Skip to main content

REVIEW article

Front. Plant Sci., 08 April 2022
Sec. Technical Advances in Plant Science
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Technical Advances in Plant Science: 2021 View all 13 articles

Applications of a Hyperspectral Imaging System Used to Estimate Wheat Grain Protein: A Review

  • 1Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing, China
  • 2CSIRO Agriculture and Food, Queensland Bioscience Precinct, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia

Recent research advances in wheat have focused not only on increasing grain yields, but also on establishing higher grain quality. Wheat quality is primarily determined by the grain protein content (GPC) and composition, and both of these are affected by nitrogen (N) levels in the plant as it develops during the growing season. Hyperspectral remote sensing is gradually becoming recognized as an economical alternative to traditional destructive field sampling methods and laboratory testing as a means of determining the N status within wheat. Currently, hyperspectral vegetation indices (VIs) and linear nonparametric regression are the primary tools for monitoring the N status of wheat. Machine learning algorithms have been increasingly applied to model the nonlinear relationship between spectral data and wheat N status. This study is a comprehensive review of available N-related hyperspectral VIs and aims to inform the selection of VIs under field conditions. The combination of feature mining and machine learning algorithms is discussed as an application of hyperspectral imaging systems. We discuss the major challenges and future directions for evaluating and assessing wheat N status. Finally, we suggest that the underlying mechanism of protein formation in wheat grains as determined by using hyperspectral imaging systems needs to be further investigated. This overview provides theoretical and technical support to promote applications of hyperspectral imaging systems in wheat N status assessments; in addition, it can be applied to help monitor and evaluate food and nutrition security.

Introduction

Wheat accounts for 21% of global food crops, with a production of 766 million tons in 2019 (FAO, 2020), and it is one of the most important foods for human survival. The viscoelastic properties of dough made with wheat allow it to be formed into a variety of baked goods, which require the highest possible flour quality. Grain protein concentration (GPC) is the main descriptor for indicating flour quality; it affects the formation of gluten in bread production and the technological properties in baked products and determines the monetary value of wheat grain (Asseng et al., 2019). However, GPC alone may not be a suitable parameter for evaluating flour quality, which is a complex parameter and needs to be determined by combining GPC and composition characteristics (Chaudhary et al., 2016).

Grain proteins are polymorphic and based on their solubility properties, can be divided into various components: albumins, globulins, gliadins, and glutenins. Albumin and globulin have high nutritional value as well as structural and metabolic functions (Shewry et al., 1995). Gliadins and glutenins are gluten proteins, and their composition is decisive for flour quality, accounting for roughly 80% of the protein in wheat flour (Shewry and Halford, 2002). Specifically, the viscosity and ductility of dough are highly influenced by gliadins, while the strength and elasticity of the dough are mainly influenced by gliadins (Wieser, 2007). Increasing the nitrogen (N) content and changing the N distribution would increase the GPC and improve the composition by changing N partitioning in the grain proteins, thus enhancing flour quality and helping to ensure food and nutrition security (Zörb et al., 2010; Xue et al., 2016).

N is absorbed throughout the growing season as an essential nutrient as illustrated in Figure 1 (Hawkesford, 2017). It is absorbed by seedling roots to supply the seed, as the seed’s reserves are rapidly exhausted. It continues to be absorbed during growth, driving the establishment of the canopy before anthesis. N uptake is highest around jointing and does not continue to rise after heading. Changes in N uptake, accumulation, and further partitioning within the plant lead to variations in the final GPC and its components (Hirel et al., 2007; Gaju et al., 2011). Differences in N uptake between the pre- and post-anthesis periods may affect N partitioning in wheat plants (Bogard et al., 2010) and the N content in the grains, as this mainly comes from two different sources: N stored in vegetative organs during the pre-flowering stage and N absorbed from the soil after flowering. Grain N is mainly remobilized from senescing canopy tissues and from the soil through the roots. Furthermore, N uptake efficiency is mainly related to the ability of the plant to maintain root activity and/or the plant’s ability to regulate N uptake during the grain-filling period (Foulkes et al., 2009; Hawkesford, 2014). The process of post-anthesis N remobilization to the grain affects the final GPC and composition during grain filling (Barraclough et al., 2010; Gaju et al., 2014), with the leaves and stems being the most valuable sources of N to the grain (Gaju et al., 2014). Canopy reflectance has been widely reported to be a good indicator of the N status in wheat plants because it is related to chlorophyll (Chl) a and b content (Wang et al., 2004; Zhao et al., 2005; Reyniers and Vrindts, 2006). Therefore, studying the eco-physiological characteristics of wheat canopy N during the growth period can provide a way to obtain field information in real time for agricultural production and can inform the breeding of high-yielding and good-quality wheat.

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. It is a review of hyperspectral imaging systems for evaluating wheat grain protein. Hyperspectral imaging systems, a combination of hyperspectral remote sensing and machine learning, have significant advantages in evaluating wheat grain proteins. Hyperspectral remote sensing can capture information reflecting nitrogen (N) status in wheat plants in real-time and non-destructively. Meanwhile, machine learning can effectively simulate the non-linear relationship between nitrogen and spectral data of wheat. Hyperspectral imaging systems are now widely used to predict wheat grain protein content (GPC), and crop models can complement the analysis of eco-physiological mechanisms in the prediction process.

Numerous studies have already shown the potential of hyperspectral imaging techniques to estimate the quality of wheat grain (Figure 1). Traditional methods of assessing wheat N status requires destruction of the plant for chemical analysis. Although this method is more accurate, it is also time-consuming and laborious. To monitor the N status in wheat plants in real time and non-invasively, hyperspectral remote sensing has gradually been applied in recent years. This new method also reflects the spatial and temporal variation of N during the growing season using appropriate algorithms, which allows for recommendations before mid-season fertilization (Feng et al., 2008; Saberioon et al., 2014; Moharana and Dutta, 2016; Raya-Sereno et al., 2022). It is helpful for the early diagnosis of N stress, to inform remedial measures to ameliorate the stress. Moreover, it is of great significance to study the effect of environmental conditions on wheat grain quality.

Spectral data obtained from hyperspectral remote sensing instruments have a non-linear relationship with N in wheat plants. Hyperspectral vegetation indices (VIs) and machine learning are gradually being applied for the assessment of N status in wheat plants (Ranjan et al., 2012; Camps-Valls et al., 2018). The objectives of this study were (1) to investigate the existing wheat N-related hyperspectral VIs, which were inferred by hyperspectral inversion, with the aim of providing a reference method for selecting VIs in agricultural fields; (2) to summarize machine learning algorithms that can analyze field-derived hyperspectral data for wheat N status assessments; and (3) to explore the main challenges and future directions for the continued development of predicting wheat GPC and composition.

Hyperspectral Techniques and Canopy Spectral Vegetation Indices of Nitrogen Status in Wheat Plants

Hyperspectral analysis can be used as a high-throughput phenotyping tool for assessing the N status in wheat plants during the growing season (Figure 1). Optical remote sensing techniques can measure eco-physiological traits in a high-throughput manner in field trials. Remote sensing of vegetation is mainly achieved by passive sensors that acquire electromagnetic wave reflection information from the canopy. It has been established that the reflectance of a wheat canopy in terms of its electromagnetic spectrum (spectral reflectance or emission characteristics of the canopy) is determined by the morphological and chemical characteristics of the leaf surface (Zhang and Kovacs, 2012). This data typically ranges from 350 to 2,500 nm, with unique reflectance value profiles in the visible (400–700 nm), near-infrared (700–1,200 nm), and short-wave infrared regions (1,200–2,500 nm), which are generally used to infer wheat plant growth characteristics (Serbin et al., 2015; Heckmann et al., 2017; Yendrek et al., 2017). Remotely-sensed data that indicate the growth, vigor, and N dynamics of a wheat canopy can provide necessary information for estimating grain quality and beneficial insights for agricultural production (Xue and Su, 2017).

In recent years, progress has been made in studying canopy spectral reflectance VIs in wheat plants with respect to N. When sunlight hits a wheat plant, most of the irradiance is consumed by water transpiration, and a small portion is used for CO2 assimilation. Part of the light energy is absorbed by the canopy and a part is reflected to space. The reflected light in the visible region of the electromagnetic spectrum is influenced by the chlorophyll pigment content in the wheat canopy, which in turn is related to the concentration of leaf N (Thomas and Gausman, 1977; Wessman, 1990). Blue (450 nm) and red (670 nm) wavelengths are two major absorption bands, due to the uptake of Chl a and b, the two main leaf pigments in wheat, which account for approximately 65% of the total pigment concentration in wheat plants. Therefore, it is possible to rapidly estimate the N status of wheat plants by remotely sensing the canopy Chl content.

The VIs, which are derived from wheat canopy hyperspectral reflectance, are used to describe vegetation characteristics that depend on the environment. The list of indices in Table 1 summarizes 20 VIs that quickly provide information on the N status of the entire wheat plant under field conditions (Gamon et al., 1997; le Maire et al., 2004; Herrmann et al., 2010). VIs for predicting Chl contents are usually based on (i) reflectance values far from the pigment absorption maxima and (ii) the selection of wavelengths close to the absorption bands. Another exciting region of the spectral area is the region between the strong red light absorption by Chl (680 nm) and the highly reflective near-infrared wavelengths (780 nm), a region of the spectrum known as the “red edge;” several red edge indices have been described (Vogelmann et al., 1993; Filella and Penuelas, 1994; Barnes et al., 2000). In wheat plants, Chl reduction caused by N deficiency leads to increased reflectance in the visible range (400–700 nm), changing the spectral signature, which reduces symptom-specific spectral characteristics (Osborne et al., 2002). Conducting experiments under diverse ecological conditions is helpful for validating other known VIs and for developing more broadly applicable monitoring models to indirectly assess the eco-physiological traits associated with N stress (El-Hendawy S. E. et al., 2019). Rodriguez et al. (2006) tested several developed VIs for estimating the level of canopy N nutrition in wheat plants under different environmental conditions and they derived a simple canopy reflectance index entirely independent of environmental factors. A N stress-free VI was developed that adjusts shoot %N according to the plant’s biomass and area; thus, it considers the environmental conditions affecting wheat growth.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. The 27 selected vegetation indices (VIs) that have been applied to wheat under field conditions were reviewed in the study, together with their number of spectral bands, band-specific formulations, and associated principal reference, including 17 two-band VIs and 10 three-band VIs.

Two-band VIs are increasingly used for N estimation (Table 1). VIs are calculated from canopy reflectance values for specific visible and near-infrared wavelengths (Frels et al., 2018). These indices can estimate changes in canopy Chl content and thus indicate the N status of wheat plants (Gutierrez et al., 2004). Hansen and Schjoerring (2003) used two-band combinations of the normalized vegetation index (λ1 − λ2)/(λ1 + λ2) to predict N-related crop variables at different growth stages during the winter wheat growing season in a field experiment. Zhu et al. (2008) identified common spectral bands and VIs to characterize the N status of wheat leaves and analyze the quantitative relationship between leaf N status and canopy reflectance. In their study, ratio VIs (RVIs) (R870, R660) and RVIs (R810, R660) showed the highest correlation with leaf N status compared to other specific RVIs, differential VIs (DVIs), and normalized VIs (NDVIs) in the 16 bands from the MSR16 radiometer. Yao et al. (2010) conducted real-time monitoring of wheat canopy hyperspectral reflectance and leaf N status under different treatments in a field experiment. They found that the sensitive spectral bands of the leaf N status concentrated in the visible and near-infrared regions, and that NDSIs (R860, R720), RSIs (R990, R720), NDSIs (FD736, FD526), and RSIs (FD725, FD516) were the best VIs for estimating the N status in wheat plants. However, the values of VIs calculated by combining two bands were found to be closely related to the number of leaves in the canopy. A dense canopy can quickly saturate the two bands, making it less sensitive to the plant’s high eco-physiological content (Gitelson, 2004). Therefore, three-band VIs were developed to solve the problem of canopy saturation that can occur in two-band VIs (Wang et al., 2012).

Selecting the optimal central bands for three-band VIs requires a comprehensive analysis of two-band VIs based on hyperspectral information (Hansen and Schjoerring, 2003; Zhu et al., 2008; Yao et al., 2010). Selecting the central band of the three-band VIs is a bandwidth issue, and is controversial in wheat plant growth monitoring. Broge and Mortensen (2002) predicted eco-physiological traits in wheat at three newton levels in the field by comparing the predictive power of broadband-based VIs with narrowband-based VIs. They concluded that narrowband-based VIs were more sensitive to changes in wheat plants during growth and more effective at minimizing noise and saturation in eco-physiological trait estimation. In contrast, Wang et al. (2012) conducted field experiments with different N levels, moisture conditions, and wheat varieties, and concluded that broadband-based VIs are more realistic. Therefore, they constructed a new three-band VI by combining narrowband-based VIs and broadband-based VIs to reduce the saturation of broadband-based two-band VIs on the basis of reality (Table 1). Based on this, a reliable and stable linear monitoring model for leaf N concentration was established, which provides a good index and an accurate estimation model for monitoring the N status in wheat plants using a three-band VI (Wang et al., 2012).

There is little agreement in previous studies on which VIs are most suitable for determining the N status in wheat plants. Main et al. (2011) investigated 73 VIs and ranked them according to their relationship with total Chl content, which is related to N. They found that indices using the red-edge region (680–730 nm) were better predictors of the N status of wheat canopy (via canopy Chl content), with a better linear relationship and lower saturation than other VIs. Frels et al. (2018) used 299 wheat genotypes in a 2-year trial near Ithaca, NE, United States, to compare the correlation between 28 VIs inferred from canopy spectral reflectance during the grain filling stage and N-related traits in wheat plants. They concluded that it is more accurate to use VIs to estimate N traits in wheat plants during the early grain filling stage, as more traits were associated with the Maccioni index. This index captures many components of the N use efficiency. Incorporating it into the existing selection programs could yield more N-related indicators (Frels et al., 2018).

Dissection of Hyperspectral Reflectance to Estimate Nitrogen Status in Wheat Plants Based on Machine Learning Algorithms

Machine learning is an effective method for solving complex problems such as multicollinearity and overfitting in multiple linear models (MLMs) to estimate the N status in wheat plants (Figure 1). With the development of hyperspectral imaging systems, the amount of computation required has gradually increased. Moreover, the massive data features tend to cause overfitting and affect estimations produced by MLM. Selecting a suitable estimation method can reduce the dimensionality of the raw data, screen out necessary information from the data, significantly improve the validity of the data, and is an important aspect of improving the accuracy of N status estimation in wheat plants (Li D. et al., 2020). Most studies have used MLM to quantitatively assess the relationship between spectral indices and N status (Babar et al., 2006; Pavuluri et al., 2015). However, when many characteristic dimensions are used, the correlations between VIs and leaf N status are generally low, and the models are prone to multicollinearity and overfitting, which reduces the accuracy of the estimated N status (El-Hendawy S. et al., 2019). To address these issues, machine learning methods can reduce the wide range of co-linear variables and non-correlated factors, and reduce the impact of background effects on model precision (Singh et al., 2021).

Machine learning techniques are advantageous for estimating agricultural indices from hyperspectral remote sensing data (Zhang et al., 2021). Wheat canopy reflectance is a function of the wheat leaf’s optical properties, wheat canopy structure, soil background, atmospheric conditions, observation geometry, and solar zenith angle (Boegh et al., 2002; Baret et al., 2007; Homolová et al., 2013). The relationship between canopy reflectance and wheat N status is controlled by many influencing factors. Thus, finding the response mechanism of canopy hyperspectral reflectance to the wheat N status is often complicated and nonlinear in character (Fu et al., 2021). Most machine learning algorithms are often considered “black boxes” because they provide no information about how they work. Therefore, machine learning can be used to explore the complex non-linear relationships between spectral features and the N status in wheat plants without a clear understanding of the original data distribution (Singh et al., 2021). This not only provides a multi-faceted and flexible direction for data analysis, but also a wider scope for experts to apply their theoretical knowledge to explain the principles in conjunction with algorithms. Previous spectral indices have depended on a few available spectral bands and, therefore, do not use all the information conveyed by the spectral trace. In contrast, machine learning techniques not only use inverse VIs but also all the spectral information, demonstrating the potential to analyze hyperspectral reflectance data with a large number of bands and to evaluate additional features. This provides more information for high-precision prediction modeling of the N status in wheat plants (Chlingaryan et al., 2018). Recently, the advantages of machine learning over VI-based approaches have been highlighted. Specifically, machine learning has excelled in modeling the complex mechanisms of canopy-scale spectral features in response to the N status in wheat plants, without the need to know the underlying data distribution (Thorp et al., 2017; Miphokasap and Wannasiri, 2018; Tan K. et al., 2018). With the proliferation of spaceborne, airborne, and unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) imaging spectrometers, many types of hyperspectral data are now available and has ushered in the era of “big data” in the field of remote sensing. This requires machine learning algorithms to mine available information to more effectively monitor the N status in wheat plants in real time and to predict their GPC and composition (Fu et al., 2021).

Machine learning involves various types of learning techniques. Partial least squares regression (PLSR) is a commonly used technique for estimating eco-physiological traits in wheat from hyperspectral data (Fu et al., 2014). Hansen and Schjoerring (2003) calculated NDVIs for all possible combinations of wavelengths in the range of 438–884 nm. They found that linear regression and PLSR can be used to estimate Chl and N concentrations in wheat plants. Pimstein et al. (2007) also used PLSR to estimate the N content of wheat leaves from spectral (350–2,500 nm) data collected in the field. The authors concluded that the appropriate wavelength and application of derivatives to the raw spectra could improve the predictive quality of the estimated model. Li et al. (2014) also estimated canopy N content in wheat plants using optimized hyperspectral VIs combined with PLSR. Mahesh et al. (2015) used PLSR to predict wheat GPC based on hyperspectral reflectance. In conclusion, PLSR has been applied as a method capable of analyzing a large amount of noise-laden co-linear data to monitor N content in wheat plants and predict wheat GPC in agricultural fields. Its accuracy improves with an increase in the number of relevant variables and observations (Berger et al., 2020).

In addition to PLSR, kernel-based regression methods are becoming more popular in wheat N status assessment using hyperspectral data. Machine learning algorithms require a few statistical assumptions to be applied to the data to develop linear and nonlinear models. Among them, kernel-based regression methods [e.g., support vector regression (SVR) and Gaussian process regression (GPR)] use structural risk minimization. Therefore, with a limited training set, these methods are considered to have a better generalization ability than artificial neural networks (ANNs) (Fu et al., 2020). Li et al. (2016) compared four chemometric techniques used to estimate N status in winter wheat plants using spectral features. In their study, the predictive power and the impact of sample size were assessed. They proposed that SVR is more suitable than back-propagation neural networks (BPNN) for estimating winter wheat N concentrations when the sample size is insufficient. Different kernel functions differ in their ability to embed geometric structures in the training samples. To combine the advantages of different kernel functions, Wang et al. (2017) constructed a multiple-kernel SVR (MK-SVR) consisting of a radial basis function (RBF) kernel and polynomial kernel for N status estimation in wheat plants. They found that the MK-SVR outperformed multiple linear regression (MLR), partial least squares (PLS), ANNs, and single kernel SVR (SK-SVR) models, introducing a new method for non-destructive and rapid monitoring of the N status in wheat plants based on hyperspectral data.

Physical and hybrid methods have also been applied to wheat N-inversion. Their application is based on the high degree of correlation between leaf Chl and the N status in wheat plants, and their effectiveness depends on the radiative transfer models (RTM) used, the inversion technique applied, and the quality of the data measured (Danner et al., 2021). PROSAIL is a widely used radiative transfer model for estimating the N status in wheat because it provides a good compromise between model realism and inversion possibilities. Yang et al. (2015) developed an N-PROSPECT model to estimate the N status of the winter wheat canopy by replacing the Chl uptake coefficient with the N uptake coefficient in the original PROSPECT model. Coupling of the N-PROSPECT model and the SAIL model (N-PROSAIL) has been used to estimate canopy N density in wheat plants, and the model has been shown to have a high potential for establishing the N status in wheat plants (Li et al., 2018b,2019). However, the ability of PROSAIL and N-PROSAIL models to characterize a non-homogenous canopy structure before complete canopy closure is poor, resulting in less accurate estimates of the N status in wheat plants (Botha et al., 2010).

Deficiencies and Prospects of the Hyperspectral Imaging System for Estimating the Nitrogen Status in Wheat Plants

The use of the hyperspectral imaging system often allows for immediate and punctuated estimates of the wheat N status over wide regions. However, there are intrinsic inevitable shortcomings in the empirical methods. Hyperspectral VIs are widely used in crop N estimation due to its simple, timely and efficient computation. Further, machine learning techniques are expected to be more suitable for simulating wheat N status from such data due to their ability to deal with nonlinear problems. Many combinations of hyperspectral VIs and machine learning algorithms have yielded improved N status estimates for wheat plants, and there have been studies modeling the relationship between VIs and GPC based on machine learning algorithms. For example, Tan et al. (2020) analyzed 14 VIs by using PLSR and found that 12 of them were closely related to wheat GPC (model prediction accuracy > 90%). Nevertheless, PLSR was not compared with other machine learning methods in the study. Although PLSR is superior to linear regression and principal component analysis model, decision tree, random forest, artificial neural networks and other methods may have better simulation results for wheat GPC. Furthermore, the hyperspectral imaging system still needs improvement. First, the results of models calibrated with hyperspectral data are significantly influenced by seasonal characteristics, cropping environments and experimental design, which is characterized by poor spatio-temporal heterogeneity. Therefore, applying a model from one specific environment or growing season to any other environment or growing seasons may result in poor prediction results of wheat grain nutrition (Colaço and Bramley, 2018, 2019). Second, the spectral features identified by the available feature mining techniques involve statistical models and largely depend on a dataset without any inherent relationships between GPC, the environment, and management, with unclear physical meaning and poor explanation of mechanism (Li Z. et al., 2020; Figure 1). Some researchers have argued that as (i) wheat growth is a dynamic process and (ii) wheat canopy N status changes dynamically; a better understanding of the physical processes underlying the hyperspectral response to wheat canopy N status is required. This would enable the development of robust assessment models with causal relationships that complement the eco-physiologically hyperspectral imaging systems (Li et al., 2018a; Fu et al., 2021).

The combination of crop models and remote sensing data is emerging as a promising approach for monitoring wheat growth and grain protein accumulation. Crop models can simulate the dynamic biological processes of wheat growth based on the quantitative relationships between wheat growth and environmental conditions, including weather, soil conditions, wheat genotype information, and field management (Jin et al., 2018). Crop models combined with hyperspectral data can provide time continuity for wheat quality prediction systems. This can enable the effective development of crops based on the environment and stress conditions (water or N), improve the temporal and spatial expansion ability of wheat quality prediction, enhance the agronomic and mechanical rationality of prediction, and can be used for scenario testing and strategic (long-term) decisions (Li Z. et al., 2020). In previous studies, the transfer of N to the grain has been simulated at various levels of complexity. Both simpler harvest indexing approaches [e.g., SIRIUS (Jamieson et al., 1998) and STATISTICS (Brisson et al., 1998)] and more sophisticated source-aggregation models [e.g., SIRIUS (Jamieson and Semenov, 2000)] illustrate this evolution. The CERES-Wheat grain filling program applied independent controls for dry matter and N accumulation in the grain, dividing the grain filling process into stages. However, variation in N accumulation due to genetic variance was not considered in this procedure (Ritchie et al., 1998). APSIM-Nwheat used the same grain protein program as CERES-Wheat and applied the model to study the effect of seasonal temperature and rainfall interactions on grain N concentrations (Asseng and Milroy, 2006). Meanwhile, other studies have proposed a framework to model the mechanisms of N uptake and partitioning in wheat plants, thus advancing toward more accurate modeling of N dynamics (Jamieson and Semenov, 2000). In recent years, crop models have been used to assess the impact of climate change on wheat GPC, however, uncertainty varies with location (Asseng et al., 2019).

In addition, the SiriusQuality model has been developed to consider the assignment of structural and storage proteins in wheat grain. Within the routine, the model divides N into structural/metabolic proteins and major storage proteins, and it provides predictions of the protein compositions, which are the alcoholic and glutenin fractions (Martre et al., 2003, 2006). The SiriusQuality model also assumes that the partitioning of N between the storage protein compositions, alcoholic, and gluten remains constant during the grain filling stage. It also assumes that the interactions between the genotype and environment alters the total grain N through source limitation rather than through partitioning of N between different protein compositions (Martre et al., 2006). This provides proof of concept that crop models can be extended to explain protein composition. In general, existing crop models can correctly simulate GPC in the absence of stress treatments; however, the performance of models under extreme temperature conditions still needs to be improved (Osman et al., 2020). In addition, some important model input parameters are difficult or impossible to obtain, and the information provided to crop models on wheat growth is limited to scattered points (Fu et al., 2021).

Conclusion

An accurate assessment of the in-plant N status of wheat is essential for predicting GPC and composition, in addition to ensuring food and nutritional safety. We are at the beginning of a promising path toward using hyperspectral imaging systems to predict GPC and composition in wheat plants. On the one hand, as a high-throughput phenotypic tool, hyperspectral remote sensing has the potential to complement or even replace types of field measurements for some wheat N-related traits in the growing season. On the other hand, the combination of hyperspectral VIs and machine learning algorithms is a powerful tool for estimating agricultural indices from hyperspectral remote sensing data. However, VIs and the spectral features identified by machine learning algorithms in hyperspectral imaging systems depend heavily on the input dataset without any intrinsic relationship between GPC, the environment, and field management. Based on our review, we suggest that these issues can be understood in conjunction with crop models. Crop models consider the environmental effects of wheat growth. These methods strive to uncover the underlying mechanisms of wheat growth when using hyperspectral data to predict wheat GPC and composition. Insight into the limitations of these methods will help us select the appropriate method for monitoring the N status in wheat plants and contribute to further developing methods for wheat grain quality studies.

Author Contributions

YH: conceptualization, funding acquisition, and writing-review and editing. JM and YH: formal analysis. JM, BZ, and YH: writing the manuscript, read, and agreed to the submitted version.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41975148), the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Elite Youth Program, and the Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences Central Public-interest Scientific Institution Basal Research Fund (BSRF202202 and BSRF202005).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher’s Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

References

Asseng, S., Martre, P., Maiorano, A., Rotter, R. P., Oleary, G., Fitzgerald, G. J., et al. (2019). Climate change impact and adaptation for wheat protein. Glob. Change Biol. 25, 155–173. doi: 10.1111/gcb.14481

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Asseng, S., and Milroy, S. P. (2006). Simulation of environmental and genetic effects on grain protein concentration in wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 25, 119–128. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2006.04.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Babar, M. A., Reynolds, M. P., van Ginkel, M., Klatt, A. R., Raun, W. R., and Stone, M. L. (2006). Spectral reflectance to estimate genetic variation for in-season biomass, leaf chlorophyll, and canopy temperature in wheat. Crop Sci. 46, 1046–1057. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0211

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Baret, F., Houlès, V., and Guérif, M. (2007). Quantification of plant stress using remote sensing observations and crop models: the case of nitrogen management. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 869–880. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erl231

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barnes, E., Clarke, T. R., Richards, S. E., Colaizzi, P., Haberland, J., Kostrzewski, M., et al. (2000). “Coincident detection of crop water stress, nitrogen status and canopy density using ground-based multispectral data,” in Proceedings of the 2000 5th International Conference on Precision Agriculture, Bloomington, MN, 1–15. doi: 10.1094/cm-2009-1211-01-rs

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Barraclough, P. B., Howarth, J. R., Jones, J., Lopez-Bellido, R., Parmar, S., Shepherd, C. E., et al. (2010). Nitrogen efficiency of wheat: genotypic and environmental variation and prospects for improvement. Eur. J. Agron. 33, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2010.01.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Berger, K., Verrelst, J., Féret, J.-B., Wang, Z., Wocher, M., Strathmann, M., et al. (2020). Crop nitrogen monitoring: recent progress and principal developments in the context of imaging spectroscopy missions. Remote Sens. Environ. 242:111758. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2020.111758

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Boegh, E., Soegaard, H., Broge, N., Hasager, C. B., Jensen, N. O., Schelde, K., et al. (2002). Airborne multispectral data for quantifying leaf area index, nitrogen concentration, and photosynthetic efficiency in agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 81, 179–193. doi: 10.1016/S0034-4257(01)00342-X

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Bogard, M., Allard, V., Brancourt-Hulmel, M., Heumez, E., Machet, J.-M., Jeuffroy, M.-H., et al. (2010). Deviation from the grain protein concentration–grain yield negative relationship is highly correlated to post-anthesis N uptake in winter wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 61, 4303–4312. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq238

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Botha, E. J., Leblon, B., Zebarth, B. J., and Watmough, J. (2010). Non-destructive estimation of wheat leaf chlorophyll content from hyperspectral measurements through analytical model inversion. Int. J. Remote Sens. 31, 1679–1697. doi: 10.1080/01431160902926574

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Brisson, N., Mary, B., Ripoche, D., Jeuffroy, M.-H., Ruget, F., Nicoullaud, B. B., et al. (1998). STICS: a generic model for the simulation of crops and their water and nitrogen balances. I. Theory and parameterization applied to wheat and corn. Agronomie 18, 311–346. doi: 10.1051/agro:19980501

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Broge, N. H., and Mortensen, J. V. (2002). Deriving green crop area index and canopy chlorophyll density of winter wheat from spectral reflectance data. Remote Sens. Environ. 81, 45–57. doi: 10.1016/s0034-4257(01)00332-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Camps-Valls, G., Martino, L., Svendsen, D. H., Campos-Taberner, M., Muñoz-Marí, J., Laparra, V., et al. (2018). Physics-aware Gaussian processes in remote sensing. Appl. Soft Comput. 68, 69–82. : a doi: 10.1016/j.asoc.2018.03.021

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chaudhary, N., Dangi, P., and Khatkar, B. S. (2016). Relationship of molecular weight distribution profile of unreduced gluten protein extracts with quality characteristics of bread. Food Chem. 210, 325–331. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.04.043

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Chlingaryan, A., Sukkarieh, S., and Whelan, B. (2018). Machine learning approaches for crop yield prediction and nitrogen status estimation in precision agriculture review. Comput. Electron. Agric. 151, 61–69. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.05.012

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colaço, A. F., and Bramley, R. G. V. (2018). Do crop sensors promote improved nitrogen management in grain crops? Field Crops Res. 218, 126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.01.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Colaço, A. F., and Bramley, R. G. V. (2019). Site–Year Characteristics Have a Critical Impact on Crop Sensor Calibrations for Nitrogen Recommendations. Agron. J. 111, 2047–2059. doi: 10.2134/agronj2018.11.0726

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Danner, M., Berger, K., Wocher, M., Mauser, W., and Hank, T. (2021). Efficient RTM-based training of machine learning regression algorithms to quantify biophysical & biochemical traits of agricultural crops. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 173, 278–296. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2021.01.017

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Duan, D.-D., Zhao, C.-J., Li, Z.-H., Yang, G.-J., and Yang, W.-D. (2019). Estimating total leaf nitrogen concentration in winter wheat by canopy hyperspectral data and nitrogen vertical distribution. J. Integr. Agric. 18, 1562–1570. doi: 10.1016/s2095-3119(19)62686-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El-Hendawy, S., Al-Suhaibani, N., Alotaibi, M., Hassan, W., Elsayed, S., Tahir, M. U., et al. (2019). Estimating growth and photosynthetic properties of wheat grown in simulated saline field conditions using hyperspectral reflectance sensing and multivariate analysis. Sci. Rep. 9:16473. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-52802-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

El-Hendawy, S. E., Al-Suhaibani, N. A., Hassan, W. M., Dewir, Y. H., Elsayed, S., Al-Ashkar, I., et al. (2019). Evaluation of wavelengths and spectral reflectance indices for high-throughput assessment of growth, water relations and ion contents of wheat irrigated with saline water. Agric. Water Manage. 212, 358–377. doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

FAO (2020). Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Available online at: from http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/QC (accessed July 12, 2020).

Google Scholar

Feng, W., Wu, Y., He, L., Ren, X., Wang, Y., Hou, G., et al. (2019). An optimized non-linear vegetation index for estimating leaf area index in winter wheat. Precis. Agric. 20, 1157–1176. doi: 10.1007/s11119-019-09648-8

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Feng, W., Yao, X., Zhu, Y., Tian, Y. C., and Cao, W. X. (2008). Monitoring leaf nitrogen status with hyperspectral reflectance in wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 28, 394–404. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2007.11.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Filella, I., and Penuelas, J. (1994). The red edge position and shape as indicators of plant chlorophyll content, biomass and hydric status. Int. J. Remote Sens. 15, 1459–1470. doi: 10.1080/01431169408954177

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Foulkes, M. J., Hawkesford, M. J., Barraclough, P. B., Holdsworth, M. J., Kerr, S., Kightley, S., et al. (2009). Identifying traits to improve the nitrogen economy of wheat: recent advances and future prospects. Field Crops Res. 114, 329–342. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Frels, K., Guttieri, M., Joyce, B., Leavitt, B., and Baenziger, P. S. (2018). Evaluating canopy spectral reflectance vegetation indices to estimate nitrogen use traits in hard winter wheat. Field Crops Res. 217, 82–92. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.12.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, Y., Yang, G., Li, Z., Li, H., Li, Z., Xu, X., et al. (2020). Progress of hyperspectral data processing and modelling for cereal crop nitrogen monitoring. Comput. Electron. Agric. 172:105321. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2020.105321

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, Y., Yang, G., Pu, R., Li, Z., Li, H., Xu, X., et al. (2021). An overview of crop nitrogen status assessment using hyperspectral remote sensing: current status and perspectives. Eur. J. Agron. 124:126241. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2021.126241

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Fu, Y., Yang, G., Wang, J., Song, X., and Feng, H. (2014). Winter wheat biomass estimation based on spectral indices, band depth analysis and partial least squares regression using hyperspectral measurements. Comput. Electron. Agric. 100, 51–59. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2013.10.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gaju, O., Allard, V., Martre, P., Gouis, J. L., Moreau, D., Bogard, M., et al. (2014). Nitrogen partitioning and remobilization in relation to leaf senescence, grain yield and grain nitrogen concentration in wheat cultivars. Field Crops Res. 155, 213–223. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2013.09.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gaju, O., Allard, V., Martre, P., Snape, J. W., Heumez, E., LeGouis, J., et al. (2011). Identification of traits to improve the nitrogen-use efficiency of wheat genotypes. Field Crops Res. 123, 139–152. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.05.010

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gamon, J. A., Serrano, L., and Surfus, J. S. (1997). The photochemical reflectance index: an optical indicator of photosynthetic radiation use efficiency across species, functional types, and nutrient levels. Oecologia 112, 492–501. doi: 10.1007/s004420050337

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gitelson, A. A. (2004). Wide Dynamic Range Vegetation Index for remote quantification of biophysical characteristics of vegetation. J. Plant Physiol. 161, 165–173. doi: 10.1078/0176-1617-01176

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Gutierrez, M., Reynolds, M., Escalante Estrada, J. A., and Rodríguez-González, M. (2004). Association between canopy reflectance indices and yield and physiological traits in bread wheat under drought and well-irrigated conditions. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 55, 1139–1147. doi: 10.1071/AR04214

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Haboudane, D., Miller, J. R., Pattey, E., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., and Strachan, I. B. (2004). Hyperspectral vegetation indices and novel algorithms for predicting green LAI of crop canopies: modeling and validation in the context of precision agriculture. Remote Sens. Environ. 90, 337–352. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.12.013

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hansen, P. M., and Schjoerring, J. K. (2003). Reflectance measurement of canopy biomass and nitrogen status in wheat crops using normalized difference vegetation indices and partial least squares regression. Remote Sens. Environ. 86, 542–553. doi: 10.1016/s0034-4257(03)00131-7

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hassan, M. A., Yang, M., Rasheed, A., Yang, G., Reynolds, M., Xia, X., et al. (2019). A rapid monitoring of NDVI across the wheat growth cycle for grain yield prediction using a multi-spectral UAV platform. Plant Sci. 282, 95–103. doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2018.10.022

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hawkesford, M. J. (2014). Reducing the reliance on nitrogen fertilizer for wheat production. J. Cereal Sci. 59, 276–283. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2013.12.001

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hawkesford, M. J. (2017). Genetic variation in traits for nitrogen use efficiency in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 68, 2627–2632. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx079

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Heckmann, D., Schlüter, U., and Weber, A. P. M. (2017). Machine learning techniques for predicting crop photosynthetic capacity from leaf reflectance spectra. Mol. Plant 10, 878–890. doi: 10.1016/j.molp.2017.04.009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Herrmann, I., Karnieli, A., Bonfil, D. J., Cohen, Y., and Alchanatis, V. (2010). SWIR-based spectral indices for assessing nitrogen content in potato fields. Int. J. Remote Sens. 31, 5127–5143. doi: 10.1080/01431160903283892

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Hirel, B., Le Gouis, J., Ney, B., and Gallais, A. (2007). The challenge of improving nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants: towards a more central role for genetic variability and quantitative genetics within integrated approaches. J. Exp. Bot. 58, 2369–2387. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erm097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Homolová, L., Malenovský, Z., Clevers, J. G. P. W., García-Santos, G., and Schaepman, M. E. (2013). Review of optical-based remote sensing for plant trait mapping. Ecol. Complex. 15, 1–16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.06.003

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jamieson, P. D., Semenov, M., Brooking, I., and Francis, G. (1998). Sirius: a mechanistic model of wheat response to environmental variation. Eur. J. Agron. 8, 161–179. doi: 10.1016/s1161-0301(98)00020-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jamieson, P. D., and Semenov, M. A. (2000). Modelling nitrogen uptake and redistribution in wheat. Field Crops Res. 68, 21–29. doi: 10.1016/s0378-4290(00)00103-9

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, X., Kumar, L., Li, Z., Feng, H., Xu, X., Yang, G., et al. (2018). A review of data assimilation of remote sensing and crop models. Eur. J. Agron. 92, 141–152. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2017.11.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Jin, X. L., Diao, W. Y., Xiao, C. H., Wang, F. Y., Chen, B., Wang, K. R., et al. (2013). Estimation of wheat agronomic parameters using new spectral indices. PLoS One 8:e72736. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0072736

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

le Maire, G., François, C., and Dufrêne, E. (2004). Towards universal broad leaf chlorophyll indices using PROSPECT simulated database and hyperspectral reflectance measurements. Remote Sens. Environ. 89, 1–28. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2003.09.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, D., Zhang, P., Chen, T., and Qin, W. (2020). Recent development and challenges in spectroscopy and machine vision technologies for crop nitrogen diagnosis: a review. Remote Sens. 12:2578. doi: 10.3390/rs12162578

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, F., Mistele, B., Hu, Y., Chen, X., and Schmidhalter, U. (2014). Reflectance estimation of canopy nitrogen content in winter wheat using optimised hyperspectral spectral indices and partial least squares regression. Eur. J. Agron. 52, 198–209. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2013.09.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Jin, X., Yang, G., Drummond, J., Yang, H., Clark, B., et al. (2018b). Remote sensing of leaf and canopy nitrogen status in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) based on N-PROSAIL model. Remote Sens. 10:1463. doi: 10.3390/rs10091463

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., He, J., Xu, X., Jin, X., Huang, W., Clark, B., et al. (2018a). Estimating genetic parameters of DSSAT-CERES model with the GLUE method for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) production. Comput. Electron. Agric. 154, 213–221. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2018.09.009

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Li, Z., Fairbairn, D., Li, N., Xu, B., Feng, H., et al. (2019). Multi-LUTs method for canopy nitrogen density estimation in winter wheat by field and UAV hyperspectral. Comput. Electron. Agric. 162, 174–182. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2019.04.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Nie, C., Wei, C., Xu, X., Song, X., and Wang, J. (2016). Comparison of four chemometric techniques for estimating leaf nitrogen concentrations in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) Based on Hyperspectral Features. J. Appl. Spectrosc. 83, 240–247. doi: 10.1007/s10812-016-0276-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Li, Z., Taylor, J., Yang, H., Casa, R., Jin, X., Li, Z., et al. (2020). A hierarchical interannual wheat yield and grain protein prediction model using spectral vegetative indices and meteorological data. Field Crops Res. 248:107711. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107711

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Mahesh, S., Jayas, D. S., Paliwal, J., and White, N. D. G. (2015). Comparison of Partial Least Squares Regression (PLSR) and Principal Components Regression (PCR) Methods for Protein and Hardness Predictions using the Near-Infrared (NIR) Hyperspectral Images of Bulk Samples of Canadian Wheat. Food Bioproc. Technol. 8, 31–40. doi: 10.1007/s11947-014-1381-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Main, R., Cho, M. A., Mathieu, R., O’Kennedy, M. M., Ramoelo, A., and Koch, S. (2011). An investigation into robust spectral indices for leaf chlorophyll estimation. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 66, 751–761. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2011.08.001

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martre, P., Jamieson, P. D., Semenov, M. A., Zyskowski, R., Porter, J. R., and Triboi, E. (2006). Modelling protein content and composition in relation to crop nitrogen dynamics for wheat. Eur. J. Agron. 25, 138–154. doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2006.04.007

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Martre, P., Porter, J. R., Jamieson, P. D., and Triboï, E. N. (2003). Modeling grain nitrogen accumulation and protein composition to understand the sink/source regulations of nitrogen remobilization for wheat. Plant Physiol. 133, 1959–1967. doi: 10.1104/pp.103.030585

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Miphokasap, P., and Wannasiri, W. (2018). Estimations of nitrogen concentration in sugarcane using hyperspectral imagery. Sustainability 10:1266. doi: 10.3390/su10041266

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Moharana, S., and Dutta, S. (2016). Spatial variability of chlorophyll and nitrogen content of rice from hyperspectral imagery. ISPRS J. Photogramm. Remote Sens. 122, 17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.09.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osborne, S. L., Schepers, J. S., Francis, D. D., and Schlemmer, M. R. (2002). Detection of phosphorus and nitrogen deficiencies in corn using spectral radiance measurements. Agron. J. 94, 1215–1221. doi: 10.2134/agronj2002.1215

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Osman, R., Zhu, Y., Ma, W., Zhang, D., Ding, Z., Liu, L., et al. (2020). Comparison of wheat simulation models for impacts of extreme temperature stress on grain quality. Agric. For. Meteorol. 288-289:107995. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2020.107995

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pavuluri, K., Chim, B. K., Griffey, C. A., Reiter, M. S., Balota, M., and Thomason, W. E. (2015). Canopy spectral reflectance can predict grain nitrogen use efficiency in soft red winter wheat. Precis. Agric. 16, 405–424. doi: 10.1007/s11119-014-9385-2

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Pimstein, A., Karnieli, A., and Bonfil, D. (2007). Wheat and maize monitoring based on ground spectral measurements and multivariate data analysis. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 1:013530. doi: 10.1117/1.2784799

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ranjan, R., Chopra, U. K., Sahoo, R. N., Singh, A. K., and Pradhan, S. (2012). Assessment of plant nitrogen stress in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) through hyperspectral indices. Int. J. Remote Sens. 33, 6342–6360. doi: 10.1080/01431161.2012.687473

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Raya-Sereno, M. D., Alonso-Ayuso, M., Pancorbo, J. L., Gabriel, J. L., Camino, C., Zarco-Tejada, P. J., et al. (2022). Residual Effect and N Fertilizer Rate Detection by High-Resolution VNIR-SWIR Hyperspectral Imagery and Solar-Induced Chlorophyll Fluorescence in Wheat. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 60, 1–17. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2021.3099624

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Reyniers, M., and Vrindts, E. (2006). Measuring wheat nitrogen status from space and ground-based platform. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27, 549–567. doi: 10.1080/01431160500117907

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Ritchie, J. T., Singh, U., Godwin, D. C., and Bowen, W. T. (1998). “Cereal growth, development and yield,” in Understanding Options for Agricultural Production, eds G. Y. Tsuji, G. Hoogenboom, P. K. Thornton (Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers), 79–98. doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-3624-4_5

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Robles-Zazueta, C. A., Molero, G., Pinto, F., Foulkes, M. J., Reynolds, M. P., and Murchie, E. H. (2021). Field-based remote sensing models predict radiation use efficiency in wheat. J. Exp. Bot. 72, 3756–3773. doi: 10.1093/jxb/erab115

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Rodriguez, D., Fitzgerald, G., Belford, R., and Christensen, L. (2006). Detection of nitrogen deficiency in wheat from spectral reflectance indices and basic crop eco-physiological concepts. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 57, 781–789. doi: 10.1071/AR05361

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Saberioon, M., Amin, M., Gholizadeh, A., and Ezrin, M. (2014). A Review of Optical Methods for Assessing Nitrogen Contents During Rice Growth. Appl. Eng. Agric. 30, 657–669. doi: 10.13031/aea.30.10478

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Serbin, S. P., Singh, A., Desai, A. R., Dubois, S. G., Jablonski, A. D., Kingdon, C. C., et al. (2015). Remotely estimating photosynthetic capacity, and its response to temperature, in vegetation canopies using imaging spectroscopy. Remote Sens. Environ. 167, 78–87. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2015.05.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shewry, P. R., and Halford, N. G. (2002). Cereal seed storage proteins: structures, properties and role in grain utilization. J. Exp. Bot. 53, 947–958. doi: 10.1093/jexbot/53.370.947

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Shewry, P. R., Tatham, A. S., Barro, F., Barcelo, P., and Lazzeri, P. (1995). Biotechnology of Breadmaking: unraveling and manipulating the multi-protein gluten complex. Biotechnology 13, 1185–1190. doi: 10.1038/nbt1195-1185

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Singh, H., Roy, A., Setia, R. K., and Pateriya, B. (2021). Estimation of nitrogen content in wheat from proximal hyperspectral data using machine learning and explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) approach. Model. Earth Syst. Environ. doi: 10.1007/s40808-021-01243-z

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, C., Zhou, X., Zhang, P., Wang, Z., Wang, D., Guo, W., et al. (2020). Predicting grain protein content of field-grown winter wheat with satellite images and partial least square algorithm. PLoS One 15:e0228500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228500

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, C.-W., Wang, D.-L., Zhou, J., Du, Y., Luo, M., Zhang, Y.-J., et al. (2018). Assessment of Fv/Fm absorbed by wheat canopies employing in-situ hyperspectral vegetation indexes. Sci. Rep. 8:9525. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27902-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tan, K., Wang, S., Song, Y., Liu, Y., and Gong, Z. (2018). Estimating nitrogen status of rice canopy using hyperspectral reflectance combined with BPSO-SVR in cold region. Chemometr. Intell. Lab. Syst. 172, 68–79. doi: 10.1016/j.chemolab.2017.11.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thomas, J. R., and Gausman, H. W. (1977). Leaf Reflectance vs. Leaf Chlorophyll and Carotenoid Concentrations for Eight Crops1. Agron. J. 69, 799–802. doi: 10.2134/agronj1977.00021962006900050017x

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Thorp, K. R., Wang, G., Bronson, K. F., Badaruddin, M., and Mon, J. (2017). Hyperspectral data mining to identify relevant canopy spectral features for estimating durum wheat growth, nitrogen status, and grain yield. Comput. Electron. Agric. 136, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.02.024

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Tuvdendorj, B., Wu, B., Zeng, H., Batdelger, G., and Nanzad, L. (2019). Determination of appropriate remote sensing indices for spring wheat yield estimation in Mongolia. Remote Sens. 11:2568. doi: 10.3390/rs11212568

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Vogelmann, J. E., Rock, B. N., and Moss, D. M. (1993). Red edge spectral measurements from sugar maple leaves. Int. J. Remote Sens. 14, 1563–1575. doi: 10.1080/01431169308953986

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, L., Zhou, X., Zhu, X., and Guo, W. (2017). Estimation of leaf nitrogen concentration in wheat using the MK-SVR algorithm and satellite remote sensing data. Comput. Electron. Agric. 140, 327–337. doi: 10.1016/j.compag.2017.05.023

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, W., Yao, X., Yao, X., Tian, Y., Liu, X., Ni, J., et al. (2012). Estimating leaf nitrogen concentration with three-band vegetation indices in rice and wheat. Field Crops Res. 129, 90–98. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2012.01.014

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wang, Z. J., Wang, J. H., Liu, L. Y., Huang, W. J., Zhao, C. J., and Wang, C. Z. (2004). Prediction of grain protein content in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) using plant pigment ratio (PPR). Field Crops Res. 90, 311–321. doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2004.04.004

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wessman, C. A. (1990). “Evaluation of canopy biochemistry,” in Remote Sensing of Biosphere Functioning, eds R. J. Hobbs and H. A. Mooney (New York, NY: Springer).

Google Scholar

Wieser, H. (2007). Chemistry of gluten proteins. Food Microbiol. 24, 115–119. doi: 10.1016/j.fm.2006.07.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, B., Huang, W., Ye, H., Luo, P., Ren, Y., and Kong, W. (2021). Using multi-angular hyperspectral data to estimate the vertical distribution of leaf chlorophyll content in wheat. Remote Sens. 13:1501. doi: 10.3390/rs13081501

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Wu, C., Niu, Z., Tang, Q., and Huang, W. (2008). Estimating chlorophyll content from hyperspectral vegetation indices: modeling and validation. Agric. For. Meteorol. 148, 1230–1241. doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2008.03.005

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, C., Auf’m Erley, G. S., Rossmann, A., Schuster, R., Koehler, P., and Mühling, K.-H. (2016). Split nitrogen application improves wheat baking quality by influencing protein composition rather than concentration. Front. Plant Sci. 7:738. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00738

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Xue, J., and Su, B. (2017). Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications. J. Sens. 2017:1353691. doi: 10.1155/2017/1353691

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yang, G., Zhao, C., Pu, R., Feng, H., Li, Z., Li, H., et al. (2015). Leaf nitrogen spectral reflectance model of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum) based on PROSPECT: simulation and inversion. J. Appl. Remote Sens. 9:095976. doi: 10.1117/1.Jrs.9.095976

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yao, X., Zhu, Y., Tian, Y., Feng, W., and Cao, W. (2010). Exploring hyperspectral bands and estimation indices for leaf nitrogen accumulation in wheat. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 12, 89–100. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2009.11.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Yendrek, C. R., Tomaz, T., Montes, C. M., Cao, Y., Morse, A. M., Brown, P. J., et al. (2017). High-Throughput Phenotyping of Maize Leaf Physiological and Biochemical Traits Using Hyperspectral Reflectance. Plant Physiol. 173, 614–626. doi: 10.1104/pp.16.01447

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, C., and Kovacs, J. M. (2012). The application of small unmanned aerial systems for precision agriculture: a review. Precis. Agric. 13, 693–712. doi: 10.1093/jee/toz268

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhang, Y., Hui, J., Qin, Q., Sun, Y., Zhang, T., Sun, H., et al. (2021). Transfer-learning-based approach for leaf chlorophyll content estimation of winter wheat from hyperspectral data. Remote Sens. Environ. 267:112724. doi: 10.1016/j.rse.2021.112724

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhao, C. J., Liu, L. Y., Wang, J. H., Huang, W. J., Song, X. Y., and Li, C. J. (2005). Predicting grain protein content of winter wheat using remote sensing data based on nitrogen status and water stress. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 7, 1–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2004.10.002

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zhu, Y., Yao, X., Tian, Y., Liu, X., and Cao, W. (2008). Analysis of common canopy vegetation indices for indicating leaf nitrogen accumulations in wheat and rice. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 10, 1–10. doi: 10.1016/j.jag.2007.02.006

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Zörb, C., Grover, C., Steinfurth, D., and Hermann Mühling, K. (2010). Quantitative proteome analysis of wheat gluten as influenced by N and S nutrition. Plant Soil 327, 225–234. doi: 10.1007/s11104-009-0049-3

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: hyperspectral imaging, wheat, grain protein, vegetation index, machine learning

Citation: Ma J, Zheng B and He Y (2022) Applications of a Hyperspectral Imaging System Used to Estimate Wheat Grain Protein: A Review. Front. Plant Sci. 13:837200. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2022.837200

Received: 16 December 2021; Accepted: 10 March 2022;
Published: 08 April 2022.

Edited by:

Roger Deal, Emory University, United States

Reviewed by:

Monica Moroni, DICEA-Sapienza University of Rome, Italy
Davide Cammarano, Aarhus University, Denmark

Copyright © 2022 Ma, Zheng and He. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Yong He, aGV5b25nMDFAY2Fhcy5jbg==

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.