
94% of researchers rate our articles as excellent or good
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.
Find out more
CORRECTION article
Front. Psychol., 13 December 2022
Sec. Human-Media Interaction
Volume 13 - 2022 | https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1109893
This article is a correction to:
What breaks the flow of reading? A study on characteristics of attentional disruption during digital reading
A corrigendum on
What breaks the flow of reading? A study on characteristics of attentional disruption during digital reading
by Chevet, G., Baccino, T., Vinter, A., and Drai-Zerbib, V. (2022). Front. Psychol. 13:987964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.987964
In the original article, there was an error in the correspondence details listed. Instead of “Guillaume Chevet and Thierry Baccino,” the two corresponding authors should be “Guillaume Chevet and Véronique Drai-Zerbib.” The corrected correspondence details are shown below.
*Correspondence:
Guillaume Chevet
Z3VpbGxhdW1lLmNoZXZldEB1LWJvdXJnb2duZS5mcg==
Véronique Drai-Zerbib
dmVyb25pcXVlLmRyYWktemVyYmliQHUtYm91cmdvZ25lLmZy
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: reading, attentional disruption, interruption, mind wandering, multitasking
Citation: Chevet G, Baccino T, Vinter A and Drai-Zerbib V (2022) Corrigendum: What breaks the flow of reading? A study on characteristics of attentional disruption during digital reading. Front. Psychol. 13:1109893. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1109893
Received: 28 November 2022; Accepted: 29 November 2022;
Published: 13 December 2022.
Approved by:
Frontiers Editorial Office, Frontiers Media SA, SwitzerlandCopyright © 2022 Chevet, Baccino, Vinter and Drai-Zerbib. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Guillaume Chevet, Z3VpbGxhdW1lLmNoZXZldEB1LWJvdXJnb2duZS5mcg==; Véronique Drai-Zerbib,
dmVyb25pcXVlLmRyYWktemVyYmliQHUtYm91cmdvZ25lLmZy
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Research integrity at Frontiers
Learn more about the work of our research integrity team to safeguard the quality of each article we publish.