The final, formatted version of the article will be published soon.
ORIGINAL RESEARCH article
Front. Nutr.
Sec. Nutritional Epidemiology
Volume 11 - 2024 |
doi: 10.3389/fnut.2024.1464902
This article is part of the Research Topic Scaling-Up Equitable Nutritional Care for Girls and Women in South Asia View all 9 articles
Equity in Suaahara program uptake and promoted practices: wealth, caste, and geography variation for Nepalese households
Provisionally accepted- 1 Helen Keller International, New York, United States
- 2 Helen Keller International (Nepal), Lalitpur, Nepal
- 3 Income and Benefits Policy Center, The Urban Institute, Washington D.C., United States
- 4 Center for Human Nutrition, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
- 5 Family Health International 360 (Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal
- 6 United States Agency for International Development (Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal
Monitoring and evaluation of maternal and child nutrition programs typically concentrates on overall population-level results. There is limited understanding, however, of how intervention reach and expected outcomes differ among sub-populations, necessary insight for addressing inequalities. These analyses aim to determine if maternal exposure to social and behavior change (SBC) interventions is associated with scales of maternal practices (antenatal care, iron and folic acid in pregnancy, diet in pregnancy, postnatal care, iron and folic acid postpartum, and maternal dietary diversity) and child practices (institutional birth, health mothers' group participation, growth monitoring and promotion, early initiation of breastfeeding and infant and young child feeding) in Nepal, overall and by wealth, caste, and geography. Cross-sectional data from 2022 from the USAID-funded Suaahara program in Nepal were used for analysis. The study focused on households with children aged 0-2 years (N=1815). Descriptive analysis was followed by regression models, adjusted for potentially confounding child, mother, and household factors, as well as communitylevel clustering. Greater intensity of maternal engagement with the SBC interventions was positively associated with both scales for maternal and child nutrition-related practices. The magnitude of the positive associations, however, was less for the socially excluded caste versus others for maternal nutrition; there was almost no caste-based variation in associations for child nutrition. Positive associations were found only among the lower 40% socio-economically when mothers engaged with at least two platforms for maternal nutrition and at least three platforms for child nutrition. In contrast, engagement with one platform for the relatively wealthier was positively associated with both maternal and child outcomes. Similarly, the positive associations were stronger among those residing in the terai (lowland plains) than those in the hills and mountains for both maternal and child outcomes. The scope for improving maternal and child nutrition practices is significant, in part via well-designed, targeted, SBC programs. These analyses highlight the importance of considering different domains of equity both in implementation and related research. Further mixed methods research is needed to more deeply explore why certain types of interventions reach and/or have a greater effect on sub-populations.
Keywords: Equity, Nepal, nutrition, implementatino science, Social and Behavior Change
Received: 15 Jul 2024; Accepted: 05 Dec 2024.
Copyright: © 2024 Cunningham, Adhikari, Gupta, Suresh, Chen, Sen, Shrestha, Garn, Panda and Adhikari. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
* Correspondence:
Ramesh Adhikari, Helen Keller International (Nepal), Lalitpur, 44700, Nepal
Poonam Gupta, Income and Benefits Policy Center, The Urban Institute, Washington D.C., United States
Shalini Suresh, Helen Keller International (Nepal), Lalitpur, 44700, Nepal
Manisha Laxmi Shrestha, Family Health International 360 (Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal
Kristine Garn, Helen Keller International (Nepal), Lalitpur, 44700, Nepal
Pooja Panda, Helen Keller International (Nepal), Lalitpur, 44700, Nepal
Debendra Adhikari, United States Agency for International Development (Nepal), Kathmandu, Nepal
Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.