Dhruv Galgotia1*
Nirupa Lakshmi2- 1Department of Management Studies, Dr. A. P. J. Abdul Kalam Technical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India
- 2Department of Management Studies, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Uttar Pradesh, India
All academic institution contributes to the corpus of knowledge in some way. To keep expanding, the resulting information and data must be collected in a single area and shared throughout society. Knowledge developed in academic institutions is not adequately preserved or gathered, according to research. It has also been observed that the majority of the content or knowledge developed in academic institutes is unknown to the general public and is categorized as a literature review, which may be useful if proper coding is kept in the organization. The purposeful integration of humans, processes, and technology dedicated to developing, capturing, and executing an organization’s creative infrastructure is known as a Knowledge Management (KM) method. Knowledge Management supports educational institutes in refining their capability to acquire and share information and knowledge, applying it to problem resolution and promoting research and continuous development. This paper advocates a holistic strategy for finding, analyzing, recording, retrieving, and distributing the whole of an administration’s data properties. Databases, records, procedures, regulations and hitherto un-captured knowledge and talent in ordinary employees are samples of these properties. Higher education institutions can use KM as a tried and true approach to dealing with their problems. KM aids in the motivation of research as well as the promotion of partnerships and innovations in the future.
Introduction
The purposeful integration of humans, processes, and technology dedicated to developing, capturing, and executing an organization’s intellectual infrastructure is known as a knowledge management method. It allows employees inside a company to communicate what they know, resultant in better amenities and outcomes (Ramachandran et al., 2009). Through the exchange of best practices, good decision making, quicker reaction to significant institutional challenges, proper process handling, and increased people skills, KM plays a vital role in improving high organizational performance. As a result, there will be less need to recreate the wheel, more targeted and relevant policies in line with institutional aims and objectives, faster access to information, enhanced administrative and academic services, lower costs, and fewer errors and failures. Unfortunately, few Higher education institutions (HEIs), if any, accomplish all or even the majority of these rewards in practice (Mazhar and Akhtar, 2016). The success of KM projects appears to be attributable to a lack of distribution culture, a lack of understanding of the assistance of KM, and an inability to incorporate KM into daily working practices. The massive development in the population of higher institutes in India over the last era has put tremendous pressure on schools to perform better under intense competition (Bhusry et al., 2011).
Higher education institutions are made up of a variety of administrative and academic procedures that generate knowledge as part of their operations. The challenge is whether the appropriate use of this knowledge asset adds value to the products and services they provide. HEIs must align themselves in order to establish strategies for using institutional knowledge to improve their efficiency of operations. This necessitates quick responses to rapidly changing technology and rising academic needs (Galgotia, n.d.). To do so, the organization’s knowledge must be properly discovered, captured, transformed, and communicated. This opens the door for organizations to understand the critical need for organizational learning. The use of an understanding management approach will mean reinforcing to obtain a comprehensive, reactionary, and integrative perspective of information within the organization for use in merge issues, resulting in improved knowledge distribution and further planning, decision making, and quality enhancement (Nawaz, 2015).
Individuals, groups, and entire organizations may jointly and systematically develop, share, and utilize information to better achieve their goals through knowledge management. KM fosters exceptional cooperation in order to maximize the value of the organization’s knowledge and information assets, subsequent to augmented efficiency and creativity. “Knowledge” is defined as “the insights, interpretations, and practical know-how that we all have.” It distinguished between two categories of knowledge: explicit and inferred knowledge (Sardjono and Firdaus, 2020). Tacit knowledge is information that is comprehended and implemented without conscious thought. Tacit knowledge is highly customized, based on experience and impacted by the individuals’ views, viewpoints, and values. It is tough to codify and only exists in the imaginations of those who have it. It is often communicated through highly engaging dialog and shared memories. On the other hand, knowledge acquisition is simple to explain, capture, and communicate in many ways. It is serious and methodical (Yeh, 2005).
The approach includes evaluating the current gap in the group’s knowledge needs and proposing an iterative strategy for bridging the gap. It aims at identifying higher education institutions’ strategic needs depending on organizational objectives, organizational hierarchical system, stakeholders, and procedures (Horban, 2021). The next stage is to identify the knowledge fissure as well as the variables that contribute to it (Nur et al., 2017). Figure 1 depicts the requirement to reduce the gap for effective utilization of organizational knowledge against aims and priorities.
Figure 1. This will show the Knowledge Management Structure for understanding the process which performs in Knowledge Management (Escorcia Guzmán and Barros Arrieta, 2020).
Explicit knowledge may be easily recorded and shared. This information is more easily shared and utilized within the company. Organizations use knowledge management systems to achieve their goals of enhanced performance, expertise transfer, competitive advantage, and the growth of collaborative practices (Alksasbeh et al., 2018). KM is defined as the “identifying, expansion, and successful use of essential knowledge in an organization.” Knowledge management is defined as “a methodical, comprehensive approach to improving the long-term knowledge management at all levels of the company.” Knowledge management, as according, is the act of finding, expanding, and successfully utilizing an organization’s current knowledge to fulfill the organization’s objectives while also fostering an organizational culture that encourages knowledge development (Sirajuddin et al., 2005). These and many other perspectives on knowledge management suggest that an effective knowledge management system should be incorporated into people’s everyday routines, allowing for a continual flow of information across the company. Capturing, storing, generating, and sharing organizational information is the foundation of a knowledge management system. IT is a critical facilitator for KM system, allowing for the capture, transformation, storage and distribution of acquaintance (Muftahu and Jamil, 2021).
The KM in Higher Education in India
During the administrative and academic procedures of higher education institutions, knowledge is created. Individuals develop knowledge in the form of explicit knowledge in the form of papers, methods, and outcomes, and tacit information in the procedure of experience, judgments, perspectives, and discernments (Hoffmann et al., 2019). The problem is figuring out how to make this tacit and explicit information available to the institution as a centralized resource. The ability to capture and make available institutional memory will maintain continuity and expedite institutional learning. Instead, most HEIs are faced with the arduous issue of integrating their institutional memory in order to promote information exchange and judgment. Knowledge is developed in a variability of ways at various levels, and it is compulsory in a diversity of ways at each level.
Teaching, assessment, evaluation, counseling, admissions, training, placement, and development and research are all administrative and academic activities that result in many important practices and studies that may be regarded as information in the framework of higher educational establishments (Savitri et al., 2013; Acevedo-Correa et al., 2020). Faculty, administration, academics, students, research, training and placement are only a few of the components or levels that make up an academic institution. All of these levels both develop and consume information, albeit the kind of knowledge differs depending on the level. It is critical to determine the information so each layer gives to the system and the information that each level needs to accomplish its duties and to discover effective ways to apply this knowledge at the locations of usage (Tejedor et al., 2019). The information demands at all stages must be met by a comprehensive KM system.
In the academic world, knowledge management is a relatively recent discipline. Many future national and international events and seminars will focus on knowledge management (Prahiawan et al., 2021). Many international universities are actively involved in knowledge management operations and research (Masete and Mafini, 2018). It is now gaining popularity in the sphere of education because of the necessity to reveal the intellectual potential accessible in institutions for the purpose of exchanging experiences. It has a lot of promise and should be just as important, if not more so, in the education sector. Information builds on previous knowledge, and historical events aid in the generation of new knowledge (Rahman Ahmad et al., 2020). Human efforts, which are produced via effective educational activities, scientific research, and producing novel concepts in the area of interest, are the primary source of knowledge development. All experience and understanding institutions, such as companies, Research and Development (R&D) centers, and higher ed. academics from colleges to universities, are on the lookout for new ideas in their fields of study and contribute to the understanding in a variety of ways.
Management theorists and practitioners like Peter Drucker and Paul Strass Man wrote paper in the 1970s that gave birth to knowledge management. These publications look at how knowledge and information may be used as important organizational resources. Knowledge management (KM) plays dynamic role which is critical in higher education institutions (HEIs), notably in terms of planning, organizing, monitoring, and managing KM assets connected to intellectual capital (de la Torre et al., 2021; Horban, 2021; Migdadi, 2021; Pereira et al., 2021; Terán-Bustamante et al., 2021). As a result, knowledge management might improve knowledge exchange and overall performance. Knowledge management enables for improved creativity inside the firm, increased access to best practices for consumers, and lower staff turnover. Every year, the importance of knowledge management grows rapidly in various places such as universities and organization all around the world.
Higher education may use knowledge management to improve efficiency, productivity, cooperation, and employee happiness while also encouraging high-level planning and innovation. According to a study, knowledge management created in academic institutions is not sufficiently maintained or gathered (Bratianu et al., 2021; Indrašienė et al., 2021; Sekli and De La Vega, 2021). The majority of the information or knowledge created in academic institutes is unknown to the general public and is classified as a literature review, which may be valuable provided correct coding is maintained in the organization.
Proposed Solution
Knowledge Management assists educational institutions in improving their capacity to acquire and share information and knowledge, apply to resolve many issues, promotes research and continuous development in the field of knowledge (Purwanto et al., 2020). Traditional knowledge management systems are focused on the ability to capture knowledge in centralized systems. Knowledge management builds upon collegial and professional teamwork by actively engaging people in sharing with others what they know and what they are learning (Ammirato et al., 2021; González-Campo et al., 2021). This paper provides a comprehensive approach to locating, analyzing, recording, retrieving, and disseminating an administration’s data attributes which help to understand the role of the Knowledge Management in private and government universities and how it will provide effective outcomes for the educational system.
Literature Review
Higher education is significantly involved in knowledge-related activities, but they are also accountable for knowledge generation, interchange, preservation, distribution, re-use, and learning. In higher education, KM approaches can improve administrative and academic services while also lowering expenses. Colleges and universities have a significant chance to use KM strategies to support all aspects of their assignments, including instruction, social utility, and research. The development, enhancement, preservation, and protection of knowledge are all aspects of knowledge management in higher education institutions. These institutions have immense potential and the capacity to build their own knowledge management since they were pioneers in the creation and distribution of information. The major engine that enhances the competitiveness, excellence, importance, and attractiveness of any higher education institution is the delivery of decent education and services related. The purpose of this work is to conduct an analysis of relevant literature on information management and its applicability to institutions of higher learning in particular.
Higher educational institutions (HEIs) develop and utilize knowledge. The expansion in the numbers of higher education institutions in India over the last period has boosted rivalry and pressure to perform better. As a result, institutions have been obliged to acknowledge the importance of knowledge management (KM) projects as a critical asset. The objective of this paper is to highlight the importance of KM in higher education institutions and to investigate the impact of an IT-based knowledge management intervention. The research investigates the many functions in higher education institutions, as well as the needles that influence these provinces. The authors assessed the functional provinces for IT-based knowledge management interventions and determined the apparent advantages. To support their findings, the authors provided conceptual frameworks for the effective collection, structuring, distribution, encapsulation and application of organizational knowledge more towards the aims and purposes of the organization. The authors believe that implementing the framework will improve the transition of organizational knowledge into judgment and actions (Bhusry et al., 2011).
Mazhar and Akhtar (2016) explained about the goal of this research work is to investigate (KM) methods at higher education institutions in Europe, Asia, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, as reported by faculty members. Knowledge Perception (KP), Knowledge Creation (KC), Knowledge Sharing (KS), Knowledge Gathering (KG), Knowledge Diffusion (KD), and Knowledge Retention (KR) were analyzed and compared across the three areas to see how similar and different KM practices were. A systematic questionnaire was used to gather data, which was then sent online to faculty members from various institutions in Europe, Asia, and the Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries. Scales for reliability, one-way ANOVA, and the t-test were used to evaluate, compare, and interpret the results in order to make relevant judgments. The findings show that there are no significant differences in KP, KC, KS, and KD amongst higher education institutions. However, there is a substantial difference between KG and KR. The study’s findings may be used to help higher education institutions from three distinct areas create best practices in knowledge management to improve performance (Mazhar and Akhtar, 2016).
Methodology
The knowledge management practices of instructors at public and private institutions in India and overseas were investigated using a quantitative research technique and a cross-sectional design of the study.
Design
A survey was done as part of the descriptive research. All HEC-recognized public and private universities in India and overseas were included in the study’s population. The sample was chosen using a multistage stratified random sampling procedure. At the outset, 10 universities from the public and private sectors were chosen at random. In the second step, faculties were randomly chosen from those institutions, and their methodologies for KM will be understood properly. Departments were chosen at random in the third step, and instructors were chosen at random in the final stage. The researcher individually visited each university to administer the device and collect the data from the university.
Instrument
The authors used an interviewing and group debate study, as well as relevant expertise in higher educational institutions, to identify the functional areas in HEIs and the variables that promote the efficiency of KM in these areas. Involvements were also obtained from previous work in the field of knowledge management in higher education.
Sample
The mean, variance, and percentage were calculated using descriptive statistical techniques. The t-test was used as an inferential analysis approach to compare the differences between public and private institutions. Collect the data from the different private and public universities of India and abroad. Here the authors considered 10 public and 10 private universities. The information gathered during groups and personal interviews with academics, departmental heads, deans, and employees, as well as observation of practices and methods, was used to define the areas in HEIs as well as the criteria that identify the domains. The information gathered was examined using the contents analysis method. Content analysis is examining the content of documentary sources such as books, periodicals, and newspapers, as well as oral materials such as interviews and focus groups, in order to identify particular qualities that may be quantified or tallied.
Data Collection
Areas and determinants are identified. The authors used an interviewing and group conversation-based study, as well as relevant expertise in educational institutions, to identify the domains in HEIs and the variables that promote the efficiency of KM in these areas. Inputs were also obtained from previous work in the field of knowledge management in higher learning. The gathered information through group and personal interviews with academics, heads of departments, deans, and employees, as well as inspections of practices and methods, was used to define the functional domains in HEIs and the criteria that identify the domains. The respondent role of the institute is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2. This graph shows the respondent’s role in the institution.
Data Analysis
The content analysis revealed the activity domains in higher education institutions and the factors that influence KM involvement in these areas. Institutional management and building, research, administrative support, purchase and sourcing, accounting, education—learning process, awareness process, admission, locations and faculty recruiting and selection, faculty performance appraisal, dean of students, and other domains were identified as the major realms. The authors limited their research to a few select domains which are shown in Table 1.
Table 1. This will show the author and the year in which they explain the knowledge management after analysis through their techniques.
Result and Discussion
According to the findings of several studies, top management knowledge value and knowledge-based rewards improve innovation speed and reliability. Although a knowledge-oriented culture helps to improve the quality of innovation, it has little effect on the speed of invention. Furthermore, the information sharing process acts as a mediator between all of these knowledge management enablers and the pace and efficiency of the invention. Knowledge management has an effect on business education due to the mediator of the educational course and the impact on the corporate environment, according to the findings. Transformational leaders, information sharing, and innovation all had a beneficial direct impact. Furthermore, information sharing was discovered to be a link between transformative leadership and creativity.
As a result, permitting barrier-free knowledge sharing in higher education would foster transformative leadership. Human resources, leadership, culture, curriculum, technology, and quality assurance mechanisms are the six key pillars of KM implementation, as are four knowledge processes: producing, sharing, storing, and applying knowledge. According to the findings, knowledge-based leadership has a direct and beneficial impact on organizational performance. Furthermore, the data show that knowledge management systems and innovation help to moderate the effect of knowledge-oriented leadership on organizational performance. The findings show that knowledge management characteristics differ across local and international businesses, as well as their influence across organizational levels. This suggests that, while KM methods are expected to enhance HEI innovations, discrepancies in their dimensions show the necessity for careful selection of appropriate dimensions in order to achieve desired outcomes. The study’s major goal was to examine the knowledge management strategies of private and public university professors.
This research helps to understand that countries are investing so much in their educational sectors to meet the demand which is fuelled by the ever-increasing populations of school-going children, youth and adults seeking education at all levels. With Artificial Intelligence (AI) entering all sectors, higher education is no-exception but the education sector traditionally has been characterized by a slow development of knowledge and deprived in smart systems of knowledge management. Implementation of Artificial Intelligence in Knowledge Management will enable speedy and efficient decision-making with better accuracy and quality. AI-based KM systems can provide much of the required information and support in managing interdisciplinary knowledge and progressing to bring together communities of educators and subject matter experts from other multidisciplinary areas including social sciences, psychology, management, law & regulations, medical, anthropology and many other fields of knowledge.
Conclusion
One of the majorly deprived areas of education and research is “Multidisciplinary.” Most studies reveal that the research produced by experts in most cases in higher education has not been multidisciplinary. Even most of the major archives and indexing services are based on focused research that lacks multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary research. AI-based KM systems can provide much of the required information and support in managing interdisciplinary knowledge and progressing to bring together communities of educators and subject matter experts from other multidisciplinary areas including social sciences, psychology, management, law & regulations, medical, anthropology, and many other fields of knowledge. In terms of method, culture, technology, and assessment, it is found that there are no substantial differences in knowledge management techniques between professors at public and private colleges. In terms of leadership; however, there are substantial differences in KM approaches between public and private sector institutions. The findings reveal that private institutions have stronger knowledge management practices in terms of knowledge top management. The current study’s scope is confined to solely the KM practices of the surveyed colleges that agreed to participate. Furthermore, the current study looked at universities as a whole and did not take into account any variances in KM practices based on faculty, institution type, and so on. As a result, there is a lot of room for more investigation. Our understanding of KM practices at HEIs might be further expanded by including bigger sample size and more countries. A future study might also focus on individual KM practices in higher education, in order to identify common patterns and compare and contrast institutions from different nations.
Author Contributions
DG: conceived and designed the analysis, collected the data, contributed data, performed the analysis, and wrote the paper. NL: verified the data collected, co-wrote the paper, and finalized the paper. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Acevedo-Correa, Y., Aristizábal-Botero, C. A., Valencia-Arias, A., and Bran-Piedrahita, L. (2020). Formulation of knowledge management models applied to the context of higher education institutions. Inf. Technol. 31, 103–112. doi: 10.4067/S0718-07642020000100103
Agarwal, N. K., and Marouf, L. N. (2014). Initiating Knowledge Management in Colleges and Universities: A template. International Journal of Knowledge Content Development & Technology 4, 67–95. doi: 10.5865/ijkct.2014.4.2.067
Ali, N., Ahmed, L., and Rose, S. (2018). Identifying predictors of students’ perception of and engagement with assessment feedback. Act. Learn. High. Educ. 19, 239–251. doi: 10.1177/1469787417735609
Alksasbeh, M. Z., Al-Dalaien, A. A.-H., and Alqaraleh, B. A. Y. (2018). Factors that influence the success of knowledge management implementation in Jordanian higher education institutions. Res. J. Appl. Sci. Eng. Technol. 15, 249–260. doi: 10.19026/rjaset.15.5907
Ammirato, S., Linzalone, R., and Felicetti, A. M. (2021). Knowledge management in pandemics. A critical literature review. Knowl. Manag. Res. Pract. 19, 415–426. doi: 10.1080/14778238.2020.1801364
Baptista Nunes, J. M., Kanwal, S., and Arif, M. (2017). Knowledge Management practices in Higher EducationInstitutions: a Systematic literature Review. IFLA WLIC 2017 – Wrocław, Poland – Libraries. Solidarity. Society.
Bhusry, M., Ranjan, J., and Nagar, R. (2011). Implementing Knowledge Management in Higher Educational Institutions in India: a conceptual framework. Liceo J. High. Educ. Res. 7, 34–46. doi: 10.7828/ljher.v7i1.21
Bratianu, C., Stanescu, D. F., and Mocanu, R. (2021). Exploring the knowledge management impact on business education. Sustainability 13:2313. doi: 10.3390/su13042313
Bureš, V., Griffin, D., Hackett, D., Kročitý, P., and Kubička, E. (2011). Rethinking of knowledge management introduction at teaching universities: the framework development. Probl. Educ. 21st Century 32, 33–46.
Chawla, S., and Saxena, S. (2014). Physiology of high-altitude acclimatization. Resonance 19, 538–548. doi: 10.1007/s12045-014-0057-3
Corcoran, N., and Duane, A. (2018). Using social media to enable staff knowledge sharing in higher education institutions. Australas. J. Inf. Syst. 22. doi: 10.3127/ajis.v22i0.1647
de la Torre, R., Onggo, B. S., Corlu, C. G., Nogal, M., and Juan, A. A. (2021). The role of simulation and serious games in teaching concepts on circular economy and sustainable energy. Energies 14, 1138–1159. doi: 10.3390/en14041138
Escorcia Guzmán, J., and Barros Arrieta, D. (2020). Knowledge management in higher education institutions: characterization from a theoretical reflection. Rev. Cienc. Soc. XXVI, 83–97.
Galgotia, D. (n.d.). Implementation of Knowledge Management in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Private and Government Universities in Dhruv Galgotia Introduction.
González-Campo, C. H., Murillo-Vargas, G., and García-Solarte, M. (2021). Effect of high-quality accreditation of knowledge management in higher education institutions. Form. Univ. 14, 155–164. doi: 10.4067/S0718-50062021000200155
Hoffmann, I. L., Nunes, R. C., and Muller, F. M. (2019). The information of a higher education census in the implementation of organizational knowledge management on school dropout. Gest. Prod. 26, 1–14. doi: 10.1590/0104-530X-2852-19
Horban, O. (2021). Knowledge management as the basis of quality of higher education. Educol. Discourse 33, 45–59. doi: 10.28925/2312-5829.2021.2.4
Indrašienė, V., Jegelevičienė, V., Merfeldaitė, O., Penkauskienė, D., Pivorienė, J., Railienė, A., et al. (2021). Linking critical thinking and knowledge management: a conceptual analysis. Sustainability 13:1476. doi: 10.3390/su13031476
Ivanovic, Z., and Milenkovski, A. (2019). Importance of new approaches in education for higher education institutions. UTMS J. Econ. 10, 67–76.
Keshavarz, H., Esmaili Givi, M. R., and Shekari, M. R. (2018). Knowledge management infrastructures and organizational intelligence in Iranian research centers. Data Technol. Appl. 52, 2–15. doi: 10.1108/DTA-12-2016-0080
Lawson, M. A. (2003). School-family relations in context: Parent and teacher perceptions of parent involvement. Urban Educ. 38, 77–133. doi: 10.1177/0042085902238687
Masa’deh, L., Shannak, R., Maqableh, M., and Tarhini, A. (2017). The impact of knowledge management on job performance in higher education: The case of the University of Jordan. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 30, 244–262. doi: 10.1108/JEIM-09-2015-0087
Masete, M. Z., and Mafini, C. (2018). Internal barriers to supply chain management implementation in a south African traditional university. J. Transp. Supply Chain Manag. 12, 1–12. doi: 10.4102/jtscm.v12i0.389
Mazhar, S., and Akhtar, M. S. (2016). Knowledge management practices: a comparative study of public and private sector universities at Lahore. J. Qual. Technol. Manag. 12, 81–90.
Migdadi, M. M. (2021). Knowledge management, customer relationship management and innovation capabilities. J. Bus. Ind. Mark. 36, 111–124. doi: 10.1108/JBIM-12-2019-0504
Muftahu, M., and Jamil, H. (2021). Sustainable knowledge flow and innovation in higher education: The implementation of change management in universities. Int. J. Innov. Sustain. Dev. 15:159. doi: 10.1504/IJISD.2021.114328
Nawaz, N. (2015). Review of knowledge management in higher education. Int. J. Sci. Res. 4, 2062–2065. doi: 10.21275/v4i11.nov151609
Nur, R. N. N., Fauzi, A. M., and Sukoco, H. (2017). Strategies of knowledge management implementation for academic services improvement of Indonesian higher education. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 16:1750032. doi: 10.1142/S0219649217500320
Ojo, A. (2016). Knowledge management in Nigerian universities: A conceptual model. Interdiscip. J. Inf. Knowl. Manag. 11, 331–345. doi: 10.28945/3607
Pereira, L., Santos, J., Dias, Á., and Costa, R. (2021). Knowledge management in projects. Int. J. Knowl. Manag. 17, 1–14. doi: 10.4018/IJKM.2021010101
Prahiawan, W., Fahlevi, M., Juliana, J., Purba, J., and Tarigan, S. (2021). The role of e-satisfaction, e-word of mouth and e-trust on repurchase intention of online shop. Int. J. Data Netw. Sci. 5, 593–600. doi: 10.5267/j.ijdns.2021.8.008
Purwanto, H., Fauzi, M., Wijayanti, R., Al Awwaly, K. U., Jayanto, I., Purwanto, A., et al. (2020). Developing model of halal food purchase intention among Indonesian non-Muslim consumers: an explanatory sequential mixed methods research. Syst. Rev. Pharm. 11, 396–407.
Rahman Ahmad, A., A/P Govinda Raj Segaran, V., and Rizad Md Sapry, H. (2020). Academic staff and industry revolution 4.0: knowledge, innovation and learning factor. J. Educ. Elearn. Res. 7, 190–194. doi: 10.20448/journal.509.2020.72.190.194
Ramachandran, S. D., Chong, S. C., and Ismail, H. (2009). The practice of knowledge management processes: a comparative study of public and private higher education institutions in Malaysia. Vine 39, 203–222. doi: 10.1108/03055720911003978
Sardjono, W., and Firdaus, F. (2020). Readiness model of knowledge management systems implementation at the higher education. ICIC Express Lett. 14, 477–487. doi: 10.24507/icicel.14.05.477
Savitri, F., Sahiraliani, D., and Yakhusna, R. (2013). Knowledge management implementation within the higher education institutions in Bandung, Indonesia’s city of education. South East Asia J. Contemp. Bus. Econ. Law 2, 59–63.
Sekli, G. F. M., and De La Vega, I. (2021). Adoption of big data analytics and its impact on organizational performance in higher education mediated by knowledge management. J. Open Innov. 7, 2–22. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7040221
Sirajuddin, S., Ahmad Zaki, A. B., and Rose Alinda, A. (2005). “Knowledge management implementation.” in Malaysian Public Institution of Higher Education. Proceedings of the Postgraduate Annual Research Seminar.
Tejedor, G., Segalàs, J., Barrón, Á., Fernández-Morilla, M., Fuertes, M. T., Ruiz-Morales, J., et al. (2019). Didactic strategies to promote competencies in sustainability. Sustainability 11:2086. doi: 10.3390/su11072086
Terán-Bustamante, A., Martínez-Velasco, A., and Dávila-Aragón, G. (2021). Knowledge management for open innovation: Bayesian networks through machine learning. J. Open Innov. 7, 1–18. doi: 10.3390/joitmc7010040
Keywords: high education, knowledge management, private, public, universities
Citation: Galgotia D and Lakshmi N (2022) Implementation of Knowledge Management in Higher Education: A Comparative Study of Private and Government Universities in India and Abroad. Front. Psychol. 13:944153. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.944153
Edited by:
Sebastian Saniuk, University of Zielona Góra, PolandReviewed by:
A. A. I. N. Marhaeni, Udayana University, IndonesiaCopyright © 2022 Galgotia and Lakshmi. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Dhruv Galgotia, ZGhydXZnYWxnb3RpYTAwMUBnbWFpbC5jb20=