Skip to main content

EDITORIAL article

Front. Nutr., 24 November 2023
Sec. Clinical Nutrition
This article is part of the Research Topic Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness: Potential Role of Medical Nutrition Treatment Quantity, Timing, and Composition View all 9 articles

Editorial: Intensive care unit acquired weakness: potential role of medical nutrition treatment quantity, timing, and composition

  • 1University Clinical Center Nis, Clinic for Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Intensive Care, Nis, Serbia
  • 2AMB - Medical Practice MagenDarm, Basel, Switzerland
  • 3Department of Geriatrics, Medical University of Lodz, Łódz, Poland
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital, University of Latvia, Riga, Latvia

Introduction

Profound muscle weakness during and after critical illness for which there is no other clinical explanation is termed intensive care unit acquired weakness (ICUAW) (1). Some of the terms used for the ICUAW syndrome are intensive care unit acquired paresis, syndrome of acquired weakness (2), critical illness myopathy (CIM), critical illness polyneuropathy (CIP), critical illness polineuromyopathy (3), or critical illness neuromyopathy (CINM) (4). According to Krammer (4), besides CIM, CIP, and CINM, the term ICUAW includes muscle atrophy too.

Epidemiology

As stated by De Jonghe et al. (5), the clinical incidence of ICUAW is 25.3%. Nonetheless, different data can be found in the literature and they mainly differ according to the type of acute illness and diagnostic criteria used (Czapla et al.).

Pathology

The primary pathophysiological finding in peripheral nerves of ICUAW patients is axonal degeneration without demyelination (6). In the muscle, there is prominent myonecrosis with the loss of myosin filaments, and a change in actin: myosin ratio (7), disruption of muscle organization (8), vacuolization, and phagocytosis of myofilaments.

Clinical presentation

Clinical presentations of ICUAW differ in the degree of reduction of motor and sensory action potentials. In some patients, loss of deep tendon reflexes, as well as, loss of sensitivity to pain, temperature, and vibration can be present.

The most frequently affected muscles are limb muscle groups and respiratory muscles, thus flaccid quadriparesis and neuromuscular respiratory failure can be seen. Prolonged mechanical ventilation and difficult weaning are present (9) and there is susceptibility to recurrent respiratory infection and nosocomial pneumonia. Ophthalmoplegia and facial weakness may rarely develop (10).

Diagnostics

There are various diagnostic tests that explore different pathophysiological and clinical aspects of ICUAW syndrome.

The Medical Research Council (MRC) sum score is used as a screening tool for ICUAW. This score evaluates muscle strength in three upper and lower limb muscle groups and assesses it from 0 to 5. The maximal score is 60 and if it is <48 there is diagnostically important muscle weakness (11). Its major limitations are that the patient has to be awake and cooperative and there is a substantial interobserver measure difference.

Several ICUAW diagnostic tests have a peripheral neuron-muscle connection as the examination goal. In this way, hand grip dynamometry and direct muscle stimulation (peroneal nerve test) can diagnose CIP (11). The former needs special expertise which would present its major limitation.

Electromyography and nerve conduction studies can be used in uncooperative patients (12). These tests can determine ICUAW early during critical illness (10, 11) and more importantly, distinguish this syndrome from other diagnoses.

Two diagnostic tests explore muscles on different levels of comprehension and assumption. Muscle ultrasound is a method with good interobserver reliability and accentuated analysis of muscle architecture. According to Hadda et al. (13), patients with ICUAW have a significantly higher decline in muscle thickness.

Muscle biopsy is the gold standard for diagnosing muscle involvement and differential diagnosis between ICUAW and other diagnoses. Percutaneous muscle biopsy is an easy-to-perform bedside technique (10).

Biochemical markers such as urine nitrogen, blood urea to creatinine, and blood urea to albumin level are markers of nutritional status, dehydration, and liver and renal function and they can help in the assessment of ICUAW clinical presentation (Cai et al.).

Risk factors

The main risk factors of ICUAW are severe sepsis, the duration of mechanical ventilation, and multiorgan failure. Identification of risk factors can help in defining prediction models for ICUAW (Yang et al.).

Female and older critically ill patients are more prone to develop ICUAW (5).

One of the most important correctible risk factors is hyperglycemia. Strict control of hyperglycemia without hypoglycemia reduces ICUAW incidence (4).

Drugs researched within the development of ICUAW syndrome are corticosteroids, muscle relaxants, sedatives, and some antimicrobial agents (12).

Immobilization is a risk factor too, since, as soon as 4 h after initiating it, muscle degeneration can be observed (3).

Prevention and treatment

The main intervention in ICUAW treatment nowadays is prevention.

Hyperglycemia correction presents one of the proven preventive strategies (14).

The data are not so clear for the medical nutrition therapy and its relation to autophagy. Namely, tolerating substantial macronutrient deficit early in the critical illness, according to the study of Hermans et al. (15) allowed more efficient activation of autophagy. In this way, late PN, after 7 days in the ICU, initiates faster recovery in patients and reduces weakness. Aminoacid administration suppresses autophagy in muscle which has been shown to be the contributing mechanism in the ICUAW development (15). All of these results differ from the data on the importance of reaching caloric (Lv et al.) and protein goals (Zhu et al.) between the third and the seventh day of critical illness. Therefore, further scientific approval is needed. These studies also have to determine the importance of initiating medical nutrition therapy in the course of critical illness, both enteral (Wang et al.) and parenteral (Li et al.).

Stimulated ketogenesis and supplementation of 3-hydroxybutyrate showed encouraging results in muscle protection from muscle weakness in mice models (16). This might be a novel metabolic strategy.

Reducing the use of sedative drugs and neuromuscular relaxants is a recommended approach for preventing ICUAW (17). The implementation of “sedation holidays” and daily pauses in sedative infusions has been linked to shorter mechanical ventilation and reduced ICUAW development.

Early progressive gradual mobilization is an effective ICUAW treatment strategy. It is associated with reduced mechanical ventilation time, lower incidence of ICUAW, and improved functional outcomes. Together with previously mentioned preventive strategies it might present an aspect of a multifactorial interventional set for improving outcomes for ICUAW patients.

Outcomes

Intensive care unit-acquired weakness increases acute morbidity, health care costs, and 1-year mortality (18). Prolonged mechanical ventilation and long-term disability are determined characteristics of the outcome of patients with ICUAW (11, 13). The recovery period after ICUAW may last long after the ICU discharge (19). Future studies in this area will change the current perspective regarding the time of initiation and the time of reaching the goals of clinical nutrition (Lopez-Delgado et al.) and possible special nutrients.

Conclusion

To decrease the occurrence of ICUAW, it is important to follow several prevention strategies. Those are avoiding high blood sugar levels and delaying parenteral nutrition therapy until after 7 days in the ICU. Probably, another promising approach is to minimize sedation and encourage early progressive mobilization. Studies about the activation of ketogenesis and about the use of ketones as special nutrients will add new insight to this scientific area.

Author contributions

NV: Writing—review & editing, Conceptualization. RM: Supervision, Writing—review & editing. AG: Writing—review & editing. PZ: Investigation, Resources, Writing—original draft.

Funding

The author(s) declare that no financial support was received for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the support and contribution of the neuro-language coach Daniela Kraljić.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Fan E, Cheek F, Chlan L, Gosselink R, Hart N, Herridge MS, et al. An official American Thoracic Society Clinical Practice guideline: the diagnosis of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in adults. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2014) 190:1437–46. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201411-2011ST

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

2. Andreychenko SA, Bychinin MV, Korshunov DI, Klypa TV. ICU acquired weakness in patients with respiratory failure. J Clin Pract. (2021) 12:5–13. doi: 10.17816/clinpract72074

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Stevens RD, Marshall SA, Cornblath DR, Hoke A, Needham DM, de Jonghe B, et al. A framework for diagnosing and classifying intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Crit Care Med. (2009) 37(10 Suppl.):S299–308. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181b6ef67

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Kramer CL. Intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Neurol Clin. (2017) 35:723–36. doi: 10.1016/j.ncl.2017.06.008

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. De Jonghe B, Sharshar T, Lefaucheur JP, Authier FJ, Durand-Zaleski I, Boussarsar M, et al. Paresis acquired in the intensive care unit: a prospective multicenter study. JAMA. (2002) 288:2859–67. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.22.2859

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

6. Bolton CF, Gilbert JJ, Hahn AF, Sibbald WJ. Polyneuropathy in critically ill patients. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. (1984) 47:1223–31. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.47.11.1223

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Lacomis D, Zochodne DW, Bird SJ. Critical illness myopathy. Muscle Nerve. (2000) 23:1785–8. doi: 10.1002/1097-4598(200012)23:12<1785::aid-mus1>3.0.co

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Bloch S, Polkey MI, Griffiths M, Kemp P. Molecular mechanisms of intensive care unit-acquired weakness. Eur Respir J. (2012) 39:1000–11. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00090011

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Connolly BA, Jones GD, Curtis AA, Murphy PB, Douiri A, Hopkinson NS, et al. Clinical predictive value of manual muscle strength testing during critical illness: an observational cohort study. Crit Care. (2013) 17:R229. doi: 10.1186/cc13052

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Hermans G, De Jonghe B, Bruyninckx F, Van den Berghe G. Clinical review: critical illness polyneuropathy and myopathy. Crit Care. (2008) 12:238. doi: 10.1186/cc7100

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Attwell C, Sauterel L, Jöhr J, Piquilloud L, Kuntzer T, Diserens K. Early detection of ICU-acquired weakness in septic shock patients ventilated longer than 72 h. BMC Pulm Med. (2022) 22:466. doi: 10.1186/s12890-022-02193-7

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. Yang T, Li Z, Jiang L, Wang Y, Xi X. Risk factors for intensive care unit-acquired weakness: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Neurol Scand. (2018) 138:104–14. doi: 10.1111/ane.12964

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Hadda V, Kumar R, Khilnani GC, Kalaivani M, Madan K, Tiwari P, et al. Trends of loss of peripheral muscle thickness on ultrasonography and its relationship with outcomes among patients with sepsis. J Intens Care. (2018) 6:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s40560-018-0350-4

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Patel BK, Pohlman AS, Hall JB, Kress JP. Impact of early mobilization on glycemic control and ICU-acquired weakness in critically ill patients who are mechanically ventilated. Chest. (2014) 146:583–9. doi: 10.1378/chest.13-2046

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Hermans G, Casaer MP, Clerckx B, Güiza F, Vanhullebusch T, Derde S, et al. Effect of tolerating macronutrient deficit on the development of intensive-care unit acquired weakness: a subanalysis of the EPaNIC trial. Lancet Respir Med. (2013) 1:621–9. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70183-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. Goossens C, Weckx R, Derde S, Dufour T, Vander Perre S, Pauwels L, et al. Adipose tissue protects against sepsis-induced muscle weakness in mice: from lipolysis to ketones. Crit Care. (2019) 23:236. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2506-6

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Vanhorebeek I, Latronico N, Van den Berghe G. ICU-acquired weakness. Intens Care Med. (2020) 46:637–53. doi: 10.1007/s00134-020-05944-4

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Ali NA, O'Brien JM Jr, Hoffmann SP, Phillips G, Garland A, Finley JC, et al. Acquired weakness, handgrip strength, and mortality in critically ill patients. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. (2008) 178:261–8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200712-1829OC

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Fletcher S, Kennedy D, Ghosh I, Misra V, Kiff K, Coakley J, et al. Persistent neuromuscular and neurophysiologic abnormalities in long-term survivors of prolonged critical illness*. Crit Care Med. (2003) 31:1012–16. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000053651.38421.D9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: muscle weakness, nutrition therapy, critical illness, critical illness polyneuropathy, myopathy, muscular atrophy, ventilator weaning

Citation: Vukovic N, Meier R, Guligowska A and Zalizko P (2023) Editorial: Intensive care unit acquired weakness: potential role of medical nutrition treatment quantity, timing, and composition. Front. Nutr. 10:1295911. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1295911

Received: 17 September 2023; Accepted: 14 November 2023;
Published: 24 November 2023.

Edited and reviewed by: Maurizio Muscaritoli, Sapienza University of Rome, Italy

Copyright © 2023 Vukovic, Meier, Guligowska and Zalizko. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Natalija Vukovic, massha.vukovic@gmail.com

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.