Faren Huo
Ranran Gao
Cong Sun
Guanhua Hou- Pan Tianshou College of Architecture, Arts and Design, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
With the increasingly powerful functions of vehicle-mounted entertainment facilities, people (especially young drivers) like to listen to music while driving to render different atmospheres and emotions. However, emotions are important factors affecting drivers’ decisions, behavior and may reduce drivers’ hazard perception (HP), even promote dangerous driving behaviors of drivers. The purpose of this study is to explore the young and elderly drivers in assessing the HP difference under different emotional states. We conducted a 3 × 2 mixed experimental design with emotion as a within-participants variable and age as a between-participants factor. A sample of 14 young drivers (mean age = 22.21, SD = 1.05) and 13 elderly drivers (mean age = 54.08, SD = 2.72) completed the HP self-assessment of road traffic warning signs under negative emotion, neutral emotion, and positive emotion, randomly. The results showed that the young had the highest self-assessment HP under the negative emotion arousal condition, while the old had the highest self-assessment HP under the positive emotion arousal condition. In addition, When both groups were in a positive arousal state, the older group perceived more hazards than the young group. The results could help designers create driving emotions suitable for different driver groups, thus improving their perception of hazards and reducing risky driving.
Highlights
- Negative emotions increased participants’ self-assessed Hazard Perception.
- Young drivers had the highest perceived hazard in negative emotions, while old drivers had the highest perceived hazard in positive emotions.
- It is important to create the right driving emotion for different driving groups.
Introduction
Hazard perception (HP) refers to the ability of drivers to detect potential dangers on the road, accurately assess the degree of harm and deal with them (Crundall et al., 2012). Studies show drivers’ demographic characteristics (age), driving behaviors (Song et al., 2021), and driving emotion (Steinhauser et al., 2018; Kadoya et al., 2021b) are crucial in traffic safety. Exploring the relationship between drivers’ demographic characteristics (e.g., age), driving emotions, and dangerous driving behaviors are helpful to reduce property loss and even casualties caused by risky driving.
Research has found that driving style is related to age (Taubman-Ben-Ari et al., 2004, 2016; Poo and Ledesma, 2013; Long and Ruosong, 2019; Navon and Taubman-Ben-Ari, 2019; Padilla et al., 2020), with young drivers like bad driving behavior. Young drivers are prone to be influenced by the external environment in the process of driving, resulting in a series of emotions that affect their cognition, attention, judgment, and behavior, and lead to dangerous driving. Therefore, young drivers are the main group of traffic accidents (Steinhauser et al., 2018; Kadoya et al., 2021a). Although the number of deaths among young drivers has been on the decline (Ferguson et al., 2007), a complete understanding of the potential impact of emotion on dangerous driving is needed.
However, the effect of different emotions on HP in young and old people is still unclear, therefore we studied the cognitive processing of emotions on the HP of different groups of drivers. A comprehensive understanding of how different groups of drivers think and feel about dangerous driving under different driving emotions is helpful to provide theoretical guidance for improving safe driving.
Related Work
Hazard Perception
In traffic psychology, HP refers to subjective assessment of the degree of harm caused by traffic accidents, which can affect drivers’ behavioral decisions (Deery, 1999; for example, evaluating dangerous behaviors such as running red lights.). A driver’s perception of danger is affected by driving experience and age. For example, driving experience can improve a driver’s ability to perceive danger (Deery, 1999; Rosenbloom et al., 2008). In addition, some studies believe that negative emotions such as fear and anger can also affect drivers’ perception of danger (Lu et al., 2013).
Some studies have found an antithetical relationship between perceived hazards and dangerous driving behavior. In other words, the stronger the driver’s HP ability is, the less likely he will engage in dangerous driving behavior (Machin and Sankey, 2008; Mills et al., 2008). Besides, the researcher (Ma et al., 2010) further suggested that risk perception may not directly affect drivers’ driving behavior. For example, the researchers used risk perception scales to measure participants’ attitudes toward traffic accidents (for example, how much you care about a traffic accident which might hurt others) and found that perception of danger has an indirect effect on speeding behavior. Moreover, HP moderated the relationship between age, and dangerous driving (Rhodes and Pivik, 2011). In simpler terms, HP is more suitable for predicting dangerous driving in older adults than in young adults.
To sum up, dangerous driving behaviors can be effectively reduced by improving drivers’ danger perception ability, thus improving road driving safety. Therefore, the relationship between HP, affective states, and age needs further study.
Affective States
Driving emotion (Steinhauser et al., 2018; Kadoya et al., 2021b) is crucial in traffic safety, which can cause dangerous driving behaviors by influencing drivers’ cognition, attention, judgment, and behavior (Steinhauser et al., 2018; Kadoya et al., 2021a). For example, for some drivers who take driving for pleasure, driving itself can be enjoyable and generate positive emotions during driving (Sheller, 2004). Studies have shown that driving in positive emotions, such as letting the guard down and playing with friends, can lead to dangerous driving behavior (Møller and Gregersen, 2008). However, there are opposing views that positive emotions have been found to promote more flexible, creative thinking and action, thus may enhance creativity associated with perceived danger (Isen, 1987; Lyubomirsky et al., 2005).
However, positive emotions are rarely used in road traffic environments and are considered unable to effectively awaken drivers’ awareness of vigilance (Lewis et al., 2007). To keep drivers on high alert in road traffic safety, negative emotions dominated by fear, tension, and worry are often used (Lewis et al., 2008). Obviously, it is important to use negative emotions on the traffic road. Despite this, some studies (Elliott, 2003) suggest that the use of negative emotions should be cautious, because the arousal of fear is stimulating and inhibiting, which may lead to defects in coping mechanisms in road traffic safety. Many studies have found that fear produces adverse reactions (Schoenbachler and Whittler, 1996; Witte et al., 1998; Orit Taubman Ben-Ari and Mikulincer, 2000). This kind of adverse reaction shows that in order to cope with the unpleasant feelings caused by the prompt information, they defensively ignore the prompt information, but do not control or eliminate the potential threat implied in the message. In addition, some people in fear may perceive the prompt as a self-challenge, reducing the perceived level of danger while the actual level of danger remains the same, leading to dangerous driving behavior. Therefore, scholars suggest that negative emotions such as fear should be carefully used in road traffic safety, and other types of emotions should be considered (Wundersitz et al., 2010). Whereas, when people are in a negative emotional state, they may process information more carefully (Schwarz et al., 1991). If warning signals intend to convey information about safety or danger, then negative emotions may promote the cognitive process of danger perception. As a result, it’s not clear which emotions are better for driving.
In addition, there seems to be a gender gap in positive emotions among young drivers: Young male drivers are more enjoy driving than young female drivers, according to a study of driving attitudes (Harré et al., 1996), and male drivers are more affected by positive emotions, which may explain why they are more likely to drive dangerously (Rhodes and Pivik, 2011).
If drivers’ danger perception ability is affected by emotions and age, then road traffic signs should be designed to eliminate and avoid the influence of these factors when conveying potential threat information. The effect of emotion and on the perceived danger of warning messages is unclear. Therefore, it is necessary to further study how young drivers perceive and process warning messages in different emotional states.
Age Difference
Another issue worth paying attention to is whether age differences exist in people’s processing and response to information under different emotional states. Young drivers (15 to 25 years old) drive unsafe more often than older age groups, research has also found that young drivers’ driving performance is linked to cognition (Di Meco et al., 2021). The elderly have a higher emotional happiness index and less negative emotional experience than young people (Mikels et al., 2005; Reed and Carstensen, 2012; Gronchi et al., 2018). In the process of processing emotional information, the elderly pay more attention to positive emotional information than negative emotional information, that is, the “positive effect” of the elderly. This is also true in memory research (Mather and Carstensen, 2003; Comblain et al., 2005; Spaniol et al., 2008; Scheibe and Carstensen, 2010).
Two models of cognitive-affective aging: social-emotional selectivity theory (Carstensen et al., 1999; Mikels et al., 2005) and dynamic integration theory (Labouvie-Vief, 2003, 2005, 2009; Labouvie-Vief et al., 2009) explain the positive effects.
On the one hand, SST is a life-span development theory related to motivation (Mather and Carstensen, 2003), assuming that goal selection follows adulthood. SST proposes a choice of goals throughout adulthood. Some goals involve preparing for the future, such as accumulating knowledge and meeting new friends; Other goals are related to satisfying the present life, such as enjoying intimacy and pursuing emotional satisfaction. While these goals are important over the course of life, SST places great emphasis on the negative correlation between age and future time horizons. Young people tend to perceive that the future is vast, prioritizing preparation for the future, spending more time and energy building social networks and increasing knowledge reserves to cope with an uncertain future; older adults seek to meet the emotional satisfaction of the present when they perceive the limited time in the future (Sims et al., 2015). However, when the elderly are getting older or perceive that time in the future is limited, the pursuit of emotional satisfaction takes precedence over other goals (Sims et al., 2015). The positive effect theory of SST extension theory proposes that the larger the age span of the two study groups, the easier the positive effect will be detected (Charles and Hong, 2015).
On the other hand, DIT suggests that this is an automatic process of cognitive decline due to aging (Labouvie-Vief, 2003). This theory suggests that older adults have difficulty managing cognitive-affective complexity due to the limitations of age-related cognitive resources. The theory believe that positive information is easier than negative information, and older people use fewer cognitive resources to process positive information. The elderly face the decline of cognitive resources and thus compensate for the processing of information in a simple, positive way, that is, the automatic processing of positive emotional information. Automatic processing of positive emotional information is an adaptive attentional mechanism (Labouvie-Vief, 2009), when it is associated with negative emotions such as pain and threat, it automatically preserves cognitive processing by eliminating emotional stimuli. Therefore, the positive effect of emotion processing on the elderly is minimal automatic emotion processing. The above studies showed that older people prefer positive emotional processing, while younger people do not have this preference or prefer negative emotional processing (Kennedy et al., 2004).
Both SST and DIT explain differences in emotional processing in the elderly. Positive information processing stabilized or improved with age, while negative information processing decreased with age (Carstensen et al., 1999; Labouvie-Vief, 2003). While the role of attention in each theory may lead to different assumptions. SST believes that the positive effect depends on the later attention process, which is passively controlled, while DIT believes that the positive effect depends on the early attention process, which is processed automatically.
Studies have shown that increased attention to negative material among young people leads to age-related differences in the direction of attention (Charles et al., 2003; Ready et al., 2007; Shamaskin et al., 2010). And the elderly showed a stimulative effect of attention on positive (as opposed to negative) information (Isaacowitz et al., 2006; Mather and Knight, 2006).
In conclusion, young drivers and old drivers prefer different emotional information (positive or negative), however, different emotional stimuli will guide older drivers and young drivers to judge and make decisions differently (Taubman-Ben-Ari, 2012). What is more, the influence of emotion on HP of young and old drivers is still unclear. Therefore, it is necessary to further study the influence and effect of emotion on different driving groups.
The Present Work
At present, studies on dangerous driving mainly focus on young drivers and adult drivers, but as China continues to enter an aging society, there are more and more older drivers. Therefore, We need to further explore the HP ability of young and old drivers in different emotional states. Therefore, this study explores the following questions:
1. Do emotions have a significant influence on drivers’ perceived danger?
2. Are there differences in perceived hazard between young and old drivers under different emotional states?
In this study, we used the method of listening to music while recalling imagination (Kuhbandner and Zehetleitner, 2011; Larson et al., 2013; van Steenbergen et al., 2014) to wake up the emotions of the participants. The Self-Assessment Manikin (SAM; Morris, 1995) questionnaire was used to assess their emotional valence (EV) and emotional arousal (EA), and evaluated their emotional state at that time from these two dimensions. A five-point scale questionnaire (Kalsher et al., 1995) was adopted to ask the participants to score the HP of 22 traffic warning signs. We hypothesized that emotions have a significant impact on drivers’ HP, and drivers’ HP is higher under negative emotions; the influence of age and emotion on HP is interactive, young people have higher HP under negative emotion, while old people have higher HP under positive emotion.
Materials and Methods
Design
We designed a 3 (emotion: Negative, Neutral, and Positive) × 2 (age: young group, old group) mixed experimental design. Emotion and age are independent variables, the former is a within-participants variable and the latter is a between-participants factor. The dependent variable was the self-assessment of the HP of traffic warning signs. The framework for experimental design is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Framework for experiment design.
Participants
We recruited 14 young drivers with an age range of 21 to 24 (M = 22.21, SD = 1.05) and 13 older drivers with an age range of 50 to 60 (M = 54.08, SD = 2.72). There were nine men and five women among the younger drivers, and twelve men and one woman among the older drivers. The young drivers are undergraduate students from Ningbo University. The older drivers are didi ‘s express drivers (Non-professional driver), as long as they meet the application requirements (age: 22–60; Driver’s license C2 or above for express; Driving experience more than 1 year; and Drivers with a total mileage of less than 100,000 km) can apply through Didi’s express drivers. These drivers usually pick up customers on the way home and earn part of the fee, which does not have the same positive feelings toward customers as professional drivers.
In order to control the driver’s driving experience at a similar level, we first measure the driver’s driving activity level (driving age, weekly driving frequency, driving mileage, and the number of traffic accidents) through questionnaires. Drivers with driving experience of more than 1 year and less than 2 years, driving frequency of three times or more per week, total mileage of 10,000 or so, and no traffic accidents were selected and invited as participants to participate in the experiment, so as to avoid the influence of driving experience as the intervention variable. The gender composition of the two groups was not deliberately controlled, but the result of random invitations. All participants had normal or corrected visual acuity and were not color blind.
According to the mixed experimental design, we randomly divided participants into three (Negative, Neutral, and Positive) emotion groups, repeatedly arousing three different emotional states over different time periods. Each participant completed the experimental tasks measured by the questionnaire in three different emotional states.
G* Power (Faul et al., 2007) was used for prior power analysis. Under the conditions of standard effect size f is 0.4 (large), significance level of 5% and power of 80%, the total sample size required was 64. Therefore, the minimum sample size of young (old) drivers should be 11.
Materials
To exclude the influence of incomprehensibility on the participants’ self-assessment of perceived hazard. We measured the understanding of Chinese road traffic warning signs stipulated in Road Traffic Signs and Lines (GB5768) and selected the signs with an understandable level of 70% as experimental materials for the questionnaire. In order to avoid and reduce the weariness caused by too many questions in the traffic warning sign comprehension experiment, we randomly selected one of the signs with opposite directions but the same meaning. For example, “turn left” or “turn right” were randomly selected as test signs in the traffic sign comprehension experiment, as shown in Figure 2. Participants would see one of the signs and fill in its meaning in the experiment. This preliminary screening method can not only avoid subjective exclusion but also reduce the number of questions to a certain extent.
Figure 2. Screening criteria: the same meaning but opposite direction of the sign to choose one, such as sharp left turn and sharp right turn.
Finally we selected 43 triangular warning signs (as shown in Figure 3) from the 77 road traffic warning signs stipulated in Road Traffic Signs and Lines (GB5768) as the test signs of the experiment.
Figure 3. Preliminary screening of 43 traffic warning signs.
Remove the text message of the 43 signs, and only the logo image was retained and printed in color on A4 white paper. Each page had 6 signs with a size of 2 cm × 2 cm. At the top of the questionnaire, we used a description of the “Yield pedestrian” sign as a reference.
We invited 10 people (including inexperienced, novice, and skilled drivers) to participate in the traffic warning signs comprehension experiment. The participants ranged from 21 to 45 years old (M = 25.4, SD = 6.98). All participants had normal or corrected visual acuity, were not color blind, did not participated in similar experiments recently.
After simply informing participants of the purpose and process of the experiment, we asked them to write down their understanding meanings under the 43 traffic warning signs on the paper questionnaire as detailed as possible. The experiment lasted about 30 min.
To evaluate the fairness, two independent raters gave corresponding comprehension scores for the meaning description written by the participants according to the scoring criteria of the open questionnaire scale, as shown in Table 1. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient value of the scale was 0.96, indicating high reliability of the scale (Duarte and Rebelo, 2005).
Table 1. Scoring criteria sacle.
Descriptive statistics of the comprehensible rate of 43 signs are shown in Table 2.
Table 2. Descriptive statistics of the comprehension rate of 43 signs.
The understanding rates for all signs ranged from −40.0% (Sign 17 — split road) to 100% (Sign 1 — crossroads), with an overall mean (±standard deviation) of 60.0% (±25.83%) understanding rates for all signs. Ten signs had an understanding rate of greater than 85% as recommended by ANSI Z535.3, 2002, and 15 signs had an understanding rate of between 67 and 85% that is considered acceptable by ISO 3864-3, 2006 (a sign understanding rate of greater than 67%). Among them, the “low-lying road” sign, “high-protrusion road” sign, and “uneven road” sign have similar meanings, so the low-lying road sign with the highest understanding rate is retained. Although the understanding rate of the “Watch out for wild animals” sign reaches 80.0%, it is not common in daily traffic roads, so we removed it. After the sign comprehension test, we screened out 22 road traffic warning signs meeting the requirements, as shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4. 22 traffic warning signs with an understanding rate of 67% or more.
Procedure
Pre-experiments
We conducted a preliminary experiment to test whether listening to music and recalling the past successfully aroused the corresponding emotional state in participants. In this study, we used the method of listening to music while recalling and imagining (Kuhbandner and Zehetleitner, 2011; Larson et al., 2013; van Steenbergen et al., 2014) to induce the emotions of the participants.
We invited another 20 students (10 males) from Ningbo University to participate in the preliminary experiment. The pre-experiments are conducted in quiet, independent laboratories. Each participant was asked to complete two EA (negative and positive) tests at random. After a brief explanation of the purpose and procedure of the experiment, we played the corresponding musical selections to the participants (Jefferies et al., 2008), and the participants were asked to listen to music while recalling past events which had made them very delighted or very depressed, it took about 10 min. In order to avoid the boredom caused by repeated listening to a song in the group, each emotion group selected two songs to play in turn. We played “Uranus, The Magician, The Planets” and “Mars, The Bringer of War, The Planets” by Holst for the negative emotion group; Mozart’s “Eine Kleine Nachtmusik: Rondo” and “Eine Kleine Nachtmusik: Allegro” for the positive emotion group.
We adopted the SAM scale (Morris, 1995) to measure each participant’ emotional state which is a 9-point scale. Each participant was asked to score at their current EV from “1” to “9” (1 = “unhappy,” 9 = happy), and their current EA from “1” to “9” (1 = “I did not feel any stimulus,” 9 = “I felt a strong stimulus”).
After the EA test, we used SPSS 19.0 data analysis software to conduct one-way ANOVA on the data of EV and EA of participants in different emotional groups.
After data analysis, the mean EV of the positive emotion group was 6.50, SD = 0.76, and mean EA was 5.35, SD = 1.98. The mean EV of the negative emotion group was 4.00, SD = 0.80, and mean EA was 4.50, SD = 1.40. Results showed that the EV of the positive emotion group was significantly higher than that of the negative group (P = 0.008). While there was no significant difference between the EA (P = 0.125), indicating that participants in both groups had similar levels of arousal and listening to music and recalling the past induced the corresponding emotional state successfully.
Formal Experiment
After the preliminary experiment, we carried out the formal experiment. Each participant entered three stages of random arousal (negative, neutral, and positive), respectively. Before the formal experiment began, all participants (14 young drivers, 13 older drivers) were asked to read and sign an informed consent form. They were then simply told that the purpose of the music was to arouse their emotions.
First of all, the negative emotion group and the neutral emotion group were awakened the corresponding emotions, respectively, while the neutral emotion group did not awaken the emotion. The process of EA was consistent with the pre-experiment. We recorded the EV and EA before the HP test as EV1 and EA1, respectively.
In addition, 22 traffic warning signs are printed in color on A4 white paper, each with a related question: Please tick “√” where the hazard level of this sign corresponds to your understanding. All participants used a five-point scale (Kalsher et al., 1995) to score the perceived danger of 22 traffic warning signs, with “1” representing no danger at all and “5” representing fatal. The music continued throughout the experiment until it was all over. After the participants completed the HP questionnaire, using the SAM scale to evaluate the immediate emotional valence (EV2) and emotional arousal (EA2) level again.
The young drivers completed the experiment in a quiet and independent laboratory in the school. In order to avoid the tension of the elderly drivers due to the strange environment, we asked the elderly drivers to sit in the main driving position of their didi car, keep the car stationary, let the host sitting in the back read out the questions, and record their oral scoring.
Every participant’s emotional state was randomly awakened to eliminate the effect of the experiment’s order, and the experiment lasted about 40 to 50 min for each participant. Before the participants’ first EA experiment began, we first proceeded by asking questions to understand the emotional state of each participant, so as to awaken the corresponding emotional state by the way, and after each EA and HP questionnaire was completed, we would chat with the participant for about 20 min to soothe the participant’s emotions and eliminate the influence of the previous emotional manipulation, in preparation for the next EA. The second EA is a random awakening of a certain emotion, so there are participants who are awakened to negative emotions in the third EA, but we will adjust the participants’ emotions to normal levels through chat after the experiment is over.
After completing the experiment, each participant received a cash reward of 20 yuan RMB. Finally, we calculated the self-assessment HP scores of all the 22 traffic warning signs.
Data Acquisition
The participants data were emotional state data from the SAM scale and self-rated HP data from the HP questionnaire. 6 questionnaire data from the young drivers and 3 questionnaire data from the old drivers were excluded from the analysis due to the significant difference in the EV of the participants before and after the experiment. We used SPSS 19.0 data analysis software to analyze the data of all participants.
Emotional Manipulation
One-way analysis of variance was used to compare the differences in EV and EA scores between different emotional groups, so as to judge whether the emotions of the subjects were successfully aroused.
In the emotion data before starting to fill out the HP questionnaire score (EV 1and EA1), emotion was significant for EV1 score [(F (2,69) = 247.54, p < 0.001)] and EA1 score [(F (2,69) = 9.40, p < 0.001)]. Post hoc Comparison analysis showed that the EV1 score of the negative emotion group (M = 2.08, SD = 1.06) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those of the neutral emotion group (M = 5.67, SD = 0.71), and also significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those of the positive emotion group (M = 7.38, SD = 0.71). The EV1 scores of participants in the neutral emotion group were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those in the positive emotion group.
Similarly, the EA1 scores of the negative emotion group (M = 5.12, SD = 1.12) were significantly lower (p < 0.001) than those of the positive emotion group (M = 6.42, SD = 1.14), and also significantly lower (p < 0.001) than the neutral emotion group (M = 6.25, SD = 1.11). However, there was no significant difference in EAl score between neutral emotion group and positive emotion group (p > 0.05), indicating that all participants were in a state of high arousal. These results confirm that we successfully evoked the corresponding emotional states in each group of participants.
In the emotion data after filling out the HP questionnaire (EV2 and EA2), emotion had significant effect on the EV2 score [F (2,69) = 152.91, p < 0.001], and the post hoc analysis showed that the EV2 score of the negative emotion group (M = 2.63, SD = 1.01) was significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of the neutral emotion group (M = 5.33, SD = 0.76), and also significantly lower (p < 0.001) than that of the positive emotion group (M = 7.13, SD = 0.90). The EV2 scores of participants in the neutral emotion group were significantly lower than those in the positive emotion group (p < 0.001). But the EA2 score [F (2,69) = 0.87, p > 0.05] was not significant. It showed that after the completion of the test task, although the arousal degree of the three groups was at a medium level, the participants still maintained the corresponding emotional state.
Results
The commonly used data analysis method for subjective evaluation is to calculate the average value, that is, to calculate the average HP score after adding the scores corresponding to each traffic warning sign on the HP questionnaire. Self-assessment HP of 22 tested road traffic warning signs was collected, and descriptive statistics were conducted on the score of HP of sample signs with SPSS 19.0 software. Table 3 shows the statistical results.
Table 3. HP scores in different conditions (age × emotion).
If the main effect of emotion or age was significant in the analysis of variance, the differences among each group were further analyzed by post hoc.
Influence of Emotion on Hazard Perception
The effects of emotion and age on self-assessed HP were analyzed using two-factor repeated variance measures. The results of two-factor repeated variance measures shown below: Firstly, the main effect of emotion was significant [F (2,66) = 6.520, p = 0.003], which means that emotion had a significant effect on self-assessed HP. Further analysis showed that the negative emotion group (M = 3.20, SD = 0.10) perceived more harm (p = 0.002) than the neutral emotion group (M = 2.75, SD = 0.10), and the positive emotion group (M = 3.15, SD = 0.10) also perceived more harm (p = 0.005) than the neutral emotion group. In other words, in the neutral emotional state, the participants perceived the lowest perceived hazards. Results of paired comparison of emotions analysis are shown in Table 4.
Table 4. Results of paired comparison of emotions analysis.
Influence of Age and Emotion on Hazard Perception
The main effect of age was not significant, age had no significant effect on self-assessed HP, but the interaction effect of emotion and age was significant [F (2,66) = 9.18, p < 0.001]. Furthermore, simple effect analysis showed that the self-assessed HP of the young group was higher under negative emotion than under neutral emotion (p = 0.001) and positive emotion arousal (p = 0.002). In other words, the self-assessed HP of the young group was the highest under negative EA. For another, elderly group participants under the condition of positive emotion awaken was higher than in negative emotion awakened self-assessment HP (p = 0.008) and neutral emotion awaken self-assessment HP (p < 0.001). In other words, the older group participants had the highest HP in self-assessment under positive emotional conditions. Finally, when both groups were in positive EA, younger drivers perceived significantly fewer hazards than older drivers (p < 0.001). Results of simple effect analysis are shown in Table 5.
Table 5. Results of simple effect analysis (age × emotion).
Discussion
The Influence of Emotion on Self-Assessed Hazard Perception
Emotion of the participants’ self-assessment HP research results show that emotion significantly influences participants’ self-assessment of HP. Further analysis found that the negative and positive emotion groups are perceived more harm than the neutral emotion group, in other words, participants had the lowest HP under neutral emotion. Emotion and gender of the participant’s self-assessment HP research results show that both the neutral and positive emotion groups perceived less harm than the negative emotion group. In other words, participants in the negative emotional group perceived the highest levels of HP. The results of both indicated that negative emotions increased participants’ self-assessed HP.
Excluding the effect of sign familiarity, this may be because negative emotions may encourage people to process information more carefully (Schwarz et al., 1991). If warning signals intend to convey information about safety or danger, then negative emotions may promote the cognitive process of perceived danger. When the drivers in negative emotional conditions saw these traffic warning signs, the negative emotional condition might encourage them to observe the information conveyed by the warning signs more carefully and focus most of their attention on the details of the related HP. This may explain why participants perceived the most danger under negative emotions.
The Interaction Between Emotion and Age on Self-Assessed Hazard Perception
Under the negative emotion arousal condition, the younger group perceived more harm than the older group, while under the positive emotion arousal condition, the older group perceived more harm than the younger group. This may be because young people have a negative bias in emotional selection while older people have a positive bias (Gronchi et al., 2018). When the young group was in the arousal state of positive emotions, they might avoid positive emotions and inhibit the processing of positive warning signs in the visual processing stage. However, when young people see these traffic warning signs in the state of negative EA, they will focus on the information of negative warning signs, thus generating attention and memory, and negative emotions may encourage people to be more careful in information processing (Schwarz et al., 1991), and focus most of the attention on the relevant HP details (Clore and Palmer, 2009).
The “positive warning sign” here refers to the fact that if a warning traffic sign is designed to convey positive emotions, this may potentially affect the young driver’s perception of danger. For example, a traffic warning sign used to convey the accident-prone road ahead is depicted as a warm home picture, rather than a serious impact and rear-end collision. This can be called a positive warning sign and may have a revelatory effect on the design and application of road traffic warning signs for older drivers.
Dynamic integration theory holds that emotions and cognition are related. According to this theory, positive information is more straightforward than negative information, and people will use fewer cognitive resources to process positive information. Compared with young people, older people will have reduced cognitive resources. The cognitive load capacity decreases and compensates for the preference of positive emotion processing and receiving information and evaluates external objects simply and positively, that is, automatic processing of positive emotion information (Labouvie-Vief, 2009). While positive emotions could influence people to think, feel, and act creatively (Lyubomirsky et al., 2005). When the elderly drivers were in a positive emotional state and saw these traffic warning signs, creativity associated with danger perception may be improved (Isen, 1987). This may reasonably explain why young drivers with negative emotions have higher HP of road traffic warning signs, while older drivers with positive emotions have higher HP of road traffic warning signs.
Conclusion
In this experimental study, emotion and age have a significant interaction effect on drivers’ self-assessed HP, specifically, young drivers have a higher HP under negative emotions, while older drivers have a higher HP under positive emotions. The results emphasize that driver emotion is an important factor affecting HP, and creating positive emotion in the driving environment is more suitable for elderly drivers. It can be considered to create appropriate driving emotions for different driver groups, to help improve the HP of drivers.
It is worth noting the age range of older drivers in this study is 50 to 60 years old (M = 54.08, SD = 2.72), which does not meet the standard age for the elderly specified in China (60 years old). However, the age of Didi drivers is less than 60 years old in China, and the cognitive load and understanding ability of 50–60 years old drivers are very different, so it is worth studying the aged drivers in this age group. That’s why we chose 50–60 year old drivers as participants. The age range of 50–60 (M = 54.08, SD = 2.72) may can be reasonably considered as the elderly among the drivers compared with young drivers (M = 22.21, SD = 1.05).
However, there are still some limitations in this study: First, the perceived effect of road warning signs presented in paper questionnaires is different from that in real driving scenes. Secondly, although the marks selected in this study have been evaluated through the experiment to exclude the influence of comprehension since these participants are not the same as those in the formal experiment, it is difficult for us to confirm that all participants in the formal experiment have correctly understood their meanings, which may be a deficiency. Finally, relevant studies show that driving experience is of great significance to drivers’ perception of danger, and more driving indicators can be measured in the future, to conduct a more comprehensive discussion on the perception of hazard.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/Supplementary Material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding authors.
Ethics Statement
Written informed consent was obtained from the individual(s) for the publication of any potentially identifiable images or data included in this article.
Author Contributions
FH conceived the experimental process and invited experimental subjects. RG proposed research topics, conducted experiments, and wrote most of the manuscripts. CS conducted data analysis. GH reviewed the draft and made revisions. All authors edited the manuscript.
Funding
This research was sponsored by the Humanities and Social Science Research Program of the Ministry of Education of China (Grant No. 21YJA760025) and Zhejiang Province Public Welfare Technology Application Research Project of China (No. LGF21G010002).
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary Material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867673/full#supplementary-material
References
Carstensen, L. L., Isaacowitz, D. M., and Charles, S. T. (1999). Taking time seriously. Theory Soci. select. Am. Psychol. 54, 165–181. doi: 10.1037//0003-066x.54.3.165
Charles, S. T., and Hong, J. (2015). “Second Generation Socioemotional Selectivity Theories,” in Encyclopedia of Geropsychology, ed Edn, ed. N. A. Pachana (Berlin: Springer), 1–5.
Charles, S. T., Mather, M., and Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and emotional memory: the forgettable nature of negative images for older adults. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 132, 310–324. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.132.2.310
Clore, G. L., and Palmer, J. (2009). Affective guidance of intelligent agents: how emotion controls cognition. Cogn. Syst. Res. 10, 21–30. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2008.03.002
Comblain, C., D’Argembeau, A., and Van der Linden, M. (2005). Phenomenal characteristics of autobiographical memories for emotional and neutral events in older and younger adults. Exp. Aging Res. 31, 173–189. doi: 10.1080/03610730590915010
Crundall, D., Chapman, P., Trawley, S., Collins, L., van Loon, E., Andrews, B., et al. (2012). Some hazards are more attractive than others: drivers of varying experience respond differently to different types of hazard. Accid. Analysis prev. 45, 600–609. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.049
Deery, H. A. (1999). Hazard and risk perception among young novice drivers. J. Safety Res. 30, 225–236. doi: 10.1016/S0022-4375(99)00018-3
Di Meco, A., Bennett, J. M., Batchelor, J., Chekaluk, E., Andrews, E., and Habib, J. (2021). The role of cognition for identifying unsafe young drivers. Safety Sci. 138:105099. doi: 10.1016/j.ssci.2020.105099
Duarte, M. E. C., and Rebelo, F. (2005). “Comprehension of safety sign: internal and external variable influences and comprehension difficulties by disabled people,” in Proceedings of the 4th International Cyberspace Conference on Ergonomics (CybErg) (Johannesburg: International Ergonomics Association Press).
Elliott, B. (2003). The Psychology of Fear appeals Re-Visited. Road Safety Research. Sydney: Policing and Education Conference.
Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., and Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav. Res. Methods 39, 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
Ferguson, S. A., Teoh, E. R., and McCartt, A. T. (2007). Progress in teenage crash risk during the last decade. J. Safety Res. 38, 137–145. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2007.02.001
Gronchi, G., Righi, S., Pierguidi, L., Giovannelli, F., Murasecco, I., and Viggiano, M. P. (2018). Automatic and controlled attentional orienting in the elderly: a dual-process view of the positivity effect. Acta Psychol. (Amst) 185, 229–234. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.02.008
Harré, N., Field, J., and Kirkwood, B. (1996). Gender differences and areas of common concern in the driving behaviors and attitudes of adolescents. J. Safety Res. 27, 163–173. doi: 10.1016/0022-4375(96)00013-8
Isaacowitz, D. M., Wadlinger, H. A., Goren, D., and Wilson, H. R. (2006). Is there an age-related positivity effect in visual attention? A comparison of two methodologies. Emotion 6, 511–516. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.511
Isen, A. M. (1987). “Positive Affect, Cognitive Processes, and Social Behavior,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. L. Berkowitz (Cambridge: Academic Press), 203–253.
Jefferies, L. N., Smilek, D., Eich, E., and Enns, J. T. (2008). Emotional valence and arousal interact in attentional control. Psychol. Sci. 19, 290–295. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02082.x
Kadoya, Y., Watanapongvanich, S., and Khan, M.J.T.R.P.F.T.P. (2021a). How is emotion associated with driving speed? A study on taxi drivers in Japan. Transport. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 79, 205–216.
Kadoya, Y., Watanapongvanich, S., and Khan, M. S. R. (2021b). How is emotion associated with driving speed? A study on taxi drivers in Japan. Transport. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 79, 205–216. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2021.04.020
Kalsher, M., Brewster, B., Wogalter, M., and Spunar, M. (1995). Hazard level perceptions of current and proposed warning sign and label panels. Proceed. Human Fact. Ergonom. Society Annual Meet. 39, 351–355. doi: 10.1177/154193129503900512
Kennedy, Q., Mather, M., and Carstensen, L. L. (2004). The role of motivation in the age-related positivity effect in autobiographical memory. Psychol. Sci. 15, 208–214. doi: 10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.01503011.x
Kuhbandner, C., and Zehetleitner, M. (2011). Dissociable effects of valence and arousal in adaptive executive control. PLoS One 6:e29287. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029287
Labouvie-Vief, G. (2003). Dynamic integration: affect, cognition, and the self in adulthood. current directions in psychological. Science 12, 201–206. doi: 10.1046/j.0963-7214.2003.01262.x
Labouvie-Vief, G. (2005). Self-with-other representations and the organization of the self. J. Res. Pers. 39, 185–205. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.09.007
Labouvie-Vief, G. (2009). Cognition and equilibrium regulation in development and aging. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 27, 551–565. doi: 10.3233/RNN-2009-0512
Labouvie-Vief, G., Grühn, D., and Mouras, H. (2009). “Dynamic emotion-cognition interactions in adult development: Arousal, stress, and the processing of affect,” in Aging and Cognition: Research Methodologies and Empirical Advances, Eds Edn, eds H. B. Bosworth and C. Hertzog (Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association), 181–196.
Larson, M. J., Gray, A. C., Clayson, P. E., Jones, R., and Kirwan, C. B. (2013). What are the influences of orthogonally-manipulated valence and arousal on performance monitoring processes? The effects of affective state. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 87, 327–339. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2013.01.005
Lewis, I., Watson, B., and White, K. M. (2008). An examination of message-relevant affect in road safety messages: Should road safety advertisements aim to make us feel good or bad? Transport. Res. Part F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 11, 403–417. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2008.03.003
Lewis, I., Watson, B., Tay, R., and White, K. M. (2007). The role of fear appeals in improving driver safety: a review of the effectiveness of fear-arousing (threat) appeals in road safety advertising. Int. J. Behav. Consul. Therapy 3, 203–222. doi: 10.1037/h0100799
Long, S., and Ruosong, C. (2019). Reliability and validity of the multidimensional driving style inventory in chinese drivers. Traffic Inj. Prev. 20, 152–157. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1542140
Lu, J., Xie, X., and Zhang, R. (2013). Focusing on appraisals: how and why anger and fear influence driving risk perception. J. Safe. Res. 45, 65–73. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2013.01.009
Lyubomirsky, S., King, L., and Diener, E. (2005). The benefits of frequent positive affect: does happiness lead to success? Psychol. Bull. 131, 803–855. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.803
Ma, M., Yan, X., Huang, H., and Abdel-Aty, M. (2010). Safety of public transportation occupational drivers: risk perception, attitudes, and driving behavior. Transport. Res. Record J. Transport. Res. Board 2145, 72–79. doi: 10.3141/2145-09
Machin, M. A., and Sankey, K. S. (2008). Relationships between young drivers’ personality characteristics, risk perceptions, and driving behaviour. Accid Anal. Prev. 40, 541–547. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.08.010
Mather, M., and Carstensen, L. L. (2003). Aging and attentional biases for emotional faces. Psychol. Sci. 14, 409–415. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.01455
Mather, M., and Knight, M. R. (2006). Angry faces get noticed quickly: threat detection is not impaired among older adults. J. Gerontol. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 61, 54–57. doi: 10.1093/geronb/61.1.p54
Mikels, J. A., Larkin, G. R., Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and Cartensen, L. L. (2005). Divergent trajectories in the aging mind: changes in working memory for affective versus visual information with age. Psychol. Aging 20, 542–553. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.20.4.542
Mills, B., Reyna, V. F., and Estrada, S. (2008). Explaining contradictory relations between risk perception and risk taking. Psychological science 19, 429–433. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02104.x
Møller, M., and Gregersen, N. P. (2008). Psychosocial function of driving as predictor of risk-taking behaviour. Accid. Analysis Prev. 40, 209–215. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.05.007
Morris, J. (1995). Observations: SAM: the Self-assessment Manikin. SAM: System for Award Management.
Navon, M., and Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2019). Driven by emotions: The association between emotion regulation, forgivingness, and driving styles. Transport. Res. part f Traffic psychol. Behav. 65, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.005
Orit Taubman Ben-Ari, V. F., and Mikulincer. M. (2000). Does a threat appeal moderate reckless driving? A terror management theory perspective. Accid. Analysis Prev. 32, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(99)00042-1
Padilla, J.-L., Castro, C., Doncel, P., and Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2020). Adaptation of the multidimensional driving styles inventory for spanish drivers: convergent and predictive validity evidence for detecting safe and unsafe driving styles. Accid. Analysis prev. 136:105413. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2019.105413
Poo, F. M., and Ledesma, R. D. (2013). A study on the relationship between personality and driving styles. Traffic Inj. Prev. 14, 346–352. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.717729
Ready, R. E., Weinberger, M. I., and Jones, K. M. (2007). How happy have you felt lately? Two diary studies of emotion recall in older and younger adults. Cogn. Emot. 21, 728–757. doi: 10.1080/02699930600948269
Reed, A. E., and Carstensen, L. L. (2012). The theory behind the age-related positivity effect. Front. Psychol. 3:339. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00339
Rhodes, N., and Pivik, K. (2011). Age and gender differences in risky driving: the roles of positive affect and risk perception. Accid Anal. Prev. 43, 923–931. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.11.015
Rosenbloom, T., Shahar, A., Elharar, A., and Danino, O. (2008). Risk perception of driving as a function of advanced training aimed at recognizing and handling risks in demanding driving situations. Accid Anal. Prev. 40, 697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2007.09.007
Scheibe, S., and Carstensen, L. L. (2010). Emotional Aging: Recent Findings and Future Trends. J. Gerontol. Series b-Psychol. Sci. soci. sci. 65, 135–144. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbp132
Schoenbachler, D. D., and Whittler, T. E. (1996). Adolescent processing of social and physical threat communications. J. Adv. 25, 37–54. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1996.10673511
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., and Bohner, G. (1991). “Mood and Persuasion: Affective States Influence the Processing of Persuasive Communications,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, ed. M. P. Zanna (Cambridge: Academic Press), 161–199.
Shamaskin, A. M., Mikels, J. A., and Reed, A. E. (2010). Getting the message across: age differences in the positive and negative framing of health care messages. Psychol. Aging 25, 746–751. doi: 10.1037/a0018431
Sheller, M. (2004). Automotive emotions: feeling the car. Theory Culture Soci. 21, 221–242. doi: 10.1177/0263276404046068
Sims, T., Hogan, C., and Carstensen, L. (2015). Selectivity as an emotion regulation strategy: lessons from older adults. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 3, 80–84. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.02.012
Song, X., Yin, Y., Cao, H., Zhao, S., Li, M., and Yi, B. (2021). The mediating effect of driver characteristics on risky driving behaviors moderated by gender, and the classification model of driver’s driving risk. Accid Anal. Prev. 153:106038. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2021.106038
Spaniol, J., Voss, A., and Grady, C. L. (2008). Aging and emotional memory: cognitive mechanisms underlying the positivity effect. Psychol. Aging 23, 859–872. doi: 10.1037/a0014218
Steinhauser, K., Leist, F., Maier, K., Michel, V., Paersch, N., Rigley, P., et al. (2018). Effects of emotions on driving behavior. Transport. Res. part f Traffic psychol. Behav. 59, 150–163. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2018.08.012
Taubman-Ben-Ari, O. (2012). The effects of positive emotion priming on self-reported reckless driving. Accid. Analysis prev. 45, 718–725. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.039
Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Eherenfreund-Hager, A., and Prato, C. G. (2016). The value of self-report measures as indicators of driving behaviors among young drivers. Transport. Res. part f Traffic psychol. Behav. 39, 33–42. doi: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.03.005
Taubman-Ben-Ari, O., Mikulincer, M., and Gillath, O. (2004). The multidimensional driving style inventory–scale construct and validation. Accid. Analysis Prev. 36, 323–332. doi: 10.1016/s0001-4575(03)00010-1
van Steenbergen, H., Band, G. P., Hommel, B., Rombouts, S. A., and Nieuwenhuis, S. (2014). Hedonic hotspots regulate cingulate-driven adaptation to cognitive demands. Cereb Cortex 25, 1746–1756. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bht416
Witte, K., Berkowitz, J. M., Cameron, K. A., and McKeon, J. K. (1998). Preventing the spread of genital warts: using fear appeals to promote self-protective behaviors. Health Educ. Behav. off. public. Soci. Public Health Educ. 25, 571–585. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500505
Keywords: emotion, age, hazard perception, traffic warning signs, drivers
Citation: Huo F, Gao R, Sun C and Hou G (2022) Age Differences in Hazard Perception of Drivers: The Roles of Emotion. Front. Psychol. 13:867673. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.867673
Received: 01 February 2022; Accepted: 12 May 2022;
Published: 02 June 2022.
Edited by:
Waldemar Karwowski, University of Central Florida, United StatesReviewed by:
Kelly Pivik, University of West Alabama, United StatesAntonella Lopez, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Italy
Copyright © 2022 Huo, Gao, Sun and Hou. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Ranran Gao, MTA4NDYyMzQ1N0BxcS5jb20=; Cong Sun, c3VuY29uZ0BuYnUuZWR1LmNu; Guanhua Hou, NTA0NzcwNDFAcXEuY29t