Corrigendum: Terminalia catappa leaf extracts inhibited metastasis of A2058 and A375 melanoma cells via downregulating p-Src and β-catenin pathway in vitro

A Corrigendum on
Terminalia catappa leaf extracts inhibited metastasis of A2058 and A375 melanoma cells via downregulating p-Src and β-catenin pathway in vitro

by Chang C-K, Chu S-C, Huang J-Y, Chen P-N and Hsieh Y-S (2022). Front. Pharmacol. 13:963589. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.963589

In the published article, there were two errors in Figures 4, 5. First, the unit of four concentrations in Figures 4A,B were mismarked as “mg/mL.” The correct unit should be “μg/mL” in the quantization map of Figures 4A,B. Second, the wrong images were used in Figures 5A,B (at the concentration of 25 μg/mL). The corrected Figures 4, 5 and their captions appear below.

FIGURE 4

FIGURE 4. The effects of TCE on the cell migration of A2058 and A375 cells. (A,B) Photographs showed wound closure of A2058 and A375 cells treated with TCE (0, 25, 50, 100 μg/mL) and 0, 24, 48 h. Cell wound healing assay was performed as described in the Materials and Methods. % Wound coverage was determined by the rate of cells moving forward the scratched area upon time. The values of percentage wound closure ± SD of at least three independent experiments. Comparisons were performed using two-way ANOVA with post hoc Turkey’s test (***p < 0.05).

FIGURE 5

FIGURE 5. Effects of TCE on cell invasion and migration of A2058 and A375 cells. After being treated with TCE at a concentration of (0, 25, 50, 100 μg/mL) for 24 h, cell invasion and migration assay were then performed as described in the Materials and Methods. Representative images of A2058 and A375 cells on the lower side of membrane at different time points in the (A,C) invasion and (B,D) migration assay. A representative number of invading cells through the Matrigel and membrane were counted under the microscope for 10 random fields at a 3,200 magnification. The results were statistically evaluated using two-way ANOVA with post hoc Turkey’s test (***p < 0.05). The results from 3 repeated and separate experiments were similar.

The authors apologize for these errors and states that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher’s note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.