Lucy J. Troup
Anita Cservenka- 1Division of Psychology, School of Education and Social Science, University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, United Kingdom
- 2School of Psychological Science, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States
Editorial on the Research Topic
Cannabis and emotion processing
Worldwide attitudes and legislation toward cannabis have changed over the past several decades. For example, there has been a significant shift in legislation controlling cannabis as a recreational drug and as medicine both within the United States and the United Kingdom. Many countries now have laws in place for medical cannabis prescribing, and some for recreational use. Despite these changes and the lowered perception of risk related to cannabis use (Salloum et al., 2018), there are still significant gaps in our understanding of the effects of cannabis both physiologically and psychologically. In particular, there is a growing interest in understanding the relationship between cannabis use and emotion processing (Mackenzie and Cservenka, 2021) as individuals using cannabis often have co-occurring negative affect and mood symptoms (Troup et al., 2016a), and show differences in emotion recognition and brain activity in response to emotional stimuli, compared to healthy controls (Platt et al., 2010; Hindocha et al., 2014; Bayrakci et al., 2015; Troup et al., 2016b). These studies suggest that impairments in emotion processing both at the behavioral and neural levels could be related to the maintenance of chronic cannabis use. Thus, this collection of published research aims to bring together new findings related to cannabis use and emotion processing in order to increase our understanding of potential targets for prevention, intervention, and treatment studies.
Sullivan et al. conducted a functional neuroimaging study using a Go/No-go task, in which they report that abstinent young adult cannabis users showed less rostral anterior cingulate (rACC) activity compared to healthy controls during fearful response inhibition. These findings suggest potentially aberrant emotion regulation and/or emotion processing brain activity in cannabis users, consistent with other researchers' findings (Troup et al., 2016b; Zimmermann et al., 2017; Torrence et al., 2019). Female, relative to male, abstinent cannabis users also exhibited reduced connectivity of rACC with the cerebellum. This highlights potential sex differences in the effects of cannabis on emotion processing that could suggest greater female vulnerability to the negative effects of cannabis use.
Blair et al. examine the role of cannabis use disorder severity on emotion recognition in at-risk youth with conduct disorder (CD) problems, as youth with CD have previously shown reduced emotion expression recognition abilities (Fairchild et al., 2009). The authors find that both CD and cannabis use disorder severity are independently negatively associated with emotion recognition accuracy, suggesting that cannabis use may increase the risk for anti-social and aggressive behavior.
Since healthy socio-emotional processing may be important to substance use disorder (SUD) recovery (Anand et al., 2017), Bjork et al. investigate the role of different SUDs, including cannabis use disorder (CaUD), on social information processing with a Go/No-go task. Participants with CaUD had reduced hit rates to emotionless faces compared to healthy controls, and greater false alarm rates in response to non-target emotional faces (particularly happy faces), suggesting a potential bias toward positively valenced emotional faces. The authors suggest that this approach behavior to positive social stimuli could be used as an important non-drug reward for recovery from CaUD. These findings also support previous research suggesting altered processing of happy faces in cannabis users (Torrence et al., 2019).
In other contributions to this special topic, al'Absi and Allen review the literature on the relationship between acute and chronic cannabis effects on the regulation of stress responses. In particular, they report sex differences as a variable of interest considering significant increases in women using cannabis during pregnancy in response to stress. Additionally, they highlight the role of emotion processing disorders and their comorbidity with cannabis use to emphasize the importance of studying the role of stress in cannabis use within specific subpopulations.
Similarly, Cavalli and Cservenka report on the role of stress in problematic cannabis use. Their data show that more stressful life events and less perceived stress are associated with more problematic cannabis use at greater levels of emotion dysregulation. These findings indicate that emotion dysregulation is an important moderator of the relationship between different measurements of stress and problematic cannabis use.
The studies in this Research Topic suggest that cannabis use may be related to emotion processing and stress regulation impairments at both a behavioral and neural level. Despite evidence that cannabis is used in the context of a potential treatment for emotion processing disorders (Erridge et al., 2021), it seems clear from the studies in this Research Topic that cannabis use may be related to atypical emotion processing and regulation. One of the important factors that has been highlighted in the research reported here is understanding individual differences. For example, future studies should continue to investigate the role of psychiatric co-morbidities, gender, and SUD status, as possible variables that may influence the association between cannabis and emotion processing. Furthermore, types of stress and the valence of emotional stimuli may be important variables to consider in future research. In other words, we must look at cannabis use in the context of emotion processing in all of its many facets as well as highlight the role of exogenous variables and how they affect emotion processing to better develop targets for prevention, intervention, and treatment studies.
Author contributions
All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Anand, D., Chen, Y., Lindquist, K. A., and Daughters, S. B. (2017). Emotion differentiation predicts likelihood of initial lapse following substance use treatment. Drug Alcohol Depend. 180, 439–444. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.09.007
Bayrakci, A., Sert, E., Zorlu, N., Erol, A., Saricicek, A., and Mete, L. (2015). Facial emotion recognition deficits in abstinent cannabis dependent patients. Compr. Psychiatry 58, 160–164. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2014.11.008
Erridge, S., Salazar, O., Kawka, M., Holvey, C., Coomber, R., Usmani, A., et al. (2021). An initial analysis of the UK Medical Cannabis Registry: outcomes analysis of first 129 patients. Neuropsychopharmacol. Rep. 41, 362–370. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12183
Fairchild, G., Van Goozen, S. H., Calder, A. J., Stollery, S. J., and Goodyer, I. M. (2009). Deficits in facial expression recognition in male adolescents with early-onset or adolescence-onset conduct disorder. J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry 50, 627–636. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2008.02020.x
Hindocha, C., Wollenberg, O., Carter Leno, V., Alvarez, B. O., Curran, H. V., and Freeman, T. P. (2014). Emotional processing deficits in chronic cannabis use: a replication and extension. J. Psychopharmacol. 28, 466–471. doi: 10.1177/0269881114527359
Mackenzie, A., and Cservenka, A. (2021). Cannabis and emotion processing: a review of behavioral, physiological, and neural responses. Exp. Clin. Psychopharmacol. doi: 10.1037/pha0000529. [Epub ahead of print].
Platt, B., Kamboj, S., Morgan, C. J., and Curran, H. V. (2010). Processing dynamic facial affect in frequent cannabis-users: evidence of deficits in the speed of identifying emotional expressions. Drug Alcohol Depend. 112, 27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2010.05.004
Salloum, N. C., Krauss, M. J., Agrawal, A., Bierut, L. J., and Grucza, R. A. (2018). A reciprocal effects analysis of cannabis use and perceptions of risk. Addiction 113, 1077–1085. doi: 10.1111/add.14174
Torrence, R. D., Rojas, D. C., and Troup, L. J. (2019). Awareness of emotional expressions in cannabis users: an event-related potential study. Front Psychol 10, 69. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00069
Troup, L. J., Andrzejewski, J. A., Braunwalder, J. T., and Torrence, R. D. (2016a). The relationship between cannabis use and measures of anxiety and depression in a sample of college campus cannabis users and non-users post state legalization in Colorado. PeerJ 4, e2782. doi: 10.7717/peerj.2782
Troup, L. J., Bastidas, S., Nguyen, M. T., Andrzejewski, J. A., Bowers, M., and Nomi, J. S. (2016b). An event-related potential study on the effects of cannabis on emotion processing. PLoS ONE 11, e0149764. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0149764
Keywords: cannabis, marijuana, emotion, emotion recognition, emotion regulation, stress
Citation: Troup LJ and Cservenka A (2022) Editorial: Cannabis and emotion processing. Front. Psychol. 13:1039982. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1039982
Received: 08 September 2022; Accepted: 14 September 2022;
Published: 17 October 2022.
Edited and reviewed by: Florin Dolcos, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, United States
Copyright © 2022 Troup and Cservenka. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Anita Cservenka, YW5pdGEuY3NlcnZlbmthJiN4MDAwNDA7b3JlZ29uc3RhdGUuZWR1
†These authors have contributed equally to this work