Controlling Video Stimuli in Sign Language and Gesture Research: The OpenPoseR Package for Analyzing OpenPose Motion-Tracking Data in R

Researchers in the fields of sign language and gesture studies frequently present their participants with video stimuli showing actors performing linguistic signs or co-speech gestures. Up to now, such video stimuli have been mostly controlled only for some of the technical aspects of the video material (e.g., duration of clips, encoding, framerate, etc.), leaving open the possibility that systematic differences in video stimulus materials may be concealed in the actual motion properties of the actor’s movements. Computer vision methods such as OpenPose enable the fitting of body-pose models to the consecutive frames of a video clip and thereby make it possible to recover the movements performed by the actor in a particular video clip without the use of a point-based or markerless motion-tracking system during recording. The OpenPoseR package provides a straightforward and reproducible way of working with these body-pose model data extracted from video clips using OpenPose, allowing researchers in the fields of sign language and gesture studies to quantify the amount of motion (velocity and acceleration) pertaining only to the movements performed by the actor in a video clip. These quantitative measures can be used for controlling differences in the movements of an actor in stimulus video clips or, for example, between different conditions of an experiment. In addition, the package also provides a set of functions for generating plots for data visualization, as well as an easy-to-use way of automatically extracting metadata (e.g., duration, framerate, etc.) from large sets of video files.

Introduction

Researchers in linguistics, psychology, and neuroscience who are studying sign language and gesture frequently present their participants with pre-recorded video stimuli showing actors performing manual gestures. Such gestures may be lexicalized signs of a natural sign language which can be combined to build up complex meanings (Klima et al., 1979; Mathur and Rathmann, 2014; Cecchetto, 2017) and are primarily processed by the brain’s left-hemispheric core language network (Emmorey, 2015; Trettenbrein et al., 2021). Alternatively, non-signers may use a wide variety of so-called co-speech gestures to support different communicative functions in situations where gestures are produced spontaneously alongside speech (McNeill, 1985; Krauss, 1998; Özyürek, 2018).

The reliance on video clips as stimulus materials presents researchers in sign language and gesture studies with a number of challenges. While controlling for primarily technical aspects of the video material (e.g., duration of clips, encoding, framerate, etc.) is rather straightforward, it is strikingly more difficult to capture aspects of the video material which are related to the actor and the specific movements they performed. For example, while the length of video clips in an experiment may be perfectly matched across the different conditions, systematic differences could nevertheless exist with regard to the speed, duration, and extent of the movements performed by the actor in each condition. In a hypothetical neuroimaging experiment on sign language, such systematic differences could for example, lead to unexpected response of parts of cortex that are sensitive to biological motion across conditions, thus distorting the actual contrasts of interest. By quantifying the bodily movements of the actor in a video clip it becomes possible to control for potential differences in these movement patterns across different conditions, or use information about velocity or acceleration as further regressors in a statistical model.

Up to now, researchers have usually focused on controlling their video stimuli only with respect to certain technical properties. Some have used device-based optic marker motion-tracking systems, but only to create stimulus materials which displayed gestures in the form of point-light displays instead of a human actor (Poizner et al., 1981; Campbell et al., 2011). A number of markerless motion-tracking systems (e.g., Microsoft Kinect; Zhang, 2012) and tools for analyzing these data exist (Trujillo et al., 2019), but using them for creating video stimuli with ultimately only two dimensions in many cases may constitute too big of an expenditure in terms of time, effort, and hardware requirements. Also, neither optic marker nor markerless motion-tracking systems can be retroactively applied to videos already recorded. As a result, the possibility that systematic differences in video stimulus materials may be concealed in the actual motion properties of the actor’s movements has at times been disregarded in sign language and gesture research.

Recent technical advances in video-based tracking systems offer an exciting opportunity for creating means to control video stimuli that go beyond technical aspects such as clip duration by recovering different parameters (e.g., velocity or acceleration) of the actor’s movements performed in the video. A number of existing tools may be used to quantify motion using pixel-based frame-differencing methods (e.g., Paxton and Dale, 2013; Kleinbub and Ramseyer, 2020; Ramseyer, 2020), but they tend require a static camera position, very stable lighting conditions, and do not allow for the actor to change their location on the screen. In contrast, computer vision methods such as OpenPose (Cao et al., 2017, 2019) deploy machine learning methods which enable the fitting of a variety of different body-pose models to the consecutive frames of a video clip. By extracting body-pose information in this automated and model-based fashion, such machine learning-based methods essentially make it possible to recover the position of the actor’s body or parts of their body (e.g., head and hands) in every frame of a video clip. Based on this information contained in the body-pose model, the movements performed by the actor in a particular video clip can be recovered in a two-dimensional space without the use of a point-based or markerless motion-tracking system during recording. Consequently, such video-based tracking methods do not require any special equipment and can also be applied retroactively to materials which have been recorded without the aid of motion-tracking systems.

Methods

Here we present OpenPoseR, a package of specialized functions for the R statistics language and environment (R Core Team, 2019) which provides a straightforward and reproducible way of working with body-pose model data extracted from video clips using OpenPose. The source code for OpenPoseR is freely available from the project’s GitHub page.¹ In essence, OpenPoseR allows researchers in the fields of sign language and gesture studies to quantify the amount of motion pertaining only to the movements performed by the actor in a video clip (Figure 1A) by using information from body-pose models fit by OpenPose (Figure 1B). In its current version, OpenPoseR provides quantitative measures of motion based on velocity and acceleration of the actor in the video which can be used for controlling differences in these movement parameters, for example, between different conditions of an experiment. More precisely, the package makes it possible to straightforwardly compute the Euclidean norms of sums of all velocity or acceleration vectors (Figure 1C) and thereby provide a quantitative measure of motion for an entire video clip. OpenPoseR has already successfully been used to automatically detect onset and offset for a set of more than 300 signs from German Sign Language (Trettenbrein et al., in press). The onset and offset of the sign “psychology” are also clearly visible in the time series depicted Figure 1D. Moreover, an approach similar to the one presented here has shown the general validity of OpenPose data (Pouw et al., 2020). In addition to its core functionality the package also provides some functions for generating basic plots for illustration purposes, as well as an easy-to-use way of automatically extracting metadata (e.g., duration, framerate, etc.) from large sets of video files. See Table 1 for an overview of all functions included in the current version. Due to its integration into the larger R environment, OpenPoseR supports reproducible workflows (e.g., using R Markdown; Allaire et al., 2020) and allows for seamless interaction with other R packages for further statistical analysis of movement parameters and technical properties of the video materials analyzed. Hence, results of OpenPoseR analyses can readily be integrated with other data such as, for example, manual annotation data created using ELAN (Lausberg and Sloetjes, 2009).

FIGURE 1

Figure 1. Using body-pose estimation for controlling video stimuli. (A) Representative frames of an example video file showing an actor produce the German Sign Language sign for “psychology” (video courtesy of Henrike Maria Falke, gebaerdenlernen.de; license: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0). (B) Representative frames from the example input video file illustrating the body-pose model which was fit automatically using OpenPose. (C) The information from the fit body-pose model is then used by OpenPoseR to compute the vertical (y-axis) and horizontal (x-axis) velocity of the different points of the model. Based on these calculations, the software then computes the Euclidean norm of the sums of the velocity vectors. (D) The illustrated procedure makes it possible to quantify the total amount of bodily motion in the video using a single measure. Onset and offset the sign are clearly visible as peaks in the plot (shaded areas).

TABLE 1

Table 1. List of functions available in OpenPoseR.

Installation and Prerequisites

OpenPoseR was created using a current version of R (3.1 or newer; R Core Team, 2019). In addition, we recommend using a current version of RStudio (RStudio Team, 2020). Upon installation, OpenPoseR will automatically resolve its dependencies and install additional packages for plotting and reading video files which it requires to run in case they are missing. Notice that OpenPoseR provides a means of analyzing motion-tracking data generated by OpenPose (Cao et al., 2017, 2019), which is freely available for download.² You will need to install and run OpenPose on your system or a compute cluster to fit body-pose models (Figure 1B) which can then be analyzed with OpenPoseR. Accordingly, an installation of OpenPose is not required on the same machine on which you use OpenPoseR, meaning that you can, for example, fit body-pose models on a central compute cluster with more powerful GPUs and analyze the output of OpenPose locally on your workstation or laptop. A number of different so-called “cloud computing” companies now also offer options to purchase GPU computing time in case such hardware is not available locally. OpenPoseR can be used to analyze data from all three standard models that can be fit with OpenPose (“body25,” “face,” or “hand”), whereas your choice of model of course depends on what exactly you want to control for. By default, we recommend fitting the “body25” model in the context of stimulus control. In the below example, we describe the analysis of data from the “body25” model, however, “face” and “hand” models can be fit and analyzed in the same manner.

The most straight-forward way of installing OpenPoseR on your machine is to use the install_github() function provided by the devtools package:

install.packages(”devtools”)

devtools::install_github(”trettenbrein/OpenPoseR”)

This will download and install the latest version of OpenPoseR on your system. Alternatively, it is also possible to use R’s ability to manually install packages from a downloaded archive of the source code, however, we strongly recommend to directly install the package from GitHub.

Example

Below we outline an example workflow for using OpenPoseR to analyze OpenPose motion-tracking data derived from an example video clip. Throughout, we will use the results of the analysis of a short video clip showing the German Sign Language sign for PSYCHOLOGY (Figure 1A) in order to demonstrate the capabilities of OpenPoseR. All of OpenPoseR’s functionality can either directly be called upon in R scripts for data loaded into the R workspace or, alternatively, may indirectly be accessed using wrapper function (prefixed “file_”) which make it easier to work with data derived from large sets of video files (see Table 1 for an overview). The present example will use these wrapper functions to demonstrate how OpenPoseR would be used to compute the velocity of the body-pose model for the PSYCHOLOGY video clip. In addition to this abridged example, an interactive and reproducible demonstration of the approach including code examples and example data is available as an R Markdown file from the project’s GitHub repository.³

Convert OpenPose Data

OpenPose creates a JSON file with information about the fit body-pose model(s) for every frame of the input video. Consequently, an input video file with a duration of exactly 5 s and a rate of 25 frames per second will already generate 125 individual files. To make these data easier to handle, OpenPoseR combines the output for an entire video file into a single CSV file with a human-readable tabular data structure. Depending on the model (“body25,” “face,” or “hand”) that has been fit using OpenPose the CSV file generated by OpenPoseR will contain consecutive columns for the x and y position of the points in the body-pose model followed by the confidence value (ranging from 0 to 1) for every point in the model. Every consecutive row contains the data of a frame of the input video clip. This conversion into the OpenPoseR format can be achieved using the create_csv() function:

create_csv(“input/path/”, “file_name”, “output/path/”)

The function will create a CSV file using the JSON files stored in the specified input directory with the suffix of the body-pose model (e.g., “_body25”) in the given output directory. In addition, the raw motion-tracking data may be viewed by plotting a heatmap of the data using the plot_frontal() function.

Clean Motion-Tracking Data

On rare occasions, the model fit using OpenPose may contain zero values for x, y, and c of a point, indicating that the model fit failed for this particular point for the given frame. This is rather unlikely when working with stimulus video recordings which have been produced in the well-lit setting of professional video-recording facilities, but may occur with materials recorded in less optimal conditions. Similarly, points with very low confidence values (e.g., <0.3) might reasonably be excluded from further analysis as these values indicate that OpenPose had trouble detecting a point in a particular frame. Including zero values and frames with very low confidence values could lead to a situation where points may appear to be “jumping around” from frame to frame due to incorrect x and y values, thereby misrepresenting the actual velocity or acceleration of the model in the video clip.

Accordingly, to increase the accuracy of our calculations the data of the body-pose model should be cleaned and thresholded before further processing. OpenPoseR provides the clean_data() function which will take care of this step by automatically imposing zero values as well as values below a pre-defined cutoff using the mean of the previous and consecutive frames. By using file_clean() we can run this function for a large set of files:

file_clean(”path/to/file.csv”, cutoff=0.3, overwrite=FALSE)

This will create a file called “filename_model_cleaned.csv” because the argument “overwrite” was set to FALSE upon calling the function, thereby preventing OpenPoseR from overwriting the input CSV file with the cleaned data. Using the “cutoff” argument, the threshold for the confidence value that a point has to surpass can be adjusted. If everything went well, the function will return TRUE.

Compute Velocity

After having successfully converted and cleaned the date, we can now compute the velocity of the different points of the body-pose model using OpenPoseR’s file_velocity() function. As already mentioned above, all functions prefixed with “file_” provide wrappers for OpenPoseR functions which make it possible to directly pass a filename to the function (see Table 1). In this case, file_velocity() will compute the velocity of a point on either the x- or y-axis using the velocity_x() and velocity_y() functions. Both functions compute the velocity of a point on either the x- or y-axis according to the following formula:

$\frac{p_t-p_{t-1}}{t-\left(t-1\right)}$

By using the file_velocity() function we can disregard these details regarding the computations being carried out and simply pass to the function the filename or a path to a CSV file in the OpenPoseR format as specified above in section “Clean Motion-Tracking Data”:

file_velocity(”path/to/file_model_cleaned.csv”)

Notice that if your video was recorded with more or less than 25 frames per second, you will have to specify this when calling the function by setting the argument “fps” to the desired value. Output files will be created automatically and carry either the suffix “_velocity_x” or “_velocity_y.” If everything went well, the function will return TRUE.

Compute Euclidean Norm of Sums of Velocity Vectors

Given that our goal is to capture the total amount of bodily motion between frames in a single value, our final step in this analysis will be to compute the Euclidean norm of sums of velocity vectors (Figure 1C). In OpenPoseR, this is implemented in the en_velocity() function which takes the velocity vectors of the x- and y-axis as its input. The Euclidean norm of sums for velocity as the given motion feature then is computed using the following formula:

$M{F}_1=||\sum _{i=1}^N{v}_i||$

Again, we may disregard the details of the implementation by using the wrapper function file_en_velocity() which takes the filenames or path to the two CSV files created in the previous step as its input:

file_en_velocity(”path/to/file_model_cleaned_velocity_x.csv”,

”path/to/file_model_cleaned_velocity_y.csv”)

The output file will be created automatically and carries the suffix “_en_velocity.” If everything went well, the function will return TRUE.

Plotting Results

Finally, the result of the previous computations can be visualized using basic plotting functions included in the package. OpenPoseR uses the functionality of ggplot2 (Wickham, 2016) to provide some straightforward time series plots which can be created using the plot_timeseries() function:

example <- read.csv(”path/to/file_model_cleaned_en_velocity.csv”,

sep=””)”

plot_timeseries(example)

This will create the simple plot in Figure 1D which provides an illustration of how we have quantified the total amount of bodily motion occurring in the input video clip of the German Sign Language Sign PSYCHOLOGY. The sign is articulated with an initial large movement of the signer’s dominant right hand to the chest which is followed by a small hand movement in the same place on the chest, which is followed by another large movement of the hand into its original position. The onset and offset of this movement is clearly visible in the form of peaks in the timeseries in Figure 1D, thereby indicating that we succeeded in capturing the bodily motion occurring in the example video clip.

Discussion and Outlook

The method and workflow presented here provides researchers in sign language and gesture studies with a straightforward and reproducible means for using body-pose estimation data derived from OpenPose for controlling their video stimuli. By quantifying the bodily movements of the actor in a video clip in terms of velocity or acceleration of a body-pose model it becomes possible to control for potential differences in these movement patterns, for example, across the different conditions of an experiment. In addition, this approach has already been successfully used to automatically detect the onset and offset for a large set of signs from German Sign Language (Trettenbrein et al., in press). OpenPoseR’s core functionality of computing measures of velocity and acceleration for OpenPose data is furthermore supplemented by functions for generating basic plots as well as an easy-to-use way of extracting metadata (e.g., duration, framerate, etc.) from large sets of video files. With its integration into the larger R environment, OpenPoseR supports reproducible workflows and enables seamless interaction with other packages in order to subject the motion-tracking results to further statistical analysis.

OpenPoseR was developed to assist sign language and gesture researchers with stimulus control in experiments that present participants with video recordings of an actor signing or gesturing, by reconstructing motion parameters of the actor using the data of body-pose models fit with OpenPose. However, we believe that the package’s functionality may also be useful for other domains of sign language and gesture research, especially as it can be continuously expanded due to the open-source nature of the project. For example, given that unlike other methods (e.g., Ramseyer, 2020) OpenPose does not require a static camera position, is sensitive to the actual body pose of the actor in the video, and it not biased by other motion or changes in the background, the method and workflow described here has the potential to enable the use of naturalistic stimuli in sign language research, similar to the increasing popularity of naturalistic stimuli in research on spoken language (Hamilton and Huth, 2020). Similarly, we believe that the functionality provided by OpenPoseR may prove useful in the automated analysis of large-scale OpenPose data derived from sign language corpora (e.g., Schulder and Hanke, 2019).

Data Availability Statement

Publicly available datasets were analyzed in this study. This data can be found here: https://github.com/trettenbrein/OpenPoseR.

Author Contributions

PT wrote R code and curated online resources. EZ supervised the project. Both authors conceptualized the functionality of the package, implemented algorithms, contributed to the article, and approved the submitted version.

Funding

This work was funded by the Max Planck Society.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Angela D. Friederici for supporting us in the development of this software.

Footnotes

1. ^ https://github.com/trettenbrein/OpenPoseR
2. ^ https://github.com/CMU-Perceptual-Computing-Lab/openpose
3. ^ https://github.com/trettenbrein/OpenPoseR/blob/master/demo.zip

References

Allaire, J., Xie, Y., McPherson, J., Luraschi, J., Ushey, K., Atkins, A., et al. (2020). R Markdown: Dynamic Documents for R. Available online at: https://github.com/rstudio/rmarkdown (accessed February 25, 2020).

Google Scholar

Campbell, R., Capek, C. M., Gazarian, K., MacSweeney, M., Woll, B., David, A. S., et al. (2011). The signer and the sign: cortical correlates of person identity and language processing from point-light displays. Neuropsychologia 49, 3018–3026. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.06.029

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Cao, Z., Hidalgo, G., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., and Sheikh, Y. (2019). OpenPose: realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. ArXiv [Preprint]. ArXiv:1812.08008

Google Scholar

Cao, Z., Simon, T., Wei, S.-E., and Sheikh, Y. (2017). Realtime multi-person 2D pose estimation using part affinity fields. ArXiv [Preprint]. arXiv:1611.08050

Google Scholar

Cecchetto, C. (2017). “The syntax of sign language and Universal grammar,” in The Oxford handbook of Universal Grammar, ed. I. Roberts (Oxford: Oxford UP).

Google Scholar

Emmorey, K. (2015). “The neurobiology of sign language,” in Brain Mapping: An Encyclopedic Reference, Vol. 3, eds A. W. Toga, P. Bandettini, P. Thompson, and K. Friston (Cambridge, MA: Academic Press), 475–479. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-12-397025-1.00272-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hamilton, L. S., and Huth, A. G. (2020). The revolution will not be controlled: natural stimuli in speech neuroscience. Lang. Cogn. Neurosci. 35, 573–582. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2018.1499946

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Kleinbub, J. R., and Ramseyer, F. T. (2020). rMEA: an R package to assess nonverbal synchronization in motion energy analysis time-series. Psychother. Res. 1–14. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2020.1844334

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Klima, E. S., Bellugi, U., Battison, R., Boyes-Braem, P., Fischer, S., Frishberg, N., et al. (1979). The Signs of Language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.

Google Scholar

Krauss, R. M. (1998). Why do we gesture when we speak? Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 7, 54–54. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.ep13175642

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Lausberg, H., and Sloetjes, H. (2009). Coding gestural behavior with the NEUROGES-ELAN system. Behav. Res. Methods 41, 841–849. doi: 10.3758/BRM.41.3.841

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mathur, G., and Rathmann, C. (2014). “The structure of sign languages,” in The Oxford Handbook of Language Production, eds M. A. Goldrick, V. S. Ferreira, and M. Miozzo (Oxford: Oxford UP), 379–392.

Google Scholar

McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychol. Rev. 92, 350–371. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.92.3.350

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Özyürek, A. (2018). “Role of gesture in language processing: toward a unified account for production and comprehension,” in The Oxford Handbook of Psycholinguistics, eds S.-A. Rueschemeyer and M. G. Gaskell (Oxford: Oxford University Press), 591–607. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198786825.013.25

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Paxton, A., and Dale, R. (2013). Frame-differencing methods for measuring bodily synchrony in conversation. Behav. Res. Methods 45, 329–343. doi: 10.3758/s13428-012-0249-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Poizner, H., Bellugi, U., and Lutes-Driscoll, V. (1981). Perception of American sign language in dynamic point-light displays. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 7, 430–440. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.7.2.430

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pouw, W., Trujillo, J. P., and Dixon, J. A. (2020). The quantification of gesture–speech synchrony: a tutorial and validation of multimodal data acquisition using device-based and video-based motion tracking. Behav. Res. Methods 52, 723–740. doi: 10.3758/s13428-019-01271-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

R Core Team (2019). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

Google Scholar

Ramseyer, F. T. (2020). Motion energy analysis (MEA): a primer on the assessment of motion from video. J. Counsel. Psychol. 67, 536–549. doi: 10.1037/cou0000407

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. Boston, MA: RStudio, PBC.

Google Scholar

Schulder, M., and Hanke, T. (2019). OpenPose in the Public DGS Corpus. Hamburg: University of Hamburg. doi: 10.25592/UHHFDM.842

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trettenbrein, P. C., Papitto, G., Friederici, A. D., and Zaccarella, E. (2021). Functional neuroanatomy of language without speech: an ALE meta–analysis of sign language. Hum. Brain Mapp. 42, 699–712. doi: 10.1002/hbm.25254

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trettenbrein, P. C., Pendzich, N.-K., Cramer, J.-M., Steinbach, M., and Zaccarella, E. (in press). Psycholinguistic norms for more than 300 lexical signs in German Sign Language (DGS). Behav. Res. Methods. In press. doi: 10.3758/s13428-020-01524-y

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Trujillo, J. P., Vaitonyte, J., Simanova, I., and Özyürek, A. (2019). Toward the markerless and automatic analysis of kinematic features: a toolkit for gesture and movement research. Behav. Res. Methods 51, 769–777. doi: 10.3758/s13428-018-1086-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wickham, H. (2016). ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Google Scholar

Zhang, Z. (2012). Microsoft Kinect Sensor and Its Effect. IEEE Multimedia 19, 4–10. doi: 10.1109/MMUL.2012.24

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar