Mike Murphy
Andrea Lami
Carmen Moret-Tatay- 1School of Applied Psychology, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
- 2European Asylum Support Office, Rome, Italy
- 3MEB Laboratory, Universidad Católica de Valencia San Vicente Mártir, Valencia, Spain
- 4NESMOS, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
Resilience has attracted the interest of the scientific community during the Covid-19 outbreak, as a protective factor in mental health. As the migrant population arguably has one of the most vulnerable profiles in the current health crisis, the aim of this study is to assess the psychometric properties of the Italian version of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) across native and migrant residents in Italy, and to compare scores across these two populations. Other personal attitudes to the current restrictions were considered. Preliminary psychometrics were tested in a version of the translated instrument with an independent sample. A second independent sample was used to analyse the differences between migrant and native adults. The results showed no differences between the new version and the previous Spanish adaptation or the original instrument. Moreover, no differences were found between the migrant and non-migrant group. BRCS scores were predicted by attitudes toward Covid-19 but not by migrant or native group. These results suggest that the BRCS may be a useful tool to measure resilience in Italy at time of pandemic, irrespective of cultural differences.
Introduction
Resilience is defined as the capacity to overcome adversity but also to be transformed by these experiences (Herrman et al., 2011). Two ways of understanding resilience have emerged: as a personality trait (Fino et al., 2020); or as a consequence of coping with experiences, mixed with a trait component (Parsons et al., 2016; Ye et al., 2020). Studies during the current pandemic have shown the direct impact of stress, arising from the circumstances, on mental health (Bozdag and Ergün, 2020; Ye et al., 2020). Contemporary society is currently facing an urgent psychological need for support in an unprecedented health crisis worldwide, and resilience might be a protective key in this situation (West et al., 2020). In this scenario, an interesting underlying topic is related to how this concept varies not only across cultures, but also contexts.
Previous disaster literature, related to such occurrences as Hurricane Katrina, the Haitian earthquake of 2010, and the Fukushima nuclear event of 2011, has shown an inverse relationship between resilience and distress (Osofsky and Osofsky, 2013; Blanc et al., 2016; Kaye-Kauderer et al., 2019). Studies during the current pandemic have shown the direct impact on the mental health of individuals of stress arising from the circumstances (Burrai et al., 2020; Roma et al., 2020; Pérez-Mengual et al., 2021). It is clear that society is currently facing the urgent psychological need for support in an unprecedented health crisis worldwide, and resilience might be a key protective factor in this situation (West et al., 2020). In this scenario, an interesting underlying topic is related to how this concept varies not only across cultures, but also contexts.
Many scales have been developed for the purpose of measuring resilience, demonstrating good psychometric properties, both in reliability and validity. Some of the most widely-used scales are the Resilience Scale (Wagnild and Young, 1993), the Dispositional Resilience Scale (Bartone, 2007) and the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS; Sinclair and Wallston, 2004). The BRCS has proven robust, with adequate levels of reliability and validity. It consists of 4 items, with responses on a 5-point Likert scale, and with item scores added to yield a single total score. Its main benefit is that it offers a one-dimensional structure composed of four items, which is easy to apply and has demonstrated good psychometric properties. Although the BRCS has been translated into different languages and validated for use with specific populations (Tomás et al., 2012; Moret-Tatay et al., 2015; López-Pina et al., 2016; Rice and Liu, 2016; Heinen et al., 2017) demonstrating that it is a valuable assessment instrument, its psychometric properties have not been thoroughly examined among Italian-speaking populations. This country was one of the first in Europe to suffer the effects of Covid-19, and also to adopt restriction measures and lockdown. It is possible that examination of differences in resilience between native Italians and potentially more vulnerable and less integrated migrants at a time of pandemic might provide some support for one or other of the trait and state-trait explanations of resilience.
As expected by its complexity, there are many variables that might underlie the resilience concept. According to the literature, resilience may be a key variable in understanding stress experienced due to the Covid-19 effects across ages (Pearman et al., 2020; Vahia et al., 2020). Moreover, gender differences seem to appear across profiles and cultures (Moret-Tatay et al., 2016; Iimura and Taku, 2018; Portnoy et al., 2018), and even a moderator effect of gender has been described (Zhang et al., 2018). Migrant status may also play a role in predicting resilience if the state-trait explanation is correct.
As has occurred in other crises or catastrophes, migrants may be particularly vulnerable to both direct and indirect effects of Covid-19. Meanings and functions of social networks which are crucial for them (Sundvall et al., 2021) may be particularly affected. Moreover, it should be noted that problems related to adequate health care, economic well-being, religious expression, living and working conditions, and inclusion in host communities, among others, often vary according to migration status (Cetrez, 2011; Ledoux et al., 2018; Aragona et al., 2020). Conversely, experience of successful coping with adversity experienced in the migration process might be expected to increase resilience. In this case, Italy is considered a country with a prolonged immigration transit within frontier countries in Europe (Assirelli et al., 2019; Giordano et al., 2019). Analyzing differences between the Italian and migrant samples might be considered an opportunity to address the State-Trait dimension in resilience.
The aim of this research is to study the psychometric properties of the Italian BRCS adaptation over different groups related to personal characteristics, such as age, gender and country of origin. This might shed light on the construct's nature across individuals from different cultures and levels of vulnerability. Moreover, attitudes toward the Covid-19 outbreak are also considered, as positive attitudes have been found to be predictors of adherence to health regulations and guidance (e.g.„ vaccination) in previous literature (Cordina and Lauri, 2021).
Methods
Sample
Two independent samples were selected. The first sample was a group of university students in an international mobility programme. A total of 20 Italian students (with an average age of 23.15 years, SD = 5.54), with high proficiency in Spanish and English, as well as 22 Spanish students (with an average age of 24.50 years, SD = 4.36) with high proficiency in Italian and English participated in this first study. None of these students has a level lower than B2 in the languages under study (according to CEFR Language Levels). For the Italian subsample, 60% were women, and for the Spanish one 81.8%.
A second independent sample of 526 participants volunteered to take part in this study. They were divided into two groups: migrants and non-migrants. The first group was composed of 105 participants, of whom 29.5 % were male and 70.5 % were female. A majority (69.5%) had migrated from European countries, while 30.5% came from a non-European country, as described in Appendix A. The average age was 30.2 years (SD = 8.42), with an age range of 19-62. The non-migrant group was composed of 421 participants, of whom 36.8% were male and 63.2% were female. The average age was 32.35 years (SD = 13.81), with an age range of 18–81.
Procedure
Data was collected online through Qualtrics software, which was distributed by different communication applications. This study was approved by the ethics committee of the School of Applied Psychology of UCC on April 6, 2020. The study was carried out in April 2020. Non-probability sampling was employed, under an incidental sample. The inclusion criteria for the first and second subsample was very similar except for the language requirements described in participant section. Thus, the criteria for the second subsample were: (i) the participants had to be 18 years old or over, (ii) Speak fluent Italian and be resident in Italy for the second study (and Italy or Spain in the first one), and (iii) consent to participate, in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. Participation was completely voluntary and could be withdrawn at any time.
Additionally, for the first sample, and as described in previous literature procedures (Sousa and Rojjanasrirat, 2011), participants were asked to answer the Italian version BRCS, and were asked to supply socio-demographic data as a distractor. Secondly, they had to answer to the BRCS Spanish scale used for the translation, and afterwards a new distractor block of questions about their language proficiency was presently. Lastly, participants had to answer the original BRCS scale in English.
Instruments
Sociodemographic data, as well as questions developed to measure attitudes toward the Covid-19 outbreak on a Likert scale from 1 to 10 (as reported in Murphy and Moret-Tatay, 2021), were employed in an isolated way. These questions are sorted as follows:
i. I fear people with contagious diseases
Temo le persone con malattie contagiose
ii. I think my sense of belonging to Italy has increased since the outbreak began Penso che il mio senso di appartenenza all'Italia sia aumentato dall'inizio del Covid-19.
iii. I consider that I have correctly informed myself about Covid-19
Ritengo di essermi informato/a correttamente sul Covid-19.
Lastly, an Italian adaptation of the BRCS was developed. In order to facilitate conducting this research with an Italian-speaking sample, a back translation of the previous Spanish adaptation (Moret-Tatay et al., 2015) was carried out, in accordance with procedures described in previous literature (e.g., Chen et al., 2009; Muñiz et al., 2013). To properly consider linguistic and cultural factors during the adaptation, several independent tranlations were reviewed by a committee of four with knowledge of Italian language and culture. One bilingual researcher translated, another back-translated, and all items were reviewed by authors to confirm meaning and comparability. Considering the strong similarities between Italian and Spanish cultures, it is considered unlikely that important differences in the meaning and understanding of resilience will appear. Nevertheless, an independent sample of Italian university students and Spanish one answered to the three BRCS versions and their results were compared.
The resulting scale is presented below:
i. I look for creative ways to alter difficult situations
Tendo a cercare modi creativi per affrontare situazioni difficili.
ii. Regardless of what happens to me, I believe I can control my reaction to it
Non importa quel che mi succede, sono fiducioso/a di poter controllare la mia reazione
iii. I believe I can grow in positive ways by dealing with difficult situations
Penso di poter imparare cose positive quando devo affrontare situazioni difficili.
iv. I actively look for ways to replace the losses I encounter in life
Ricerco attivamente modi per sostituire le perdite che mi capitano nella vita.
Data Analysis
All statistical analyses were performed using the software IBM SPSS 21 and AMOS 21. Assumptions were checked to ensure the appropriateness of factor analysis—high sample size, multivariate normality, linearity and correlation between variables (Tabachnick and Fidell, 1989). We checked for internal consistency of the scale through mean inter-item correlation, Cronbach's Alpha, and assessed items of homogeneity; KMO index and the Bartlett test of sphericity (Kaiser, 1974).
After a descriptive approach and comparisons of means through a t-test for independent samples, a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), accompanied by goodness of fit indices, was conducted. Confirmation of the adequacy of the model used absolute fit indices; the chi-square statistic X2 (Saris and Stronkhorst, 1984); the comparative fit index (CFI) with a reference value of 0.90 (Bollen, 1989), and, within parsimony adjustment indices, the error of the root mean square approximation (RMSEA), for which the smaller the value the better the fit, the reference value being 0.06 (Hu and Bentler, 1999). Secondly, a multigroup structural model was done to fully understand the multivariate relationships and compare both samples. This analysis offers, from the field of structural equation modeling techniques, a hierarchical procedure to estimate parameters for determination of the model as well as the associated standard error, comprising variances and the coefficients related to relationships between variables or measures (Bentler, 1992). This hierarchy starts by testing the factorial homogeneity structure across groups, from a stage where all parameters do not need to be equal to a stage where they do. Pearson's correlation and linear regression in predicting fear of Covid-19 were carried out.
Results
First, a non-parametric approach was carried out across the scores on BRCS for the first sample of 20 and 22 international students. As depicted in Appendix B, scores and correlations were very similar across the Italian version of the BRCS, and both the Spanish and English versions. The Friedman test showed no statistically significant differences, as expected.
With regards to the second independent sample composed by migrant and non-migrant resident in Italy depicted an α = 0.69. Table 1 depicts the descriptive data for the main variables of interest. Levene's test on equality of variances was satisfactory (p > 0.05) across groups. While score variables were slightly higher for the migrant group, differences did not reach the statistical significance in a t-test for independent samples.
Table 1. Descriptive analysis on the main variables of interest (SD = standard deviation), and t-test for independent samples across groups.
Cronbach's alpha of the BRCS scale showed an adequate values for both migrant and non-migrant samples (0.062 and 0.71, respectively), as well as mean inter-item correlation for the migrant (from 0.29 to 0.51) and non-migrant (from 0.49 to 0.51) samples. Although the development of a confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) may be a matter of debate as a unidimensional factor is expected from 4 items, it was conducted so as to be consistent with previous literature (Tomás et al., 2012; Moret-Tatay et al., 2015). The CFA confirmed the existence of a single factor for the whole dataset: χ2(2) = 6.26; χ2/df = 3.13; p = 0.04; CFI = 0.98; RMSEA = 0.06. A multigroup analysis was carried out to test invariance across, both groups. Table 2 depicts acceptable values up to and including structural covariance level.
Table 2. Analysis of invariance across migrant and non-migrant groups.
A Pearson's coefficient was carried out on the variables of interest for the whole dataset. As depicted in Table 3 several relationships were found, being the Sense of belonging and Fear to contagious diseases the strongest one.
Table 3. Pearson Correlations on the variables of interest for the whole dataset.
When the Pearson's coefficient was carried out exclusively on the migrant group, BRCS correlated with Informed (r = 0.24; p < 0.01), Informed with Fear (r = 0.22; p < 0.01), Belonging with Fear (r = 0.43; p < 0.001), and Fear with Age (r = 0.23; p < 0.01). When the Pearson's coefficient was carried out exclusively on the non-migrant group, BRCS correlated with Age (r = 0.15; p < 0.001), Informed with Fear (r = 0.12; p < 0.01), Belonging with Fear (r = 0.31; p < 0.001), Fear with Age (r = 0.20; p < 0.001), and Belonging with Age (r = 0.18; p < 0.001).
Lastly, a regression analysis was carried out on the prediction of fear of contagious diseases. The model reached statistical significance: F(6, 518) = 19.86; MSE = 103.56; R2 = 0.19; p < 0.001. As depicted in Table 4, migration status did not reach the statistical significance, while the rest of variables did.
Table 4. Linear regression analysis on the prediction of Fear in the whole dataset, which reached statistical significance: F(6, 518) = 19.86; MSE = 103.56; R2 = 0.19; p < 0.001.
Conclusions and Discussion
The aim this research was to examine the psychometric properties of the Italian adaptation of the BRCS, for migrant and non-migrant participants. Moreover, variables such as age, sex, attitudes toward the Covid-19 outbreak and country of origin were also considered in the prediction of fear of contagious diseases. The main results are described as follows: (i) the Italian BRCS adaptation depicted good psychometric properties for both migrant and non-migrant groups; (ii) The multigroup analysis pointed to a high invariance across groups; (iii) A relationship of BRCS was found with Informed in the migrant group and Age in the non-migrant; (iv) Migrant group did not predict Fear.
The current results suggest that the BRCS Italian adaptation may be a useful tool to measure resilience in both the Italian population, and the resident migrant population. Not only did psychometric properties show adequate indices, but invariance also reached a high level of parameters across samples. In an applied level, one should bear in mind that the short number of items makes it an easier solution in terms of time of application, which might also avoid fatigue from respondents when several variables want to be measured.
Even if migrants can be considered a vulnerable group, no differences were found with the non-migrant group in terms of resilience. This could be related to the specific characteristic of the current sample. Purposes of the migration were not canvassed, but according to sociodemographic data a student profile predominates. This issue needs clarification in further research, as living conditions, as well as economic status, might be an important predictor of the variables under study. Nevertheless, the results seems to partially support the hypothesis that resilience might contain stable components described as traits in the literature (Fino et al., 2020). Future lines of research should address the role of living conditions in this scenario. Moreover, longitudinal research might shed light on the mixed State-Trait nature.
Gender and age predicted fear of contagious diseases as expected from previous literature (Özdin and Bayrak Özdin, 2020). Literature has suggested that women's traditional role as main caregivers, combined with working from home, may be partly responsible (Gausman and Langer, 2020). This blurring situation might lead to increased anxiety, depicting a context-specific vulnerability, which is of interest for future lines of research. Moreover, older adults might experience higher fear, and not anxiety or loneliness, because of isolation and health conditions (Luchetti et al., 2020); this should also be addressed in future lines of research.
Effects of attitudes toward Covid-19 were also measured as previously approached in the literature. This is of interest to understand the role of resilience in the current pandemic. Sense of belonging to Italy was correlated to fear of contagious diseases for both groups. This result might support traditional theories which explains how, in times where death awareness emerge, individuals tend to strengthen their self-esteem to reduce anxiety against death (Pyszczynski et al., 1999). Moreover, this can also lead to a search for cohesion between people who share similar world views and hostility toward those with alternative world views (Su and Shen, 2021). Regarding feeling well-informed about Covid-19, it is described in the literature that ambiguous information is related to fear (Lissek et al., 2006). In this case, the migrant group showed a correlation between this variable and Resilience. This might reflect a special sensibility in the migrant group to look for information that calms them.
The main limitations that arise is that the sample was selected through non-probability sampling, which can introduce distortions in the results. Moreover, data was recruited in a self-report way. Thus, biases might occur with regards to a high component of self-perception in the data. With regards to personal characteristics, there is a significantly higher number of women than men. Lastly, some variables related to attitudes were measured though a single item in a Likert format scale of 10 points. These were selected as procedures from previous literature (Boot et al., 2015; Moret-Tatay et al., 2019) considering these items have face validity and capture the main ways in which people could experience the restrictions effects, such as prevailed when the data were gathered.
Data Availability Statement
The raw data supporting the conclusions of this article will be made available by the authors.
Ethics Statement
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by UCC approval on April 2020. The patients/participants provided their written informed consent to participate in this study.
Author Contributions
MM and CM-T drafted the manuscript. AL and CM-T focused on the back translation process. All authors have substantial contributed to the conception and design of the work, the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data for the work and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
We thank the participants involved in this study. We specially thank Carla Messina, Corrado Gangemi, and Francesca Paolucci for their help in the back translation and support on the recruitment of the Italian sample.
References
Aragona, M., Barbato, A., Cavani, A., Costanzo, G., and Mirisola, C. (2020). Negative impacts of COVID-19 lockdown on mental health service access and follow-up adherence for immigrants and individuals in socio-economic difficulties. Public Health 186, 52–56. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2020.06.055
Assirelli, G., Barone, C., and Recchi, E. (2019). “You better move on”: determinants and labor market outcomes of graduate migration from Italy. Int. Migr. Rev. 53, 4–25. doi: 10.1177/0197918318767930
Bartone, P. T. (2007). Test-retest reliability of the dispositional resilience scale-15, a brief hardiness scale. Psychol. Rep. 101, 943–944. doi: 10.2466/pr0.101.3.943-944
Bentler, P. M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychol. Bull. 112:400. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.3.400
Blanc, J., Rahill, G. J., Laconi, S., and Mouchenik, Y. (2016). Religious beliefs, PTSD, depression and resilience in survivors of the 2010 Haiti earthquake. J. Affect. Disord. 190, 697–703. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.10.046
Bollen, K. A. (1989). A new incremental fit index for general structural equation models. Sociol. Methods Res. 17, 303–316. doi: 10.1177/0049124189017003004
Boot, W. R., Charness, N., Czaja, S. J., Sharit, J., Rogers, W. A., Fisk, A. D., et al. (2015). Computer proficiency questionnaire: assessing low and high computer proficient seniors. Gerontologist 55, 404–411. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt117
Bozda, F., and Ergün, N. (2020). Psychological resilience of healthcare professionals during COVID-19 pandemic. Psychol. Rep. 33294120965477. doi: 10.1177/0033294120965477
Burrai, J., Roma, P., Barchielli, B., Biondi, S., Cordellieri, P., Fraschetti, A., et al. (2020). Psychological and emotional impact of patients living in psychiatric treatment communities during Covid-19 lockdown in Italy. J. Clin. Med. 9:3787. doi: 10.3390/jcm9113787
Cetrez, Ö. A. (2011). The next generation of Assyrians in Sweden: religiosity as a functioning system of meaning within the process of acculturation. Ment. Health Relig. Cult. 14, 473–487. doi: 10.1080/13674676.2010.484061
Chen, L. H., Chen, M.-Y., Kee, Y. H., and Tsai, Y.-M. (2009). Validation of the gratitude questionnaire (GQ) in Taiwanese undergraduate students. J. Happiness Stud. 10, 655–664. doi: 10.1007/s10902-008-9112-7
Cordina, M., and Lauri, M. A. (2021). Attitudes towards COVID-19 vaccination, vaccine hesitancy and intention to take the vaccine. Pharm. Pract. 19:2317. doi: 10.18549/PharmPract.2021.1.2317
Fino, E., Mema, D., and Russo, P. M. (2020). War trauma exposed refugees and posttraumatic stress disorder: the moderating role of trait resilience. J. Psychosom. Res. 129:109905. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2019.109905
Gausman, J., and Langer, A. (2020). Sex and gender disparities in the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Women's Health 29, 465–466. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2020.8472
Giordano, F., Cipolla, A., Ragnoli, F., and Brajda Bruno, F. (2019). Transit migration and trauma: the detrimental effect of interpersonal trauma on Syrian children in transit in Italy. Psychol. Injury Law 12, 76–87. doi: 10.1007/s12207-019-09345-x
Heinen, I., Bullinger, M., and Kocalevent, R.-D. (2017). Perceived stress in first year medical students—associations with personal resources and emotional distress. BMC Med. Educ. 17:4. doi: 10.1186/s12909-016-0841-8
Herrman, H., Stewart, D. E., Diaz-Granados, N., Berger, E. L., Jackson, B., and Yuen, T. (2011). What is Resilience? Can. J. Psychiatry 56, 258–265. doi: 10.1177/070674371105600504
Hu, L. T., and Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct. Equat. Model. 6, 1–55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
Iimura, S., and Taku, K. (2018). Gender differences in relationship between resilience and big five personality traits in Japanese adolescents. Psychol. Rep. 121, 920–931. doi: 10.1177/0033294117741654
Kaye-Kauderer, H. P., Levine, J., Takeguchi, Y., Machida, M., Sekine, H., Taku, K., et al. (2019). Post-traumatic growth and resilience among medical students after the March 2011 disaster in Fukushima, Japan. Psychiatr. Q. 90, 507–518. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09646-z
Ledoux, C., Pilot, E., Diaz, E., and Krafft, T. (2018). Migrants' access to healthcare services within the European Union: a content analysis of policy documents in Ireland, Portugal and Spain. Glob. Health 14:57. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0373-6
Lissek, S., Pine, D. S., and Grillon, C. (2006). The strong situation: a potential impediment to studying the psychobiology and pharmacology of anxiety disorders. Biol. Psychol. 72, 265–270. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2005.11.004
López-Pina, J.-A., Meseguer-Henarejos, A.-B., Gascón-Cánovas, J.-J., Navarro-Villalba, D.-J., Sinclair, V. G., and Wallston, K. A. (2016). Measurement properties of the brief resilient coping scale in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus using rasch analysis. Health Q. Life Outcomes 14:128. doi: 10.1186/s12955-016-0534-3
Luchetti, M., Lee, J. H., Aschwanden, D., Sesker, A., Strickhouser, J. E., Terracciano, A., et al. (2020). The trajectory of loneliness in response to COVID-19. Am. Psychol. 75, 897–908. doi: 10.1037/amp0000690
Moret-Tatay, C., Beneyto-Arrojo, M. J., Gutierrez, E., Boot, W. R., and Charness, N. (2019). A Spanish adaptation of the computer and mobile device proficiency questionnaires (CPQ and MDPQ) for older adults. Front. Psychol. 10:1165. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01165
Moret-Tatay, C., Beneyto-Arrojo, M. J., Laborde-Bois, S. C., Martínez-Rubio, D., and Senent-Capuz, N. (2016). Gender, coping, and mental health: a bayesian network model analysis. Soc. Behav. Pers. 44, 827–835. doi: 10.2224/sbp.2016.44.5.827
Moret-Tatay, C., Fernández-Muñoz, J. J., Civera-Mollá, C., Navarro-Pardo, E., and Alcover-de-la-Hera, C. (2015). Psychometric properties and factor structure of the BRCS in an elderly Spanish sample. Anales Psicología 31:1030. doi: 10.6018/analesps.31.3.188401
Muñiz, J., Elosua, P., and Hambleton, R. K. (2013). Directrices para la traducción y adaptación de los tests: Segunda edición. Psicothema 25, 151–157. doi: 10.7334/psicothema2013.24
Murphy, M., and Moret-Tatay, C. (2021). Personality and attitudes confronting death awareness during the COVID-19 outbreak in Italy and Spain. Front. Psychiatry 12:627018. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.627018
Osofsky, H. J., and Osofsky, J. D. (2013). Hurricane katrina and the gulf oil spill. Psychiatr. Clin. North Am. 36, 371–383. doi: 10.1016/j.psc.2013.05.009
Özdin, S., and Bayrak Özdin, Ş. (2020). Levels and predictors of anxiety, depression and health anxiety during COVID-19 pandemic in Turkish society: The importance of gender. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 66, 504–511. doi: 10.1177/0020764020927051
Parsons, M., Glavac, S., Hastings, P., Marshall, G., McGregor, J., McNeill, J., et al. (2016). Top-down assessment of disaster resilience: a conceptual framework using coping and adaptive capacities. Int. J. Disaster Risk Reduct. 19, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijdrr.2016.07.005
Pearman, A., Hughes, M. L., Smith, E. L., and Neupert, S. D. (2020). Age differences in risk and resilience factors in COVID-19-related stress. J. Gerontol. 76, e38–e44. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa120
Pérez-Mengual, N., Aragonés-Barbera, I., Moret-Tatay, C., and Moliner-Albero, A. R. (2021). The Relationship of fear of death between neuroticism and anxiety during the Covid-19 pandemic. Front. Psychiatry 12:648498. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.648498
Portnoy, G. A., Relyea, M. R., Decker, S., Shamaskin-Garroway, A., Driscoll, M., Brandt, C. A., et al. (2018). Understanding gender differences in resilience among veterans: trauma history and social ecology. J. Trauma. Stress 31, 845–855. doi: 10.1002/jts.22341
Pyszczynski, T., Greenberg, J., and Solomon, S. (1999). A dual-process model of defense against conscious and unconscious death-related thoughts: an extension of terror management theory. Psychol. Rev. 106, 835–845. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835
Rice, V., and Liu, B. (2016). Personal resilience and coping Part II: identifying resilience and coping among U.S. military service members and veterans with implications for work. Work 54, 335–350. doi: 10.3233/WOR-162301
Roma, P., Monaro, M., Colasanti, M., Ricci, E., Biondi, S., Di Domenico, A., et al. (2020). A 2-month follow-up study of psychological distress among Italian people during the COVID-19 lockdown. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 17:8180. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17218180
Saris, W. E., and Stronkhorst, L. H. (1984). Causal Modelling in Nonexperimental Research: An Introduction to the LISREL Approach. Sociometric Research Foundation.
Sinclair, V. G., and Wallston, K. A. (2004). The development and psychometric evaluation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale. Assessment 11, 94–101. doi: 10.1177/1073191103258144
Sousa, V. D., and Rojjanasrirat, W. (2011). Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J. Eval. Clin. Pract. 17, 268–274. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01434.x
Su, R., and Shen, W. (2021). Is nationalism rising in times of the COVID-19 pandemic? Individual-level evidence from the United States. J. Chin. Polit. Sci. 26, 169–187. doi: 10.1007/s11366-020-09696-2
Sundvall, M., Titelman, D., DeMarinis, V., Borisova, L., and Çetrez, Ö. (2021). Safe but isolated - an interview study with Iraqi refugees in Sweden about social networks, social support, and mental health. Int. J. Soc. Psychiatry 67, 351–359. doi: 10.1177/0020764020954257
Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (1989). Using Multivariate Statistics (2nd ed.), Harper & Row, New York.
Tomás, J. M., Meléndez, J. C., Sancho, P., and Mayordomo, T. (2012). Adaptation and initial validation of the BRCS in an elderly Spanish sample. Eur. J. Psychol. Assess. 28, 283–289. doi: 10.1027/1015-5759/a000108
Vahia, I. V., Jeste, D. V., and Reynolds, C. F. (2020). Older adults and the mental health effects of COVID-19. JAMA. 324, 2253–2254. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.21753
West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Sinsky, C., Trockel, M., Tutty, M., Nedelec, L., et al. (2020). Resilience and burnout among physicians and the general US working population. JAMA Netw. Open 3:e209385. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9385
Ye, Z., Yang, X., Zeng, C., Wang, Y., Shen, Z., Li, X., et al. (2020). Resilience, social support, and coping as mediators between COVID-19-related stressful experiences and acute stress disorder among college students in China. Appl. Psychol. Health Well Being 12, 1074–1094. doi: 10.1111/aphw.12211
Zhang, M., Zhang, J., Zhang, F., Zhang, L., and Feng, D. (2018). Prevalence of psychological distress and the effects of resilience and perceived social support among Chinese college students: does gender make a difference? Psychiatry Res. 267, 409–413. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2018.06.038
Appendix
Appendix A. Descriptive analyses on migrant group (non-eu with a sample size of N = 32 or 30.5%, and eu with an N = 73 OR 69.5%).
Appendix B. Socres on the three bRCS language versions employed for the first sample (sd in brackets).
Keywords: Brief Resilient Coping Scale, multigroup analysis, attitudes, Covid-19, psychometric
Citation: Murphy M, Lami A and Moret-Tatay C (2021) An Italian Adaptation of the Brief Resilient Coping Scale (BRCS) and Attitudes During the Covid-19 Outbreak. Front. Psychol. 12:641213. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.641213
Received: 13 December 2020; Accepted: 28 May 2021;
Published: 01 July 2021.
Edited by:
Önver Andreas Cetrez, Uppsala University, SwedenReviewed by:
Jakub Polák, National Institute of Mental Health, CzechiaJoaquín T. Limonero, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Spain
Copyright © 2021 Murphy, Lami and Moret-Tatay. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carmen Moret-Tatay, bWFyaWFjYXJtZW4ubW9yZXQmI3gwMDA0MDt1Y3YuZXM=