Skip to main content

CORRECTION article

Front. Nutr., 27 July 2022
Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism
This article is part of the Research Topic Insights in Nutrition and Metabolism View all 18 articles

Corrigendum: Nutrient intake and nutrition status in vegetarians and vegans in comparison to omnivores—the nutritional evaluation (NuEva) study

\nChristine Dawczynski,
Christine Dawczynski1,2*Thomas Weidauer,Thomas Weidauer1,2Cora RichertCora Richert3Peter Schlattmann,Peter Schlattmann2,4Kristin DawczynskiKristin Dawczynski5Michael KiehntopfMichael Kiehntopf3
  • 1Junior Research Group Nutritional Concepts, Institute of Nutritional Sciences, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany
  • 2Competence Cluster for Nutrition and Cardiovascular Health (nutriCARD), Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
  • 3Institute of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital, Jena, Germany
  • 4Department of Medical Statistics, Informatics and Data Science, University Hospital, Jena, Germany
  • 5Department for Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Sophien- and Hufeland Hospital, Weimar, Germany

A corrigendum on
Nutrient intake and nutrition status in vegetarians and vegans in comparison to omnivores—the nutritional evaluation (NuEva) study

by Dawczynski, C., Weidauer, T., Richert, C., Schlattmann, P., Dawczynski, K., and Kiehntopf. M. (2022). Front. Nutr. 9:819106. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.819106

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Table 1. Characteristics of the study collective - NuEva-screening (Median/Interquartile range (IQR); (Min - Max)).” as published. The Information “*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05)” was lost. The corrected legend appears below.

“Groups: 1 = omnivores, 2 = flexitarians, 3 = vegetarians, 4 = vegans.

*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05).”

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Table 2. Daily intake of energy and macronutrients (self-reports, 5 days) - NuEva-screening (Median/IQR; (Min - Max)).” as published. The Information “*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05)” was lost. The corrected legend appears below.

“Groups: 1 = omnivores, 2 = flexitarians, 3 = vegetarians, 4 = vegans.

Adjusted for age: Σ monounsaturated fatty acids (%).

§Reference intake: DGE, 2019.

*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05).”

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Table 3. Daily intake of vitamins (self-reports, 5 days) - NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).” as published. The Information “*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05)” was lost. The corrected legend appears below.

“Groups: 1 = omnivores, 2 = flexitarians, 3 = vegetarians, 4 = vegans.

§Reference intake: DGE, 2019.

Significant influence of sex: vitamin B1, B2, B12.

*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05).”

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Table 4. Daily intake of minerals and trace elements (self-reports, 5 days) - NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).” as published. The Information “*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05)” was lost. To complete the data, we would like to insert the information that the calculation of iodine and selenium intake was not possible. The corrected legend appears below.

“Groups: 1 = omnivores, 2 = flexitarians, 3 = vegetarians, 4 = vegans.

Adjusted for BMI: Iodine (μg).

§Reference intake: DGE, 2019.

Significant influence of sex: chloride, iron, copper, zinc.

The selenium intake was not calculated because the nutritional software (PRODI®) does not provide any information on the selenium levels in foods.

The iodine intake was not calculated because the additional intake by fortified table salt was unknown.

*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05).”

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Table 5. Anthropometric data, body composition and blood lipids – NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).” as published. The Information “*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05)” was lost. The corrected legend appears below.

“Adjusted for age: BMI, total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1, apolipoprotein B.

Adjusted for BMI: waist circumferences.

Significant influence of sex: weight, BMI, body cell mass, extracellular mass, BCM/ECM, metabolic rate, body fat, body water, lean body mass, phase angle, cell amount, HDL cholesterol, apolipoprotein A1/ apolipoprotein B.

*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05).”

In the published article, there was an error in the legend for “Table 6. Vitamins, minerals and trace elements in plasma/serum and 24h urine – NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).” as published. The Information “*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05)” was lost. In addition, the information on 4cB12score [§4cB12 score - combined index of B12 deficiency (normal range:−0.5 - 1.0)] was also lost. The corrected legend appears below.

TABLE 6
www.frontiersin.org

Table 6. Vitamins, minerals and trace elements in plasma/serum and 24h urine – NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).

“Significant influence of sex: zinc.

Adjusted for age: vitamin E.

*Diet groups with different indices differ significantly (p < 0.05).

§4cB12 score - combined index of B12 deficiency (normal range:−0.5 - 1.0).”

In the published article, there was an error in “Table 6. Vitamins, minerals and trace elements in plasma/serum and 24h urine – NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).” as published. The units for ferritin (μg/l), transferrin (g/l) and transferrin saturation (%) were lost in Table 6. The corrected “Table 6. Vitamins, minerals and trace elements in plasma/serum and 24h urine – NuEva-screening (Median / IQR; (Min - Max)).” and its legend appear below.

The authors apologize for this error and state that this does not change the scientific conclusions of the article in any way. The original article has been updated.

Publisher's note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Keywords: vegans, vegetarians, omnivores, nutrient intake, blood lipids, body weight

Citation: Dawczynski C, Weidauer T, Richert C, Schlattmann P, Dawczynski K and Kiehntopf M (2022) Corrigendum: Nutrient intake and nutrition status in vegetarians and vegans in comparison to omnivores—the nutritional evaluation (NuEva) study. Front. Nutr. 9:975159. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.975159

Received: 21 June 2022; Accepted: 15 July 2022;
Published: 27 July 2022.

Edited and reviewed by: Ellen E. Blaak, Maastricht University, Netherlands

Copyright © 2022 Dawczynski, Weidauer, Richert, Schlattmann, Dawczynski and Kiehntopf. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Christine Dawczynski, Christine.Dawczynski@uni-jena.de

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.