Xiaoyuan Zheng2
Mei Li1,3*Shilong Tian1,3Shouqiang Li1,3Jianxin Chen1,3Xuejiao Zhang2Xiaohua Wu1,3
Xia Ge1,3Jiachun Tian1,3Yuwen Mu1,3Juan Song1,3- 1Agricultural Product Storage and Processing Research Institute, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China
- 2College of Food Science and Engineering, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, China
- 3Gansu Innovation Center of Fruit and Vegetable Storage and Processing, Lanzhou, China
by Zheng XY, Li M, Tian SL, Li SQ, Chen JC, Zhang XJ, Wu XH, Ge X, Tian JC, Mu YW and Song J (2022) Front. Plant Sci. 13:887179. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.887179
In the published article, there was an error in Figure 4 as published. In Figure 4B, ‘Zeatin biosynthesis’ and ‘Stem growth induced germination’ appeared twice. The corrected Figure 4 and its caption appear below.
Figure 4 The phenylpropane biosynthesis pathway and the DEGs involved in this pathway (A) (PAL, phenylalanine ammonia-lyase; 4CL, 4-coumarate–CoA ligase; CYP73A, trans-cinnamate 4-monooxygenase; CAD, cinnamyl-alcohol dehydrogenase; COMT, caffeic acid 3-O-methyltransferase; POD, peroxidase; CCoAOMT, caffeoyl-CoA O-methyltransferase; CAG, coniferyl-alcohol glucosyltransferase) and The plant hormone signal transduction and the DEGs involved in this pathway. (B) (AUXIAA, auxin-responsive protein IAA; ARF, auxin response factor; GH3, auxin-responsive GH3 gene family; SAUR, SAUR family protein; CRE1, cytokinin receptor; AHP, histidine-containing phosphotransfer protein; A-ARR, two-component response regulator ARR-A family; TF, phytochrome-interacting factor 4; PYR/PYL, abscisic acid receptor PYR/PYL family; PP2C, protein phosphatase 2C; SnRK2, serine/threonine-protein kinase SRK2; ABF, ABA-responsive element binding factor; ETR, ethylene receptor; JAR1, jasmonic acid-amino synthetase; JAZ, jasmonate ZIM domain-containing protein; TGA, transcription factor TGA; PR-1, pathogenesis-related protein 1).
The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Keywords: potato tuber, chlorine dioxide, repression of sprout, transcriptome, metabolome
Citation: Zheng X, Li M, Tian S, Li S, Chen J, Zhang X, Wu X, Ge X, Tian J, Mu Y and Song J (2024) Corrigendum: Integrated analysis of transcriptome and metabolome reveals the mechanism of chlorine dioxide repressed potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tuber sprouting. Front. Plant Sci. 15:1373758. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2024.1373758
Received: 20 January 2024; Accepted: 13 February 2024;
Published: 15 March 2024.
Edited and Reviewed by:
Luigi Lucini, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, ItalyCopyright © 2024 Zheng, Li, Tian, Li, Chen, Zhang, Wu, Ge, Tian, Mu and Song. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Mei Li, 908260866@qq.com