Søren Kyllingsbæk*
Signe Vangkilde
Claus Bundesen- Department of Psychology, Center for Visual Cognition, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
The Neural Theory of Visual Attention of Bundesen et al. (2005) was proposed as a neural interpretation of Bundesen's (1990) theory of visual attention (TVA). In NTVA, visual attention operates via two mechanisms: by dynamic remapping of receptive fields of cortical cells such that more cells are devoted to behaviorally important objects than to less important ones (filtering) and by multiplicative scaling of the level of activation in cells coding for particular features (pigeonholing). NTVA accounts for a wide range of known attentional effects in human performance and a wide range of effects observed in firing rates of single cells in the primate visual system and thus provides a mathematical framework to unify the two fields of research.
In this Research Topic of Frontiers in Psychology, a host of new empirical findings from studies employing a theoretical and methodological framework based on NTVA are presented and discussed. The presented articles relate to the cognitive, neuropsychological, and neurocomputational levels of contemporary attention research and employ a variety of methods including behavioral testing, neuroimaging, and computational modeling.
In the first article of the Research Topic, Habekost (2015) offers a review of clinical TVA-based studies, in which the theoretical framework of TVA and NTVA is presented and discussed in relation to its clinical use. The review is followed by an article by Bogon et al. (2014), who present a TVA-based assessment of visual attention functions in developmental dyslexia. Following this, two papers on TVA-based measures of age-related effects and white matter brain microstructures are presented by Espeseth et al. (2014) and Wilms and Nielsen (2014). The fifth paper, by Nielsen and Wilms (2015), is also related to aging, but uses confirmatory factor analyses in Structural Equation Modeling in combination with TVA-based modeling. Next Bullock and Giesbrecht (2014) explore how acute exercise and aerobic fitness may influence selective attention during visual search. This paper is followed by a TVA-based study by Poth et al. (2014) combining a prospective memory task with traditional whole and partial report paradigms, thus studying effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Then Kyllingsbæk et al. (2014) present a study on automatic attraction of visual attention to supraletter features. In the final paper, Tsotsos and Kruijne (2014) propose an extension of their Selective Tuning model of attention, in which executive control over visual attention is implemented by Cognitive Programs. In the future, NTVA might also be extended with Cognitive Programs.
This collection of articles reflects the strong, continued interest in using a TVA-based framework for investigating and understanding visual attention in both healthy participants and patient groups, and the articles also provide important examples of how this may be done. If the reader should wish to delve into the latest theoretical developments of TVA and NTVA complementing the articles presented here, we further recommend the recent papers by Bundesen et al. (2014, 2015).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
References
Bogon, J., Finke, K., and Stenneken, P. (2014). TVA-based assessment of visual attentional functions in developmental dyslexia. Front. Psychol. 5:1172. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01172
Bullock, T., and Giesbrecht, B. (2014). Acute exercise and aerobic fitness influence selective attention during visual search. Front. Psychol. 5:1290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01290
Bundesen, C., Habekost, T., and Kyllingsbæ, S. (2005). A neural theory of visual attention: bridging cognition and neurophysiology. Psychol. Rev. 112, 291–328. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.112.2.291
Bundesen, C., Vangkilde, S., and Habekost, T. (2015). Components of visual bias: a multiplicative hypothesis. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1339, 116–124. doi: 10.1111/nyas.12665
Bundesen, C., Vangkilde, S., and Petersen, A. (2014). Recent developments in a computational theory of visual attention (TVA). Vision Res. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.11.005. [Epub ahead of print].
Espeseth, T., Vangkilde, S. A., Petersen, A., Dyrholm, M., and Westlye, L. T. (2014). TVA–based assessment of attentional capacities–associations with age and indices of brain white matter microstructure. Front. Psychol. 5:1177. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01177
Habekost, T. (2015). Clinical TVA-based studies: a general review. Front. Psychol. 6:290. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00290
Kyllingsbæ, S. Van Lommel, S., Sørensen, T. A., Bundesen, C. (2014). Automatic attraction of visual attention by supraletter features of former target strings. Front. Psychol. 5:1383. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01383
Nielsen, S., and Wilms, I. L. (2015). Cognitive aging on latent constructs for visual processing capacity: a novel structural equation modeling framework with causal assumptions based on a theory of visual attention. Front. Psychol. 5:1596. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01596
Poth, C. H., Petersen, A., Bundesen, C., and Schneider, W. X. (2014). Effects of monitoring for visual events on distinct components of attention. Front. Psychol. 5:930. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00930
Tsotsos, J. K., and Kruijne, W. (2014). Cognitive programs: software for attention's executive. Front. Psychol. 5:1260. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01260
Keywords: neural, visual, attention, computational, model
Citation: Kyllingsbæk S, Vangkilde S and Bundesen C (2015) Editorial: Theories of visual attention—linking cognition, neuropsychology, and neurophysiology. Front. Psychol. 6:767. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00767
Received: 06 May 2015; Accepted: 22 May 2015;
Published: 12 June 2015.
Edited and reviewed by: Bernhard Hommel, Leiden University, Netherlands
Copyright © 2015 Kyllingsbæk, Vangkilde and Bundesen. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Søren Kyllingsbæk, sk@psy.ku.dk