Shanshan Liu- Foreign Languages Department, Liaocheng University Dongchang College, Liaocheng, China
Since students' academic success is tied to their academic motivation and engagement, determining the predictors of these two variables seems critical. So, several inquiries have inspected the role of students' emotional and personal variables in their academic motivation and engagement. Nonetheless, the function of L2 enjoyment as an important emotional factor has remained elusive. Moreover, no inquiry has reviewed this issue neither systematically nor theoretically. To fill these lacunas, this review study aims to explain definitions, dimensions, and theoretical frameworks of L2 enjoyment, student academic motivation, and student academic engagement. This study also intends to outline the positive consequences of L2 enjoyment for students' academic engagement and motivation. Relying on the theoretical and empirical evidence, the positive role of L2 enjoyment in raising EFL students' engagement and motivation was firmly affirmed. Finally, the implications of the findings are discussed.
Introduction
Academic motivation and engagement are inseparable aspects of students' success in educational settings (Roksa and Whitley, 2017; Kahu and Nelson, 2018). That is, unmotivated and disengaged students will find nothing but academic failure (Peng, 2021). Because of this, improving students' motivation and engagement has always been the primary concern of all distinguished teachers. However, many university lecturers, instructors, and teachers, including EFL teachers, have no idea how to raise their pupils' motivation and academic engagement (Ford, 2012). Students' academic motivation in a general term pertains to “individual students' primary impetus for initiating learning as well as the reason for continuing the prolonged and tedious process of learning” (Ushioda, 2008, p. 19). Language learners' motivation, in particular, refers to students' attempts and desire to achieve the goals of acquiring the language (Guilloteaux and Dörnyei, 2008). In a similar definition, Hsu (2010) described this construct as the extent to which a language learner puts effort into acquiring a language due to his/her personal desire to do so and a sense of happiness and satisfaction experienced throughout the learning process. Besides, academic engagement as another influential factor in students' learning success pertains to “the quality and quantity of students' participation or connection with the educational endeavor and hence with activities, values, individuals, aims, and place that comprise it” (Skinner et al., 2009, p. 496). According to Baralt et al. (2016), the construct of academic engagement in the language education domain refers to the amount of students' participation in language-related activities and their continual endeavors in mastering a foreign/second language. Taken together, academic motivation and academic engagement are two related concepts (Ghelichli et al., 2020) that are intertwined with students' progress, academic growth, and increased achievement (Zhou et al., 2021).
To illustrate the value of students' academic motivation, Gilakjani et al. (2012) stated that academic motivation as an important personal trait plays a facilitative role in promoting students' academic performance. Cheng and Cheng (2012) also submitted that students with high levels of academic motivation typically have positive attitudes toward learning, which empowers them to proceed with the learning process successfully. In a similar vein, Feng et al. (2013) mentioned that students' learning outcomes can be remarkably affected by their academic motivation. To them, motivated students typically gain more desirable outcomes as a result of the extra effort they devote to classroom tasks and activities. In this regard, Yin and Wang (2016) also explained the value of academic motivation by highlighting its positive consequences for students' classroom engagement. They posited that academic motivation as a driving force stimulates students to take an active role in classroom contexts.
In an effort to illuminate the importance of students' academic engagement, Liem and Chong (2017) stated that students' educational attainment highly depends on the extent to which they are committed to and take part in classroom activities. In a similar attempt, Hiver et al. (2021) also referred to the value of academic engagement by revealing its capability to predict a range of positive educational outcomes such as academic growth, advancement, and success. Additionally, Carver et al. (2021) suggested that students' active involvement in educational contexts will gradually improve their learning outcomes. Based on what has been noted on the significance of students' academic engagement and motivation, delving into the antecedents of these interrelated constructs appears to be critical.
Against this backdrop, a multitude of empirical and theoretical inquiries have been dedicated to students' academic motivation and engagement and their determinants. Several studies have inspected the effects of teachers' personal (e.g., self-efficacy, autonomy, personality, etc.) and interpersonal traits (e.g., praise, caring, stroke, credibility, immediacy, confirmation, etc.) on students' level of motivation (Furlich, 2016; Wijaya, 2017; Sabet et al., 2018; Khalilzadeh and Khodi, 2021; Liu, 2021; Peng, 2021; Xie and Derakhshan, 2021, to cite a few) and engagement (Imlawi et al., 2015; Papa, 2015; Derakhshan, 2021; Gao, 2021; Lu and Mustafa, 2021; Wang and Ye, 2021; Zheng, 2021; Zhou, 2021, to cite a few). Many studies have also delved into the impact of students' personal (e.g., self-efficacy, character, etc.) and emotional factors (e.g., satisfaction, happiness, joy, etc.) on these constructs (Ariani, 2015; Qureshi et al., 2016; Zhang et al., 2020b; Angelovska et al., 2021; Chen et al., 2021; Khajavy, 2021, to cite a few). Yet, L2 enjoyment as a prime instance of students' emotional factor has received scant attention (Dewaele and Proietti Ergn, 2020; D'Orazzi, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020a; Wang et al., 2021).
The concept of enjoyment in a broad term refers to the degree to which an experience, event, or action is perceived as offering joy, happiness, and pleasure (Brantmeier, 2005). Further, Csikszentmihalyi (2014) conceptualized this construct by distinguishing it from happiness and pleasure. To him, enjoyment is generally “a good feeling coming from breaking through homeostatic limits and stretching beyond oneself to accomplish something new or even unexpected, especially in face of some difficult tasks” (as cited in Li et al., 2018, p. 5). In a similar vein, Dewaele and MacIntyre (2016) defined L2 enjoyment as “a complex emotion, capturing interacting dimensions of the challenge and perceived ability that reflects the human drive for success in the face of difficult tasks” (p. 216). According to Dewaele et al. (2018), L2 enjoyment arises as students meet their educational needs and even go beyond them to gain something new throughout the process of language learning. As Dewaele and MacIntyre (2019) noted, L2 Enjoyment as a positive activating disposition drives students into action and strengthens their educational motives. Lee (2020) also proposed that L2 enjoyment can improve language learners' tendency to take part in classroom activities.
In spite of the importance of L2 enjoyment in raising students' academic engagement and motivation (Dewaele and MacIntyre, 2019; Lee, 2020; Wang and Guan, 2020), not much scholarly attention has been paid to the association of these variables (Dewaele and Proietti Ergn, 2020; D'Orazzi, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020b). Furthermore, no comprehensive review has been done on this topic. This review study is an attempt to address these gaps by offering a through description of these constructs (i.e., L2 enjoyment, academic motivation, and academic engagement), their theoretical underpinnings, and their associations.
Student Academic Motivation
Motivation in a general sense is the underlying reason for humans' behaviors (Covington and Müeller, 2001). That is, motivation provides people with a purpose, direction, and orientation to pursue (Broussard and Garrison, 2004). Dörnyei and Ushioda (2009) conceptualized student academic motivation as “individual students' motive to make certain academic decisions, participate in classroom activities, and persist in pursuing the demanding process of learning” (p. 2). To enumerate different types of student academic motivation, Ryan and Deci (2000) stated that academic motivation as an incentive prompting students to pursue their academic goals is of two types, namely “intrinsic/internal motivation” and “extrinsic/external motivation”. Students' intrinsic motivation pertains to the sense of satisfaction and enjoyment they gain while performing academic tasks/activities (Osterloh and Frey, 2000). Students' extrinsic motivation also refers to the benefits and rewards they receive as a result of their actions (Pintrich and Schunk, 2002).
Student Academic Engagement
Student engagement generally includes the amount of time and energy students freely and enthusiastically allocate to their learning (Hu and Kuh, 2002; Kuh, 2003). Lawson and Lawson (2013) defined this concept as students' physical and psychological investments toward acquiring, comprehending, and mastering the knowledge, content, and information that instructors strive to convey. Student engagement, as Skinner and Pitzer (2012) mentioned, deals with “how actively involved a student is in a learning task and the extent to which that physical and mental activity is goal-directed and purpose-driven” (p. 22).
There has been no agreement among scholars on how to name this concept (Alrashidi et al., 2016). That is, different scholars named this construct in various ways. Many academics, however, referred to this concept as “student academic engagement” (Greenwood et al., 2002; Furrer and Skinner, 2003; Ross et al., 2008; to cite a few). The rest named it as “educational engagement” (MacDonald and Marsh, 2004; London et al., 2007), “study engagement” (Ouweneel et al., 2011; Salmela-Aro and Read, 2017), and “school engagement” (Fredricks et al., 2005; Dotterer and Lowe, 2011).
Likewise, scholars have reached no consensus regarding the categorization of student engagement. It means that they classified the components of this construct in different ways. Finn (1989), for instance, divided the underlying factors of student engagement into two major categories, namely “behavioral engagement” and “emotional engagement”. In contrast, Jimerson et al. (2003) grouped the components of this construct into three dimensions of “affective engagement”, “behavioral engagement”, and “cognitive engagement” (Table 1).
Table 1. Different categorizations of student engagement.
Regardless of the type and the number of its underlying components, student academic engagement is a multi-faceted construct that represents students' academic inclination (Upadyaya and Salmela-Aro, 2013).
L2 Enjoyment
Enjoyment as an emotional experience is associated with a range of positive feelings, including pleasure, joy, and contentment (Goetz et al., 2006; Guo, 2021). Enjoyment in language classes, which is known as L2 enjoyment, is conceptualized as “a complex emotion, capturing interacting dimensions of challenge and perceived ability” (Dewaele and MacIntyre, 2016, p. 217). As Dewaele and MacIntyre (2016) noted, L2 enjoyment has two major dimensions, namely “social dimension” and “private dimension”. The social dimension of L2 enjoyment is tied to a desirable learning atmosphere as well as supportive and encouraging instructors, contributing to students' positive emotions. The private dimension is also related to the cognition that comes with enjoyment (Dewaele and Dewaele, 2017). The private and social aspects of L2 enjoyment are intertwined and collaborate to generate a cohesive feeling (Dewaele and MacIntyre, 2014).
The Role of L2 Enjoyment in EFL Students' Academic Motivation and Engagement
The role of L2 enjoyment in raising EFL students' academic engagement and motivation can be fully explained through “Broaden-and-Build Theory (BBT)” (Fredrickson, 2003). In BBT, Fredrickson (2003) submitted that positive feelings such as L2 enjoyment “broaden students' momentary thought-action repertoires and build their enduring personal resources” (p. 219). Accordingly, students' intrinsic motivation and academic engagement as instances of their personal resources can be strengthened as a result of positive emotions, including L2 enjoyment. In light of this theory, MacIntyre and Gregersen (2012) also stated that positive emotions such as L2 enjoyment prompt language learners to become engrossed in the learning process. Additionally, building upon “Control-value Theory (CVT)” (Pekrun et al., 2002), Dewaele and Li (2020) suggested that different L2 learning outcomes such as L2 motivation and academic engagement can be positively influenced by positive achievement emotions, including L2 enjoyment. In this regard, Kahu et al. (2015) also illustrated that in the presence of positive academic emotions such as L2 enjoyment, language learners tend to invest more time and effort toward learning a new language.
Empirical Studies
As previously mentioned, despite the importance of L2 enjoyment in promoting EFL students' motivation and engagement, only a few scholars have inspected the associations of these constructs (Dewaele and Proietti Ergn, 2020; D'Orazzi, 2020; Zhang et al., 2020a). Dewaele and Proietti Ergn (2020), for instance, scrutinized the consequences of L2 enjoyment for EFL students' academic motivation. To this aim, 110 Turkish students were asked to fill out two close-ended scales designed to measure L2 enjoyment and students' level of motivation. The analysis of participants' answers revealed a positive connection between sense of enjoyment and academic motivation. By the same token, (D'Orazzi 2020) also inspected the role of L2 enjoyment in increasing university students' motivation. In doing so, two valid measures of L2 enjoyment and academic motivation were given to 728 university students. The analysis of the gathered data indicated that L2 enjoyment can dramatically contribute to students' increased motivation. In a similar vein, Zhang et al. (2020b) studied L2 enjoyment in relation to Chinese EFL students' motivation. To this end, two pre-developed questionnaires were administered to 335 university students. Participants' responses to the questionnaires were thoroughly analyzed through IBM SPSS software. The results demonstrated a strong and favorable association between L2 enjoyment and student motivation.
Conclusion and Pedagogical Implications
So far, definitions, dimensions, and theoretical frameworks of L2 enjoyment, student academic motivation, and student academic engagement were presented. Based on the “broaden-and-build theory” and “control-value theory”, the close bond between L2 enjoyment, student academic motivation, and student academic engagement was also illustrated. A short summary of the previous related articles was also provided. Drawing on the aforementioned theories and the results of previous studies, one can logically infer that L2 enjoyment as an emotional experience can greatly affect EFL students' motivation and engagement in a positive way. This result may be illuminating for EFL teachers, notably those who do not know how to improve their pupils' motivation and engagement. Given the centrality of positive emotions such as L2 enjoyment in EFL students' enhanced engagement and motivation (MacIntyre and Gregersen, 2012; Dewaele and Li, 2020), teachers are required to provide an appropriate learning environment wherein pupils can enjoy acquiring a second language. The review's findings seem to be informative for teacher educators as well. They are expected to instruct both pre-service and in-service instructors on how to instill a sense of enjoyment in their pupils.
Data Availability Statement
The original contributions presented in the study are included in the article/supplementary material, further inquiries can be directed to the corresponding author/s.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by Liaocheng University Dongchang College Research Ethics Committe. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
The author confirms being the sole contributor of this work and has approved it for publication.
Funding
This manuscript was supported by Industry-University Collaborated Education Project: Business English Professional Teacher Training Under the Industry-University Cooperation Model (202002202012).
Conflict of Interest
The author declares that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's Note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
References
Alrashidi, O., Phan, H. P., and Ngu, B. H. (2016). Academic engagement: an overview of its definitions, dimensions, and major conceptualizations. Int. Educ. Stud. 9, 41–52. doi: 10.5539/ies.v9n12p41
Angelovska, T., Mercer, S., and Talbot, K. R. (2021). Personality traits as predictors of language learner engagement. Language Learn. Higher Educ. 11, 285–310. doi: 10.1515/cercles-2021-2026
Ariani, D (2015). Relationship model of personality, communication, student engagement, and learning satisfaction. Business, Manage. Educ. 13, 175–202. doi: 10.3846/bme.2015.297
Baralt, M., Gurzynski-Weiss, L., and Kim, Y. J. (2016). Engagement with the language: how examining learners' affective and social engagement explains successful learner-generated attention to form. In: Peer Interaction and Second Language Learning p. 209–239. Amsterdam: John Benjamin Publishing Company. doi: 10.1075/lllt.45.09bar
Brantmeier, C (2005). Nonlinguistic variables in advanced second language reading: learners' self-assessment and enjoyment. Foreign Language Ann. 38, 494–504. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-9720.2005.tb02516.x
Broussard, S. C., and Garrison, M. E. B. (2004). The relationship between classroom motivation and academic achievement in elementary school-aged children. Family Consumer Sci. Res. J. 33, 106–120. doi: 10.1177/1077727X04269573
Carver, C., Jung, D., and Gurzynski-Weiss, L. (2021). Examining learner engagement in relationship to learning and communication mode. In: Hiver, P.H., Al-Hoorie, A. H., and Mercer, S. (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom. p. 120–142. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Chen, P., Bao, C., and Gao, Q. (2021). Proactive personality and academic engagement: the mediating effects of teacher-student relationships and academic self-efficacy. Front. Psychol. 12:1824. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.652994
Cheng, C. M., and Cheng, T. P. (2012). Reflections of the role of motivation on learning English for successful college EFL learners in Taiwan. World J. Educ. 2, 8–14. doi: 10.5430/wje.v2n5p8
Covington, M. V., and Müeller, K. J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: an approach/avoidance reformulation. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 13, 157–76. doi: 10.1023/A:1009009219144
Csikszentmihalyi, M (2014). Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Dordrecht: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-9088-8
Derakhshan, A (2021). The predictability of Turkman students' academic engagement through Persian language teachers' nonverbal immediacy and credibility. J. Teach. Persian Speaker Other Language. 10, 3–26. doi: 10.30479/JTPSOL.2021.14654.1506
Dewaele, J.-M., and Dewaele, L. (2017). The dynamic interactions in foreign language classroom anxiety and foreign language enjoyment of pupils aged 12 to 18: a pseudo-longitudinal investigation. J. Eur. Second Language Assoc. 1, 12–22. doi: 10.22599/jesla.6
Dewaele, J.-M., and MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). The two faces of Janus? Anxiety and enjoyment in the foreign language classroom. Stud. Second Language Learning Teach. 4, 237–274. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2014.4.2.5
Dewaele, J. M., and Li, C. (2020). Emotions in second language acquisition: a critical review and research agenda. A positive psychology perspective on emotions in SLA. Foreign Language World. 196, 34–49.
Dewaele, J. M., and MacIntyre, P. D. (2016). Foreign language enjoyment and foreign language classroom anxiety. The right and left foot of FL learning? In: MacIntyre, P.D., Gregersen, T., Mercer, S. (Eds.), Positive Psychology in SLA. p. 215–236. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi: 10.21832/9781783095360-010
Dewaele, J. M., and MacIntyre, P. D. (2019). (Eds.). The predictive power of multicultural personality traits, learner and teacher variables on foreign language enjoyment and anxiety. In: Evidence-Based Second Language Pedagogy. p. 263–286 London: Routledge. doi: 10.4324/9781351190558-12
Dewaele, J. M., and Proietti Ergn, A. L. (2020). How different are the relations between enjoyment, anxiety, attitudes/motivation and course marks in pupils' Italian and English as foreign languages? J. Eur. Second Language Assoc. 4, 45–57. doi: 10.22599/jesla.65
Dewaele, J. M., Witney, J., Saito, K., and Dewaele, L. (2018). Foreign language enjoyment and anxiety: The effect of teacher and learner variables. Language Teach. Res. 22, 676–697. doi: 10.1177/1362168817692161
D'Orazzi, G (2020). Influences of willingness to communicate and foreign language enjoyment on second language learners' motivation. Konińskie Studia Jezykowe. 8, 263–93. doi: 10.30438/ksj.2020.8.3.3
Dörnyei, Z., and Ushioda, E. (2009). Motivation, language identities and the L2 self: a theoretical overview. In: Dörnyei, Z., Ushioda, E. (Eds.), Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. p. 1–8. Bristol: Multilingual Matters. doi: 10.21832/9781847691293
Dotterer, A. M., and Lowe, K. (2011). Classroom context, school engagement, and academic achievement in early adolescence. Journal of youth and adolescence, 40, 1649–1660. doi: 10.1007/s10964-011-9647-5
Feng, H. Y., Fan, J. J., and Yang, H. Z. (2013). The relationship of learning motivation and achievement in EFL: Gender as an intermediated variable. Educational Research International 2, 50–58. doi: 10.5296/ijld.v2i3.1791
Finn, J. D (1989). Withdrawing from School. Rev. Educ. Res. 59, 117–142. doi: 10.3102/00346543059002117
Ford, I. R (2012). Teacher Self-Efficacy and its Influence on Student Motivation (Doctoral Dissertation). Cleveland State University, Cleveland, Ohio.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P., Friedel, J., and Paris, A. (2005). School engagement. In: What do children need to flourish? p. 305–321. Springer, Boston, MA. doi: 10.1007/0-387-23823-9_19
Fredrickson, B. L (2003). The value of positive emotions. Am. Sci. 91, 330–335. doi: 10.1511/2003.4.330
Furlich, S. A (2016). Understanding instructor nonverbal immediacy, verbal immediacy, and student motivation at a small liberal arts university. J. Scholarship Teach. Learn. 16, 11–22. doi: 10.14434/josotl.v16i3.19284
Furrer, C., and Skinner, E. (2003). Sense of relatedness as a factor in children's academic engagement and performance. J. Educ. Psychol. 95:148. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.1.148
Gao, Y (2021). Towards the role of language teacher confirmation and stroke in EFL/ESL students' motivation and academic engagement: a theoretical review. Front. Psychol. 12:3026. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723432
Ghelichli, Y., Seyyedrezaei, S. H., Barani, G., and Mazandarani, O. (2020). The relationship between dimensions of student engagement and language learning motivation among Iranian EFL learners. Int. J. Foreign Language Teach. Res. 8, 43–57.
Gilakjani, A. P., Leong, L. M., and Sabouri, N. B. (2012). A study on the role of motivation in foreign language learning and teaching. Int. J. Modern Educ. Comput. Sci. 4, 9–16. doi: 10.5815/ijmecs.2012.07.02
Goetz, T., Nathan, C., Hall, A., Frenzel, C., and Pekrun, R. (2006). A hierarchical conceptualization of enjoyment in students. Learn. Instruct. 16, 323–338. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.004
Greenwood, C. R., Horton, B. T., and Utley, C. A. (2002). Academic engagement: current perspectives on research and practice. School Psychol. Rev. 31, 328–349. doi: 10.1080/02796015.2002.12086159
Guilloteaux, M. J., and Dörnyei, Z. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly. 42, 55–77. doi: 10.1002/j.1545-7249.2008.tb00207.x
Guo, Y (2021). Exploring the dynamic interplay between foreign language enjoyment and learner engagement with regard to EFL achievement and absenteeism: a sequential mixed methods study. Front. Psychol. 12:766058. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.766058
Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Vitta, J. P., and Wu, J. (2021). Engagement in language learning: a systematic review of 20 years of research methods and definitions. Language Teach. Res. doi: 10.1177/13621688211001289
Hsu, L (2010). The impact of perceived teachers' nonverbal immediacy on students' motivation for learning English. Asian EFL J. 12, 188–204.
Hu, S., and Kuh, G. D. (2002). Being (dis)engaged in educationally purposeful activities: The influences of student and institutional characteristics. Res. Higher Educ. 43, 555–575. doi: 10.1023/A:1020114231387
Imlawi, J., Gregg, D., and Karimi, J. (2015). Student engagement in course-based social networks: The impact of instructor credibility and use of communication. Comput. Educ. 88, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.015
Jimerson, S. R., Campos, E., and Greif, J. L. (2003). Toward an understanding of definitions and measures of school engagement and related terms. California School Psychol. 8, 7–27. doi: 10.1007/BF03340893
Kahu, E., Stephens, C., Leach, L., and Zepke, N. (2015). Linking academic emotions and student engagement: Mature-aged distance students' transition to university. J. Further Higher Educ. 39, 481–497. doi: 10.1080/0309877X.2014.895305
Kahu, E. R., and Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Educ. Res. Develop. 37, 58–71. doi: 10.1080/07294360.2017.1344197
Khajavy, G. H (2021). Modeling the relations between foreign language engagement, emotions, grit and reading achievement. In: Hiver, P., Al-Hoorie, A. H., Mercer, S. (Eds.),Student engagement in the language classroom. p. 241–259. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.
Khalilzadeh, S., and Khodi, A. (2021). Teachers' personality traits and students' motivation: a structural equation modeling analysis. Curr. Psychol. 40, 1635–1650. doi: 10.1007/s12144-018-0064-8
Kuh, G. D (2003). What we're learning about student engagement from NSSE: Benchmarks for effective educational practices. Magazine Higher Learn. 35, 24–32. doi: 10.1080/00091380309604090
Lawson, M. A., and Lawson, H. A. (2013). New conceptual frameworks for student engagement research, policy, and practice. Rev. Educ. Res. 83, 432–479. doi: 10.3102/0034654313480891
Lee, J. S (2020). The role of grit and classroom enjoyment in EFL learners' willingness to communicate. J. Multilingual Multic. Develop. 1–17. doi: 10.1080/01434632.2020.1746319
Li, C., Jiang, G., and Dewaele, J. M. (2018). Understanding Chinese high school students' foreign language enjoyment: validation of the Chinese version of the foreign language enjoyment scale. System. 76, 183–196. doi: 10.1016/j.system.2018.06.004
Liem, G. A. D., and Chong, W. H. (2017). Fostering student engagement in schools: International best practices. School Psychol. Int. 38, 121–130. doi: 10.1177/0143034317702947
Liu, W (2021). Does teacher immediacy affect students? A systematic review of the association between teacher verbal and non-verbal immediacy and student motivation. Front. Psychol. 12:2475. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713978
London, B., Downey, G., and Mace, S. (2007). Psychological theories of educational engagement: a multi-method approach to studying individual engagement and institutional change. Vand. L. Rev. 60, 455–479.
Lu, Q., and Mustafa, Z. (2021). Toward the impact of EFL teachers' self-efficacy and collective efficacy on students' engagement. Frontiers in Psychology, 4051. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.744586
MacDonald, R., and Marsh, J. (2004). Missing school: Educational engagement, youth transitions, and social exclusion. Youth Soc. 36, 143–162. doi: 10.1177/0044118X04265156
MacIntyre, P., and Gregersen, T. (2012). Emotions that facilitate language learning: the positive-broadening power of the imagination. Stud. Second Language Learn. Teach. 2, 193–213. doi: 10.14746/ssllt.2012.2.2.4
Osterloh, M., and Frey, B. S. (2000). Motivation, knowledge transfer, and organizational forms. Organiz. Sci. 11, 538–550. doi: 10.1287/orsc.11.5.538.15204
Ouweneel, E., Le Blanc, P. M., and Schaufeli, W. B. (2011). Flourishing students: a longitudinal study on positive emotions, personal resources, and study engagement. J. Positive Psychol. 6, 142–153. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2011.558847
Papa, L. A (2015). The impact of teaching and academic self-efficacy on student engagement and academic outcomes (Doctoral Dissertation). Utah State University, Logan, Utah.
Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., and Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: a program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educ. Psychol. 37, 91–105. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
Peng, C (2021). The academic motivation and engagement of students in English as a foreign language classes: does teacher praise matter. Front. Psychol. 12:778174. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.778174
Pintrich, P. R., and Schunk, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research and Applications. (2nd ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Qureshi, A., Wall, H., Humphries, J., and Balani, A. B. (2016). Can personality traits modulate student engagement with learning and their attitude to employability? Learn. Indiv. Differences. 51, 349–358. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2016.08.026
Roksa, J., and Whitley, S. E. (2017). Fostering academic success of first-year students: exploring the roles of motivation, race, and faculty. J. College Student Develop. 58, 333–348. doi: 10.1353/csd.2017.0026
Ross, D. D., Bondy, E., Bondy, E., and Hambacher, E. (2008). Promoting academic engagement through insistence: Being a warm demander. Childh. Educ. 84, 142–146. doi: 10.1080/00094056.2008.10522992
Ryan, R. M., and Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemp. Educ. Psychol. 25, 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
Sabet, M. K., Dehghannezhad, S., and Tahriri, A. (2018). The relationship between Iranian EFL teachers' self-efficacy, their personality and students' motivation. Int. J. Educ. Literacy Stud. 6, 7–15. doi: 10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.6n.4p.7
Salmela-Aro, K., and Read, S. (2017). Study engagement and burnout profiles among Finnish higher education students. Burnout Res. 7, 21–28. doi: 10.1016/j.burn.2017.11.001
Skinner, E. A., Kindermann, T. A., and Furrer, C. J. (2009). A motivational perspective on engagement and disaffection: Conceptualization and assessment of children's behavioral and emotional participation in academic activities in the classroom. Educ. Psychol. Measure. 69, 493–525. doi: 10.1177/0013164408323233
Skinner, E. A., and Pitzer, J. R. (2012). Developmental dynamics of student engagement, coping, and everyday resilience. In Christenson, S.L., Reschly, A.L., and Wylie, C. (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement. p. 21–44. New York: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_2
Upadyaya, K., and Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). Development of school engagement in association with academic success and well-being in varying social contexts: a review of empirical research. Eur. Psychol. 18, 136–147. doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000143
Ushioda, E (2008). Motivation and good language learners. In: Griffiths, C. (Ed.), Lessons from good language learners. p. 19–34. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511497667.004
Wang, F., and Ye, Z. (2021). On the role of EFL/ESL teachers' emotion regulation in students' academic engagement. Front. Psychol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.758860
Wang, Y.L, Derakhshan, A., and Zhang, L. J. (2021). Researching and practicing positive psychology in second/foreign language learning and teaching: The past, current status and future directions. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.731721
Wang, Y. L., and Guan, H. F. (2020). Exploring demotivation factors of Chinese learners of English as a foreign language based on positive psychology. Rev. Argent. Clin. Psicol. 29, 851–861. doi: 10.24205/03276716.2020.116
Wijaya, R. K (2017). Students' perception of teachers nonverbal immediacy behavior toward students' attitude and motivation in learning English. ELT Worldwide: J. English Language Teach. 4, 75–91. doi: 10.26858/eltww.v4i1.3198
Xie, F., and Derakhshan, A. (2021). A conceptual review of positive teacher interpersonal communication behaviors in the instructional context. Front. Psychol. 12, 1–10. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.708490
Yin, H., and Wang, W. (2016). Undergraduate students' motivation and engagement in China: an exploratory study. Assessment Eval. Higher Educ. 41, 601–621. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2015.1037240
Zhang, H., Dai, Y., and Wang, Y. (2020a). Motivation and second foreign language proficiency: the mediating role of Foreign Language Enjoyment. Sustainability. 12:1302. doi: 10.3390/su12041302
Zhang, X., Chen, G., and Xu, B. (2020b). The influence of group Big-Five personality composition on student engagement in online discussion. Int. J. Inf. Educ. Technol. 10, 744–750. doi: 10.18178/ijiet.2020.10.10.1452
Zheng, J (2021). The role of Chinese EMI teachers' clarity and credibility in fostering students' academic engagement and willingness to attend classes. Front. Psychol. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.756165
Zhou, S., Hiver, P., and Al-Hoorie, A. H. (2021). Measuring L2 engagement: A review of issues and applications. In: Hiver, P.H., Al-Hoorie, A. H., and Mercer, S. (Eds.), Student engagement in the language classroom. p. 75–98. Bristol: Multilingual Matters
Keywords: academic motivation, academic engagement, L2 enjoyment, EFL students, emotional factor
Citation: Liu S (2022) Toward the Role of L2 Enjoyment in EFL Students' Academic Motivation and Engagement. Front. Psychol. 12:822588. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.822588
Received: 26 November 2021; Accepted: 29 December 2021;
Published: 26 January 2022.
Edited by:
Ali Derakhshan, Golestan University, IranReviewed by:
Aizhen Zhang, Henan Finance University, ChinaAkbar Jahanbakhsh, University of Tabriz, Iran
Omid Mazandarani, Islamic Azad University, Iran
Copyright © 2022 Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Shanshan Liu, d3lsc3N1bnNoaW5lJiN4MDAwNDA7MTYzLmNvbQ==