Yuanyuan Ma- Department of Elementary Education, Jiaozuo Normal College, Jiaozuo, China
Since learners’ academic achievement is the ultimate goal of any system of education, multitudes of studies have been conducted on this variable and its determinants. That is, several scholars have explored the effects of student-related and teacher-related factors on learners’ academic achievement. Notwithstanding, a few researchers have investigated the effects of teachers’ self-efficacy and creativity on learners’ academic achievement. Furthermore, no study has reviewed the role of these teacher-related factors in learners’ achievement. Therefore, the present study seeks to bridge the lacunas by delving into the influence of teachers’ self-efficacy and creativity on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners’ academic achievement. The beneficial effects of self-efficacy beliefs and creative teaching were outlined through the existing evidence. This seems to be illuminative for EFL teachers. Given the positive consequences of teachers’ self-efficacy for students’ achievement, EFL teachers should believe in themselves and their abilities to lead their students to academic success. Additionally, with regard to the positive impact of teachers’ creativity on learners’ achievement, EFL teachers are expected to teach the course content creatively.
Introduction
In any instructional-learning context, learners’ academic achievement is the primary focus of policymakers, educational administrators, and instructors, and English as a Foreign Language (EFL) contexts are not an exception by any means. Academic achievement is “the outcome of learning, which is typically measured by classroom grades, classroom assessments, and external achievement tests” (Gajda et al., 2017, p. 270). Put simply, academic achievement pertains to the extent to which learners have effectively acquired and mastered course content (Ho and Hau, 2008). In the language education domain, academic achievement deals with how well language learners have acquired a new language (Cho et al., 2018). Owing to the fact that language learners’ personal qualities and characteristics may serve an influential role in enhancing their academic achievement (Komarraju et al., 2009; Hakimi et al., 2011), numerous inquiries have been done to uncover the effects of student-related variables, including motivation, self-concept, and self-efficacy on language learners’ academic achievement (e.g., Othman and Leng, 2011; McInerney et al., 2012; Chen et al., 2013; Soodmand Afshar et al., 2014; Wang, 2015; Li and Lynch, 2016; Li, 2020, to cite a few). Given the central position of teachers in classroom contexts, several research studies have also been conducted on the impact of teacher-related factors on language learners’ academic achievement (Hofferber et al., 2014; Kola and Sunday, 2015; Rahimi and Karkami, 2015; Klusmann et al., 2016; Kheirzadeh and Sistani, 2018; Kim and Seo, 2018; Ma et al., 2018, to cite a few). Yet, the effects of teachers’ self-efficacy and creativity on language learners’ academic achievement have received relatively little attention (Gowrie and Ramdass, 2014; Kim and Seo, 2018).
The term “self-efficacy” generally refers to an individual’s belief in his or her own ability to successfully carry out a given action (Bandura, 1997). Applied to the educational context, teacher self-efficacy pertains to “a teacher’s judgment of his/her capabilities to bring about desired outcomes of student engagement and learning, even among those students who may be difficult or unmotivated” (Tschannen-Moran and Hoy, 2001, p. 784). Put differently, teacher self-efficacy deals with teachers’ beliefs in their capacity and ability to fulfill the educational responsibilities they are in charge of (Klassen and Chiu, 2010). As Klassen et al. (2014) submitted, teachers who strongly believe in themselves and their instructional abilities are able to: (a) utilize alternate approaches and techniques when the expected outcomes are not attained and (b) manage a difficult condition by altering the conditions’ cognitive and emotional processes. Teachers with high levels of self-efficacy, according to Gibbs and Powell (2012), are capable of increasing their students’ academic achievement as well. That is, teachers’ self-efficacy is believed to favorably influence student academic achievement (Han and Wang, 2021).
Teacher creativity as another influential factor in learners’ academic achievement pertains to “the utilization of imaginative approaches to make learning more interesting” (Jeffrey and Craft, 2004, p. 78). In another definition, Nunan (2013) referred to this concept as “the recombination of familiar elements into new and previously unrehearsed forms” (p. 70). More specifically, language teachers’ creativity deals with their ability to offer some opportunities to their pupils to use the language they have been educated in novel and innovative ways (Richards, 2013). Creative teaching is thought to improve language learners’ interest, academic motivation, and academic achievement (Baghaei and Riasati, 2015; Xerri and Vassallo, 2016).
Despite the prominence of teachers’ self-efficacy and creativity in improving learners’ academic achievement (Gibbs and Powell, 2012; Xerri and Vassallo, 2016), the effects of these teacher-related variables on learners’ academic achievement have not been widely studied (Gowrie and Ramdass, 2014; Kim and Seo, 2018). Moreover, only a few researchers have probed the impact of teachers’ creativity and self-efficacy on EFL learners’ academic achievement (Mojavezi and Tamiz, 2012; Rashidi and Moghadam, 2014). Additionally, no review study has been conducted on this subject to highlight the positive consequences of teachers’ self-efficacy and creativity for EFL learners’ academic achievement. This review study attempts to bridge the gaps by illustrating the function of teachers’ creativity and self-efficacy in promoting EFL learners’ academic achievement.
Teacher Self-Efficacy
The construct of self-efficacy generally pertains to one’s beliefs, thoughts, and perceptions about his/her personal abilities and capabilities (Bandura, 1994). Likewise, teacher self-efficacy deals with how individual teachers perceive themselves, their instructional competence, and their professional skills (Klassen et al., 2010). Skaalvik and Skaalvik (2010) defined teacher self-efficacy as “an individual teacher’s beliefs in his or her ability to plan, organize, and carry out activities that are required to attain educational goals” (cited in Sarfo et al., 2015, p. 20). Further, Tschannen-Moran and Johnson (2011) asserted that teachers’ self-efficacy is not just a personal evaluation of professional capabilities, but rather a belief about what they can do in diverse situations. As mentioned by Tschannen-Moran and Hoy (2001), the construct of teacher self-efficacy entails three broad dimensions, including “efficacy for instructional strategies,” “efficacy for classroom management,” and “efficacy for student engagement.” Accordingly, teachers with strong self-efficacy beliefs are able to engage students in learning tasks, utilize effective teaching techniques, and control the classroom atmosphere (Fathi et al., 2020).
Teacher Creativity
The concept of creativity has been theoretically defined as “the interaction among aptitude, process, and environment by which an individual or group produces a perceptual product that is both novel and useful” (Plucker et al., 2004, p. 91). To put it in a nutshell, creativity is the use of imagination, inspiration, and innovative ideas to achieve a certain goal (Cheng, 2010). Applied to the educational context, teacher creativity pertains to individual teacher’s use of innovative approaches, methods, and techniques to improve students’ learning outcomes (Ghanizadeh and Jahedizadeh, 2016). As Lou et al. (2012) noted, creative teaching enables teachers to become aware of their full potential as educators, but only if they have mastered the subject matter themselves. Creative teaching is also believed to positively influence students’ academic attainment, academic performance, and learning outcomes (Richards, 2013).
The Effect of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Creativity on EFL Learners’ Academic Achievement
To explain the value of teachers’ personal traits in promoting English language learners’ academic achievement, Akbari and Allvar (2010) postulated that teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs inspire them to enhance their professional attempts. Put simply, self-efficacy beliefs act as a motivator, encouraging teachers to give their all in the classrooms. This, in turn, contributes to increased student achievement. In a similar vein, Gibbs and Powell (2012) also stated that instructors with strong self-efficacy beliefs invest more effort in teaching course content, which enables them to improve their learners’ language achievement. Besides, to illustrate the role of teacher creativity in learners’ academic achievement, Papa (2015) submitted that creative teachers commonly employ innovative methods, strategies, and materials that make the learning process more enjoyable. An enjoyable learning atmosphere will drive students toward higher academic outcomes (Dewaele et al., 2019; Wang et al., 2021).
Empirical Studies
As mentioned earlier, despite the value of teacher self-efficacy and creativity in learners’ academic achievement, few investigations have been performed to explore the effects of these teacher-related factors on EFL learners’ academic achievement (Mojavezi and Tamiz, 2012; Baghaei and Riasati, 2015; Kim and Seo, 2018). Mojavezi and Tamiz (2012), for example, delved into the role of teacher self-efficacy in EFL learners’ academic achievement. To do this, 80 EFL teachers and 150 EFL students were selected from different high schools in Iran. To collect data, two close-ended scales (i.e., teacher self-efficacy scale and student achievement scale) were distributed among participants. The analysis of participants’ answers demonstrated that teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs can positively affect EFL learners’ academic achievement. Moreover, Baghaei and Riasati (2015) examined the influence of teacher creativity on EFL learners’ academic achievement. In doing so, six EFL teachers and 81 EFL learners were asked to respond to two different questionnaires. The responses were analyzed using Pearson correlation and one-way ANOVA. The results indicated that EFL learners’ academic achievement can be favorably affected by teachers’ creativity.
Implications
So far, the variables of teacher creativity, self-efficacy, and learner academic achievement were described. Moreover, in light of available evidence, the effects of teacher self-efficacy and creativity on EFL learners’ academic achievement were illustrated. Taking the theoretical and empirical evidence into consideration, one can logically infer that both self-efficacy beliefs and creative teaching positively influence EFL learners’ academic achievement. This finding seems to be beneficial and enlightening for EFL teachers. With respect to the positive consequences of teachers’ self-efficacy for students’ achievement, EFL teachers need to believe in themselves and their abilities to lead their students to academic success. Further, considering the positive impact of teachers’ creativity on learners’ achievement, EFL teachers are required to make use of creative teaching in their classes. Due to the scarcity of research on the role of teachers’ creativity and self-efficacy in learners’ academic achievement, further empirical studies are thus needed.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Akbari, R., and Allvar, N. K. (2010). L2 teacher characteristics as predictors of students’ academic achievement. TESLl-EJ 13, 1–22.
Baghaei, S., and Riasati, M. J. (2015). An investigation into the relationship between teachers’ creativity and students’ academic achievement: a case study of Iran EFL context. J. Stud. Learn. Teach. Engl. 4, 21–32.
Bandura, A. (1994). “Self-efficacy,” in Encyclopedia of Human Behavior. ed. V. S. Ramachandran (New York: Academic Press), 71–81.
Chen, S. K., Yeh, Y. C., Hwang, F. M., and Lin, S. S. (2013). The relationship between academic self-concept and achievement: a multicohort–multioccasion study. Learn. Individ. Differ. 23, 172–178. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2012.07.021
Cheng, V. M. Y. (2010). Tensions and dilemmas of teachers in creativity reform in a Chinese context. Think. Skills Creat. 5, 120–137. doi: 10.1016/j.tsc.2010.09.005
Cho, K., Lee, S., Joo, M. H., and Becker, B. J. (2018). The effects of using mobile devices on student achievement in language learning: a meta-analysis. Educ. Sci. 8:105. doi: 10.3390/educsci8030105
Dewaele, J. M., Chen, X., Padilla, A. M., and Lake, J. (2019). The flowering of positive psychology in foreign language teaching and acquisition research. Front. Psychol. 10:2128. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02128
Fathi, J., Derakhshan, A., and Saharkhiz Arabani, A. (2020). Investigating a structural model of self-efficacy, collective efficacy, and psychological well-being among Iranian EFL teachers. Iran. J. Appl. Lang. Stud. 12, 123–150.
Gajda, A., Karwowski, M., and Beghetto, R. A. (2017). Creativity and academic achievement: a meta-analysis. J. Educ. Psychol. 109, 269–299. doi: 10.1037/edu0000133
Ghanizadeh, A., and Jahedizadeh, S. (2016). EFL teachers’ teaching style, creativity, and burnout: a path analysis approach. Cogent Educ. 3:1151997. doi: 10.1080/2331186X.2016.1151997
Gibbs, S., and Powell, B. (2012). Teacher efficacy and pupil behaviour: the structure of teachers’ individual and collective beliefs and their relationship with numbers of pupils excluded from school. Br. J. Educ. Psychol. 82, 564–584. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02046.x
Gowrie, G., and Ramdass, M. (2014). Dimensions of teacher efficacy and student academic achievement in selected primary schools in Trinidad and Tobago. J. Educ. Soc. Behav. Sci. 4, 1358–1371. doi: 10.9734/BJESBS/2014/10406
Hakimi, S., Hejazi, E., and Lavasani, M. G. (2011). The relationships between personality traits and students’ academic achievement. Procedia Soc. Behav. Sci. 29, 836–845. doi: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.11.312
Han, Y., and Wang, Y. (2021). Investigating the correlation among Chinese EFL teachers’ self-efficacy, work engagement, and reflection. Front. Psychol. 12:763234. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.763234
Ho, I. T., and Hau, K. T. (2008). Academic achievement in the Chinese context: the role of goals, strategies, and effort. Int. J. Psychol. 43, 892–897. doi: 10.1080/00207590701836323
Hofferber, N., Eckes, A., and Wilde, M. (2014). Effects of autonomy supportive vs. controlling teachers’ behavior on students’ achievement. European. J. Educ. Res. 3, 177–184. doi: 10.12973/eu-jer.3.4.177
Jeffrey, B., and Craft, A. (2004). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity: distinctions and relationships. Educ. Stud. 30, 77–87. doi: 10.1080/0305569032000159750
Kheirzadeh, S., and Sistani, N. (2018). The effect of reflective teaching on Iranian EFL students' achievement: the case of teaching experience and level of education. Aust. J. Teach. Educ. 43, 143–156. doi: 10.14221/ajte.2018v43n2.8
Kim, K. R., and Seo, E. H. (2018). The relationship between teacher efficacy and students’ academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Soc. Behav. Personal. Int. J. 46, 529–540. doi: 10.2224/sbp.6554
Klassen, R. M., and Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects on teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. J. Educ. Psychol. 102, 741–756. doi: 10.1037/a0019237
Klassen, R. M., Durksen, T. L., and Tze, V. M. (2014). “Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: ready to move from theory to practice,” in Teacher Motivation. eds. P. W. Richardson, S. A. Karabenick, and H. M. G. Watt (London: Routledge), 100–115.
Klassen, R. M., Usher, E. L., and Bong, M. (2010). Teachers’ collective efficacy, job satisfaction, and job stress in cross-cultural context. J. Exp. Educ. 78, 464–486. doi: 10.1080/00220970903292975
Klusmann, U., Richter, D., and Ludtke, O. (2016). Teachers’ emotional exhaustion is negatively related to students’ achievement: evidence from a large-scale assessment study. J. Educ. Psychol. 108, 1193–1203. doi: 10.1037/edu0000125
Kola, A. J., and Sunday, O. S. (2015). A review of teachers’ qualifications and its implication on students’ academic achievement in Nigerian schools. Int J. Educ. Res. and Inf. Sci. 2, 10–15.
Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., and Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the big five personality traits in predicting college students' academic motivation and achievement. Learn. Individ. Differ. 19, 47–52. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001
Li, C. (2020). A positive psychology perspective on Chinese EFL students’ trait emotional intelligence, foreign language enjoyment and EFL learning achievement. J. Multiling. Multicult. Dev. 41, 246–263. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2019.1614187
Li, T., and Lynch, R. (2016). The relationship between motivation for learning and academic achievement among basic and advanced level students studying Chinese as a foreign language in years 3 to 6 at Ascot International School in Bangkok. Thailand Hum. Sci. 8, 1–13.
Lou, S. J., Chen, N. C., Tsai, H. Y., Tseng, K. H., and Shih, R. C. (2012). Using blended creative teaching: improving a teacher education course on designing materials for young children. Australas. J. Educ. Technol. 28, 776–792. doi: 10.14742/ajet.816
Ma, L., Du, X., Hau, K. T., and Liu, J. (2018). The association between teacher-student relationship and academic achievement in Chinese EFL context: a serial multiple mediation model. Educ. Psychol. 38, 687–707. doi: 10.1080/01443410.2017.1412400
McInerney, D. M., Cheng, R. W. Y., Mok, M. M. C., and Lam, A. K. H. (2012). Academic self-concept and learning strategies: direction of effect on student academic achievement. J Adv. Acad. 23, 249–269. doi: 10.1177/1932202X12451020
Mojavezi, A., and Tamiz, M. P. (2012). The impact of teacher self-efficacy on the students' motivation and achievement. Theory Pract. Lang. Stud. 2, 483–491. doi: 10.4304/tpls.2.3.483-491
Nunan, D.(Ed.) (2013). Learner-Centered English Language Education: The Selected Works of David Nunan. London: Routledge
Othman, N., and Leng, K. B. (2011). The relationship between self-concept, intrinsic motivation, self-determination and academic achievement among Chinese primary school students. Int. J. Psychol. Stud. 3, 90–98. doi: 10.5539/ijps.v3n1p90
Papa, L. A. (2015). The impact of teaching and academic self-efficacy on student engagement and academic outcomes. Doctoral dissertation. Logan: Utah State University.
Plucker, J. A., Beghetto, R. A., and Dow, G. T. (2004). Why isn't creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research. Educ. Psychol. 39, 83–96. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3902_1
Rahimi, M., and Karkami, F. H. (2015). The role of teachers’ classroom discipline in their teaching effectiveness and students’ language learning motivation and achievement: a path method. Iran. J. Lang. Teach. Res. 3, 57–82.
Rashidi, N., and Moghadam, M. (2014). The effect of teachers' beliefs and sense of self-efficacy on Iranian EFL learners’ satisfaction and academic achievement. TESL-EJ 18, 1–23.
Sarfo, F. K., Amankwah, F., Sam, F. K., and Konin, D. (2015). Teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: the relationship between gender and instructional strategies, classroom management and student engagement. Ghana J. Dev. Stud. 12, 19–32. doi: 10.4314/gjds.v12i1-2.2
Skaalvik, E. M., and Skaalvik, S. (2010). Teacher self-efficacy and teacher burnout: a study of relations. Teach. Teach. Educ. 26, 1059–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.11.001
Soodmand Afshar, H., Rahimi, A., and Rahimi, M. (2014). Instrumental motivation, critical thinking, autonomy and academic achievement of Iranian EFL learners. Issues Educ. Res. 24, 281–298.
Tschannen-Moran, M., and Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct. Teach. Teach. Educ. 17, 783–805. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00036-1
Tschannen-Moran, M., and Johnson, D. (2011). Exploring literacy teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs: potential sources at play. Teach. Teach. Educ. 27, 751–761. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.005
Wang, Y. (2015). A trend study of the influences of parental expectation, parental involvement, and self-efficacy on the English academic achievement of Chinese eighth graders. Int. Educ. 44, 45–68.
Wang, Y., Derakhshan, A., and Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: the past, current status and future directions. Front. Psychol. 12:731721. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
Keywords: teacher creativity, teacher self-efficacy, academic achievement, EFL learners, education
Citation: Ma Y (2022) The Effect of Teachers’ Self-Efficacy and Creativity on English as a Foreign Language Learners’ Academic Achievement. Front. Psychol. 13:872147. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.872147
Edited by:
Ali Derakhshan, Golestan University, IranReviewed by:
Qianyu Cao, Chengdu University of Information Technology, ChinaSeyed Farzad Kalali Sani, Islamic Azad University Torbat-e Heydarieh Branch, Iran
Copyright © 2022 Ma. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Yuanyuan Ma, eXltYTIwMjFAMTYzLmNvbQ==