Character can be defined as self-aware knowledge that helps the individual to set goals, values, and ethical principles (Cloninger, 2004). This meta-cognitive dimension of human personality involves “Theory of Mind,” and is positively related to measures of well-being, mental health, and constructive behavior patterns. Research from at least three different fields, cultural (Shweder et al., 1997), personality (Cloninger, 2004), and social psychology (Abele and Wojciszke, 2007) suggest that character can be organized along three broad principles: agency, which is related to the autonomy and the fulfillment and enhancement of the self; communion, which is related to engagement in the protection and relations to others such as families, companies or nations; and spirituality, which is related to the human ability to transcend the self and find and interconnection with all life and appreciation of the whole world around us (Haidt, 2006; Cloninger, 2013).
Using the Temperament and Character Inventory (Cloninger et al., 1993) researchers have found that Self-directedness (i.e., agency), Cooperativeness (i.e., communion), and Self-transcendence (i.e., Spirituality) are associated to high levels of happiness, psychological well-being, and less violent behavior (Garcia et al., 2013, 2015; Nima and Garcia, 2015; Mousavi et al., 2015). Moreover, low Self-directedness and Cooperativeness is recurrent among individuals with all types of mental health problems, such as, depression, schizophrenia, anxiety disorder, autism spectrum disorders, attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder, and etcetera. Self-transcendence, in coherence with Self-directedness and Cooperativeness, guides the individual to seek self-realization in harmony with others and nature in the changing world (Cloninger, 2013). Seeing character as self-awareness of the self in three dimensions has also been associated to human responsibility and empowerment (Nima et al., 2012; Schütz et al., 2013a,b; Cloninger and Garcia, 2015).
In this Research Topic researchers offer their perspective on character, responsibility, and well-being. Ruch and his colleagues, using other measures for character, offer a series of articles ranging from life satisfaction among religious people (Berthold and Ruch, 2014) to good character in school (Wagner and Ruch, 2015). Abele develops the idea of how communal values need to be pursued in agentic ways (Abele, 2014), while Garcia and his colleagues give an insight into the possible use of character-centered teams at work places (e.g., Garcia et al., 2014a) and also its etiology in adolescence (Garcia et al., 2014b). Continuing this line, Jeppsson (2014) gives a philosophical perspective on responsibility in the field of criminal justice. Finally, Moreira et al. (2015) show the importance of character and its relation to well-being during adolescence, while Nilsson (2014) gives a critical opinion of the need of introducing the perspective of worldview when studying the association between personality and well-being.
With this range of different takes on the interactions between character, responsibility and well-being we hope to give a new perspective on the investigation of personality's role on human health and well-being.
Statements
Acknowledgments
This Research Topic was funded with support from AFA Insurance (Dnr. 130345) and the Bliwa Stiftelsen. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of any of the manuscripts.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
1
AbeleA. E. (2014). Pursuit of communal values in an agentic manner: a way to happiness?Front. Psychol.5:1320. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01320
2
AbeleA. E.WojciszkeB. (2007). Agency and communion from the perspective of self versus others. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93, 751–763. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.5.751
3
BertholdA.RuchW. (2014). Satisfaction with life and character strengths of non-religious and religious people: it's practicing one's religion that makes the difference. Front. Psychol. 5:876. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00876
4
CloningerC. R. (2004). Feeling Good: The Science of Well-being. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5
CloningerC. R. (2013). What makes people healthy, happy, and fulfilled in the face of current world challenges?Mens Sana Monogr. 1, 16–24. 10.4103/0973-1229.109288
6
CloningerC. R.GarciaD. (2015). The heritability and development of positive affect and emotionality, in Genetics of Psychological Well-Being - The Role of Heritability and Genetics in Positive Psychology, ed PluessM. (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 97–113.
7
CloningerC. R.SvrakicD. M.PrzybeckT. R. (1993). A Psychobiological model of temperament and character. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry50, 975–989.
8
GarciaD.GhiabiB.RosenbergP.NimaA. A.ArcherT. (2015). Differences between affective profiles in temperament and character in salvadorians: the self-fulfilling experience as a function of agentic (Self-directedness) and communal (Cooperativeness) values. Int. J. Happiness Dev.2, 22–37. 10.1504/IJHD.2015.067592
9
GarciaD.LindskärE.ArcherT. (2014a). To schedule or not to schedule? Agentic and cooperative teams at call centers. Front. Psychol. 5:999. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00999
10
GarciaD.NimaA. A.ArcherT. (2013). International note: temperament and character's relationship to subjective well-being in salvadorian adolescents and young adults. J. Adolesc.36, 1115–1119. 10.1016/j.adolescence.2013.08.018
11
GarciaD.StrågeA.LundströmS.RadovicS.BrändströmS.RåstamM.et al. (2014b). Responsibility and cooperativeness are constrained, not determined. Front. Psychol. 5:308. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00308
12
HaidtJ. (2006). The Happiness Hypothesis: Finding Modern Truth in Ancient Wisdom. New York, NY: Basic Books.
13
JeppssonS. M. I. (2014). Responsibility problems for criminal justice. Front. Psychol. 5:821. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00821
14
MoreiraP. A. S.CloningerC. R.DinisL.SáL.OliveiraJ. T.DiasA.et al. (2015). Personality and well-being in adolescents. Front. Psychol. 5:1494. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01494
15
MousaviF.RozsaS.NilssonT.ArcherT.AnckarsäterH.GarciaD. (2015). Persistence, not self-directedness, cooperativeness or self-transcendence, is related to twins' cognitive abilities. (In press).
16
NilssonA. (2014). A non-reductive science of personality, character, and well-being must take the person's worldview into account. Front. Psychol. 5:961. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00961
17
NimaA. A.ArcherT.GarciaD. (2012). Adolescents' happiness-increasing strategies, temperament, and character: mediation models on subjective well-being. Health4, 802–810. 10.4236/health.2012.410124
18
NimaA. A.GarciaD. (2015). Factor structure of the Happiness-Increasing Strategies Scales (H-ISS): activities and coping strategies in relation to positive and negative affect. PeerJ3:e1059. 10.7717/peerj.1059
19
SchützE.ArcherT.GarciaD. (2013a). Character profiles and adolescents' self-reported affect. Pers. Individ. Diff.54, 841–844. 10.1016/j.paid.2012.12.020
20
SchützE.SailerU.NimaA.RosenbergP.Andersson ArnténA.-C.ArcherT.et al. (2013b). The affective profiles in the USA: happiness, depression, life satisfaction, and happiness- increasing strategies. Peer J.1:e156. 10.7717/peerj.156
21
ShwederR. A.MuchN. C.MahapatraM.ParkL. (1997). The ‘Big Three’ of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the ‘Big Three’ explanations of suffering, in Morality and Health, eds BrandtM.RozinP. (New York, NY: Routledge), 119–172.
22
WagnerL.RuchW. (2015). Good character at school: positive classroom behavior mediates the link between character strengths and school achievement. Front. Psychol. 6:610. 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00610
Summary
Keywords
character, personality, well-being, responsibility, agency, communion, spirituality
Citation
Garcia D, Andersson Arntén A-C and Archer T (2015) Editorial: Character, responsibility, and well-being: influences on mental health and constructive behavior patterns. Front. Psychol. 6:1079. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01079
Received
21 June 2015
Accepted
13 July 2015
Published
29 July 2015
Volume
6 - 2015
Edited and reviewed by
Marcel Zentner, University of Innsbruck, Austria
Copyright
© 2015 Garcia, Andersson Arntén and Archer.
This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Danilo Garcia, danilo.garcia@icloud.com
This article was submitted to Personality and Social Psychology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Psychology
Disclaimer
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.