 and 15 March 2021 (during the final phase of the second wave of the pandemic in Italy). The data collected were anonymous and all participants provided written informed consent. Participants were informed about the aim of the research during the debriefing. All procedures performed in this study were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Italian Psychological Association (AIP) and with the Helsinki Declaration.
Participants had to answer the first item of the questionnaire by declaring whether they had ben sexing during the pandemic (“Did you practice sexting at least once during the last 4 months of restrictions caused by COVID-19 pandemic?”). Two hundred and three women declared that they had not been sexting during the pandemic (WHNS), one hundred and thirty-nine women declared that they had been sexting at least once (WHS). Eleven participants declared they were in homosexual relationships.
Measures
Information about relationship status and sexting
Participants were asked to answer three questions regarding relationship status and sexting. Particularly, the questions explored the following: (1) being in a couple relationship for at least 1 year, because when the research was conducted only the last year corresponded to the pandemic period; (2) the type of relationship (homosexual or heterosexual); (3) if she had practiced sexting with her partner at least once during the last 4 months of restrictions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
Intimacy, passion, and commitment
The Triangular Love Scale (Sternberg, 1988, 1997) was used to assess three components of love toward the romantic partner: intimacy (15 items; α = 0.95; e.g., “I am willing to share myself and my possessions with…”), passion (15 items; α = 0.94; e.g., “I especially like physical contact with …”), and commitment (15 items; α = 0.93; e.g., “I cannot imagine ending my relationship with…”). Respondents were asked to think about the person they love and rate the agreement on a 9-point Likert scale, from 1 (Not at all) to 9 (Extremely).
Couple satisfaction
Measured using the ENRICH (Evaluation and Nurturing Relationship Issues, Communication and Happiness) Marital Satisfaction Scale (EMS; Fowers and Olson, 1993). For the purpose of this study 6 items have been used (e.g., “My partner and I understand each other perfectly”). The scale is evaluated on a 5-point Likert-type scale (α = 0.75), from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree) with higher scores indicating a greater positive couple agreement.
Electronic surveillance
Assessed using the Interpersonal Electronic Surveillance Scale for Social Network Sites (ISS; Tokunaga, 2011), a 12 item self-report scale which measures the interpersonal electronic surveillance over SNSs (e.g., “I explore my partner’s social networking page to see if there is anything new or exciting”). The scale is evaluated on a 7-point Likert-type scale, from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree) (α = 0.94).
Results
Preliminary analyses revealed no substantial violation of normality regarding data distribution. Means and standard deviations for both groups are listed in Table 2.
Table 2. Mean and standard deviation of the dependent variables on women who declare that they had not sexting during pandemic (WHNS), and women declared that they had sexting at least once (WHS).
We initially conducted a MANOVA to detect the presence of multivariate effects associated with engagement (or not) in sexting with her partner during the lockdown period. The results showed the presence of a significant effect [Wilks’ λ(5,336) = 20.51, p < 0.000, partial η2 = 0.23] (Table 2).
At the univariate level, to test our hypotheses, we ran five ANOVAs comparisons for each of the dependent variables (intimacy, passion, commitment, couple satisfaction, electronic surveillance) between women who declared that they had not been sexting during the pandemic (WHNS), and women who declared that they had been sexting at least once (WHS).
The results show that there are differences between the two groups with regard to the Triangular Love Scale (Sternberg, 1988, 1997). In particular, differences emerge regarding the levels of intimacy [F(1,340) = 25.51; p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.07] and passion [F(1,340) = 37.75; p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.10] (greater levels of intimacy and passion for WHS), but no difference emerges regarding the levels of commitment [F(1,340) = 0.89; p = n.s.] (Table 2). Also, with regard to the levels of couple satisfaction we observed a difference between WHS and WHNS [F(1,340) = 25.51; p < 0.001, partial η2 = 0.70]. In particular, women who engaged in sexting show higher levels of couple satisfaction.
Finally, we found that WHS also activate higher levels of partner surveillance than WNHS [F(1,340) = 24.15; p < 0.001, η2 = 0.07].
Discussion
The results of Study 2 confirmed the important role of sexting as a resource for combatting social isolation in women due to the pandemic condition. The results highlight that women WHS during the second wave of the pandemic, compared to those WHNS, had higher scores on intimacy, passion, couple satisfaction and electronic surveillance. These findings support previous evidence for sexting activities affecting couple wellbeing (McDaniel and Drouin, 2015; Oriza and Hanipraja, 2020).
More in detail, previous research has observed that intimacy is an important dimension of cybersex. Weinstein et al. (2015) found that women prefer to engage in online sexual activity to increase the couple’s intimacy. The primary reason for using online sexual activities was as a part of lovemaking with one’s own partner or in response to requests by their partner, since most women interpret online sexual activities as acceptable or positive when associated with a shared activity with a partner. These results are also confirmed by Caponnetto et al. (2022), who observed that, during the pandemic, the perception of sexting improved, and was used as a coping strategy and a way of reducing the perceived distance with one’s partner. Other studies confirmed an increase in sexting during the pandemic (Bianchi et al., 2021a; Eleuteri et al., 2022) and investigated the relationship between COVID-related stress, coping strategies, and experimental, risky, and emotional sexting. They found that, during quarantine, for those who were in a long-distance relationship as opposed to those who were in a non-distance relationship or single, as an attempt to maintain intimacy with partners, there was a high frequency of experimental sexting–a type of sexting used when sexual contents are shared with a trusted partner (Wolak et al., 2012; Eleuteri et al., 2017).
In Study 2, we also observed that women who engaged in sexting during the isolation period reported higher levels of passion and couple satisfaction. Previous research (Mollaioli et al., 2021) found that those who had had more sexual activity during the pandemic showed a decrease in psychological distress and a higher level of dyadic commitment and couple satisfaction, compared with those who did not. In this vein, sexual activity seems to perform a protective role on one’s personal psychological health. In general, improvements in sexuality were associated with an improvement in the relationship with the partner, being happy and satisfied together, feeling less stressed (Arafat et al., 2020; Panzeri et al., 2021; Costantini et al., 2021). Furthermore, in a large study conducted by Balzarini et al. (2023), perceived virtual partner responsiveness helped to improve poor relationship quality associated with pandemic-related stressors. Ouytsel et al. (2019) found that engagement in sexting with one’s own partner was significantly linked to a higher perception of passion within the relationship.
In our results, no difference emerges regarding the levels of commitment between women WHS during the second wave of the pandemic compared to the WHNS. Contrary to our expectations, but in line with Matotek et al. (2021), this result is probably produced by basal high rates of couples’ commitment in our sample, for which sexting could simply constitute technology-mediated communication, useful for the couple’s more passionate and sexual aspects.
Previous research has shown how women often report that cybersex in general is characterized by chatting freely with another person, and as a result women feel more jealous than men about this activity on the part of their partner (Weinstein et al., 2015; Ruggieri et al., 2021b). This is confirmed by the results of this study, which suggest that WHS during the second wave of the pandemic, compared to WHNS, had higher scores on electronic surveillance. A reason for greater surveillance could be interpreted as the belief that one’s partner, during the period of isolation, is more inclined to also sexting with other women, being less likely to be discovered due to the forced separation caused by the pandemic. The same results were found by Shafer et al. (2022) in a cross-lagged study on adults, finding that COVID-related health concerns predicted social media surveillance of a romantic partner during COVID quarantine. Although romantic partners report developing a sense of closeness and intimacy when sexting, it is important to bear in mind how feelings of distress and uncertainty by adult couples have been shown to lead to social media surveillance of current partners (Fox and Warber, 2014) and this may have been intensified during the COVID-19 pandemic (Goodboy et al., 2021).
Conclusion
During the pandemic, women underwent a deterioration in their sexual functioning, with a decline in sexual satisfaction (de Oliveira and Carvalho, 2021). Eleuteri et al. (2022) found that anxiety, stress, and depressive symptoms due to the pandemic influenced this decrease in sexual desire for women. As a result, the frequency of sexting also increased during the pandemic (Lehmiller et al., 2020). Although previous research has shown the role of sexual activities based on technology usage and how these allowed one to remain connected during social distancing, to our knowledge there is no research on women’s perceived couple wellbeing associated with sexting during the pandemic. Compared with previous studies conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic period (Bianchi et al., 2021b; Caponnetto et al., 2022; Eleuteri et al., 2022), our study focuses on the role of sexting as an adaptive coping response combatting loneliness and social isolation and promoting sexual satisfaction and couple wellbeing in women in response to pandemic-based sexual difficulties.
Our results demonstrate the role of the online dimension to surmount physical distancing and isolation under the particular restrictions, despite the negative consequences that sexting could generate in some cases that should not be underestimated. Instead, our findings contribute to better understand positive aspects of sexting; the fact that people enjoy improved sexual satisfaction through sexting, and that sexting is linked to increased couple wellbeing, suggests that this behavior could carry out a psychological function. Specifically, these results may indicate that engagement in sexting may serve as an adaptive coping mechanism during particularly difficult circumstances.
Taken together, these results suggest that during the epidemic, engagement in sexting for women may have a protective role in safeguarding couple wellbeing.
Limitations and future research
Study limitations when interpreting results should also be considered. The first limitation of this study is that our results are based on correlational data, and great caution should be made in interpreting them causally. Also, the literature suggests that other variables belonging to the individual’s personality could be implicated in sexting behavior, such as openness to new experiences, machiavellianism or narcissism (Crimmins and Seigfried-Spellar, 2017; Morelli et al., 2021). Further research should investigate the relationship between sexting and other variables and should be conducted mainly with experimental and longitudinal approaches, to clarify the direction of these relationships and understanding potential reciprocal relationships between the variables. The second limitation of the research is that it was conducted in Italy during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic, and the results cannot be generalized to different countries, where the experience of the second wave of the pandemic may have been very different. Further research conducted in other cultural contexts (also in the absence of the restrictions produced by the COVID-19 pandemic) should investigate the relationship between sexting and individual wellbeing in women. The third limitation is linked to the sample, because the participants are only women university students in a specific type of relationship, over 1 year and not cohabiting. Further research should investigate the relationship between sexting and individual wellbeing in different types of samples such as men and general population (instead of young students only). Another limitation is the adoption of self-report instruments, which can be influenced by the social desirability bias; they may also limit conclusions from these results. Finally, we only assessed women, and it might be interesting to understand how the relationship between these variables would work in a sample of men as well. Future research needs to focus on a longitudinal design and add objective assessments of variables.
Despite these limitations, our study may bring something fresh to research, providing the first evidence for the coping role of sexting behaviors in sexual satisfaction and couple wellbeing. Our findings should be used in post-pandemic studies to better understand the coping function of sexting behavior in other environmental conditions, beyond the pandemic. Since the view of technology-mediated sexuality is at a developmental stage, future work should investigate the sexting role in sexual satisfaction with a longitudinal design, to understand how it could increase the level of intimacy within a relational relationship. From a clinical point of view, we believe that the results of our work may be useful in better understanding the phenomenon of sexting during emergencies, of sexual interactions mediated by technology, and the impact on sexual satisfaction for women.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the University of Palermo. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
RB, MG, and GL performed the material preparation and data collection. SR performed the analyses. RB and SR wrote the first draft of the manuscript. All authors contributed to the study conception and design and commented on previous versions of the manuscript, read, and approved the final manuscript.
Acknowledgments
We thank all people participated in this study.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Abedi, V., Olulana, O., Avula, V., Chaudhary, D., Khan, A., Shahjouei, S., et al. (2020). Racial, economic and health inequality and COVID-19 infection in the United States. medRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2020.04.26.20079756
Albury, K., and Crawford, K. (2012). Sexting, consent and young people’s ethics: Beyond Megan’s Story. Continuum J. Media Cu. 26, 463–473. doi: 10.1080/10304312.2012.665840
Albury, K., Crawford, K., Bryon, P., and Matthews, B. (2013). Young people and sexting in Australia: Ethics, representation and the law, final report. Sydney: Australian Research Centre for Creative Industries and Innovation, University of New South Wales.
Andrejek, N., and Fetner, T. (2019). The gender gap in orgasms: Survey data from a mid-sized Canadian city. Int. J. Sex. Health 31, 26–35. doi: 10.1080/19317611.2018.1563014
Arafat, S. M. Y., Kar, S. K., Menon, V., Kaliamoorthy, C., Mukherjee, S., Alradie-Mohamed, A., et al. (2020). Panic buying: An insight from the content analysis of media reports during COVID-19 pandemic. Neurol Psychiatry Brain Res. 37, 100–103. doi: 10.1016/j.npbr.2020.07.002
Balzarini, R. N., Muise, A., Zoppolat, G., Di Bartolomeo, A., Rodrigues, D. L., Alonso-Ferres, M., et al. (2023). Love in the time of COVID: Perceived partner responsiveness buffers people from lower relationship quality associated with COVID-related stressors. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 14, 342–355. doi: 10.1177/19485506221094437
Barak, A., and Fisher, W. A. (2002). “The future of Internet sexuality,” in Sex and the Internet: A guidebook for clinicians, ed. A. Cooper (London: Brunner-Routledge), 263–280.
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., and Chirumbolo, A. (2016). Psychometric properties of the sexting motivations questionnaire for adolescents and young adults. Rass. di Psicol. 35, 5–18. doi: 10.4558/8067-01
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., and Chirumbolo, A. (2017). Sexting as the mirror on the wall: Body-esteem attribution, media models, and objectified-body consciousness. J. Adolesc. 61, 164–172. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2017.10.006
Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Lonigro, A., Pompili, S., Zammuto, M., Di Tata, D., et al. (2021a). Love in quarantine: Sexting, stress, and coping during the COVID-19 lockdown. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy [Epub ahead of print]. doi: 10.1007/s13178-021-00645-z
Bianchi, D., Morelli, M., Baiocco, R., Cattelino, E., and Chirumbolo, A. (2021b). Patterns of love and sexting in teen dating relationships: The moderating role of conflicts. New Dir. Child Adolesc. Dev. 2021, 133–155. doi: 10.1002/cad.20427
Bolesławska, I., Błaszczyk-Bêbenek, E., Jagielski, P., Jagielska, A., and Przysławski, J. (2021). Nutritional behaviors of women and men in Poland during confinement related to the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic. Sci. Rep. 11:19984. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99561-w
Boursier, V., Gioia, F., Musetti, A., and Schimmenti, A. (2020). Facing loneliness and anxiety during the COVID-19 isolation: The role of excessive social media use in a Sample of Italian Adults. Front. Psychiatry 11:586222. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.586222
Brouillard, P., Štulhofer, A., and Buško, V. (2019). “The new sexual satisfaction scale and its short form,” in Handbook of sexuality-related measures, eds R. R. Milhausen, J. K. Sakaluk, T. D. Fisher, C. M. Davis, and W. L. Yarber (New York, NY: Routledge), 496–499.
Burleson, A., Nusstein, J., Reader, A., and Beck, M. (2007). The in vivo evaluation of hand/rotary/ultrasound instrumentation in necrotic, human mandibular molars. J. Endod. 33, 782–787. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2007.04.015
Burleson, M. H., Roberts, N. A., Munson, A. A., Duncan, C. J., Randall, A. K., Ha, T., et al. (2022). Feeling the absence of touch: Distancing, distress, regulation, and relationships in the context of COVID-19. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 39, 56–79. doi: 10.1177/02654075211052696
Caponnetto, P., Gervasi, F. F., and Maglia, M. (2022). Sexting: A potential addiction or an adaptive behavior to COVID-19 social distancing and stay-at-home policies? A qualitative study. J. Addict. Dis. 40, 84–91. doi: 10.1080/10550887.2021.1932250
Carvalho, J., and Pascoal, P. M. (2020). Challenges in the practice of Sexual Medicine, Sex Therapy, and Sexual Counseling in the time of COVID-19. J. Sex. Med. 17, 1212–1215. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.024
Cocci, A., Giunti, D., and Tonioni, C. (2020). Love at the time of the Covid-19 pandemic: Preliminary results of an online survey conducted during the quarantine in Italy. Int. J. Impot. Res. 32, 556–557. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-0305-x
Cohan, C. L., and Cole, S. W. (2002). Life course transitions and natural disaster: Marriage, birth, and divorce following Hurricane Hugo. J. Fam. Psychol. 16, 14–25. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.16.1.14
Collins, C., Landivar, L. C., Ruppanner, L., and Scarborough, W. J. (2021). COVID-19 and the gender gap in work hours. Femin. Front. 28, 101–112. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12506
Cooper, M. L., Pioli, M., Levitt, A., Telley, A. E., Micheas, L., and Collins, N. L. (2006). “Attachment styles, sex motives, and sexual behavior,” in Dynamics of romantic love: Attachment, caregiving, and sex, eds M. Mikulincer and G. S. Goodman (New York, NY: Guilford Press), 243–274.
Cooper, K., Quayle, E., Jonsson, L., and Svedin, C. G. (2016). Adolescents and self-taken sexual images: A review of the literature. Comput. Hum. Behav. 55, 706–716. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2015.10.003
Costantini, E., Trama, F., Villari, D., Maruccia, S., Li Marzi, V., Natale, F., et al. (2021). The impact of lockdown on couples’ sex lives. J. Clin. Med. 10:1414. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071414
Craig, L., and Churchill, B. (2020). Dual-earner parent couples’ work and care during COVID-19. Gend. Work Organ. 28, 66–79. doi: 10.1111/gwao.12497
Crimmins, D. M., and Seigfried-Spellar, K. C. (2017). Adults who sext: Exploring differences in self-esteem, moral foundations, and personality. IJCC 11:169. doi: 10.5281/ZENODO.1037378
Cyranowski, J. M., Bromberger, J., Youk, A., Matthews, K., Kravitz, H. M., and Powell, L. H. (2004). Lifetime depression history and sexual function in women at midlife. Arch. Sex. Behav. 33, 539–548. doi: 10.1023/B:ASEB.0000044738.84813.3b
de Oliveira, L., and Carvalho, J. (2020). The link between boredom and hypersexuality: A systematic review. J. Sex. Med. 17, 994–1004. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.02.007
de Oliveira, L., and Carvalho, J. (2021). Women’s sexual health during the pandemic of COVID-19: Declines in sexual function and sexual pleasure. Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 13, 76–88. doi: 10.1007/s11930-021-00309-4
De Rose, A. F., Chierigo, F., Ambrosini, F., Mantica, G., Borghesi, M., Suardi, N., et al. (2021). Sexuality during COVID lockdown: A cross-sectional Italian study among hospital workers and their relatives. Int. J. Impot. Res. 33, 131–136. doi: 10.1038/s41443-020-00393-5
De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., and De Cuyper, N. (2015). “Job insecurity, health and well-being,” in Sustainable working lives. Aligning perspectives on health, safety and well-being, eds J. Vuori, R. Blonk, and R. Price (Dordrecht: Springer).
Dèttore, D., Pucciarelli, M., and Santarnecchi, E. (2013). Anxiety and female sexual functioning: An empirical study. J. Sex. Marital Ther. 39, 216–240. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2011.606879
Drouin, M., Coupe, M., and Temple, J. (2017). Is sexting good for your relationship? It depends…. Comput. Hum. Behav. 75, 749–756. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.018
Eleuteri, S., Saladino, V., and Verrastro, V. (2017). Identity, relationships, sexuality, and risky behaviors of adolescents in the context of social media. SRT 32, 354–365. doi: 10.1080/14681994.2017.1397953
Eleuteri, S., Alessi, F., Petruccelli, F., and Saladino, V. (2022). The global impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on individuals’ and couples’ sexuality. Front. Psychol. 12:798260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.798260
Endler, M., Al Haidari, T., Chowdhury, S., Christilaw, J., El Kak, F., Galimberti, D., et al. (2020). Sexual and reproductive health and rights of refugee and migrant women: Gynecologists’ and obstetricians’ responsibilities. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 149, 113–119. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13111
Erwinda, L., Nirwana, H., and Afdal, A. (2020). Analysis of sexual harassment instruments by Rasch Modeling to identify sexual harassers. Couns-Edu 5, 1–5. doi: 10.23916/0020190417540
Fischer, R., Bortolini, T., Karl, J. A., Zilberberg, M., Robinson, K., Rabelo, A., et al. (2020). Rapid review and meta-meta-analysis of self-guided interventions to address anxiety, depression, and stress during COVID-19 social distancing. Front. Psychol. 11:563876. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.563876
Fitzpatrick, K. M., Harris, C., and Drawve, G. (2020). Fear of COVID-19 and the mental health consequences in America. Psychol. Trauma 12, S17–S21. doi: 10.1037/tra0000924
Flynn, K. E., Lin, L., Bruner, D. W., Cyranowski, J. M., Hahn, E. A., Jeffery, D. D., et al. (2016). Sexual satisfaction and the importance of sexual health to quality of life throughout the life course of U.S. adults. J. Sex. Med. 13, 1642–1650. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2016.08.011
Fowers, B. J., and Olson, D. H. (1993). ENRICH marital satisfaction scale: A brief research and clinical tool. J. Fam. Psychol. 7, 176–185. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.7.2.176
Fox, J., and Potocki, B. (2014). “Technology and culture: Sociocultural explanations for sexting,” in Sexting and youth: A multidisciplinary examination of research, theory, and law, eds T. C. Heistand and W. J. Weins (Durham, NC: Carolina Academic Press), 95–122.
Fox, J., and Warber, K. M. (2014). Social networking sites in romantic relationships: Attachment, uncertainty, and partner surveillance on Facebook. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 17, 3–7. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2012.0667
Gabster, A., Erausquin, J. T., Michielsen, K., Mayaud, P., Pascale, J. M., Pericas, C., et al. (2022). How did COVID-19 measures impact sexual behaviour and access to HIV/STI services in Panama? Results from a national cross-sectional online survey. Sex Transm. Infect. 98, 332–340. doi: 10.1136/sextrans-2021-054985
Galovan, A. M., Drouin, M., and McDaniel, B. T. (2018). Sexting profiles in the United States and Canada: Implications for individual and relationship well-being. Comput. Hum. Behav. 79, 19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2017.10.017
Gan, D., and Best, J. (2021). Prior social contact and mental health trajectories during COVID-19: Neighborhood friendship protects vulnerable older adults. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:9999. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18199999
Garrido-Macías, M., Valor-Segura, I., and Expósito, F. (2021). The impact of college men’s sexual coercion perpetration on proclivity toward sexual assault and their cognitive and emotional reactions. Psychol. Men. Masc. 22, 800–809. doi: 10.1037/men0000348
Goodboy, A. K., Dillow, M. R., Knoster, K. C., and Howard, H. A. (2021). Relational turbulence from the COVID-19 pandemic: Within-subjects mediation by romantic partner interdependence. JSPR 38, 1800–1818. doi: 10.1177/02654075211000135
Hamilton, L. D., and Meston, C. M. (2013). Chronic stress and sexual function in women. J. Sex. Med. 10, 2443–2454. doi: 10.1111/jsm.12249
Hasinoff, A. A. (2015). Sexting panic: Rethinking criminalization, privacy, and consent. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Hensel, D., Rosenberg, M., Luetke, M., Fu, T., and Herbenick, D. (2020). Changes in solo and partnered sexual behaviors during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Findings from a U.S. Probability Surve. MedRxiv [Preprint]. doi: 10.1101/2020.06.09.20125609
Hussein, J. (2020). COVID-19: What implications for sexual and reproductive health and rights globally? Sex. Reprod. Health Matters 28:1746065. doi: 10.1080/26410397.2020.1746065
Ibarra, F. P., Mehrad, M., Di Mauro, M., Godoy, M. F. P., Cruz, E. G., Nilforoushzadeh, M. A., et al. (2020). Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the sexual behavior of the population. The vision of the east and the west. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 46, 104–112. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538
Jacob, L., Smith, L., Butler, L., Barnett, Y., Grabovac, I., McDermott, D., et al. (2020). Challenges in the practice of sexual medicine in the time of COVID-19 in the United Kingdom. J. Sex. Med. 17, 1229–1236. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.001
Jalnapurkar, I., Allen, M., and Pigott, T. (2018). Sex differences in anxiety disorders: A review. Journal of Psychiatry. Depression Anxiety 4, 3–16. doi: 10.24966/PDA-0150/100011
Kalmbach, D. A., Pillai, V., Roth, T., and Drake, C. L. (2014). The interplay between daily affect and sleep: A 2-week study of young women. J. Sleep Res. 23, 636–645. doi: 10.1111/jsr.12190
Kort, J. (2020). Flatten your couple curve: How to stop the spread of growing conflict in your relationship. Available online at: https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/understanding-the-erotic-code/202004/flatten-your-couple-curve
Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukophadhyay, T., and Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? Am. Psychol. 53, 1017–1031. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
Lawrance, K. A., and Byers, E. S. (1995). Sexual satisfaction in long-term heterosexual relationships: The interpersonal exchange model of sexual satisfaction. Pers. Relatsh. 2, 267–285. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00092.x
Lehmiller, J. J., Garcia, J. R., Gesselman, A. N., and Mark, K. P. (2020). Less sex, but more sexual diversity: Changes in sexual behavior during the COVID-19 coronavirus pandemic. Leis. Sci. 43, 295–304. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2020.1774016
Li, S., Wang, Y., Xue, J., Zhao, N., and Zhu, T. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 epidemic declaration on psychological consequences: A study on active Weibo users. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:2032. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17062032
Lindberg, L. D., Bell, D. L., and Kantor, L. M. (2020). The sexual and reproductive health of adolescents and young adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Perspect. Sex. Reprod. Health 52, 75–79. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12151
Luetke, M., Hensel, D., Herbenick, D., and Rosenberg, M. (2020). Romantic relationship conflict due to the COVID-19 pandemic and changes in intimate and sexual behaviors in a nationally representative sample of american adults. J. Sex. Marital Ther. 46, 747–762. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2020.1810185
Maes, C., and Vandenbosch, L. (2022). Physically distant, virtually close: Adolescents’ sexting behaviors during a strict lockdown period of the COVID-19 pandemic. Comput. Hum. Behav. 126:107033. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2021.107033
Mahar, E. A., Mintz, L. B., and Akers, B. M. (2020). Orgasm equality: Scientific findings and societal implications. Curr. Sex. Health Rep. 12, 24–32. doi: 10.1007/s11930-020-00237-9
Marshall, E. M., and Kuijer, R. G. (2017). Weathering the storm? The impact of trauma on romantic relationships. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 13, 54–59. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.013
Marshall, T. C., Bejanyan, K., Di Castro, G., and Lee, R. A. (2013). Attachment styles as predictors of Facebook-related jealousy and surveillance in romantic relationships. Pers. Relatsh. 20, 1–22. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2011.01393.x
Matotek, L., Howard, D., Clancy, E. M., Fuelscher, I., and Klettke, B. (2021). Sexting and relationship satisfaction among emerging adults: Dispelling the myth. Sex. Cult. 25, 1192–1203. doi: 10.1007/s12119-021-09832-x
McDaniel, B. T., and Drouin, M. (2015). Sexting among married couples: Who is doing it, and are they more satisfied? Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 18, 628–634. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2015.0334
McNulty, J. K., Wenner, C. A., and Fisher, T. D. (2016). Longitudinal associations among relationship satisfaction, sexual satisfaction, and frequency of sex in early marriage. Arch. Sex. Behav. 45, 85–97. doi: 10.1007/s10508-014-0444-6
Medrano, J. L. J., Lopez Rosales, F., and Gámez-Guadix, M. (2018). Assessing the links of sexting, cybervictimization, depression, and suicidal ideation among university students. Arch. Suicide Res. 22, 153–164. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2017.1304304
Meston, C. M., Kilimnik, C. D., Freihart, B. K., and Buss, D. M. (2020). Why humans have sex: Development and psychometric assessment of a short-form version of the YSEX? Instrument. J. Sex. Marital Ther. 46, 141–159. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2019.1654581
Mollaioli, D., Sansone, A., Ciocca, G., Limoncin, E., Colonnello, E., Di Lorenzo, G., et al. (2021). Benefits of sexual activity on psychological, relational, and sexual health during the COVID-19 breakout. JSM 18, 35–49. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.10.008
Morelli, M., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Pezzuti, L., and Chirumbolo, A. (2017). Sexting behaviors and cyber pornography addiction among adolescents: The moderating role of alcohol consumption. Sex. Res. Soc. Policy 14, 113–121. doi: 10.1007/s13178-016-0234-0
Morelli, M., Urbini, F., Bianchi, D., Baiocco, R., Cattelino, E., Laghi, F., et al. (2021). The relationship between dark triad personality traits and sexting behaviors among adolescents and young adults across 11 Countries. IJERPH 18:2526. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052526
Muise, A., Schimmack, U., and Impett, E. A. (2016). Sexual frequency predicts greater well-being, but more is not always better. Soc. Psychol. Pers. Sci. 7, 295–302. doi: 10.1177/1948550615616462
Oriza, I. I., and Hanipraja, M. A. (2020). Sexting and Sexual Satisfaction on Young Adults in Romantic Relationship. PRoUSt 3, 30–39. doi: 10.7454/proust.v3i1.61
Ouytsel, J. V., Walrave, M., and Ponnet, K. (2019). Sexting within adolescents’ romantic relationships: How is it related to perceptions of love and verbal conflict? Comput. Hum. Behav. 97, 216–221. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2019.03.029
Peixoto, M. M., and Nobre, P. (2015). Prevalence and sociodemographic predictors of sexual problems in Portugal: A population-based study with women aged 18 to 79 years. J. Sex. Marital Ther. 41, 169–180. doi: 10.1080/0092623X.2013.842195
Panzeri, A., Bertamini, M., Butter, S., Levita, L., Gibson-Miller, J., Vidotto, G., et al. (2021). Factors impacting resilience as a result of exposure to COVID-19: The ecological resilience model. PLoS One 16:e0256041. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256041
Pascoal, P. M., Carvalho, J., Raposo, C. F., Almeida, J., and Beato, A. F. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on sexual health: A preliminary framework based on a qualitative study with clinical sexologists. Sex. Med. 9:100299. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100299
Pennanen-Iire, C., Prereira-Lourenço, M., Padoa, A., Ribeirinho, A., Samico, A., Gressler, M., et al. (2021). Sexual health implications of COVID-19 pandemic. Sex. Med. Rev. 9, 3–14. doi: 10.1016/j.sxmr.2020.10.004
Pietromonaco, P. R., and Overall, N. C. (2022). Implications of social isolation, separation and loss during the covid-19 pandemic for couples’ relationships. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 43, 189–194. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.07.014
Ringrose, J., Harvey, L., Gill, R., and Livingstone, S. (2013). Teen girls, sexual double standards and ‘sexting’: Gendered value in digital image exchange. Fem. Theory 14, 305–323. doi: 10.1177/1464700113499853
Rosenberg, E. S., Hall, E. W., Rosenthal, E. M., Maxted, A. M., Gowie, D. L., Dufort, E. M., et al. (2021). Monitoring Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) through trends in influenza-like illness, laboratory-confirmed influenza, and COVID-19-New York State, Excluding New York City, 1 January 2020-12 April 2020. Clin. Infect. Dis. 72, 144–147. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciaa684
Ruggieri, S., Boca, S., and Garro, M. (2013). Leadership styles in synchronous and asynchronous virtual learning environments. Turkish Online J. Educ. Technol. 12, 96–102.
Ruggieri, S., Ingoglia, S., Bonfanti, R. C., and Lo Coco, G. (2021a). The role of online social comparison as a protective factor for psychological wellbeing: A longitudinal study during the COVID-19 quarantine. Pers. Individ. Differ. 171:110486. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2020.110486
Ruggieri, S., Bonfanti, R. C., Passanisi, A., Pace, U., and Schimmenti, A. (2021b). Electronic surveillance in the couple: The role of self-efficacy and commitment. Comput. Hum. Behav. 114:106577. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2020.106577
Russell, D. (1996). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. J. Pers. Assess. 66, 20–40. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2
Salter, M. (2016). Crime, justice and social media, 1 Edn. Abingdon: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781315687742
Sánchez-Fuentes, M. D. M., Santos-Iglesias, P., and Sierra, J. C. (2014). A systematic review of sexual satisfaction. Int. J. Clin. Health Psychol. 14, 67–75. doi: 10.1016/S1697-2600(14)70038-9
Satici, B., Gocet-Tekin, E., Deniz, M. E., and Satici, S. A. (2020). Adaptation of the Fear of COVID-19 Scale: Its association with psychological distress and life satisfaction in Turkey. Int. J. Ment. Health Addict. 8, 1–9. doi: 10.1007/s11469-020-00294-0
Schmid, L., Wörn, J., Hank, K., Sawatzki, B., and Walper, S. (2021). Changes in employment and relationship satisfaction in times of the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from the German family Panel. Eur. Soc. 23, S743–S758. doi: 10.1080/14616696.2020.1836385
Setty, E. (2019). Meanings of bodily and sexual expression in youth sexting culture: Young women’s negotiation of gendered risks and harms. Sex Roles 80, 586–606. doi: 10.1007/s11199-018-0957-x
Shafer, J., May, R. W., and Fincham, F. D. (2022). Exploring temporal evaluations of interpersonal social media surveillance during the COVID-19 lockdown. Emerg. Adulthood 10, 282–290. doi: 10.1177/21676968211046073
Shindel, A. W., and Rowen, T. S. (2020). Challenges in the practice of sexual medicine in the time of COVID-19 in the United States. J. Sex. Med. 17, 1216–1219. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.05.011
Sikali, K. (2020). The dangers of social distancing: How COVID-19 can reshape our social experience. J. Community Psychol. 48, 2435–2438. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22430
Slonje, R., Smith, P. K., and Frisén, A. (2017). Perceived reasons for the negative impact of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. Eur. J. Dev. Psychol. 14, 295–310. doi: 10.1080/17405629.2016.1200461
Stasko, E. C., and Geller, P. A. (2015). “Reframing sexting as a positive relationship behavior,” in Paper presented at American psychological association 2015 convention, August 6–9, (Toronto).
Statista, (2022). Social media use during COVID-19 worldwide - statistics & facts. Available online at: https://www.statista.com/ (accessed October 30, 2022).
Sterina, E., Hermida, A. P., Gerberi, D. J., and Lapid, M. I. (2022). Emotional resilience of older adults during COVID-19: A systematic review of studies of stress and well-being. Clin. Gerontol. 45, 4–19. doi: 10.1080/07317115.2021.1928355
Sternberg, R. J. (1988). “A triarchic view of intelligence in cross-cultural perspective,” in Human abilities in cultural context, eds S. H. Irvine and J. W. Berry (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 60–85. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511574603.003
Sternberg, R. J. (1997). The concept of intelligence and its role in lifelong learning and success. Am. Psychol. 52, 1030–1037. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.52.10.1030
Temple, J. R., and Choi, H. (2014). Longitudinal association between teen sexting and sexual behavior. Pediatrics 134, e1287–e1292. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1974
Thomas, M. F., Binder, A., and Matthes, J. (2022). Love in the time of corona: Predicting willingness to engage in sexting during the first COVID-19-related lockdown. Arch. Sex. Behav. 51, 157–168. doi: 10.1007/s10508-022-02292-w
Tokunaga, R. S. (2011). Social networking site or social surveillance site? Understanding the use of interpersonal electronic surveillance in romantic relationships. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 705–713. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2010.08.014
Tokunaga, R. S. (2016). Interpersonal surveillance over social network sites. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 33, 171–190.
Uzieblo, K., and Prescott, D. (2020). Online pornography use during the COVID-19 pandemic: Should we worry? Part I. Sex. Abuse-blogspot 1–3.
Van Ouytsel, J., Van Gool, E., Walrave, M., Ponnet, K., and Peeters, E. (2017). Sexting: Adolescents’ perceptions of the applications used for, motives for, and consequences of sexting. J. Youth Stud. 20, 446–470. doi: 10.1080/13676261.2016.1241865
Wang, C., Pan, R., Wan, X., Tan, Y., Xu, L., Ho, C. S., et al. (2020). Immediate Psychological Responses and Associated Factors during the Initial Stage of the 2019 Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Epidemic among the General Population in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 17:1729. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17051729
Weinstein, A., Dorani, D., Elhadif, R., Bukovza, Y., Yarmulnik, A., and Dannon, P. (2015). Internet addiction is associated with social anxiety in young adults. Ann. Clin. Psychiatry 27, 4–9.
Whitty, M. T. (2003). Pushing the wrong buttons: Men’s and women’s attitudes toward online and offline infidelity. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 6, 569–579. doi: 10.1089/109493103322725342
Wolak, J., Finkelhor, D., and Mitchell, K. (2012). Trends in law enforcement responses to technology facilitated child sexual exploitation crimes: The third national juvenile online victimization study (NJOV-3). Durham: Crimes against Children Research Center.
Yuksel, B., and Ozgor, F. (2020). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on female sexual behavior. Int. J. Gynaecol. Obstet. 150, 98–102. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.13193
Keywords: COVID-19, women, sexting, sexual satisfaction, couple, wellbeing
Citation: Bonfanti RC, Garro M, Lavanco G and Ruggieri S (2023) The role of sexting in couple wellbeing for Italian women during the second wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Front. Psychol. 14:1105556. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1105556
Received: 22 November 2022; Accepted: 20 February 2023;
Published: 08 March 2023.
Edited by:
Kath Woodward, The Open University, United KingdomReviewed by:
Rocco Servidio, University of Calabria, ItalyStefano Pagliaro, D’Annunzio University of Chieti–Pescara, Italy
Copyright © 2023 Bonfanti, Garro, Lavanco and Ruggieri. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Maria Garro, bWFyaWEuZ2Fycm9AdW5pcGEuaXQ=