Rina Ruolin Yan
Jimmy Chun Yu Louie- 1School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Science, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
- 2Department of Nursing and Allied Health, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, VIC, Australia
1. Introduction
High intakes of added/free sugars have been identified as a major contributor to the current obesity epidemic (1). In response, various public health agencies worldwide, such as the WHO (2), U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) (3), and Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition (SACN) (4), have issued quantitative guidelines to limit added/free sugars intake to below 5–10% of daily energy intake for improved health (see Supplementary Table 1). While these guidelines have gained acceptance among public health practitioners and researchers, some have raised concerns about their validity, including our research group (5–7). Unfortunately, such skepticism has led to accusations of undermining public health (8). To avoid misinterpretation, we want to clarify that we recognize the need to reduce added/free sugar intake. However, based on the current evidence, we believe the focus should primarily be on reducing sugars from specific sources, such as sugar-sweetened beverages (SSBs), rather than applying the current quantitative guidelines to all food types. In the following sections, we will outline and discuss the rationale behind our skepticism regarding the issuance of quantitative guidelines for added/free sugars intake in the general population.
2. Strong evidence supports reducing sugars from SSBs, but not all food sources
Undoubtedly, a substantial body of evidence consistently links sugars from SSBs to adverse health outcomes (9, 10). However, most governments and public health agencies have extended these findings beyond their scope and issued guidelines advocating for a reduction in added/free sugar intake from all food sources (2–4). Nevertheless, studies investigating the effects of sugars from solid foods on metabolic and endocrine health have generally yielded inconclusive results (11–13). For example, while a high intake of liquid sugars has been associated with higher body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference, no such associations have been found for solid sugars in prospective cohort studies involving children (14, 15). Moreover, only a high intake of sugars from liquid sources, not solid foods, has been linked to an increased risk of all-cause mortality (11). In the Swedish prospective cohort study by Ramne et al. (16), high added sugar intake from SSBs was associated with increased all-cause mortality, whereas sugar intake from solid foods was associated with decreased mortality risk.
Studies examining the relationship between sugars from solid foods and the risks of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have also failed to find a positive association (12, 13). Differential health effects of liquid vs. solid sugar sources have been demonstrated in several clinical trials (17, 18). Furthermore, a recent systematic review and meta-analysis that investigated the association of both solid and liquid sources of sugar with the incidence of metabolic syndrome (MetSyn) concluded that only high consumption of SSBs was associated with an increased risk of MetSyn, while no association was found between solid sugar-containing foods like ice cream and confectionery and the incidence of MetSyn (19). The systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials by Chiavaroli et al. (20) also concluded that while solid sources of fructose-containing sugars generally have no effects on adiposity irrespective of energy control levels, i.e., substitution (energy-matched replacement of sugars), addition (energy from sugars added), subtraction (energy from sugars removed), and ad libitum (energy from sugars freely replaced), with some food sources even leading to decreases in adiposity, e.g., fruits at doses of ≤ 10% daily energy or 50 g/day, excess energy intake from SSBs at ≥ 20% daily energy or 100 g/day leads to increased adiposity. Similarly, Sundborn et al. (21) suggested that liquid sources of added sugar may confer a greater risk of developing MetSyn than solid sources.
3. Not all added/free sugars are equal
Our research group has previously discussed the physiological differences between sugars derived from solid and liquid sources (7). Intake of sugars from solid sources is less likely to result in overconsumption of dietary energy (a key contributor to weight gain) due to incomplete compensation for the energy provided by sugars. This disparity may be attributed to the faster gastric emptying time of liquid sugar sources, leading to a higher fructose absorption rate and increased liver exposure to dietary fructose (21, 22). This explanation aligns with findings from animal studies, where the administration of sugar in drinking water led to obesity and metabolic disturbances, while a solid high-sugar diet did not have the same effect (23).
Additionally, some studies have suggested that high intake of SSBs may contribute to overeating and weight gain by disrupting the production of appetite control hormones (24). However, no such effect has been observed with high consumption of solid sugar-containing foods, although the precise mechanisms remain unclear (25). For instance, a study that randomized normal-weight subjects to consume beverages sweetened with fructose or glucose at 30% of their daily energy intake found that the fructose-sweetened group exhibited significantly lower leptin secretion (a hormone that suppresses hunger and appetite) and reduced suppression of circulating ghrelin (a hormone that stimulates appetite and triggers hunger) compared to the glucose-sweetened group (26). Another study showed that consuming fructose-sweetened beverages at 25% of daily energy intake decreased the 24-h leptin area under the curve (AUC) compared to sucrose-sweetened beverages. Interestingly, in a 24-h cross-over study by Stanhope et al. (27) that randomized subjects to consume beverages sweetened with sucrose, high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS), glucose, or fructose, no significant differences were found in 24-h leptin and ghrelin AUC between the groups. Furthermore, excessive fructose intake, such as from SSBs, exposes the liver to high concentrations of fructose, increasing the risk of fat accumulation and associated co-morbidities, whereas the small intestine can convert fructose to glucose and other metabolites at low doses (21).
4. Unintended adverse consequences of the current guidelines and related policy directions
In response to the WHO guidelines on free sugar, several agencies and governments have developed and/or implemented sugar reduction targets for a wide range of processed foods, including those not traditionally considered discretionary or junk foods (see Supplementary Table 2) (28–32). However, we believe that these measures may have unintended adverse effects. It is indisputable that added/free sugar are prevalent in our food supply (33, 34). Nevertheless, it is essential to acknowledge that many of these added/free sugar serve functions beyond sweetening agents in processed foods (see Supplementary Table 3) (35). These sugars are used for color and flavor formation, providing bulk and texture, and preservation (35). Reducing or eliminating these sugars, which serve purposes beyond sweetening, often requires substituting the lost functions with other ingredients or food additives to maintain the product's organoleptic properties (35).
Supplementary Table 4 provides examples of ingredient lists comparing similar full-sugar and low-sugar products. Lower-sugar products may also be nutritionally inferior in some instances. Data from the FoodSwitch Hong Kong database, compiled by our group (33), revealed higher saturated fat content in lower-sugar yogurts and yogurt drinks compared to “full” sugar varieties (see Supplementary Table 5). Additionally, the combined use of different food additives may pose potential health risks, although the true extent of these risks remains inadequately researched and largely unknown (36). Even in terms of sweetness, sugars can enhance the palatability of otherwise bland but healthy foods, such as rolled oats (7), as acknowledged in the U.S. Dietary Guidelines (3). Often, the reduced sweetness in reformulated lower-sugar products must be compensated for by using non-caloric or low-calorie sweeteners to maintain the desired taste profile (35). Our group has previously demonstrated that non-caloric and low-calorie sweeteners are now present in a significant proportion of non-low-calorie products (37), which may increase exposure in unsuspecting consumers and potentially lead to adverse health outcomes, such as cancer (38). It should be noted that the current risk assessment approach based on total diet studies (39) does not consider non-low-calorie products as a potential source of these non-caloric or low-calorie sweeteners, leading to a significant underestimation of exposure.
Finally, while the consumption of fresh or minimally processed foods, which are naturally low in added/free sugar, is undoubtedly healthier and should be promoted, it is unrealistic to expect individuals, particularly those with busy lifestyles who rely to some extent on processed foods to meet their nutritional needs, to eliminate processed foods in order to adhere to the recommendation of consuming < 10% of daily energy intake from added/free sugar. Our group (40, 41) and others (42) have shown that for the average consumer, excessively reducing added/free sugar, such as below 5% of daily energy intake, as recommended by the WHO (2) and SACN (4), may result in lower intake of essential micronutrients due to the elimination of many nutrient-dense foods that contain added/free sugar from the diet.
5. No ready access to essential information for translating the guidelines into practice
Currently, except for the U.S. (43), labeling added/free sugars on packaged foods is not mandatory. This lack of mandatory labeling means that the general public does not have sufficient information to implement the quantitative guidelines effectively (44). Some public health agencies provide an example upper limit of 50 grams of added/free sugar per day based on a 2,000 kcal/day diet (2), and this limit is often cited in popular media (45). However, without nutrition labels indicating the added/free sugar content of the foods they consume, consumers, who already have trouble differentiating between the terms total, added, and free sugar (44), face difficulties in assessing their added/free sugar intake in relation to this numerical limit. Furthermore, this limit is not directly applicable to individuals with caloric requirements above or below 2,000 kcal/day. Specialized food composition databases that provide added/free sugar values are only available in a limited number of countries (46–48), which means that health professionals in other countries have limited means to evaluate their clients' diets against the quantitative guidelines.
6. Lack of relevance and applicability to clinical practice
Given the lack of easily accessible information on the added/free sugar content of foods and beverages, the practical advice given to the general public regarding sugar intake often revolves around limiting the consumption of high-sugar foods and beverages such as SSBs and confectionery (49, 50). In this context, it is uncertain how the quantitative guidelines, which recommend limiting the intake of added/free sugar to below 10% (or 5%) of daily energy intake, offer additional clarity beyond the standard advice. As an extreme example, consumers may be unsure whether a diet containing 10% of energy from added/free sugar, primarily from SSBs, is healthier than a diet that contains 15% of energy from added/free sugar derived from a mix of nutrient-dense foods (e.g., breakfast cereals, sweetened yogurt).
7. Discussion and final remarks
We believe that guidelines regarding sugars and health for the general public should consist of clear and practical messages that are easily understood and can be implemented. These messages should focus on limiting the consumption of SSBs and other high-sugar discretionary/junk foods, as these recommendations are supported by robust scientific evidence. While there may be ongoing controversies surrounding the validity of quantitative targets for added/free sugar intake, we suggest that such targets be reserved for research purposes. Currently, consumers and health professionals in most parts of the world lack the necessary knowledge and information to apply these quantitative guidelines in their daily lives effectively. Therefore, it is essential to prioritize accessible and actionable recommendations that align with the understanding and needs of the general population.
Author contributions
JL conceived the idea, wrote the first draft of the article, and has primary responsibility for the content presented. RRY collected information for the tables and figures and contributed substantially to the subsequent writing of the article. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
Acknowledgments
The manuscript text written by the authors was edited using ChatGPT 3.5 to enhance clarity, coherence, flow, and grammar, using the prompt Improve the text below for clarity, flow, coherence and grammar for an academic audience.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Supplementary material
The Supplementary Material for this article can be found online at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fnut.2023.1227377/full#supplementary-material
References
1. Alexander Bentley R, Ruck DJ, Fouts HN. US obesity as delayed effect of excess sugar. Econ Hum Biol. (2020) 36:100818. doi: 10.1016/j.ehb.2019.100818
2. World Health Organization. Guideline: Sugar Intake for Adults and Children. Geneva: WHO Department of Nutrition for Health and Development (NHD), (2015), pp. 50.
3. US Department of Agriculture. Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020 – 2025. USDA: Washington, DC (2020).
4. Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition. Why 5%? An Explanation of the Scientific Advisory Committee on Nutrition's Recommendations About Sugars and Health, in the Context of Current Intakes of Free Sugars, Other Dietary Recommendations and the Changes in Dietary Habits Needed to Reduce Consumption of Free Sugars to 5% of Dietary Energy. London: Public Health England (2015).
5. Erickson J, Sadeghirad B, Lytvyn L, Slavin J, Johnston BC. The scientific basis of guideline recommendations on sugar intake. Ann Intern Med. (2017) 166:257–67. doi: 10.7326/M16-2020
6. Archer E, Arjmandi B. Falsehoods and facts about dietary sugars: a call for evidence-based policy. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr. (2021) 61:3725–39. doi: 10.1080/10408398.2020.1804320
7. Yan RR, Chan CB, Louie JCY. Current WHO recommendation to reduce free sugar intake from all sources to below 10% of daily energy intake for supporting overall health is not well supported by available evidence. Am J Clin Nutr. (2022) 116:15–39. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqac084
8. Stanhope KL. Guidelines to lower intake of added sugar are necessary and justified. Nat Rev Cardiol. (2022) 19:569–70. doi: 10.1038/s41569-022-00750-5
9. Wang Y, Zhao R, Wang B, Zhao C, Zhu B, Tian X. The dose-response associations of sugar-sweetened beverage intake with the risk of stroke, depression, cancer, and cause-specific mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies. Nutrients. (2022) 14:777. doi: 10.3390/nu14040777
10. Neelakantan N, Park SH, Chen G-C, van Dam RM. Sugar-sweetened beverage consumption, weight gain, and risk of type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular diseases in Asia: a systematic review. Nutr Rev. (2021) 80:50–67. doi: 10.1093/nutrit/nuab010
11. Laguna JC, Alegret M, Cofán M, Sánchez-Tainta A, Díaz-López A, Martínez-González MA. Simple sugar intake and cancer incidence, cancer mortality and all-cause mortality: a cohort study from the PREDIMED trial. Clin Nutr. (2021) 40:5269–77. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2021.07.031
12. Janzi S, Ramne S, González-Padilla E, Johnson L, Sonestedt E. Associations between added sugar intake and risk of four different cardiovascular diseases in a Swedish population-based prospective cohort study. Front Nutr. (2020) 7:603653. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2020.603653
13. Bergeron A, Labonté M, Brassard D, Laramée C, Robitaille J, Desroches S, et al. Associations of intake of free and naturally occurring sugars from solid foods and drinks with cardiometabolic risk factors in a Quebec adult population: the PREDISE (PRÉDicteurs individuels, sociaux et environnementaux) study. J Nutr. (2021) 151:1561–71. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab042
14. Zheng M, Allman-Farinelli M, Heitmann BL, Toelle B, Marks G, Cowell C. Liquid versus solid energy intake in relation to body composition among Australian children. J Hum Nutr Diet. (2015) 28 Suppl 2:70–9. doi: 10.1111/jhn.12223
15. Welsh JA, Wang Y, Figueroa J, Brumme C. Sugar intake by type (added vs. naturally occurring) and physical form (liquid vs. solid) and its varying association with children's body weight, NHANES 2009-2014. Pediatr Obes. (2018) 13:213–21. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12264
16. Ramne S, Alves Dias J, González-Padilla E, Olsson K, Lindahl B, Engström G. Association between added sugar intake and mortality is nonlinear and dependent on sugar source in 2 Swedish population-based prospective cohorts. Am J Clin Nutr. (2019) 109:411–23. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy268
17. DiMeglio DP, Mattes RD. Liquid versus solid carbohydrate: effects on food intake and body weight. Int J Obes. (2000) 24:794–800. doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0801229
18. Raben A, Vasilaras TH, Møller AC, Astrup A. Sucrose compared with artificial sweeteners: different effects on ad libitum food intake and body weight after 10 wk of supplementation in overweight subjects. Am J Clin Nutr. (2002) 76:721–9. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/76.4.721
19. Semnani-Azad Z, Khan TA, Blanco Mejia S, Souza RJde, Leiter LA, Kendall CWC. Association of major food sources of fructose-containing sugars with incident metabolic syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open. (2020) 3:e209993. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.9993
20. Chiavaroli L, Cheung A, Ayoub-Charette S, Ahmed A, Lee D. Important food sources of fructose-containing sugars and adiposity: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled feeding trials. Am J Clin Nutr. (2023) 117:741–65. doi: 10.1016/j.ajcnut.2023.01.023
21. Sundborn G, Thornley S, Merriman TR, Lang B, King C, Lanaspa MA. Are liquid sugars different from solid sugar in their ability to cause metabolic syndrome? Obesity. (2019) 27:879–87. doi: 10.1002/oby.22472
22. López-Portillo ML, Huidobro A, Tobar-Calfucoy E, Yáñez C, Retamales-Ortega R. The association between fasting glucose and sugar sweetened beverages intake is greater in Latin Americans with a high polygenic risk score for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Nutrients. (2021) 14:69. doi: 10.3390/nu14010069
23. Togo J, Hu S, Li M, Niu C, Speakman JR. Impact of dietary sucrose on adiposity and glucose homeostasis in C57BL/6J mice depends on mode of ingestion: liquid or solid. Mol Metab. (2019) 27:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.molmet.2019.05.010
24. Sigala DM Widaman AM Hieronimus B Nunez MV Lee V Benyam Y Effects Effects of consuming sugar-sweetened beverages for 2 weeks on 24-h circulating leptin profiles ad libitum food intake and body weight in young adults. Nutrients. (2020) 12:893. doi: 10.3390/nu12123893
25. Sigala DM, Stanhope KL. An exploration of the role of sugar-sweetened beverage in promoting obesity and health disparities. Curr Obes Rep. (2021) 10:39–52. doi: 10.1007/s13679-020-00421-x
26. Teff KL, Elliott SS, Tschöp M, Kieffer TJ, Rader D, Heiman M. Dietary fructose reduces circulating insulin and leptin, attenuates postprandial suppression of ghrelin, and increases triglycerides in women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2004) 89:2963–72. doi: 10.1210/jc.2003-031855
27. Stanhope KL, Griffen SC, Bair BR, Swarbrick MM, Keim NL, Havel PJ. Twenty-four-hour endocrine and metabolic profiles following consumption of high-fructose corn syrup-, sucrose-, fructose-, and glucose-sweetened beverages with meals. Am J Clin Nutr. (2008) 87:1194–203. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/87.5.1194
28. Shangguan S, Mozaffarian D, Sy S, Lee Y, Liu J, Wilde PE. Health impact and cost-effectiveness of achieving the national salt and sugar reduction initiative voluntary sugar reduction targets in the United States: a microsimulation study. Circulation. (2021) 144:1362–76. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053678
29. NYC Health. Sugar Reduction Targets from the National Salt and Sugar Reduction Initiative. New York, NY: NYC Health (2021).
30. Vercammen KA, Dowling EA, Sharkey AL, Curtis CJ, Wang J, Kenney EL. Estimated reductions in added sugar intake among us children and youth in response to sugar reduction targets. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2022) 122:1455–64. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2022.02.008
31. Public Health England. Sugar Reduction: Achieving the 20%. London: Public Health England (2017).
32. Department of Health (Australia). Partnership Reformulation Program – Summary of Food Categories and Reformulation Targets. Adelaide SA: Department of Health (Australia) (2021).
33. Chan LY, Coyle DH, Wu JHY, Louie JCY. Total and free sugar levels and main types of sugars used in 18,784 local and imported pre-packaged foods and beverages sold in Hong Kong. Nutrients. (2021) 13:3404. doi: 10.3390/nu13103404
34. Dunford EK, Coyle DH, Louie JC, Rooney K, Blaxland A, Pettigrew H. Changes in the presence of nonnutritive sweeteners, sugar alcohols, and free sugars in Australian foods. J Acad Nutr Diet. (2022) 122:991–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jand.2021.11.018
35. Goldfein KR, Slavin JL. Why sugar is added to food: food science 101. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Safety. (2015) 14:644–56. doi: 10.1111/1541-4337.12151
36. Chazelas E, Deschasaux M, Srour B, Kesse-Guyot E, Julia C, Alles B. Food additives: distribution and co-occurrence in 126,000 food products of the French market. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:3980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-60948-w
37. Coyle DH, Dunford EK, Wu JH, Louie JC. The use of non-nutritive and low-calorie sweeteners in 19,915 local and imported pre-packaged foods in Hong Kong. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1861. doi: 10.3390/nu13061861
38. Debras C, Chazelas E, Srour B, Druesne-Pecollo N, Esseddik Y, Szabo F, et al. Artificial sweeteners and cancer risk: results from the nutrinet-santé population-based cohort study. PLoS Med. (2022) 19:e1003950. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003950
39. Lee JG, Kim SH, Kim HJ, Yoon HJ. Total diet studies as a tool for ensuring food safety. Toxicol Res. (2015) 31:221–6. doi: 10.5487/TR.2015.31.3.221
40. Wong THT, Mok A, Ahmad R, Rangan A, Louie JCY. Intake of free sugar and micronutrient dilution in Australian children and adolescents. Eur J Nutr. (2019) 58:2485–95. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1801-3
41. Mok A, Ahmad R, Rangan A, Louie JCY. Intake of free sugars and micronutrient dilution in Australian adults. Am J Clin Nutr. (2018) 107:94–104. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqx008
42. Fujiwara A, Okada E, Okada C, Matsumoto M, Takimoto H. Association between free sugars intake and nutrient dilution among Japanese adults: the 2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey, Japan. Eur J Nutr. (2020) 59:3827–39. doi: 10.1007/s00394-020-02213-4
43. Magnuson EA, Chan PS. Added sugar labeling. Circulation. (2019) 139:2625–7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.040325
44. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Literature Review on Consumer Knowledge, Attitudes and Behaviours Relating to Sugars and Food Labelling. Canberra, ACT: FSANZ (2018).
45. Livingston M. How Much Sugar Should You Eat in a Day? The Experts Explain. San Francisco, CA: CNet.com (2022).
46. Bowman SA. Added sugars: definition and estimation in the USDA food patterns equivalents databases. J Food Compost Anal. (2017) 64:64–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jfca.2017.07.013
47. Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Determining the Amount of Added Sugars and Free Sugars in Foods Listed in the AUSNUT 2011-13 Dataset. Canberra, ACT: FSANZ (2021).
48. Wanselius J, Axelsson C, Moraeus L, Berg C, Mattisson I, Larsson C. Procedure to estimate added and free sugars in food items from the swedish food composition database used in the national dietary survey riksmaten adolescents 2016–17. Nutrients. (2019) 11:1342. doi: 10.3390/nu11061342
49. The American Heart Association. Tips for Cutting Down on Sugar. Dallas, TX: The American Heart Association (2018).
Keywords: free sugars, guidelines, evidence-based, general public, added sugars
Citation: Yan RR and Louie JCY (2023) Sugar guidelines should be evidence-based and contain simple and easily actionable messages. Front. Nutr. 10:1227377. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1227377
Received: 23 May 2023; Accepted: 31 July 2023;
Published: 15 August 2023.
Edited by:
Gemma Bridge, Independent Researcher, Leeds, United KingdomReviewed by:
P. Courtney Gaine, The Sugar Association, Inc., United StatesCopyright © 2023 Yan and Louie. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jimmy Chun Yu Louie, amltbXlsb3VpZSYjeDAwMDQwO3N3aW4uZWR1LmF1