Roser Sala-Llonch- Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Healthy aging (HA) is associated with certain declines in cognitive functions, even in individuals that are free of any process of degenerative illness. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has been widely used in order to link this age-related cognitive decline with patterns of altered brain function. A consistent finding in the fMRI literature is that healthy old adults present higher activity levels in some brain regions during the performance of cognitive tasks. This finding is usually interpreted as a compensatory mechanism. More recent approaches have focused on the study of functional connectivity, mainly derived from resting state fMRI, and have concluded that the higher levels of activity coexist with disrupted connectivity. In this review, we aim to provide a state-of-the-art description of the usefulness and the interpretations of functional brain connectivity in the context of HA. We first give a background that includes some basic aspects and methodological issues regarding functional connectivity. We summarize the main findings and the cognitive models that have been derived from task-activity studies, and we then review the findings provided by resting-state functional connectivity in HA. Finally, we suggest some future directions in this field of research. A common finding of the studies included is that older subjects present reduced functional connectivity compared to young adults. This reduced connectivity affects the main brain networks and explains age-related cognitive alterations. Remarkably, the default mode network appears as a highly compromised system in HA. Overall, the scenario given by both activity and connectivity studies also suggests that the trajectory of changes during task may differ from those observed during resting-state. We propose that the use of complex modeling approaches studying effective connectivity may help to understand context-dependent functional reorganizations in the aging process.
Introduction
For many years, studies of human brain function typically associated specific cognitive domains to discrete brain anatomical structures. The evidences of brain-behavior relationships mainly emerged from studies on the consequences of focal lesions on the loss of specific cognitive functions. More recently, and mostly thanks to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the neuroscientific community has moved to the idea that the majority of functions are supported by coordinated activity between distinct, separated brain regions, so that the brain works in networks. These ideas have lead to the definition of Brain Connectivity (Catani et al., 2013; Sporns, 2013b), and Connectomics (Smith et al., 2013).
Brain connectivity refers to patterns of links connecting distinct units within the nervous system. It can be studied at different scales, and therefore, units or nodes can be defined as individual neurons, neural populations, or segregated brain regions, described by anatomical or functional landmarks. Recent advances in “in vivo” neuroimaging techniques allow the measurement of connectomics in a non-invasive way (Behrens and Sporns, 2012). In addition, the progress made on both neuroscience and computational sciences has motivated new approaches for studying brain structure and function from a complex systems perspective (Sporns, 2013a). These current trends have suggested that connectivity-based methods may provide good tools in order to understand brain functioning in healthy subjects, as well as to study changes during lifespan, or during the timecourse of neurodegenerative diseases.
In general terms, in neuroimaging, human brain connectivity can be studied at the structural and functional levels. By one hand, brain structural connectivity refers to the presence of fiber tracts directly connecting different brain regions (Basser et al., 1994). The use of Diffusion MRI allows investigating structural connections in the brain’s white matter by estimating the directionality of white matter fibers. On the other hand, brain functional connectivity refers to the temporal synchrony of brain activity at different regions, and it can be measured using functional MRI (fMRI).
The focus of the present review is functional connectivity in healthy aging (HA), and therefore, the results of structural connectivity studies will not be included. In this regard, it should be mentioned that the relationship between structural and functional connectivity is not always straightforward. It has been suggested that whereas functional connectivity depends on structural connectivity, structural connectivity is not sufficient to predict functional connectivity patterns (Friston, 2011). This statement should be understood under the idea that a single brain structure may support a wide variety of functions, and that functional networks usually have context-dependent or time-dependent characteristics (Park and Friston, 2013).
Furthermore, within the general term of functional connectivity, it is possible to differentiate between functional and effective connectivity. Functional connectivity aims to describe statistical dependence between measurements of neuronal activity, whereas effective connectivity refers to more complex approaches that measure the causal influence of one neural system over another. Effective connectivity is highly dependent on the context and the system dynamics, and its derived methods usually search for directionality and information flow (Friston, 2011). Here, we will first review the main findings as regards functional connectivity in aging and we will then discuss how the new approaches focused on effective connectivity may help understanding functional changes in the aging brain. In Table 1, we provide a glossary of the main terms related with connectivity within the field of neuroimaging.
Table 1. T2* indicates T2 star MRI sequence.
Methods for the Study of Functional Connectivity with MRI
Functional magnetic resonance imaging allows measuring changes in blood-oxygen-dependent (BOLD) signal in the brain across time. In its more traditional application, task-fMRI has been used to identify areas of increased or decreased neuronal activity during the performance of a task (Logothetis et al., 2001; Logothetis, 2003; Raichle and Mintun, 2006).
Another popular type of fMRI is the so-called resting-state fMRI (rs-fMRI), which refers to the sequential acquisition of fMRI scans, of duration typically between 5 and 10 min. During this time, subjects are asked to lie down, not to fall asleep and not to think in anything particular. The potential of rs-fMRI has been used to identify temporal coherences between spontaneous fluctuations that occur during rest, measured as low-frequency oscillations of the BOLD signal (Biswal et al., 1995).
During the last years, the use of rs-fMRI to study functional connectivity has increased massively and has revealed meaningful low frequency BOLD fluctuations that are correlated across distant brain regions, allowing the study of what has been called resting state functional connectivity (RSFC). Although, the origin and interpretation of these spontaneous fluctuations are still under debate (Schölvinck et al., 2010), RSFC seems to be highly informative about both brain architecture and brain organization, and it has a high variability in humans, probably reflecting behavioral inter-individual differences (Fox et al., 2007).
The analysis of rs-fMRI connectivity covers an elevated number of methodological approaches, and this number increases day-to-day thanks to technical advances and ongoing inter-disciplinary research. Basically, it is possible to differentiate between three main methodologies: seed-based connectivity analysis, independent component analysis (ICA), and whole-brain approaches using graph-theory.
Seed-based Connectivity
This method consists on identifying whole-brain, voxel-wise connectivity maps of areas showing correlated activity with a seed, which is a delimitated brain region (a voxel or a group of voxels) defined a priori with data from previous analyses, from the literature or from an atlas. Although seed-based correlation methods usually have an elevated number of confounds and they are highly dependent on the seed definition and the preprocessing applied to the data, they still represent the best approach to answer directly some questions related to connectivity. The use of these methods is the best option to find, for example, correlation patterns from a certain region when there is a strong hypothesis previously formulated, providing a straightforward interpretability (Cole et al., 2010).
Independent Component Analysis
Independent component analysis is used to find spatio-temporal patterns of synchronized brain activity. It decomposes the data into a set of independent components (IC), where each IC is formed by a spatial map and a timeseries and is independent from the other components (Beckmann and Smith, 2004). In comparison with seed-based correlation, one of its advantages is that it does not require the specification of any a priori seeds or hypothesis. Thus it is very useful for exploratory analysis. In addition, ICA appears as a good approach to identify signals of no-interest, such as artifacts, head motion, physiological noise or CSF-related signals, which can be then easily removed from the original fMRI data (Griffanti et al., 2014).
Graph-theory Approaches
These kind of studies aim to investigate the overall brain connectivity by describing the brain as a single interconnected network (Bullmore and Sporns, 2009). They belong to the set of higher-level models used to evaluate functional connectivity in a more integrative way than the two methods described above. Graph-theory studies require, in general, a first stage in order to parcellate the brain into a set of regions or nodes. Then, in a second stage, one would find the relationships between all possible node pairs, defining a “big” whole-brain network. Once the whole-brain network is defined, it can be studied at different levels of complexity or specificity. For example, it is possible to obtain connectivity characteristics at regional level, and it is possible to obtain parameters reflecting whole-brain organization, including efficiency, integration or segregation (Rubinov and Sporns, 2010). Furthermore, using measures of nodal connectivity or centrality it has been possible to define cortical hubs as a key-connected brain regions, that have an special role in controlling connectivity paths across the whole brain (Buckner et al., 2009; Cole et al., 2010; Power et al., 2013).
Network Discovery in Healthy Subjects
There is an outstanding interest in understanding functional brain organization in normal or healthy brains. It appears as an essential need in order to further define neuropsychological correlates and potential clinical biomarkers for neurodegenerative diseases, giving that the majority of these diseases have been described as disconnection syndromes (Geshwing and Kaplan, 1962; O’Sullivan et al., 2001; Seeley et al., 2009). In addition, it brings new insight to the design of interventional studies and to track brain changes longitudinally.
The use of rs-fMRI to study functional connectivity has allowed the identification of a reduced set of networks or connectivity patterns named resting state networks (RSNs). These networks are commonly identified across subjects (Damoiseaux et al., 2006), and have shown high reproducibility rates (Guo et al., 2012). In addition, RSNs have been associated with networks of brain functions (Sadaghiani and Kleinschmidt, 2013).
The most-studied RSNs is the default mode network (DMN), which has the specific property of being deactivated during the performance of goal-directed tasks and shows high levels of activity at rest. It was first identified as a set of regions commonly activated during passive compared with active conditions, using positron emission tomography (PET; Shulman et al., 1997; Raichle et al., 2001) and task-fMRI (Gusnard and Raichle, 2001). The DMN was further identified in a series of resting-state functional connectivity studies (Greicius et al., 2003; Fox et al., 2005; Fransson, 2005; Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Vincent et al., 2006). By gathering together studies of task-induced deactivations and functional connectivity analyses, Buckner et al. (2008) defined the core regions associated with the brain’s default network: the ventral/dorsal medial prefrontal cortex (PFC), the posterior cingulate and retrosplenial cortex, the inferior parietal lobule and the hippocampal formation (including entorhinal cortex and parahippocampal cortex).
Besides the DMN, other networks of intrinsic brain connectivity have been consistently described in healthy population. Different parcellations can be derived from resting-state functional connectivity data. For example, by using resting state data from 1000 subjects, Yeo et al. (2011), divided the human cortex into 7 and 17 networks of functionally coupled regions, with hierarchical relationship between the two parcellation schemes. Other studies have focused on the similarity between resting-state connectivity patterns, and task-based functional networks. In this regard, several studies agree in a set of 10 RSNs, covering the full repertory of task-related brain activation patterns (Fox et al., 2005; Damoiseaux et al., 2006; Smith et al., 2009). These findings indicate that the human brain has a network-based organization even at rest. In this regard, Smith et al. (2009) used ICA on rs-fMRI data and compared the components with task-patterns averaged from the BrainMap database (Laird et al., 2005) which assembled results from more than 7000 task-fMRI experiments. They found that the patterns of RSFC could be easily associated with patterns of task-related co-activations from a wide range of cognitive domains. The spatial maps of the 10 most commonly defined networks are illustrated in Figure 1.
Figure 1. Spatial maps of the main RSNs. Paterns are obtained using ICA with a group of healthy young subjects. Adapted from Palacios et al. (2013). (A) Visual medial network, (B) Visual occipital network, (C) Visual lateral network, (D) Default mode network, (E) Cerebellum, (F) Sensorimotor network, (G) Salience network, (H) Auditory network, (I) Right fronto-parietal network, and (J) Left fronto-parietal.
Apart from the studies that have used ICA to describe the main RSNs, other researchers have focused on whole-brain approaches to investigate patterns of RSFC in healthy brains. For example, Crossley et al. (2013) used graph-theory to define a network from rs-fMRI, and they compared this network with a network of task-co-activation patterns obtained from the BrainMap Database (Laird et al., 2005). They described a brain structure based on functional connectivity patterns that showed modular organization and which was very similar between task and rest. Concretely, they defined four modules that were associated with different functions: the occipital module (perception), the central and sensorimotor module (action), the frontoparietal module (executive functions) and the DMN (emotion). The authors concluded that there is a well-defined network organization in the brain that is equally evidenced at rest and during task performance. In another study, Cole et al. (2014) studied connectivity patterns by creating whole-brain networks from data obtained at rest and while subjects performed a variety of cognitive tasks. They defined an intrinsic network structure obtained from rs-fMRI, which was highly dominant in the resting brain and even during the performance of a task. Interestingly, they also found that this network structure is slightly modulated by task-evoked connectivity changes that were both task-general and task-specific.
FMRI in Healthy Aging
From the behavioral point of view, it is known that some adults are able to maintain their cognitive capabilities at high levels, in contrast with other persons who show clear cognitive declines with advancing age. It has been hypothesized that this variability depends on neurofunctional resources. However, the exact mechanisms that lead to such wide differences are still unclear (Park and Reuter-Lorenz, 2009).
The use of task-fMRI in aging has revealed a complex pattern of brain activity changes, which is characterized by both, decreases and increases in old subjects compared to young subjects (Grady, 2012). In some cases, the diversity of findings depends on many variables, such as the cognitive tests used and their level of difficulty (Grady et al., 2006). Nonetheless, there is a relative consensus that there is an age-related increase of brain activity in the (PFC; Turner and Spreng, 2012), while the findings as regards reduced activation are localized more heterogeneously in the brain.
In this part, we will review some of these main theories that have appeared in the attempt to explain the trajectories of brain changes and their relationship with cognition. It is important to note that whereas earlier or “more classical” views aimed to provide meaningful interpretations of a variety of isolated phenomena, such as the increased or the decreased regional brain activity in old compared with young subjects, more recent theories aim to provide a global, integrative interpretation of brain changes.
Classical Theories Derived from Task-fMRI Studies
In general, regional hyperactivation has been interpreted as compensation (or an attempt to compensate), whereas a failure to activate or reduced activation has been typically related with cognitive deficits associated with aging. Two main hypotheses were proposed to explain the nature of these age-related activity changes: the dedifferentiation hypothesis and the compensation hypothesis.
By one hand, the term dedifferentiation is described as the loss of functional specificity in the brain regions that are engaged during the performance of a task (Park et al., 2004; Rajah and D’Esposito, 2005). In neurobiological terms, it has been suggested that this pattern of changes is caused by a chain of processes which starts from a decline in the dopaminergic neuromodulation that produces increases in neural noise, leading to less distinctive cortical representations (Li et al., 2001).
On the other hand, the compensation hypothesis in aging states that older adults are able to recruit higher levels of activity in comparison to young subjects in some brain areas to compensate for functional deficits located somewhere else in the brain. This increased activity is often seen in frontal regions (Park and Reuter-Lorenz, 2009; Turner and Spreng, 2012). The first studies suggesting compensatory mechanisms appeared early in the literature and used PET during the performance of visuospatial (Grady et al., 1994) or episodic memory (Cabeza et al., 1997; Madden et al., 1999) tasks. Later on, these findings were replicated with fMRI (Cabeza et al., 2002).
Furthermore, the different patterns of spatial localization of the compensation-related mechanisms leaded to the formulation of three main cognitive models:
(1) The Hemispheric Asymmetry Reduction in Old Adults (HAROLD) model (Cabeza, 2002) states that older adults use a less lateralized pattern of activity in comparison with young subjects during the performance of a task, which is compensatory. This reduced lateralization was mainly observed in frontal areas, during the performance of episodic memory and working memory tasks (Cabeza et al., 2002; Cabeza, 2004).
(2) The Compensation-Related Utilization of Neural Circuits Hypothesis (CRUNCH; Reuter-Lorenz and Cappell, 2008; Schneider-Garces et al., 2010) defends that, in older adults, higher neural recruitment occurs in cognitive levels that typically imply lower brain activity in younger subjects. This effect has been observed in the PFC and also in the parietal cortex, concretely in the precuneus and posterior cingulate and both in episodic memory tasks (Spaniol and Grady, 2012) and in working memory tasks (Mattay et al., 2006; Reuter-Lorenz and Cappell, 2008).
(3) The Posterior-Anterior Shift with Aging (PASA) was experimentally proved by Davis et al., who used two different tasks, visuoperceptive and episodic retrieval and found that older subjects had deficits to activate regions in the posterior midline cortex accompanied with increased activity in medial frontal cortex (Davis et al., 2008).
Global, Integrative Theories of Cognitive Function and the Aging Brain
With the unique information provided by fMRI activity and with the classification described above, which presents the models as being exclusive between them, it seems difficult to discern which of the proposed model better explains the age-related changes in cognition.
More recently, an important contribution to the interpretation of these models has been given by multimodal studies that integrate structural and functional brain measures. For example, in some cases, it has been reported that reduced activity in task-related regions correlated positively with brain atrophy in the same brain regions (Brassen et al., 2009; Rajah et al., 2011), whereas other studies have reported correlations between the increased functional activity in the PFC and the preserved structural integrity of the entorhinal cortex and other medial temporal lobe (MTL) structures (Rosen et al., 2005; Braskie et al., 2009). Given this, some authors have theorized that while increased activity in the PFC may be triggered by the atrophy of frontal GM, which is a commonly reported feature in aging, the compensatory role of this increased activity may depend on the preserved structural integrity of distal regions mainly in the MTL (Maillet and Rajah, 2013).
Therefore, and mainly thanks to the new advances in neuroimaging techniques, it has been suggested that cognitive function in aging is a result of a sum of processes, including structural and functional brain measures as well as external factors. In this regard, the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition (STAC) states that there is a process in the aging brain, called compensatory scaffolding that entails the engagement of additional neural resources (in terms of network reorganization) providing a support to preserve cognitive function in the face of structural and functional decline (Park and Reuter-Lorenz, 2009). This theory has been recently revised in order to include the more recent findings on the field, obtained mainly from longitudinal and interventional studies. As a result, the STAC-r is a conceptual model that extends the STAC by incorporating life-course influences that enhance, preserve, or compromise brain status, compensatory potential and cognitive function over time (Reuter-Lorenz and Park, 2014).
In a similar sense, Walhovd et al. (2014) proposed a system-vulnerability view of cognition in aging. According to them, the age-associated cognitive decline would be the result of a life-long accumulation of impact that alters brain function and structure in a multidimensional way, affecting a wide range of neuroimage markers such as structural integrity, functional activity and connectivity, glucose metabolism, or amyloid deposition. According to this view some particular brain systems such as the hippocampus and posteromedial regions would be particularly vulnerable to ageing effects, related to its central role as mechanisms subtending lifetime brain plasticity (Fjell et al., 2014).
Finally, a complementary hypothesis, also emerged from the results of longitudinal studies is the “brain maintenance,” which states that the lack of changes in brain structural and functional markers would allow some people to show little or no age-related cognitive decline. The conceptual idea of brain maintenance was motivated by the fact that increased functional activity in HA do not necessarily imply up-regulation of functional networks over time. Therefore, according to maintenance, the best predictors of successful performance in aging would be the minimization of chemical, structural and functional changes over time (Nyberg et al., 2012).
Connectivity-related Changes in Aging
Results from task-activation fMRI studies in aging are sometimes controversial and difficult to interpret. Therefore, more recently, studies on HA have also taken advantage from the advances as regards brain connectivity (Dennis and Thompson, 2014). Brain connectivity changes related with aging are thought to be useful in order to interpret functional reorganizations in the context of the models mentioned above of functional brain compensation and dedifferentiation.
Some evidences of task-related connectivity changes in aging are found in the working memory literature. Nagel et al. (2011) found load-related increases in PFC activity accompanied with decreases in the functional coupling between PFC and premotor cortex. Madden et al. (2010) studied task switching and found similar levels of brain activity between young an old groups, with lower functional connectivity in older subjects. Similarly, in episodic memory tasks, connectivity changes have been described (Daselaar et al., 2006; Dennis et al., 2008; Addis et al., 2010). Concretely, these studies reported reduced connectivity from the hippocampus and MTL to posterior and occipital regions together with increased connectivity from the same regions to frontal areas, such as the PFC. These results support the PASA model and indicate that functional connectivity changes follow similar patterns than those described with task-related activity.
In addition to task-fMRI studies, functional connectivity in aging has been primarily studied with rs-fMRI. Alterations of RSFC in aging include disconnection or dysfunction within some of the large-scale networks as well as alterations in whole-brain connectivity patterns. A summary of the most relevant studies in aging and functional connectivity using rs-fMRI, including those that reported correlations with cognitive changes, is given in Table 2.
Table 2. Summary of functional connectivity studies in healthy aging.
It is noteworthy that a great majority of articles have focused on the DMN. This fact can be explained because the DMN has been related to the functional and neurobiological changes underlying Alzheimer’s Disease (AD), specially at its first stages (Buckner et al., 2009), which is the most common neurodegenerative disease affecting aged population.
A common finding of the studies reviewed in Table 2 is the decreased connectivity within the nodes of some of the main RSNs, including the DMN and the Salience and executive/attention networks. This result has been observed using ICA (Damoiseaux et al., 2008; Jones et al., 2011; Onoda et al., 2012), and also using seed-based connectivity (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Wang et al., 2010) and graph-theory or whole-brain approaches (Tomasi and Volkow, 2012; Betzel et al., 2014; Geerligs et al., 2014; Song et al., 2014). Disrupted connectivity in aging persists even controlling for brain atrophy or age-related structural changes (Ferreira and Busatto, 2013). Connectivity decreases directly imply reductions in how information is transferred between different brain regions. In this regard, a commonly result is the disconnection between the anterior and the posterior nodes of the DMN, which correlates with age-related cognitive decline (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Damoiseaux et al., 2008), and with white-matter alterations (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007).
The results as regards somatosensory, motor and subcortical networks are not as consistent as with the DMN. Some studies have reported connectivity increases (Tomasi and Volkow, 2012; Song et al., 2014), no changes in connectivity (Geerligs et al., 2014) or non-linear changes (Betzel et al., 2014).
Connectivity changes have been further explored using higher-level analysis methods. Tomasi and Volkow (2012) found that long-range connectivity decreased with age whereas short-range connections were stronger. These results were interpreted under the hypothesis that some brain regions, with key roles in whole-brain connectivity, named hubs (Buckner et al., 2009; Crossley et al., 2013), could experiment strengthening of functional connectivity with their closest regions, leading to an increase in local connectivity (Ferreira and Busatto, 2013). In addition, another line of research refers to the study of functional connectivity within and between the main large-scale networks. In this regard, it has been described that the age-related decreases in connectivity between regions of a network are accompanied by increases in the connectivity of these network toward regions of other RSNs, affecting the overall functional connectivity architecture (Betzel et al., 2014; Geerligs et al., 2014).
Finally, few papers have reported relationships between connectivity and cognition. In some cases, connectivity changes have been related to executive and memory functions (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007; Damoiseaux et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2010; Onoda et al., 2012; Sala-Llonch et al., 2014). Decreased functional connectivity has been also correlated with decreased structural connectivity in aging (Andrews-Hanna et al., 2007).
Future Directions
Importantly, in the upcoming years, multi-centric international projects such as the Human Connectome Project (HCP, http://www.humanconnectome.org/) will represent an important contribution to understand human brain connectivity. The HCP consortium has recently presented a database for housing and disseminating publicy available human brain connectivity data (Hodge et al., in press). This database includes data from multiple MRI modalities, magnetoencephalography (MEG) data, as well as its associated cognitive and behavioral data. It currently includes data from young subjects, but additional related projects will focus on life-span trajectories of human brain connectivity. We believe that these initiatives will provide an excellent tool to test the cognitive models of the aging brain and to understand changes that are related to network reorganization processes.
It should be noted that all the studies mentioned in this review are based on the study of functional connectivity as the statistical dependence between timeseries. This definition of functional connectivity, as opposite to effective connectivity, does not allow inferring causality and it is less biologically meaningful. However, in general, functional connectivity analyses are more robust and faster to compute (Smith et al., 2013). In addition, they still represent the best and most used approach for rs-fMRI data.
On the other hand, these more complex network modeling approaches, related with effective connectivity, can measure directional and causal relationships between network nodes and they are thought to provide more biologically interpretable results (Friston, 2011). These methods were initially designed to study task-fMRI data, giving the fact that they refer to the study of how information flows among the regions of a network as a response to a specific stimulus. Several approaches have been proposed to estimate effective connectivity, including structural equation model (SEM; McLntosh and Gonzalez-Lima, 1994), granger causality analysis (GCA; Goebel et al., 2003), and dynamic causal modeling (DCM; Friston et al., 2003). Of the three, both SEM and GCA methods have shown many controversies as regards their applicability for fMRI data, and DCM seems the best approach for fMRI timeseries (Friston, 2011; Di and Biswal, 2014).
Only few studies have reported results as regards effective connectivity in aging (Addis et al., 2010; Waring et al., 2013). These studies have shown age-related modulations in networks involved in selective memory in emotional domains. For example, Waring et al. (2013) reported that older adults showed stronger connectivity during task within frontal regions and from frontal regions to MTL. Models of effective connectivity have been also applied in the context of neurodegenerative diseases, such as Alzheimer’s Disease (Rosenbaum et al., 2010; Jacobs et al., 2012) or Parkinson’s Disease (Trujillo et al., 2015).
We believe that the use of effective connectivity to study network models in aging can provide a more meaningful interpretation of the results reported so far both as regards patterns of brain activity and connectivity. For example, DCM has been used in healthy young samples to study context-dependent modulations within the fronto-parietal network (Dima et al., 2014; Harding et al., 2015). These studies described patterns reflecting the functional adaptability of different neural representations within a common system. From the set of studies included in the present review, we have concluded that increased activity during task coexists with decreased connectivity, mainly measured at rest, suggesting that age-related changes in the brain networks would have a strong context-related component. In addition, the PFC appeared as a core region related to compensatory mechanisms. Therefore, as an example, a potential application of effective connectivity models in old adults could address how functional signals from this area toward other structures is modified from resting-state acquisitions to task-related fMRI studies tapping on cognitive domains typically affected in ageing such as memory or executive functions.
However, although the use of such complex models seems promising, there are still several limitations as regards their applicability and their implementation that need to be solved. First, they are computationally sophisticated and not very robust. In addition, they were originally meant for task-fMRI data, and their adaptations for resting-state data are still on their early developments (Friston et al., 2014).
Conflict of Interest Statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Acknowledgments
This work has been supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (grantsPSI2012-38257, PSI2013-41293and personal grant to RS-L: BES2011-047053) and by the Generalitat de Catalunya (consolidated research group, 2014-SGR98).
References
Achard, S., and Bullmore, E. (2007). Efficiency and cost of economical brain functional networks. PLoS Comput. Biol. 3:e17. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.0030017
Addis, D. R., Leclerc, C. M., Muscatell, K. A., and Kensinger, E. A. (2010). There are age-related changes in neural connectivity during the encoding of positive, but not negative, information. Cortex 46, 425–433. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2009.04.011
Andrews-Hanna, J. R., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Lustig, C., Head, D., Raichle, M. E., et al. (2007). Disruption of large-scale brain systems in advanced aging. Neuron 56, 924–935. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.10.038
Basser, P. J., Mattiello, J., and LeBihan, D. (1994). Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J. Magn. Reson. B 103, 247–254.
Beckmann, C. F., and Smith, S. M. (2004). Probabilistic independent component analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 23, 137–152. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2003.822821
Behrens, T. E. J., and Sporns, O. (2012). Human connectomics. Curr. Opin. Neurobiol. 22, 144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2011.08.005
Betzel, R. F., Byrge, L., He, Y., Goñi, J., Zuo, X.-N., and Sporns, O. (2014). Changes in structural and functional connectivity among resting-state networks across the human lifespan. Neuroimage 102, 345–357. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.07.067
Biswal, B., Yetkin, F. Z., Haughton, V. M., and Hyde, J. S. (1995). Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo-planar MRI. Magn. Reson. Med. 34, 537–541.
Braskie, M. N., Small, G. W., and Bookheimer, S. Y. (2009). Entorhinal cortex structure and functional MRI response during an associative verbal memory task. Hum. Brain Mapp. 30, 3981–3992. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20823
Brassen, S., Büchel, C., Weber-Fahr, W., Lehmbeck, J. T., Sommer, T., and Braus, D. F. (2009). Structure-function interactions of correct retrieval in healthy elderly women. Neurobiol. Aging 30, 1147–1156. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.10.005
Buckner, R. L., Andrews-Hanna, J. R., and Schacter, D. L. (2008). The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 1–38. doi: 10.1196/annals.1440.011
Buckner, R. L., Sepulcre, J., Talukdar, T., Krienen, F. M., Liu, H., Hedden, T., et al. (2009). Cortical hubs revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity: mapping, assessment of stability, and relation to Alzheimer’s disease. J. Neurosci. 29, 1860–1873. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5062-08.2009
Bullmore, E., and Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 10, 186–198. doi: 10.1038/nrn2575
Cabeza, R. (2002). Hemispheric asymmetry reduction in older adults: the HAROLD model. Psychol. Aging 17, 85–100. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.17.1.85
Cabeza, R. (2004). Task-independent and task-specific age effects on brain activity during working memory, visual attention and episodic retrieval. Cereb. Cortex 14, 364–375. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhg133
Cabeza, R., Anderson, N. D., Locantore, J. K., and McIntosh, A. R. (2002). Aging gracefully: compensatory brain activity in high-performing older adults. Neuroimage 17, 1394–1402. doi: 10.1006/nimg.2002.1280
Cabeza, R., Grady, C. L., Nyberg, L., McIntosh, A. R., Tulving, E., Kapur, S., et al. (1997). Age-related differences in neural activity during memory encoding and retrieval: a positron emission tomography study. J. Neurosci. 17, 391–400.
Campbell, K. L., Grady, C. L., Ng, C., and Hasher, L. (2012). Age differences in the frontoparietal cognitive control network: implications for distractibility. Neuropsychologia 50, 2212–2223. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.05.025
Catani, M., Thiebaut de Schotten, M., Slater, D., and Dell’Acqua, F. (2013). Connectomic approaches before the connectome. Neuroimage 80, 2–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.05.109
Cole, D. M., Smith, S. M., and Beckmann, C. F. (2010). Advances and pitfalls in the analysis and interpretation of resting-state FMRI data. Front. Syst. Neurosci. 4:8. doi: 10.3389/fnsys.2010.00008
Cole, M. W., Bassett, D. S., Power, J. D., Braver, T. S., and Petersen, S. E. (2014). Intrinsic and task-evoked network architectures of the human brain. Neuron 83, 238–251. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.05.014
Crossley, N. A., Mechelli, A., Vértes, P. E., Winton-Brown, T. T., Patel, A. X., Ginestet, C. E., et al. (2013). Cognitive relevance of the community structure of the human brain functional coactivation network. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 110, 11583–11588. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1220826110
Damoiseaux, J. S., Beckmann, C. F., Arigita, E. J. S., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., et al. (2008). Reduced resting-state brain activity in the “default network” in normal aging. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1856–1864. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm207
Damoiseaux, J. S., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Barkhof, F., Scheltens, P., Stam, C. J., Smith, S. M., et al. (2006). Consistent resting-state networks across healthy subjects. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 103, 13848–13853. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601417103
Daselaar, S. M., Fleck, M. S., Dobbins, I. G., Madden, D. J., and Cabeza, R. (2006). Effects of healthy aging on hippocampal and rhinal memory functions: an event-related fMRI study. Cereb. Cortex 16, 1771–1782. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhj112
Davis, S. W., Dennis, N. A., Daselaar, S. M., Fleck, M. S., and Cabeza, R. (2008). Que PASA? The posterior-anterior shift in aging. Cereb. Cortex 18, 1201–1209. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm155
Dennis, E. L., and Thompson, P. M. (2014). Functional brain connectivity using fMRI in aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychol. Rev. 24, 49–62. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9249-6
Dennis, N. A., Hayes, S. M., Prince, S. E., Madden, D. J., Huettel, S. A., and Cabeza, R. (2008). Effects of aging on the neural correlates of successful item and source memory encoding. J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 34, 791–808. doi: 10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.791
Di, X., and Biswal, B. B. (2014). Identifying the default mode network structure using dynamic causal modeling on resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroimage 86, 53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.07.071
Dima, D., Jogia, J., and Frangou, S. (2014). Dynamic causal modeling of load-dependent modulation of effective connectivity within the verbal working memory network. Hum. Brain Mapp. 35, 3025–3035. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22382
Ferreira, L. K., and Busatto, G. F. (2013). Resting-state functional connectivity in normal brain aging. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 37, 384–400. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.01.017
Fjell, A. M., McEvoy, L., Holland, D., Dale, A. M., and Walhovd, K. B. (2014). What is normal in normal aging? Effects of aging, amyloid and Alzheimer’s disease on the cerebral cortex and the hippocampus. Prog. Neurobiol. 117, 20–40. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2014.02.004
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., Corbetta, M., Van Essen, D. C., and Raichle, M. E. (2005). The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 102, 9673–9678. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0504136102
Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L., and Raichle, M. E. (2007). Intrinsic fluctuations within cortical systems account for intertrial variability in human behavior. Neuron 56, 171–184. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2007.08.023
Fransson, P. (2005). Spontaneous low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: an fMRI investigation of the resting-state default mode of brain function hypothesis. Hum. Brain Mapp. 26, 15–29. doi: 10.1002/hbm.20113
Friston, K. J. (2011). Functional and effective connectivity: a review. Brain Connect. 1, 13–36. doi: 10.1089/brain.2011.0008
Friston, K. J., Harrison, L., and Penny, W. (2003). Dynamic causal modelling. Neuroimage 19, 1273–1302. doi: 10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00202-7
Friston, K. J., Kahan, J., Biswal, B., and Razi, A. (2014). A DCM for resting state fMRI. Neuroimage 94, 396–407. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.12.009
Geerligs, L., Renken, R. J., Saliasi, E., Maurits, N. M., and Lorist, M. M. (2014). A brain-wide study of age-related changes in functional connectivity. Cereb. Cortex 2, 1–13. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhu012
Geshwing, N., and Kaplan, E. (1962). A human cerebral deconnection syndrome. A preliminary report. Neurology 12, 675–685.
Goebel, R., Roebroeck, A., Kim, D.-S., and Formisano, E. (2003). Investigating directed cortical interactions in time-resolved fMRI data using vector autoregressive modeling and Granger causality mapping. Magn. Reson. Imaging 21, 1251–1261. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2003.08.026
Grady, C. (2012). The cognitive neuroscience of ageing. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 13, 491–505. doi: 10.1038/nrn3256
Grady, C. L., Maisog, J. M., Horwitz, B., Ungerleider, L. G., Mentis, M. J., Salerno, J. A., et al. (1994). Age-related changes in cortical blood flow activation during visual processing of faces and location. J. Neurosci. 14, 1450–1462.
Grady, C. L., Springer, M. V, Hongwanishkul, D., McIntosh, A. R., and Winocur, G. (2006). Age-related changes in brain activity across the adult lifespan. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 18, 227–241. doi: 10.1162/089892906775783705
Greicius, M. D., Krasnow, B., Reiss, A. L., and Menon, V. (2003). Functional connectivity in the resting brain: a network analysis of the default mode hypothesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 253–258. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0135058100
Griffanti, L., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Beckmann, C. F., Auerbach, E. J., Douaud, G., Sexton, C. E., et al. (2014). ICA-based artefact removal and accelerated fMRI acquisition for improved resting state network imaging. Neuroimage 95, 232–247. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.03.034
Guo, C. C., Kurth, F., Zhou, J., Mayer, E. A., Eickhoff, S. B., Kramer, J. H., et al. (2012). One-year test–retest reliability of intrinsic connectivity network fMRI in older adults. Neuroimage 61, 1471–1483. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.027
Gusnard, D. A., and Raichle, M. E. (2001). Searching for a baseline: functional imaging and the resting human brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2, 685–694. doi: 10.1038/35094500
Harding, I. H., Yücel, M., Harrison, B. J., Pantelis, C., and Breakspear, M. (2015). NeuroImage Effective connectivity within the frontoparietal control network differentiates cognitive control and working memory. Neuroimage 106, 144–153. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.11.039
Hodge, M. R., Horton, W., Brown, T., Herrick, R., Olsen, T., Hileman, M. E., et al. (in press). ConnectomeDB—sharing human brain connectivity data. Neuroimage doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.04.046 [Epub ahead of print].
Jacobs, H. I., Van Boxtel, M. P., Heinecke, A., Gronenschild, E. H., Backes, W. H., Ramakers, I. H., et al. (2012). Functional integration of parietal lobe activity in early Alzheimer disease. Neurology 78, 352–360. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318245287d
Jones, D. T., Machulda, M. M., Vemuri, P., McDade, E. M., Zeng, G., Senjem, M. L., et al. (2011). Age-related changes in the default mode network are more advanced in Alzheimer disease. Neurology 77, 1524–1531. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e318233b33d
Laird, A. R., Lancaster, J. L., and Fox, P. T. (2005). BrainMap: the social evolution of a human brain mapping database. Neuroinformatics 3, 65–78. doi: 10.1385/NI:3:1:065
Li, S. C., Lindenberger, U., and Sikström, S. (2001). Aging cognition: from neuromodulation to representation. Trends Cogn. Sci. 5, 479–486. doi: 10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01769-1
Logothetis, N. K. (2003). The underpinnings of the BOLD functional magnetic resonance imaging signal. J. Neurosci. 23, 3963–3971.
Logothetis, N. K., Pauls, J., Augath, M., Trinath, T., and Oeltermann, A. (2001). Neurophysiological investigation of the basis of the fMRI signal. Nature 412, 150–157. doi: 10.1038/35084005
Madden, D. J., Costello, M. C., Dennis, N. A., Davis, S. W., Shepler, A. M., Spaniol, J., et al. (2010). Adult age differences in functional connectivity during executive control. Neuroimage 52, 643–657. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.04.249
Madden, D. J., Gottlob, L. R., Denny, L. L., Turkington, T. G., Provenzale, J. M., Hawk, T. C., et al. (1999). Aging and recognition memory: changes in regional cerebral blood flow associated with components of reaction time distributions. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 11, 511–520.
Maillet, D., and Rajah, M. N. (2013). Association between prefrontal activity and volume change in prefrontal and medial temporal lobes in aging and dementia: a review. Ageing Res. Rev. 12, 479–489. doi: 10.1016/j.arr.2012.11.001
Mattay, V. S., Fera, F., Tessitore, A., Hariri, A. R., Berman, K. F., Das, S., et al. (2006). Neurophysiological correlates of age-related changes in working memory capacity. Neurosci. Lett. 392, 32–37. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2005.09.025
McLntosh, A. R., and Gonzalez-Lima, F. (1994). Structural equation modeling and its application to network analysis in functional brain imaging. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2, 2–22. doi: 10.1002/hbm.460020104
Meunier, D., Achard, S., Morcom, A., and Bullmore, E. (2009). Age-related changes in modular organization of human brain functional networks. Neuroimage 44, 715–723. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.09.062
Nagel, I. E., Preuschhof, C., Li, S.-C., Nyberg, L., Bäckman, L., Lindenberger, U., et al. (2011). Load modulation of BOLD response and connectivity predicts working memory performance in younger and older adults. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 23, 2030–2045. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2010.21560
Nyberg, L., Lövdén, M., Riklund, K., Lindenberger, U., and Bäckman, L. (2012). Memory aging and brain maintenance. Trends Cogn. Sci. 16, 292–305. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.005
O’Sullivan, M., Jones, D. K., Summers, P. E., Morris, R. G., Williams, S. C., and Markus, H. S. (2001). Evidence for cortical “disconnection” as a mechanism of age-related cognitive decline. Neurology 57, 632–638. doi: 10.1212/WNL.57.4.632
Onoda, K., Ishihara, M., and Yamaguchi, S. (2012). Decreased functional connectivity by aging is associated with cognitive decline. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 24, 2186–2198. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00269
Palacios, E. M., Sala-Llonch, R., Junque, C., Roig, T., Tormos, J. M., Bargallo, N., et al. (2013). Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging activity and connectivity and cognitive outcome in traumatic brain injury. JAMA Neurol. 70, 845–851. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.38
Park, D. C., Polk, T. A., Park, R., Minear, M., Savage, A., and Smith, M. R. (2004). Aging reduces neural specialization in ventral visual cortex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 101, 13091–13095. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0405148101
Park, D. C., and Reuter-Lorenz, P. (2009). The adaptive brain: aging and neurocognitive scaffolding. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 60, 173–196. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093656
Park, H.-J., and Friston, K. (2013). Structural and functional brain networks: from connections to cognition. Science 342, 1238411. doi: 10.1126/science.1238411
Power, J. D., Schlaggar, B. L., Lessov-Schlaggar, C. N., and Petersen, S. E. (2013). Evidence for hubs in human functional brain networks. Neuron 79, 798–813. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.035
Raichle, M. E., MacLeod, A. M., Snyder, A. Z., Powers, W. J., Gusnard, D. A., and Shulman, G. L. (2001). A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98, 676–682. doi: 10.1073/pnas.98.2.676
Raichle, M. E., and Mintun, M. A. (2006). Brain work and brain imaging. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 29, 449–476. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.29.051605.112819
Rajah, M. N., and D’Esposito, M. (2005). Region-specific changes in prefrontal function with age: a review of PET and fMRI studies on working and episodic memory. Brain 128, 1964–1983. doi: 10.1093/brain/awh608
Rajah, M. N., Languay, R., and Grady, C. L. (2011). Age-related changes in right middle frontal gyrus volume correlate with altered episodic retrieval activity. J. Neurosci. 31, 17941–17954. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1690-11.2011
Reuter-Lorenz, P., and Cappell, K. A. (2008). Neurocognitive aging and the compensation hypothesis. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 17, 177–182. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2008.00570.x
Reuter-Lorenz, P. A., and Park, D. C. (2014). How Does it STAC Up? revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition. Neuropsychol. Rev. 24, 355–370. doi: 10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
Rosen, A. C., Gabrieli, J. D. E., Stoub, T., Prull, M. W., O’Hara, R., Yesavage, J., et al. (2005). Relating medial temporal lobe volume to frontal fMRI activation for memory encoding in older adults. Cortex 41, 595–602. doi: 10.1016/S0010-9452(08)70199-0
Rosenbaum, R. S., Furey, M. L., Horwitz, B., and Grady, C. L. (2010). Altered connectivity among emotion-related brain regions during short-term memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 31, 780–786. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2008.06.002
Rubinov, M., and Sporns, O. (2010). Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52, 1059–1069. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.003
Sadaghiani, S., and Kleinschmidt, A. (2013). Functional interactions between intrinsic brain activity and behavior. Neuroimage 80, 379–386. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.04.100
Sala-Llonch, R., Junqué, C., Arenaza-Urquijo, E. M., Vidal-Piñeiro, D., Valls-Pedret, C., Palacios, E. M., et al. (2014). Changes in whole-brain functional networks and memory performance in aging. Neurobiol. Aging 35, 2193–2202. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2014.04.007
Schneider-Garces, N. J., Gordon, B. A., Brumback-Peltz, C. R., Shin, E., Lee, Y., Sutton, B. P., et al. (2010). Span, CRUNCH, and beyond: working memory capacity and the aging brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 22, 655–669. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2009.21230
Schölvinck, M. L., Maier, A., Ye, F. Q., Duyn, J. H., and Leopold, D. A. (2010). Neural basis of global resting-state fMRI activity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 107, 10238–10243. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0913110107
Seeley, W. W., Crawford, R. K., Zhou, J., Miller, B. L., and Greicius, M. D. (2009). Neurodegenerative diseases target large-scale human brain networks. Neuron 62, 42–52. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2009.03.024
Shulman, G. L., Fiez, J. A., Corbetta, M., Buckner, R. L., Miezin, F. M., Raichle, M. E., et al. (1997). Common blood flow changes across visual tasks: II. decreases in cerebral cortex. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 9, 648–663. doi: 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.648
Smith, S. M., Fox, P. T., Miller, K. L., Glahn, D. C., Fox, P. M., Mackay, C. E., et al. (2009). Correspondence of the brain’s functional architecture during activation and rest. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 106, 13040–1305. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0905267106
Smith, S. M., Vidaurre, D., Beckmann, C. F., Glasser, M. F., Jenkinson, M., Miller, K. L., et al. (2013). Functional connectomics from resting-state fMRI. Trends Cogn. Sci. 17, 666–682. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.09.016
Song, J., Birn, R., Boly, M., Meier, T. B., Nair, V. A., Meyerand, M. E., et al. (2014). Age-related reorganizational changes in modularity and functional connectivity of human brain networks. Brain Connect. 4, 662–676. doi: 10.1089/brain.2014.0286
Spaniol, J., and Grady, C. (2012). Aging and the neural correlates of source memory: over-recruitment and functional reorganization. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 425.e3–18. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.10.005
Sporns, O. (2013a). Structure and function of complex brain networks. Dialogues Clin. Neurosci. 15, 247–262.
Sporns, O. (2013b). The human connectome: origins and challenges. Neuroimage 80, 53–61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.03.023
Tomasi, D., and Volkow, N. D. (2012). Aging and functional brain networks. Mol. Psychiatry 17, 549–558. doi: 10.1038/mp.2011.81
Trujillo, J. P., Gerrits, N. J., Veltman, D. J., Berendse, H. W., Van Der Werf, Y. D., and van den Heuvel, O. A. (2015). Reduced neural connectivity but increased task-related activity during working memory in de novo parkinson patients. Hum. Brain Mapp. 36, 1554–1566. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22723
Turner, G. R., and Spreng, R. N. (2012). Executive functions and neurocognitive aging: dissociable patterns of brain activity. Neurobiol. Aging 33, 826.e1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2011.06.005
Vincent, J. L., Snyder, A. Z., Fox, M. D., Shannon, B. J., Andrews, J. R., Raichle, M. E., et al. (2006). Coherent spontaneous activity identifies a hippocampal-parietal memory network. J. Neurophysiol. 96, 3517–3531. doi: 10.1152/jn.00048.2006
Walhovd, K. B., Fjell, A. M., and Espeseth, T. (2014). Cognitive decline and brain pathology in aging–need for a dimensional, lifespan and systems vulnerability view. Scand. J. Psychol. 55, 244–254. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12120
Wang, L., Laviolette, P., O’Keefe, K., Putcha, D., Bakkour, A., Van Dijk, K. R. A., et al. (2010). Intrinsic connectivity between the hippocampus and posteromedial cortex predicts memory performance in cognitively intact older individuals. Neuroimage 51, 910–917. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.02.046
Yeo, B. T. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., et al. (2011). The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J. Neurophysiol. 106, 1125–1165. doi: 10.1152/jn.00338.2011
Waring, J. D., Addis, D. R., and Kensinger, E. A. (2013). Effects of aging on neural connectivity underlying selective memory for emotional scenes. Neurobiol. Aging 34, 451–467. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2012.03.011
Keywords: fMRI, brain networks, aging, memory, connectivity, independent component analysis, default mode network
Citation: Sala-Llonch R, Bartrés-Faz D and Junqué C (2015) Reorganization of brain networks in aging: a review of functional connectivity studies. Front. Psychol. 6:663. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00663
Received: 30 January 2015; Accepted: 05 May 2015;
Published: 21 May 2015.
Edited by:
Pietro Cipresso, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, ItalyReviewed by:
Ritobrato Datta, University of Pennsylvania, USADavid Facal, University of Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Copyright © 2015 Sala-Llonch, Bartrés-Faz and Junqué. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Carme Junqué, Department of Psychiatry and Clinical Psychobiology, University of Barcelona, Casanova 143, 08036 Barcelona, Spain, cjunque@ub.edu