- 1School of Strength and Conditioning Training, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
- 2School of Physical Education, Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, China
- 3Sports Coaching College, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
- 4Department of Physical Education, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, China
- 5Human Biology Major, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, CA, United States
- 6China Institute of Sport and Health Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing, China
- 7Hebrew Senior Life Hinda and Arthur Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States
Objectives: To investigate the effect of combined balance and plyometric training on knee function and proprioception of elite badminton athletes.
Methods: Sixteen elite male badminton players (age: 20.5 ± 1.1 years, height: 177.8 ± 5.1 cm, weight: 68.1 ± 7.2 kg, and training experience: 11.4 ± 1.4 years) volunteered to participate and were randomly assigned to a combined balance and plyometric training (CT) (n = 8) and plyometric (PT) group (n = 8). The CT group performed balance combined with plyometric training three times a week over 6 weeks (40 min of plyometrics and 20 min of balance training); while the PT group undertook only plyometric training for the same period (3–4 sets × 8–12 reps for each exercise). Both groups had the same technical training of badminton.
Results: The knee function and proprioception were assessed at baseline and after the intervention by measuring the performance of single-legged hop tests (LSIO, LSIT, LSIC, LSIS), standing postural sway (COPAP, COPML), and LSI of dominant leg and non-dominant leg. The results showed that as compared to PT, CT induced significantly greater improvements in LSIT and LSIS (p < 0.001) and significant greater percent increase in NAP (p = 0.011). The changes in LSIO, LSIC, DAP, NAP, LSIAP, DML, NML, and LSIML induced by CT did not differ from that induced by PT (p > 0.213).
Conclusion: In elite badminton players, intervention using CT holds great promise to augment the benefits for knee function compared to the intervention using PT only, and at the same time, with at least comparable benefits for proprioception. Future studies are needed to examine and confirm the results of this study.
Introduction
Badminton is considered as one of the fastest racket sports (Phomsoupha and Laffaye, 2015; Abdullahi and Coetzee, 2017; Gómez et al., 2021), requiring frequent quick starts, stops, lunges, and changes of direction (Shariff et al., 2009; Hong et al., 2014). These high-intensity and quick movements and reactions in badminton significantly increased the risks of injuries to lower extremities, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury of knees, one type of injury that frequently occurs in badminton athletes (Kimura et al., 2012; Alikhani et al., 2019; Zhao and Gu, 2019). In addition, badminton matches require players to adjust their body position continuously throughout the game, in which their capacity of dynamic balance to maintain their center of gravity within the base of support to react to the moving shuttlecock (Faude et al., 2007; Chang et al., 2013). Strategies aiming to improve knee function and proprioception are thus beneficial for the on-court performance of badminton players and can help reduce the risk of injuries (White et al., 2013).
One such strategy is plyometric training (PT), of which the goal is to improve lower limb strength, knee function (e.g., isokinetic muscle strength test and single-legged hop tests), and movement pattern of landing (e.g., depth jump and continuous jump) (Hewett et al., 2010) by shortening muscle eccentric-concentric contraction cycle [also termed as a stretch-shortening cycle (SSC)] (Markovic and Mikulic, 2010; Ramírez-delaCruz et al., 2022). Studies have shown that PT can enhance the sport performance of athletes, such as strength (Asadi, 2012), running economy (do Carmo et al., 2022), agility (Maciejczyk et al., 2021), and sprint ability (Markovic and Mikulic, 2010), as well as reducing ACL injury risk. Alikhani et al. (2019) observed that, for example, 6-week PT significantly improved dynamic balance and knee proprioception in female badminton players by enhancing their functional adaptations and neural recruitment of motor units that activate appropriate muscles before landing and the proprioceptive inputs.
More recently, studies have emerged to combine PT with other training programs and observed that this combined training (CT) can significantly augment the benefits of using PT only for knee function and proprioception (Nessler et al., 2017). These kinds of CT can simultaneously enhance multiple aspects contributing to knee function and proprioception, target reflexive response and proprioception, and help adjust the body positioning while landing with correct knee and hip position (Hewett et al., 2006). The study of Wedderkopp et al. (2003) for example, showed that combined training of balance and strength is of great promise to reduce the incidence of injuries in young female handball players. Additionally, several of our previous studies showed that combined training of balance and PT significantly improved the capacity to adjust the direction of movements and dynamic balance, which are essential for athletic performance and the prevention of injury risk (Guo et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022). These findings suggest that compared to PT only, CT may induce greater benefits for athletes of badminton by simultaneously augmenting their knee function and proprioception, which, however, have not been examined.
Therefore, this pilot randomized controlled study aims to characterize the effects of a 6-week CT with balance training and plyometric training on knee function and proprioception in a group of elite badminton players and examine if this kind of CT can induce greater benefits as compared to PT. Participants completed the CT and PT of the same training protocol as validated in our previous studies (Guo et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022). Specifically, we hypothesize that the CT protocol would induce a significant increase in performance (e.g., single-legged hop tests and center of pressure) pertaining to knee function and proprioception compared to PT.
Materials and methods
Participants
Sixteen healthy elite male badminton players were recruited in the study. The inclusion criteria were: (1) Elite players who had won the top four of national youth games and provincial games, or higher-level games; (2) The dominant arm or leg is the right side; and (3) the ability and willingness to complete the 6-week programs of tests and intervention. The exclusion criteria were: (1) Participants had ACL, hamstring, meniscus, ankle, or any other lower-extremity injuries during the last 3 years, and (2) Limb Symmetry Index (LSI) of single-legged hop tests were < 85%. Eight players entered the quarterfinalists of national youth games and the rest entered the finals at the provincial level. All the participants were from the same club, all right-handed, and undertook three training sessions per week each of which consisted of 2–3 h of technical and physical training sections. The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Sport University (Approval number: 2020008H), and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Before data collection, the participants were informed about the benefits and possible risks associated with the study, and the participants provided written informed consent to participate.
Procedures
All experimental training programs were conducted along with a weekly technical training routine. Participants were randomized into the group of CT (n = 8) and the group of PT (n = 8) (Table 1). Before the initiation of the study, all participants completed a 2-week familiarization (three sessions per week) with the same training protocols as used in the following intervention in this study. During the intervention period, participants in CT group completed the intervention that combining the balance training and PT. Specifically, they completed three sessions of CT per week for 6 weeks (i.e., 18 sessions). Within each session of CT, they were asked to complete 40 min of PT (e.g., depth jump and lateral barrier jump) and then 20 min of balance training that was performed on an unstable support (e.g., BOSU ball, Swiss ball, and Balance pad). In PT group, participants also completed three sessions of PT per week for 6 weeks. To ensure a similar training load between CT and PT group, in each session the participants in PT group first completed 40 min of PT and then 20 min of balance training that was the same as CT group, but on the stable support (i.e., solid floor). The recovery period of 24–48 h was provided between each training session. The details of the protocols of balance training and PT were included in Supplementary Material.
Single-legged hop tests hold potential as predictive factors of knee function in individuals to evaluate the risk of ACL injury and discriminate between those individuals who return to previous activity level after ACL injury or reconstruction (Figure 1; Noyes et al., 1991). The single hop for distance, triple hop for distance, cross-over hop for distance and timed for 6 meters hop were measured, respectively. Smart Speed device (Fusion Sport, Coopers Plains, Australia) was set for Time for six meters hop to record the time. After hopping, participants needed to stand with a single leg for 2 s to make results effective. Participants were asked to jump three times every leg in each test, and the longest distance and the shortest time in the three tests were taken as the final data when the four tests’ lower LSI was calculated. LSI was counted as the ratio between the non-dominant leg and dominant leg while timed for 6 meters hop was calculated by dominant and non-dominant in the division. Four kinds of LSI were defined as LSIO (Single Hop for Distance), LSIT (Triple Hop for distance), LSIC (Cross-over for distance), LSIS (Time for 6 meters Hop) in this study. When LSI ≥ 85%, there is no risk of ACL injury; and LSI < 85%, ACL is at risk of injury (Noyes et al., 1991).
The proprioception test was used to assess the balance performance of players by the center of pressure (COP) (Sell, 2012), which evaluate the proprioception of players to observe the injury risk of knee or ankle (Thompson et al., 2017). Participants stood on an in-ground force plate (Kistler 9281CA, KISTLER, Winterthur, Switzerland, 1,000 Hz) and stood with a dominant or non-dominant leg for 10 s. MATLAB software (r2014b, MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts, United States) was used to calculate COP. All data were smoothed through low-pass filtering, and the truncation frequency was set to 13.33 Hz.
COP was calculated from the time series within 10 s after standing, and anterior-posterior (AP) displacement difference, and medial-lateral (ML) displacement difference of both legs (DAP, NAP, DML, NML) (Ziv and Lidor, 2010). XT and YT are the anterior-posterior (AP), medial-lateral (ML) displacements at t seconds and the value of t are 1–10 s. LSI of COP was counted as the ratio between non-dominant leg and dominant leg while timed for 6 meters hop was calculated by dominant and non-dominant in the division.
Statistical analysis
Experimental data were processed by IBM SPSS statistical software package (version 25.0, IBM, Chicago, IL, United States). All data were presented as means and SD. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05 for all tests. To examine the effects of the combined training on the performance of single-legged hop tests and proprioception tests, we firstly performed two-way repeated-measure ANOVA (group × time). The dependent variable for each model was LSIO, LSIT, LSIC, LSIS, D-(AP, ML, LSI), and N-(AP, ML, LSI). The model factors were group, time, and their interaction. When a significant interaction was observed, LSD post-hoc correction was performed to identify the location of the significance. Secondly, we examined the effects of CT on the performance within each group, and the percent changes from pre- to post-intervention between CT and PT by using separate one-way ANOVA models. The model factor was time. Partial η2 was used to assess the effect size (ES) where the significance was observed, with its strength being interpreted as the following: < 0.06 as small, < 0.14 as moderate, and ≥ 0.14 as large (Cohen, 2013).
Results
The primary two-way repeated-measures ANOVA models showed significant interactions between group and time on LSIT (p = 0.008) and LSIS (p = 0.019) but not on LSIO and LSIC (p > 0.507). The post-hoc analysis revealed that the LSIT [F(1, 28) = 7.535, p = 0.010, partial η2 = 0.212] and LSIS [F(1, 28) = 14.402, p = 0.001, partial η2 = 0.340] in CT group were significant greater after the intervention as compared to all the other pre- and post-interventions (Table 2).
For LSIO and LSIC, the secondary one-way ANOVA models showed that the LSIO was significantly improved as compared to pre-intervention within either CT and PT group (p < 0.048), while no significant effect and percent change in LSIC of both groups was observed (p > 0.719). Additionally, the percent changes in LSIT (p = 0.007) and LSIS (p = 0.023) within the CT group was significantly improved compared to PT group, indicating greater benefits was induced by CT.
The primary two-way repeated-measures ANOVA models revealed no significant interaction of group and time on DAP (p = 0.460), NAP (p = 0.146), LSIAP (p = 0.472), DML (p = 0.933), NML (p = 0.605) or LSIML (p = 0.508). Only significant effects of time on DAP, LSIAP, NAP, NML, and LSIML (but not on DML) were observed (DAP: p < 0.001; NAP: p < 0.001; LSIAP: p = 0.006; NML: p < 0.001; LSIML: p = 0.019).
Secondarily, one-way ANOVA models showed that compared to pre-intervention, DAP, DML, NAP, and NML were significantly decreased after the intervention within both CT and PT groups (p < 0.014) and within CT, LSIAP, and LSIML were significantly improved after intervention (LSIAP: p = 0.014; LSIML: p = 0.033), while no significant difference was observed within PT group. Additionally, the percent changes in NAP within the CT group were significantly improved compared to PT group (p = 0.011), indicating greater benefits was induced by CT.
Discussion
This pilot study demonstrated that combined training (CT) of balance and plyometric training (PT) is of great promise to enhance knee function and proprioception. Multiple aspects of knee function and proprioception (e.g., LSIO, DAP, LSIAP, NML, LSIML) were improved after the intervention. Though as compared PT, significantly greater benefits of CT were observed only for LSIT and LSIS, the results of this pilot study suggest that CT can at least induce comparable benefits to that by PT-only intervention, providing critical knowledge of study design, sample size estimation for future large-scale randomized trials.
We observed that compared to PT, CT significantly improved LSIT and LSIs but not on LSIC and LSIO. LSIT, and LSIs mainly reflect knee functions and limb symmetry for the continuous hopping process of the stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) (Fitzgerald et al., 2000). For example, Zwolski et al. (2016) has shown that LSIS can be used to identify dynamic stability of knees in ACL injury rehabilitation.
LSIO only reflects muscle strength of single-leg and limb symmetry between legs, and LSIC reflects the capacity of imposing forces in frontal and transverse planes with multiple hops in the sagittal plane, which is a more technique-demanding condition (Logerstedt et al., 2012). The traditional PT focuses only on enhancing the musculoskeletal function and consolidating the movement pattern of landing, which may thus particularly benefit the LSIC and LSIO. The balance training of CT protocol focuses on multiple abilities of balance and stability including the posterior thigh muscles, the abdominal muscles, and the hip muscles, especially improving the stability of ankle during the process of landing and take-off (Hewett et al., 2010). Hariri and Sadeghi (2018) found that it was necessary to increase the speed of the knee in order to achieve maximum foot speed toward the target in the performance of the Karate. Improving muscle performance and joint movement is thus of great importance in quick movement during badminton matches, especially in enhancing knee function. CT intervention thus can simultaneously target lower limb strength, knee function, and movement pattern of landing, and can improve both power and agility of badminton players (Fischetti et al., 2018; Guo et al., 2021). It may thus induce significantly greater improvements specifically in LSIT and LSIs (but not LSIC and LSIO) by targeting SSC and dynamic stability of knees, suggesting particular benefits from CT on dynamic stability of knees.
However, as compared to PT, no significant improvements in proprioception as assessed by COP outcomes induced by CT were observed, suggesting CT induced benefits for proprioception which are only comparable to PT. The proprioception and stability of postural control require the integration of the visual, vestibular information and coordination across those systems, among which the strength of the lower limb is extremely important (Wrisley and Stephens, 2011; Zhao and Gu, 2019). Alikhani et al., observed that 6-week of PT improved dynamic balance and knee proprioception in female badminton players (Alikhani et al., 2019). Additionally, Nepocatych et al. (2018) observed that balance training can increase ankle stability by augmenting neuromuscular function and proprioception as well as the dynamic balance by optimizing the postural control system to more efficiently utilize multiple kinds of sensory inputs (e.g., visual, proprioceptive) (Söderman et al., 2000; Guo et al., 2021; Lu et al., 2022). However, no significant difference in COP outcomes between CT and PT is observed here, though a greater percentage change in these outcomes was induced by CT compared to PT, which thus needs to be further explored in future studies.
Meanwhile, one potential reason for non-significant results may be the ceiling effects that only elite professional players were included, and using PT may be sufficient to induce maximum improvements in proprioception. Taken together, our results show that CT may uniquely augment knee function, suggesting that this type of CT would be a helpful strategy that can be included in the training routines of elite badminton players with adaptive protocols to maximize the benefits for athletes (e.g., using balance training as a passive rest method between different sets of exercises).
Several limitations of this pilot study should be noted. First, only sixteen male elite badminton players were included, so the generalizability of the study findings was limited. Studies with larger sample size and consisting of both male and female participants, as well as of other cohorts (e.g., adolescent players), are highly demanded to further examine and confirm the observations in this study. Second, we here only examined the short-term/immediate effects of CT, studies consisting of longer-term follow-up assessments and the record of athletic injury incidence are needed to examine how such benefits can sustain and if CT can help reduce the incidence of injuries in athletes. Additionally, we here implemented the CT following our previous work, it is worthwhile to examine the effects of other types of CT protocol, and to explore the appropriate training intensity and number of sessions that can help maximize the benefits of CT. Third, future studies can implement assessments which are more closely linked to on-court performance (e.g., badminton-field reaction test and three-dimensional motion capture technique) to examine the benefits of CT for badminton performance, in addition to the knee function. Additionally, future studies are needed to examine the effects of CT on other psychological and physiological aspects related to badminton, such as cognitive function, and mood, to comprehensively assess the benefits of CT on this cohort.
Conclusion
This pilot study showed that balance training combined with plyometric training program may induce a significant effect on knee function and at least comparable positive effects on proprioception of elite badminton players as compared to plyometric training only. The knowledge obtained from this pilot study will ultimately help inform the design of future larger-scale studies to confirm the findings here.
Data availability statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors, without undue reservation.
Ethics statement
The study protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Beijing Sport University (Approval number: 2020008H), and all procedures were conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author contributions
LZ, WG, SW, ZG, and DB: research concept and study design. LZ, WG, SC, DB, and JZ: literature review and writing of the manuscript. LZ, WG, and DB: conceptualization and methodology. SW, ZG, and ML: formal analysis, investigation, and resources. ZG, ML, and JZ: data collection, data analysis and interpretation, and statistical analyses. LZ and WG: writing—original draft preparation. LZ, SC, DB and JZ: writing—review and editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
This research was funded by the National Key Research and Development Project of China (grant nos. 2019YFF0301602-3 and 2019YFF0301803).
Acknowledgments
We appreciate the participation and contribution of the participants. We extend their gratitude to each member of the Beijing Sport University badminton team for their commitment to this work.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947877/full#supplementary-material
References
Abdullahi, Y., and Coetzee, B. (2017). Notational singles match analysis of male badminton players who participated in the African Badminton Championships. Int. J. Perform. Anal. Sport 17, 1–16. doi: 10.1080/24748668.2017.1303955
Alikhani, R., Shahrjerdi, S., Golpaigany, M., and Kazemi, M. (2019). The effect of a six-week plyometric training on dynamic balance and knee proprioception in female badminton players. J. Can. Chiropr. Assoc. 63, 144–153.
Asadi, A. (2012). Effects of six weeks depth jump and countermovement jump training on agility performance. Sport Science 5, 67–70.
Chang, W.-D., Chang, W.-Y., Lee, C.-L., and Feng, C.-Y. (2013). Validity and reliability of wii fit balance board for the assessment of balance of healthy young adults and the elderly. J. Phys. Ther. Sci. 25, 1251–1253. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1251
Cohen, J. (2013). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Milton Park: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9780203771587
do Carmo, E. C., Barroso, R., Gil, S., da Silva, N. R., Bertuzzi, R., Foster, C., et al. (2022). Can plyometric training change the pacing behaviour during 10-km running? Eur. J. Sport Sci. Online ahead of print. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2021.2013952
Faude, O., Meyer, T., Rosenberger, F., Fries, M., Huber, G., and Kindermann, W. (2007). Physiological characteristics of badminton match play. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 100, 479–485. doi: 10.1007/s00421-007-0441-8
Fischetti, F., Vilardi, A., Cataldi, S., and Greco, G. (2018). Effects of plyometric training program on speed and explosive strength of lower limbs in young athletes. J. Phys. Educ. Sport 18, 2476–2482.
Fitzgerald, G. K., Axe, M. J., and Snyder-Mackler, L. (2000). A decision-making scheme for returning patients to high-level activity with nonoperative treatment after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 8, 76–82. doi: 10.1007/s001670050190
Gómez, M. A., Cid, A., Rivas, F., Barreira, J., Chiminazzo, J. G. C., and Prieto, J. (2021). Dynamic analysis of scoring performance in elite men’s badminton according to contextual-related variables. Chaos Solitons Fractals 151, 111295. doi: 10.1016/j.chaos.2021.111295
Guo, Z., Huang, Y., Zhou, Z., Leng, B., Gong, W., Cui, Y., et al. (2021). The effect of 6-week combined balance and plyometric training on change of direction performance of elite badminton players. Front. Psychol. 12:684964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.684964
Hariri, S., and Sadeghi, H. (2018). Biomechanical analysis of mawashi-geri technique in karate. Int. J. Sport Stud. Health 1:e84349. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182645
Hewett, T. E., Ford, K. R., and Myer, G. D. (2006). Anterior cruciate ligament injuries in female athletes: Part 2, a meta-analysis of neuromuscular interventions aimed at injury prevention. Am. J. Sports Med. 34, 490–498. doi: 10.1177/0363546505282619
Hewett, T. E., Ford, K. R., Hoogenboom, B. J., and Myer, G. D. (2010). Understanding and preventing acl injuries: Current biomechanical and epidemiologic considerations - update 2010. North Am. J. Sports Phys. Ther. 5, 234–251.
Hong, Y., Wang, S. J., Lam, W. K., and Cheung, J. T. M. (2014). Kinetics of badminton lunges in four directions. J. appl. Biomech. 30, 113–118. doi: 10.1123/jab.2012-0151
Kimura, Y., Ishibashi, Y., Tsuda, E., Yamamoto, Y., Hayashi, Y., and Sato, S. (2012). Increased knee valgus alignment and moment during single-leg landing after overhead stroke as a potential risk factor of anterior cruciate ligament injury in badminton. Br. J. Sports Med. 46, 207–213. doi: 10.1136/bjsm.2010.080861
Logerstedt, D., Grindem, H., Lynch, A., Eitzen, I., Engebretsen, L., Risberg, M. A., et al. (2012). Single-legged hop tests as predictors of self-reported knee function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: The Delaware-Oslo ACL cohort study. Am. J. Sports Med. 40, 2348–2356. doi: 10.1177/0363546512457551
Lu, Z., Zhou, L., Gong, W., Chuang, S., Wang, S., Guo, Z., et al. (2022). The effect of 6-week combined balance and plyometric training on dynamic balance and quickness performance of elite badminton players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 19:1605. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031605
Maciejczyk, M., Błyszczuk, R., Drwal, A., Nowak, B., and Strzała, M. (2021). Effects of short-term plyometric training on agility, jump and repeated sprint performance in female soccer players. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:2274. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052274
Markovic, G., and Mikulic, P. (2010). Neuro-musculoskeletal and performance adaptations to lower-extremity plyometric training. Sports Med. 40, 859–895. doi: 10.2165/11318370-000000000-00000
Nepocatych, S., Ketcham, C. J., Vallabhajosula, S., and Balilionis, G. (2018). The effects of unstable surface balance training on postural sway, stability, functional ability and flexibility in women. J. Sports Med. Phys. Fitness 58, 27–34. doi: 10.23736/S0022-4707.16.06797-9
Nessler, T., Denney, L., and Sampley, J. (2017). ACL injury prevention: What does research tell us? Curr. Rev. Musculoskelet. Med. 10, 281–288. doi: 10.1007/s12178-017-9416-5
Noyes, F. R., Barber, S. D., and Mangine, R. E. (1991). Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop tests after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am. J. Sports Med. 19, 513–518. doi: 10.1177/036354659101900518
Phomsoupha, M., and Laffaye, G. (2015). The science of badminton: Game characteristics, anthropometry, physiology, visual fitness and biomechanics. Sports Med. 45, 473–495. doi: 10.1007/s40279-014-0287-2
Ramírez-delaCruz, M., Bravo-Sánchez, A., Esteban-García, P., Jiménez, F., and Abián-Vicén, J. (2022). Effects of plyometric training on lower body muscle architecture, tendon structure, stiffness and physical performance: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med. Open 8:40. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00431-0
Sell, T. C. (2012). An examination, correlation, and comparison of static and dynamic measures of postural stability in healthy, physically active adults. Phys. Ther. Sport 13, 80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2011.06.006
Shariff, A. H., George, J., and Ramlan, A. A. (2009). Musculoskeletal injuries among Malaysian badminton players. Singapore Med. J. 50, 1095–1097.
Söderman, K., Werner, S., Pietilä, T., Engström, B., and Alfredson, H. (2000). Balance board training: Prevention of traumatic injuries of the lower extremities in female soccer players? A prospective randomized intervention study. Knee Surg. Sports Traumatol. Arthrosc. 8, 356–363. doi: 10.1007/s001670000147
Thompson, L. A., Badache, M., Cale, S., Behera, L., and Zhang, N. (2017). Balance performance as observed by center-of-pressure parameter characteristics in male soccer athletes and non-athletes. Sports 5:86. doi: 10.3390/sports5040086
Wedderkopp, N., Kaltoft, M., Holm, R., and Froberg, K. (2003). Comparison of two intervention programmes in young female players in European handball–with and without ankle disc. Scand. J. Med. Sci. Sports 13, 371–375. doi: 10.1046/j.1600-0838.2003.00336.x
White, K., Di Stasi, S. L., Smith, A. H., and Snyder-Mackler, L. (2013). Anterior cruciate ligament- specialized post-operative return-to-sports (ACL-SPORTS) training: A randomized control trial. BMC Musculoskelet. Disord. 14:108. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-14-108
Wrisley, D. M., and Stephens, M. J. (2011). The effects of rotational platform training on balance and ADLs. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. 2011, 3529–3532. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6090586
Zhao, X., and Gu, Y. (2019). Single leg landing movement differences between male and female badminton players after overhead stroke in the backhand-side court. Hum. Mov. Sci. 66, 142–148. doi: 10.1016/j.humov.2019.04.007
Ziv, G., and Lidor, R. (2010). Vertical jump in female and male basketball players–a review of observational and experimental studies. J. Sci. Med. Sport 13, 332–339. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2009.02.009
Keywords: plyometric exercise, physical conditioning, knee, postural balance, badminton
Citation: Zhou L, Gong W, Wang S, Guo Z, Liu M, Chuang S, Bao D and Zhou J (2022) Combined balance and plyometric training enhances knee function, but not proprioception of elite male badminton players: A pilot randomized controlled study. Front. Psychol. 13:947877. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.947877
Received: 19 May 2022; Accepted: 22 July 2022;
Published: 09 August 2022.
Edited by:
Jesus Ramón-Llin, University of Valencia, SpainReviewed by:
David Cabello-Manrique, University of Granada, SpainDiego Muñoz, University of Extremadura, Spain
Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Gong, Wang, Guo, Liu, Chuang, Bao and Zhou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dapeng Bao, YmFvZHBAYnN1LmVkdS5jbg==