Yimeng Lu1,2†
Xudong Zhang
Shanshan Wu
Jichun Tan- 1Center of Reproductive Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
- 2Key Laboratory of Reproductive Dysfunction Disease and Fertility Remodeling of Liaoning Province, Shenyang, China
Background: Vitamin D plays an invaluable role in reproductive health, but vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency are generally common among couples of childbearing age and pregnant women. This study aimed to evaluate the evolution, development trend, and research hotspot of publications on vitamin D and reproductive health.
Methods: The literature on vitamin D and reproductive health between 2012 and 2021 was retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC). We used VOSviewer and CiteSpace to analyze publication years, countries, institutions, journals, highly cited authors and publications, and co-occurrence and citation bursts of keywords.
Results: A total of 1,828 articles and reviews on vitamin D and reproductive health published between 2012 and 2021 were identified. The annual publication outputs showed steady growth, with the most publications (272) and citations (7,097) in 2021. The United States contributed the most publications (458) and had the highest h-index (58). In terms of the number of publications and h-index, the journal named Nutrients ranked first. Nutrition dietetics, obstetrics gynecology, and endocrinology metabolism were three well-represented disciplines in research on vitamin D and reproductive health. Hollis BW, Wagner CL, and Litonjua AA were the top three most productive authors in this field during the last decade. Apart from vitamin D, the five keywords with the most frequent occurrence were vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy, risk, vitamin D supplementation, and 25-hydroxyvitamin D. Keyword citation burst analysis revealed that low birth weight, adipose tissue, marker, and embryo had a citation burst lasting until 2021.
Conclusion: In conclusion, vitamin D has received continuous attention in the field of reproductive health, and there appears to have a higher level of research in North America. Multidisciplinary intersection contributed to the in-depth exploration in this field. And the effect of maternal vitamin D levels on fetal lipid metabolism and the prediction of fertility by vitamin D-related markers might be hotspots for the research.
Introduction
Vitamin D is an essential fat-soluble vitamin that serves a vital role in physiological processes such as calcium and phosphorus metabolism, immune regulation, cell growth, differentiation, and apoptosis in the body (1). Vitamin D is a steroid derivative, which can be divided into ergocalciferol (vitamin D2) and cholecalciferol (vitamin D3) according to the chemical constitution (2). Vitamin D2 is sourced from the UV irradiation of ergosterol in some plants or fungi, while vitamin D3 is mostly synthesized from 7-dehydrocholesterol in the skin following the UV irradiation (3). It is estimated that about 80% of the body’s vitamin D comes from the endogenous synthesis in the skin (ambient UV exposure), and only 20% comes from exogenous intake, including vitamin D3–exogenous (egg yolks and oily fish), vitamin D2 fortified foods (margarine and breakfast cereals) and vitamin supplements (3, 4). After binding to the multifunctional vitamin D-binding protein (VDBP), vitamin D is transported to the liver, where it is transformed by the action of 25-hydroxylation into 25-hydroxy vitamin D3 [25-(OH)D3], which is its main form of circulation and storage in the human body. Then, 25-(OH)D3 needs to be metabolized to 1,25-(OH)2D3, the main active form of vitamin D, by the action of 1α-hydroxylase, which is expressed by many cell types (i.e., skin, immune cells, bone cells, placenta), but the highest concentration is found in the kidney proximal tubule cells (5, 6).
1,25-(OH)2D3 exerts hormone-like effects by binding to the vitamin D receptor (VDR). VDR belongs to the steroid receptor family, widely present in various tissues of the body, including the intestines, renal tubules, skin, pancreas, skeleton, immune system, and germ tissues (7). The binding of 1,25-(OH)2D3 to the ligand-binding domain of VDR promotes the phosphorylation of VDR and the heterodimerization of retinoid X receptor (RXR) to form a 1,25-(OH)2D3-VDR/RXR complex which interacts with the vitamin D responsive elements (VDRE) in the promotor region of target genes to exert the genomic effects (6, 8). In the non-genomic pathway, the 1,25-(OH)2D3-VDR-caveolin-1 complex induces modifications in cellular signaling pathways, thereby affecting cellular function (9). The VDR gene, located on chromosome 12, has single nucleotide polymorphism, which can have biological functions (8). VDR polymorphisms are closely related to renal diseases, bone biology, cancer, diabetes, and other diseases, which are expected to be a diagnostic tool for the diseases, but further large-scale population studies are needed (10).
The high prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is a worldwide problem, especially in pregnant and reproductive-age women (11, 12). Recent studies have shown that vitamin D played an important role in the regulation of female reproductive health and was involved in the oocyte development, and production of anti-mullerian (AMH), ovarian steroidogenesis, and endometrial receptivity (13). Vitamin D deficiency can lead to adverse pregnancy outcomes and cause a variety of reproductive disorders. Some meta-analyses have reported that vitamin D deficiency could increase the risks of preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), maternal infections, intrauterine growth restriction, and preterm birth (14–16). Vitamin D deficiency is associated with a high risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy (17). Matias et al. found that vitamin D can downregulate the activation of the inflammasome and the TLR4-MyD88-NF-κB pathway in preeclampsia (18). Evidence suggested that vitamin D could improve insulin sensitivity by enhancing insulin responsiveness to glucose transport (19) and thus prevent the occurrence of GDM. A prospective study demonstrated follicular fluid vitamin D level was positively correlated with clinical pregnancy and implantation rates and was an independent predictor of the success of in vitro fertilization treatment (20). Moreover, vitamin D was also involved in the development of reproductive disorders including polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) (21), endometriosis (22), and uterine fibroids (23).
Bibliometric analysis is a world-accepted statistical evaluation of published articles and has grown in popularity (24), which was first proposed by American bibliographers in 1969. Through qualitative and quantitative analysis of publications, it could use literature metrology characteristics to provide investigators with crucial messages and discover frontiers and evaluate the distribution of countries/regions, authors, and journals in a certain specific field (25). In line with the growing interest in the role of vitamin D in reproductive health, there is a growing body of literature, including numerous systematic reviews and meta-analyses, but few bibliometric analyses explored the hot spots and frontiers of research in this field. In this study, we aimed to provide a general description of quantitative and visual information in the global literature on the associations between vitamin D and reproductive health, identifying its emerging trends and potential hot spots from various aspects through integrative analysis of relevant information from manuscripts published worldwide from 2012 to 2021. We presented a brief discussion of vitamin D-reproductive research and predicted possible trends in this field over the next few years, laying a foundation for the direction and development of future research.
Materials and methods
Data collection and search strategy
All relevant articles published between 2012 and 2021 were retrieved from the Web of Science (WoS) Core Collection (WoSCC), one of the most widely used literature search databases. The main merits of the WoS database are a wide range of applications, few utilization restrictions, convenience to support horizontal comparison, and robust tools that assist in conducting advanced assessments over gathered information. The search strategies were as follows: Topic = (“reproducti*” OR “*fertil*” OR “steril*” OR “pregnan*”) AND Topic = (“*Vitamin D*”) AND Language = (English). The timespan was set from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2021. For document types, only original articles and reviews were included in the study, with a total of 4,187 publications. Similarly, we searched for studies with the Topic = (“Vitamin D*”) following the same search strategies. A total of 48,493 relevant literature were retrieved. To avoid possible bias produced by continuous database updating, the retrieval and export of documents were created within 1 day (May 1, 2022). As well, to ensure the accuracy of retrieval, two independent authors (Xudong Zhang and Yimeng Lu) performed the search process and confirmed the search query and results. After excluding those on unrelated search topics (n = 2,359), the remaining 1,828 publications were included in the subsequent analyses.
Data extraction and analysis
The retrieved data were downloaded and exported into different formats for further analysis. The “Analyze Results” and “Citation Report” functions of WoS were utilized for basic information statistics, including annual production, WoS categories, and quality of publications by country, institution, author, and journal. The quality of publications in this study mainly referred to the number of publications, the sum of the times cited, average citations per item (ACI), and h-index. Impact factors and category quartiles of journals for individual publications were collected from the 2021 Journal Citation Reports (JCR) (Clarivate Analytics, Philadelphia, United States). The country distribution maps were created using the online mapchart.1
VOSviewer and CiteSpace, two common software for bibliometric analysis, were employed to further analyze the underlying connections and key themes. We used VOSviewer (1.6.17, Leiden University, the Netherlands) to visualize co-authorship among countries/institutions/authors, co-citation of references, and co-occurrence of keywords. The specific steps included creating a map based on the bibliographic data, reading data from bibliographic database files, selecting the appropriate type and unit of analysis, and setting the counting method to full counting. In the figures obtained, the node represented country/institution/author/keyword, the size of the node indicated the number of publications or frequency of occurrence, the thickness of the curve showed the strength of the link, and the color reflected the cluster. CiteSpace is a Java-based software program and one of its features is citation burst analysis (26). CiteSpace (5.8. R3) was utilized to view citation bursts and a timeline of keywords. The parameters of CiteSpace were set as follows: link retaining factor (LRF = 3), look back years (LBY = 5), time slicing (from 2012 to 2021), years per slice (1), links (strength = cosine; scope = within slices), selection criteria (g-index, k = 25), and minimum duration (MD = 2). In the network graph, nodes represented various keywords, whereas the size of nodes reflected the frequency, and the connections between nodes represented the link.
Results
Temporal distribution map of the literature
A total of 1,828 pieces of literature from 2012 to 2021 related to Vitamin D and reproductive health were retrieved from WoS. There were 1,534 articles (83.92%) and 294 reviews (16.08%), respectively. As shown in Figure 1A, the number of publications on vitamin D and reproductive health generally showed an upward trend. From 2012 to 2016, the number of publications increased steadily, with a slight decline in 2017, and then continued to increase until reaching its peak (272 publications) in 2021. Similarly, the percentage of research on vitamin D and reproductive health in all vitamin D-related publications gradually increased from 2012 to 2016, declined in 2017, and remained volatile at approximately 4.40% from 2018 to 2021 (Figure 1B). Cited times of publications increased year by year, except for a slight drop in 2019, and the most citations (7,097 times) were achieved in 2021 (Figure 1A).
Figure 1. Trends in the growth of publications from 2012 to 2021. (A) The number of publications and citations per year on vitamin D and reproductive health. (B) Trends in the proportion of research on vitamin D and reproductive health in vitamin D-related research.
Distribution of countries and institutions
A total of 96 countries contributed to publications in this field (Figure 2). As shown in Table 1, the United States contributed the greatest number of publications (458, 25.06% of all), followed by China (283, 15.48%), England (187, 10.23%), Australia (147, 8.04%), and Canada (139, 7.60%). The top five countries in terms of ACI values were Canada (29.00), the United States (28.91), England (27.78), Denmark (24.29), and Australia (21.61). Regarding the h-index, the United States (58), England (38), and Canada (35) ranked in the top three. A total of 44 countries with more than five publications in the field were analyzed in the co-authorship analysis (Figure 3A). The five countries with the highest total link strength were the United States (total link strength = 359 times), England (264), Canada (168), Australia (135), and Denmark (124) (Table 1).
Figure 2. World map of countries contributing to vitamin D and reproductive health.
Table 1. Top 10 productive countries regarding the research on vitamin D and reproductive health.
Figure 3. Co-authorship analysis of countries and institutions. (A) Network map of co-authorship between countries with more than five publications. (B) Network map of co-authorship between institutions with more than 15 publications.
As shown in Table 2, the institution with the highest number of research publications in this field is Harvard University with a quantity of 96, followed by the University of Copenhagen (68) and Harvard Medical School (47). The research institution with the highest ACI value in this field was the Medical University of South Carolina, which had an ACI value of 65.62, followed by the University of London (31.72) and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (31.40). We analyzed the co-authorship of 46 institutions with more than 15 publications. The exclusion of one item that was not connected revealed the collaborations of 45 institutions (Figure 3B). The three institutions with the highest total link strength were the University of Copenhagen (total link strength = 149 times), Harvard Medical School (145), and Brigham and Women’s Hospital (127) (Table 2).
Table 2. Top 10 institutions in the studies of vitamin D and reproductive health.
Analysis of journals and distribution of disciplines
A total of 1,828 articles were published in 518 journals. As shown in Table 3, the journal with the highest number of articles in this field was Nutrients (108), followed by PLoS One (68), Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology (49), Journal of Maternal Fetal Neonatal Medicine (43), and BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (42). The journal with the highest ACI value was Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism (41.69), followed by American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (34.78), Fertility and Sterility (34.68), PLoS One (22.46), and European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (21.95). The top five journals in terms of h-index were Nutrients (25), PLoS One (24), Journal of Clinical Endocrinology Metabolism (24), BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth (17), and American Journal of Clinical Nutrition (17).
Table 3. Top 15 journals in the studies of vitamin D and reproductive health.
As shown in Table 4, the top three disciplines according to the number of publications were nutrition dietetics (393, 21.50%), obstetrics gynecology (384, 21.01%), and endocrinology metabolism (337, 18.44%). Additional disciplines represented in the literature were reproductive biology (142, 7.77%), pediatrics (119, 6.51%), biochemistry molecular biology (110, 6.02%), medicine general internal (105, 5.74%), public environmental occupational health (97, 5.31%), immunology (96, 5.25%), multidisciplinary sciences (94, 5.14%), and other disciplines.
Table 4. The top 20 subject categories in the studies of vitamin D and reproductive health.
Analysis of authors
As shown in Table 5, Hollis BW from the Medical University of South Carolina has the highest number of published articles (33), followed by Wagner CL from the Medical University of South Carolina (30) and Litonjua AA from the University of Rochester (26). The top three authors in terms of ACI values were Hollis BW (71.00), Wagner CL (64.93), and Camargo CA (49.88) from Massachusetts General Hospital. Five of the top 10 authors are from the United States, four are from England, and one is from Canada.
Table 5. Top 10 authors in the studies of vitamin D and reproductive health.
We analyzed a total of 204 authors that were co-authored in more than four publications (Figure 4). The five authors with the highest total link strength were Weiss ST (total link strength = 142 times), Litonjua AA (138), Harvey NC (130), Cooper C (129), and Godfrey KM (119). Three of the five are from the same institution called the University of Southampton.
Figure 4. Network map of co-authorship between authors with more than four publications.
Citation and co-citation analyses
Table 6 lists the top 10 documents with the highest citations. There were 501 citations for “Vitamin D effects on musculoskeletal health, immunity, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, cancer, fertility, pregnancy, dementia and mortality-A review of recent evidence,” (27) followed by “Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies,” (15) with 335 citations. The third-ranked article for the largest number of citations was “Maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” (14) with 290 citations.
Table 6. Top 10 citation analysis of documents on vitamin D and reproductive health.
Table 7 lists the top 10 references with the highest co-citations. The five references with the largest number of citations were by Aghajafari et al. (15), Holick (28), Holick et al. (29), Hollis et al. (30), and Bodnar et al. (31).
Table 7. Top 10 co-citation analysis of cited reference on vitamin D and reproductive health.
Research hotspots and frontier analysis
Keywords are highly summarized and focused on descriptions of the subject of the article, which means that keywords with high frequency can reflect the research hotspots and trends of major issues in related fields. As shown in Table 8, in addition to vitamin D, keywords with a high frequency of occurrence were vitamin D deficiency (890), pregnancy (858), risk (493), vitamin D supplementation (396), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (378), and women (377).
Table 8. The top 20 keywords in the studies of vitamin D and reproductive health.
We analyzed a total of 120 keywords that were identified as occurring more than 20 times (Figure 5). The size of the node represents the number of times the keyword appears, and the thickness of the curve between the nodes represents the frequency of the two keywords appearing together. The keywords formed five clusters, which represented the five major research directions in the field.
Figure 5. Network visualization of keywords in studies on vitamin D and reproductive health.
The red cluster was dominated by female, infertility, semen quality, PCOS, and VDR. Vitamin D could affect the synthesis of human hormones (32), the development of oocytes in women (13), the quality of sperm in men (33), and the implantation of the embryo (34). PCOS is one of the critical causes of infertility in childbearing women and its incidence was closely linked to vitamin D deficiency. VDR polymorphisms played an important role in the development of PCOS and associated hormonal and metabolic abnormalities (35).
The yellow cluster focused on randomized controlled trial (RCT), meta-analysis, and neonatal outcomes. RCTs and meta-analyses were the more common types of studies investigating the association between vitamin D and reproductive health. Most RCTs evaluated the efficacy of vitamin D supplementation on IVF outcomes (36), infant acute respiratory infections (37), psychological distress (38), maternal postnatal bone indices (39), and so on. The meta-analysis was a secondary analysis primarily based on RCTs. Neonatal outcomes involved in exploring the effects of maternal vitamin D deficiency on offspring, including small-for-gestational-age (40), neonatal bone mass (41), infant glucose metabolism (42), infant atopic dermatitis (43), infant acute respiratory infections (37), infant birth weight (44), offspring sex ratio (45), infant gut microbiota (46), offspring socioemotional development (47), infant neurodevelopment (48, 49).
The blue cluster was mainly composed of diet, nutrition, and pregnancy outcomes. Vitamin D is an exogenous nutrient that can be influenced by dietary patterns (50), making diet and nutrition a significant subject in this field. Pregnancy outcomes are primarily concerned with adverse maternal effects of abnormal vitamin D status (insufficiency or deficiency), including GDM, hypertension, and preeclampsia (14).
The main research topics of the green cluster were allergy, asthma, wheeze, population, and depression. The first three parts were mainly to study the relationship between preconception and pregnancy serum vitamin D concentration and childhood atopic diseases (51–53). Population referred to discussing the relevant social factors affecting vitamin D levels (54). Depression discussed the role of poor vitamin D in perinatal depression (55).
The high-frequency ones in the purple cluster were vitamin D supplementation, season, and determinants. This clustering mainly addressed relevant determinants of vitamin D levels, such as vitamin D supplementation and season.
Burst patterns of keywords can reveal the frontiers and priorities of research between vitamin D and reproductive health. As shown in Figure 6, the timeline is depicted as a year-sliced blue line, where the red section is the detected burst, indicating the start and end years and duration of the burst. Vitamin D insufficiency ranked first with the highest burst strength (10.55), followed by high prevalence (6.63), male (5.18), lactation (5.16), 25 hydroxyvitamin D concentration (4.78), and parathyroid hormone (4.78). The burst times of the terms bone mineral content, adverse pregnancy outcome, and low birth weight lasted for 4 years. Low birth weight, adipose tissue, marker, and embryo are currently within the burst period and might become new research foci in this field.
Figure 6. Top 20 keywords with the strongest citation bursts based on CiteSpace.
Discussion
In this paper, we conducted a bibliometric analysis of the literature on vitamin D and reproductive health published from 2012 to 2021 based on the visualization software CiteSpace and VOSviewer. The spatial and temporal distribution, author and journal contribution, core literature, research hotspots, and research frontier analysis were assessed. The timeline of keywords revealed the evolution of the research theme and the burst analysis suggested current research hotspots.
The research on vitamin D in reproductive health showed a steady upward trend. Research on vitamin D in the field of reproductive health can still arouse great interest so far. On one hand, it is inextricably linked to the benefits of vitamin D. Vitamin D has a physiological role in ovarian follicular development and luteinization, including alteration of AMH signaling, FSH sensitivity, and progesterone production and release (56). Vitamin D also performed vital functions in male reproduction. Serum 25-(OH)D3 level was positively associated with sperm motility and VDR in human spermatozoa could be regarded as a positive predictor of sperm quality (57). On the other hand, some of the effects of vitamin D on reproductive health are controversial and have not yet been elucidated. For example, there were differing views on whether vitamin D was associated with IVF outcomes or whether vitamin D supplementation could improve IVF pregnancy outcomes. A retrospective study that analyzed the association between serum 25-(OH)D3 level 7 days prior to embryo transfer and pregnancy revealed that vitamin D deficiency impaired clinical pregnancy rate in a single blastocyst transfer cycle (58). Conversely, a RCT by Somigliana et al. showed that a single oral dose of 600,000 IU of vitamin D3 did not improve IVF clinical pregnancy rates in women with normal weight (36).
The study of vitamin D in the reproductive health field showed a pattern of extensive coverage, but uneven development. As shown in Figure 1, approximately more than half of the countries in the world, covering 5 continents, have been involved in this area of research in the last decade. This was probably due to the high prevalence of vitamin D abnormalities (vitamin D insufficiency and deficiency) among the reproductive-aged and pregnant women, which was a worldwide phenomenon. Even in abundant sunshine’s tropical countries like India, the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency among reproductive-aged women is as high as 80%. Numerous studies indicated that vitamin D insufficiency or deficiency varied with geography, economic situation, social status, national policy (food fortification), and individual awareness (59–62). From raising population self-awareness, national intervention to the actual improvement of vitamin D levels, each country needs to further explore its own solutions.
Overall, the America, Europe, Asia, and Oceania were relatively active in this field, while Africa might be in a low active state due to limited economic development. Of these, North America, especially the United States and Canada, probably hold a stronger basis and more mature research system in the field, as 7 and 6 of the top 10 productive institutions and authors come from these two countries, respectively. The Medical University of South Carolina in the United States had the highest ACI, and the top two productive authors are from this institution (Tables 1, 2). The research team mainly focused on prenatal vitamin D screening (63), and the effects of vitamin D supplementation on early life (pregnancy, lactation, and childhood), including glycemic, lipidemic, oxidative stress biomarkers (64), inflammatory biomarkers (65), growth factors, immune-mediators (66), bone mineral density (67), the vaginal microbiome (68), preeclampsia (69) during pregnancy, preterm birth (70), offspring epigenetic clock (71), asthma, allergies and recurrent wheeze (72–75). The conclusions of most original studies were derived from RCTs, with high-level evidence and instructive significance. Furthermore, they also dabbled in basic research, using model animals to explore the effects of a low vitamin D diet on maternal hypertension as well as placental and fetal development (76). Researchers of the University of Southampton focused more on the association between vitamin D and bone-related outcomes such as maternal osteoporosis (39, 77), offspring bone structure (78), bone formation (79), bone mass (80), bone health (81–83) and fractures in late childhood (84). Concurrently, genetic variation in gene expression also received greater interest, with studies showing that detection of genetic susceptibility-related variant genes for vitamin D deficiency may guide vitamin D supplementation (85–87). Europe and Asia are also undergoing rapid development and are represented by the University of Southampton and Tehran University of Medical Sciences, respectively. Tehran University of Medical Sciences paid more attention to the role of vitamin D in male reproduction (88–90) and the mechanism by which vitamin D improved female reproductive disorders including endometriosis (91, 92), PCOS (93, 94), repeated implantation failure (51, 95), and endometritis (96).
It formed a development landscape of multidisciplinary intersection with nutrition, obstetrics and gynecology, and endocrinology metabolism as the core in this field. From Tables 3, 4, we can note that nutrition, gynecology and obstetrics, and endocrinology metabolism are the most dominant WoS categories and the scope of the top 15 journals. These were reflected in the literature on topics such as diet and vitamin D supplementation, the effects of vitamin D on the maternal and offspring, and the expression, role, and variation of vitamin D-related receptors and enzymes. Meanwhile, we should also take note of public environmental, environmental sciences, immunology, multidisciplinary sciences, biochemistry molecular biology, medicine research experimental, pharmacology, cell biology, and so on (Table 4). Multidisciplinary intersection contributed to a more comprehensive understanding of the role of vitamin D in reproductive health to guide the prevention, treatment, and even reversal of the consequences of vitamin D deficiency. The participation of basic disciplines is to split the whole into the tissue, cellular, and molecular levels, to gain an in-depth understanding of the mechanism.
Risk factors and adverse impacts of vitamin D deficiency were the focus of current research. The effect of maternal vitamin D levels on fetal lipid metabolism and the prediction of fertility by vitamin D-related markers might be hot spots and frontier areas in the field. Adipose tissue serves as a reservoir for vitamin D and affects its activity (97). Maternal vitamin D deficiency may affect fetal weight by influencing lipid metabolism, but the current findings are controversial. A birth cohort-based study in China suggested that maternal serum 25-(OH)D3 was positively associated with fetal birth weight and that vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy increased the risk of low birth weight infants (98). A study performed by Morales et al. indicated that maternal deficit of 25(OH)D3 was associated with an increased risk of fetal overweight and overweight in offspring at age 1 year (99). This might be due to maternal vitamin D deficiency resulting in polarization in the adipose depots (100). Moreover, vitamin D-related indexes are expected to be new markers for fertility assessment. Li et al. reported urine VDBP levels were significantly positively correlated with ovarian reserve and were expected to be a biomarker for predicting ovarian reserve (101). In assisted reproductive technology, vitamin D level in the follicular fluid could be used as a marker of oocyte quality, and vitamin D level in serum could be used as a marker of in vitro fertilization outcome (102). For men of childbearing age, the vitamin D metabolizing enzyme CYP24A1 was positively correlated with total sperm count, concentration, motility, and morphology, and the expression of CYP24A1 at the annulus of human spermatozoa might serve as a novel marker of semen quality (103). Therefore, further research is needed to clarify the above-mentioned effects of vitamin D, and RCT with a higher level of evidence might be a more meaningful research approach.
To our knowledge, this study is the first bibliometric analysis to explore the research on vitamin D in reproductive health. However, it had a few limitations. First, we only selected the WoS database and were limited by visual analysis software to include only the WoSCC. Second, we only analyzed the literature over the last decade, but this field has developed for such a considerable period of time that some previous views might be ignored by us. Finally, some of the more recently published articles may have been overlooked by the hotspot analysis because they did not have sufficient citations.
Conclusion
Vitamin D holds great research significance and the clinical application potential in the field of reproductive health. Based on visual analysis software, we evaluated the evolution process, contribution distribution, development trend, research hotspots, and frontiers of vitamin D research in reproductive health over the past decade. The field has received great attention globally, and the multidisciplinary intersection is the development trend. Furthermore, the effect of maternal vitamin D levels on fetal lipid metabolism and the prediction of fertility by vitamin D-related markers might be the focus of the research, and the exploration of population heterogeneity in the diagnostic criteria of vitamin D deficiency and the specific mechanisms of vitamin D effects on reproductive health should also be paid attention to.
Data availability statement
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Author contributions
XZ and YL were responsible for experiment conception and design, collection and assembly of data, data analysis and interpretation, and manuscript writing. SW and SZ contributed acquisition data and revised the manuscript. JT designed the work, provided technical guidance, and finally approved the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2018YFC1002105), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82071601), the Major Special Construction Plan for Discipline Construction Project of China Medical University (3110118033), and the Shengjing Freelance Researcher Plan of Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Publisher’s note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Footnotes
References
1. Zmijewski MA. Vitamin D and human health. Int J Mol Sci. (2019) 20:145. doi: 10.3390/ijms20010145
2. Wilson LR, Tripkovic L, Hart KH, Lanham-New SA. Vitamin D deficiency as a public health issue: using vitamin D2 or vitamin D3 in future fortification strategies. Proc Nutr Soc. (2017) 76:392–9. doi: 10.1017/S0029665117000349
3. Tripkovic L, Lambert H, Hart K, Smith CP, Bucca G, Penson S, et al. Comparison of vitamin D2 and vitamin D3 supplementation in raising serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D status: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr. (2012) 95:1357–64. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.111.031070.1
4. Young AR, Morgan KA, Harrison GI, Lawrence KP, Petersen B, Wulf HC, et al. A revised action spectrum for vitamin D synthesis by suberythemal UV radiation exposure in humans in vivo. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2021) 118:1–8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2015867118
5. Bikle D, Christakos S. New aspects of vitamin D metabolism and action — addressing the skin as source and target. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2020) 16:234–52. doi: 10.1038/s41574-019-0312-5
6. Martens P, Gysemans C, Verstuyf A, Mathieu C. Vitamin D ’s effect on immune function. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1248.
7. Wang Y, Zhu J, DeLuca HF. Where is the vitamin D receptor? Arch Biochem Biophys. (2012) 523:123–33. doi: 10.1016/j.abb.2012.04.001
8. Christakos S, Dhawan P, Verstuyf A, Verlinden L, Carmeliet G. Vitamin D: metabolism, molecular mechanism of action, and pleiotropic effects. Physiol Rev. (2015) 96:365–408. doi: 10.1152/physrev.00014.2015
9. Hii CS, Ferrante A. The non-genomic actions of vitamin D. Nutrients. (2016) 8:1–14. doi: 10.3390/nu8030135
10. Valdivielso JM, Fernandez E. Vitamin D receptor polymorphisms and diseases. Clin Chim Acta. (2006) 371:1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2006.02.016
11. Ginde AA, Sullivan AF, Mansbach JM Jr., Camargo CA. Vitamin D insufficiency in pregnant and nonpregnant women of childbearing age in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2010) 202:.e1–436. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2009.11.036.Vitamin
12. Peterlik M, Boonen S, Cross HS, Lamberg-Allardt C. Vitamin D and calcium insufficiency-related chronic diseases: an emerging world-wide public health problem. Int J Environ Res Public Health. (2009) 6:2585–607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph6102585
13. Shahrokhi SZ, Ghaffari F, Kazerouni F. Role of vitamin D in female reproduction. Clin Chim Acta. (2016) 455:33–8. doi: 10.1016/j.cca.2015.12.040
14. Wei SQ, Qi HP, Luo ZC, Fraser WD. Maternal vitamin D status and adverse pregnancy outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Matern Neonatal Med. (2013) 26:889–99. doi: 10.3109/14767058.2013.765849
15. Aghajafari F, Nagulesapillai T, Ronksley PE, Tough SC, O’Beirne M, Rabi DM. Association between maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level and pregnancy and neonatal outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational Studies. BMJ. (2013) 346:1–14. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f1169
16. Nassar N, Halligan GH, Roberts CL, Morris JM, Ashton AW. Systematic review of first-trimester vitamin D normative levels and outcomes of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2011) 205:.e1–208. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2011.03.058
17. Magnus MC, Miliku K, Bauer A, Engel SM, Felix JF, Jaddoe VWV, et al. Vitamin D and risk of pregnancy related hypertensive disorders: Mendelian randomisation study. BMJ. (2018) 361:k2167. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2167
18. Matias ML, Romao-Veiga M, Ribeiro VR, Nunes PR, Gomes VJ, Devides AC, et al. Progesterone and vitamin D downregulate the activation of the NLRP1/NLRP3 inflammasomes and TLR4-MyD88-NF-κB pathway in monocytes from pregnant women with preeclampsia. J Reprod Immunol. (2021) 144:103286. doi: 10.1016/j.jri.2021.103286
19. Buchanan TA, Xiang AH. Gestational diabetes mellitus. J Clin Invest. (2005) 115:485–91. doi: 10.1172/JCI200524531
20. Ozkan S, Jindal S, Greenseid K, Shu J, Zeitlian G, Hickmon C, et al. Replete vitamin D stores predict reproductive success following IVF. Fertil Steril. (2010) 94:1314–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.05.019.Replete
21. He C, Lin Z, Robb SW, Ezeamama AE. Serum vitamin d levels and polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nutrients. (2015) 7:4555–77. doi: 10.3390/nu7064555
22. Sayegh L, Fuleihan GEH, Nassar AH. Vitamin D in endometriosis: a causative or confounding factor? Metabolism. (2014) 63:32–41. doi: 10.1016/j.metabol.2013.09.012
23. Vergara D, Catherino WH, Trojano G, Tinelli A. Vitamin D: mechanism of action and biological effects in uterine fibroids. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1–11. doi: 10.3390/nu13020597
24. Zhang X, Lu Y, Wu S, Zhang S, Li S, Tan J. An overview of current research on mesenchymal stem cell-derived extracellular vesicles: a bibliometric analysis from 2009 to 2021. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. (2022) 10:910812. doi: 10.3389/fbioe.2022.910812
25. Mukherjee D, Lim WM, Kumar S, Donthu N. Guidelines for advancing theory and practice through bibliometric research. J Bus Res. (2022) 148:101–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.04.042
26. Chen C. Searching for intellectual turning points: progressive knowledge domain visualization. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. (2004) 101:5303–10. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0307513100
27. Pludowski P, Holick MF, Pilz S, Wagner CL, Hollis BW, Grant WB, et al. Vitamin D effects on musculoskeletal health, immunity, autoimmunity, cardiovascular disease, cancer, fertility, pregnancy, dementia and mortality-a review of recent evidence. Autoimmun Rev. (2013) 12:976–89. doi: 10.1016/j.autrev.2013.02.004
28. Holick MF. Vitamin D deficiency. N Engl J Med. (2007) 357:266–81. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7193.1284a
29. Holick MF, Binkley NC, Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Gordon CM, Hanley DA, Heaney RP, et al. Evaluation, treatment, and prevention of vitamin D deficiency: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2011) 96:1911–30. doi: 10.1210/jc.2011-0385
30. Hollis BW, Johnson D, Hulsey TC, Ebeling M, Wagner CL. Vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy: double-blind, randomized clinical trial of safety and effectiveness. J Bone Miner Res. (2011) 26:2341–57. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.463
31. Bodnar LM, Catov JM, Simhan HN, Holick MF, Powers RW, Roberts JM. Maternal vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of preeclampsia. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2007) 92:3517–22. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-0718
32. Wan T, Sun H, Mao Z, Zhang L, Chen X, Shi Y, et al. Vitamin D deficiency inhibits microRNA-196b-5p which regulates ovarian granulosa cell hormone synthesis, proliferation, and apoptosis by targeting RDX and LRRC17. Ann Transl Med. (2021) 9:1775–1775. doi: 10.21037/atm-21-6081
33. de Angelis C, Galdiero M, Pivonello C, Garifalos F, Menafra D, Cariati F, et al. The role of vitamin D in male fertility: a focus on the testis. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. (2017) 18:285–305. doi: 10.1007/s11154-017-9425-0
34. Cai S, Li J, Zeng S, Hu L, Peng Y, Tang S, et al. Impact of vitamin D on human embryo implantation—a prospective cohort study in women undergoing fresh embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. (2021) 115:655–64. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.09.005
35. Wehr E, Trummer O, Giuliani A, Gruber HJ, Pieber TR, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Vitamin D-associated polymorphisms are related to insulin resistance and vitamin D deficiency in polycystic ovary syndrome. Eur J Endocrinol. (2011) 164:741–9. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0134
36. Somigliana E, Sarais V, Reschini M, Ferrari S, Makieva S, Cermisoni GC, et al. Single oral dose of vitamin D3 supplementation prior to in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer in normal weight women: the SUNDRO randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. (2021) 225:.e1–283. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.04.234
37. Morris SK, Pell LG, Rahman MZ, Al Mahmud A, Shi J, Ahmed T, et al. Effects of maternal vitamin D supplementation during pregnancy and lactation on infant acute respiratory infections: follow-up of a randomized trial in Bangladesh. J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc. (2021) 10:901–9. doi: 10.1093/jpids/piab032
38. Rajabi-Naeeni M, Dolatian M, Qorbani M, Vaezi AA. Effect of omega-3 and vitamin D co-supplementation on psychological distress in reproductive-aged women with pre-diabetes and hypovitaminosis D: a randomized controlled trial. Brain Behav. (2021) 11:1–10. doi: 10.1002/brb3.2342
39. Curtis EM, Parsons C, Maslin K, D’Angelo S, Moon RJ, Crozier SR, et al. Bone turnover in pregnancy, measured by urinary CTX, is influenced by vitamin D supplementation and is associated with maternal bone health: findings from the maternal vitamin D osteoporosis study (MAVIDOS) trial. Am J Clin Nutr. (2021) 114:1600–11. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqab264
40. Chen B, Chen Y, Xu Y. Vitamin D deficiency in pregnant women: influenced by multiple risk factors and increase the risks of spontaneous abortion and small-for-gestational age. Medicine (Baltimore). (2021) 100:e27505. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000027505
41. Gharibeh N, Razaghi M, Vanstone CA, Wei S, McNally D, Rauch F, et al. Maternal vitamin d status and gestational weight gain as correlates of neonatal bone mass in healthy term breastfed young infants from Montreal, Canada. Nutrients. (2021) 13:4189. doi: 10.3390/nu13124189
42. Palacios C, Trak-Fellermeier MA, Melendez M, Campos M, Pomeroy J, Guo K, et al. Associations between vitamin d levels and glucose metabolism markers among pregnant women and their infants in Puerto Rico. Nutr Hosp. (2021) 38:1224–31. doi: 10.20960/nh.03600
43. Tian Y, Ye Y, Zhang Y, Dou L, Dou Y, Zhao P, et al. Maternal serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels and infant atopic dermatitis: a prospective cohort study. Pediatr Allergy Immunol. (2021) 32:1637–45. doi: 10.1111/pai.13582
44. Yang W, Jiao M, Xi L, Han N, Luo S, Xu X, et al. The association between maternal fat-soluble vitamin concentrations during pregnancy and infant birth weight in China. Br J Nutr. (2021) 125:1058–66. doi: 10.1017/S0007114520003347
45. Purdue-Smithe AC, Kim K, Nobles C, Schisterman EF, Schliep KC, Perkins NJ, et al. The role of maternal preconception vitamin D status in human offspring sex ratio. Nat Commun. (2021) 12:1–9. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23083-2
46. Zaidi AZ, Moore SE, Okala SG. Impact of maternal nutritional supplementation during pregnancy and lactation on the infant gut or breastmilk microbiota: a systematic review. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1137. doi: 10.3390/nu13041137
47. Francis EC, Charron E, Li M, Chen L, Mayo R, Butler LS, et al. Third trimester maternal vitamin D and early childhood socioemotional development. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. (2021) 35:350–8. doi: 10.1111/ppe.12736
48. Sass L, Vinding RK, Stokholm J, Bjarnadóttir E, Noergaard S, Thorsen J, et al. High-dose vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy and neurodevelopment in childhood: a prespecified secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw open. (2020) 3:e2026018. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.26018
49. Voltas N, Canals J, Hernández-Martínez C, Serrat N, Basora J, Arija V. Effect of vitamin D status during pregnancy on infant neurodevelopment: the eclipses study. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1–20. doi: 10.3390/nu12103196
50. Bolesławska I, Kowalówka M, Dobrzyńska M, Karaźniewicz-łada M, Przysławski J. Differences in the concentration of vitamin D metabolites in plasma due to the low-carbohydrate-high-fat diet and the Eastern European diet—a pilot study. Nutrients. (2021) 13:2774. doi: 10.3390/nu13082774
51. Lu M, Litonjua AA, O’Connor GT, Zeiger RS, Bacharier L, Schatz M, et al. Effect of early and late prenatal vitamin D and maternal asthma status on offspring asthma or recurrent wheeze. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 147:1234–1241.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.06.041
52. Knihtilä HM, Stubbs BJ, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Chu SH, Kelly RS, et al. Low gestational vitamin D level and childhood asthma are related to impaired lung function in high-risk children. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2021) 148:110–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.12.647
53. Briceno Noriega D, Savelkoul HFJ. Vitamin D and allergy susceptibility during gestation and early life. Nutrients. (2021) 13:1–19. doi: 10.3390/nu13031015
54. Weiler HA, Vanstone CA, Razaghi M, Gharibeh N, Patel S, Wei SQ, et al. Disparities in vitamin D status of Newborn infants from a diverse sociodemographic population in Montreal, Canada. J Nutr. (2022) 152:255–68. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxab344
55. Tan Q, Liu S, Chen D. Poor vitamin D status and the risk of maternal depression: a dose-response meta-analysis of observational studies. Public Health Nutr. (2021) 24:2161–70. doi: 10.1017/S1368980019004919
56. Irani M, Merhi Z. Role of vitamin D in ovarian physiology and its implication in reproduction: a systematic review. Fertil Steril. (2014) 102:460–8. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.04.046
57. Jensen MB. Vitamin D and male reproduction. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2014) 10:175–86. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2013.262
58. Polyzos NP, Anckaert E, Guzman L, Schiettecatte J, Van Landuyt L, Camus M, et al. Vitamin D deficiency and pregnancy rates in women undergoing single embryo, blastocyst stage, transfer (SET) for IVF/ICSI. Hum Reprod. (2014) 29:2032–40. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu156
59. Miller KM, De Klerk NH, Davis EA, Lucas RM, Hart PH, Haynes A. Demographic and clinical predictors of vitamin D status in pregnant women tested for deficiency in Western Australia. Aust N Z J Public Health. (2021) 45:474–81. doi: 10.1111/1753-6405.13150
60. Chang CJ, Barr DB, Zhang Q, Dunlop AL, Smarr MM, Kannan K, et al. Associations of single and multiple per- and polyfluoroalkyl substance (PFAS) exposure with vitamin D biomarkers in African American women during pregnancy. Environ Res. (2021) 202:111713. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2021.111713
61. Moos C, Duus KS, Frederiksen P, Heitmann BL, Andersen V. Exposure to the danish mandatory vitamin D fortification policy in prenatal life and the risk of developing coeliac disease—the importance of season: a semi ecological study. Nutrients. (2020) 12:1–11. doi: 10.3390/nu12051243
62. Han T, Dong J, Zhang J, Zhang C, Wang Y, Zhang Z, et al. Nutrient supplementation among pregnant women in China: an observational study. Public Health Nutr. (2021) 25:1537–42. doi: 10.1017/S1368980021001269
63. Rostami M, Tehrani FR, Simbar M, Yarandi RB, Minooee S, Hollis BW, et al. Effectiveness of prenatal Vitamin D deficiency screening and treatment program: a stratified randomized field trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2018) 103:2936–48. doi: 10.1210/jc.2018-00109
64. Motamed S, Nikooyeh B, Kashanian M, Chamani M, Hollis BW, Neyestani TR. Evaluation of the efficacy of two doses of vitamin D supplementation on glycemic, lipidemic and oxidative stress biomarkers during pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. (2020) 20:619. doi: 10.1186/s12884-020-03311-1
65. Motamed S, Nikooyeh B, Kashanian M, Hollis BW, Neyestani TR. Efficacy of two different doses of oral vitamin D supplementation on inflammatory biomarkers and maternal and neonatal outcomes. Matern Child Nutr. (2019) 15:1–10. doi: 10.1111/mcn.12867
66. Khatiwada A, Wolf BJ, Mulligan JK, Shary JR, Hewison M, Baatz JE, et al. Effects of vitamin D supplementation on circulating concentrations of growth factors and immune-mediators in healthy women during pregnancy. Pediatr Res. (2021) 89:554–62. doi: 10.1038/s41390-020-0885-7
67. Wei W, Shary JR, Garrett-Mayer E, Anderson B, Forestieri NE, Hollis BW, et al. Bone mineral density during pregnancy in women participating in a randomized controlled trial of Vitamin D supplementation. Am J Clin Nutr. (2017) 106:1422–30. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.116.140459
68. Jefferson KK, Parikh HI, Garcia EM, Edwards DJ, Serrano MG, Hewison M, et al. Relationship between Vitamin D status and the vaginal microbiome during pregnancy. J Perinatol. (2019) 39:824–36. doi: 10.1038/s41372-019-0343-8.Relationship
69. Mirzakhani H, Carey VJ, McElrath TF, Laranjo N, O’Connor G, Iverson RE, et al. The association of maternal asthma and early pregnancy vitamin D with risk of preeclampsia: an observation from vitamin D antenatal asthma reduction trial (VDAART). J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. (2018) 6:600.e–8.e. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.07.018
70. McDonnell SL, Baggerly KA, Baggerly CA, Aliano JL, French CB, Baggerly LL, et al. Maternal 25(OH)D concentrations =40 ng/mL associated with 60% lower preterm birth risk among general obstetrical patients at an urban medical center. PLoS One. (2017) 12:e0180483. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0180483
71. Chen L, Wagner CL, Dong Y, Wang X, Shary JR, Huang Y, et al. Effects of maternal vitamin D3 supplementation on offspring epigenetic clock of gestational age at birth: a post-hoc analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Epigenetics. (2020) 15:830–40. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2020.1734148
72. Litonjua AA, Lange NE, Carey VJ, Brown S, Laranjo N, Harshfield BJ, et al. The vitamin D antenatal asthma reduction trial (VDAART): rationale, design, and methods of a randomized, controlled trial of vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy for the primary prevention of asthma and allergies in children. Contemp Clin Trials. (2014) 38:37–50. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2014.02.006
73. Litonjua AA, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Harshfield BJ, McElrath TF, O’Connor GT, et al. Effect of prenatal supplementation with vitamin D on asthma or recurrent wheezing in offspring by age 3 years: the VDAART randomized clinical trial. JAMA. (2016) 315:362–70. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.18589
74. Litonjua AA, Carey VJ, Laranjo N, Stubbs BJ, Mirzakhani H, O’Connor GT, et al. Six-year follow-up of a trial of antenatal vitamin D for asthma reduction. N Engl J Med. (2020) 382:525–33. doi: 10.1056/nejmoa1906137
75. Wolsk HM, Harshfield BJ, Laranjo N, Carey VJ, O’Connor G, Sandel M, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy, prenatal 25(OH)D levels, race, and subsequent asthma or recurrent wheeze in offspring: secondary analyses from the vitamin D antenatal asthma reduction trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol. (2017) 140:1423–9. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2017.01.013
76. Liu NQ, Ouyang Y, Bulut Y, Lagishetty V, Chan SY, Hollis BW, et al. Dietary vitamin D restriction in pregnant female mice is associated with maternal hypertension and altered placental and fetal development. Endocrinology. (2013) 154:2270–80. doi: 10.1210/en.2012-2270
77. Harvey NC, Javaid K, Bishop N, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, Fraser R, et al. MAVIDOS maternal vitamin D osteoporosis study: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. (2012) 13:1–9. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-13
78. Lanham SA, Roberts C, Habgood AK, Alexander S, Burne THJ, Eyles DW, et al. Effect of vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy on offspring bone structure, composition and quality in later life. J Dev Orig Health Dis. (2013) 4:49–55. doi: 10.1017/S2040174412000542
79. Gopal-Kothandapani JS, Rigby AS, Harrison R, Eastell R, Moon RJ, Curtis EM, et al. Maternal pregnancy vitamin D supplementation increases offspring bone formation in response to mechanical loading: findings from a MAVIDOS trial sub-study. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact. (2020) 20:4–11.
80. Cooper C, Harvey NC, Bishop NJ, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, Schoenmakers I, et al. Maternal gestational vitamin D supplementation and offspring bone health (MAVIDOS): a multicentre, double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2016) 4:393–402. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(16)00044-9
81. Moon RJ, Curtis EM, Woolford SJ, Ashai S, Cooper C, Harvey NC. The importance of maternal pregnancy vitamin D for offspring bone health: learnings from the MAVIDOS trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. (2021) 13:1–14. doi: 10.1177/1759720X211006979
82. Ioannou C, Javaid MK, Mahon P, Yaqub MK, Harvey NC, Godfrey KM, et al. The effect of maternal vitamin D concentration on fetal bone. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2012) 97:2070–7. doi: 10.1210/jc.2012-2538
83. Curtis EM, Moon RJ, Dennison EM, Harvey NC. Prenatal calcium and vitamin D intake, and bone mass in later life. Curr Osteoporos Rep. (2014) 12:194–204. doi: 10.1007/s11914-014-0210-7
84. Händel MN, Frederiksen P, Osmond C, Cooper C, Abrahamsen B, Heitmann BL. Prenatal exposure to vitamin D from fortified margarine and risk of fractures in late childhood: period and cohort results from 222 000 subjects in the D-tect observational study. Br J Nutr. (2017) 117:872–81. doi: 10.1017/S000711451700071X
85. Moon RJ, Harvey NC, Cooper C, D’Angelo S, Curtis EM, Crozier SR, et al. Response to antenatal cholecalciferol supplementation is associated with common vitamin D-related genetic variants. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2017) 102:2941–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2017-00682
86. Simner CL, Ashley B, Cooper C, Harvey NC, Lewis RM, Cleal JK. Investigating a suitable model for the study of vitamin D mediated regulation of human placental gene expression. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. (2020) 199:105576. doi: 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2019.105576
87. Sampathkumar A, Tan KM, Chen L, Chong MFF, Yap F, Godfrey KM, et al. Genetic link determining the maternal-fetal circulation of vitamin D. Front Genet. (2021) 12:721488. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2021.721488
88. Mahmoudi AR, Zarnani AH, Jeddi-Tehrani M, Katouzian L, Tavakoli M, Soltanghoraei H, et al. Distribution of vitamin D receptor and 1α-hydroxylase in male mouse reproductive tract. Reprod Sci. (2013) 20:426–36. doi: 10.1177/1933719112459235
89. Abbasihormozi S, Kouhkan A, Alizadeh AR, Shahverdi AH, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Sadighi Gilani MA, et al. Association of vitamin D status with semen quality and reproductive hormones in Iranian subfertile men. Andrology. (2017) 5:113–8. doi: 10.1111/andr.12280
90. Hajianfar H, Karimi E, Mollaghasemi N, Rezaei S, Arab A. Is there a relationship between serum vitamin D and semen parameters? A cross-sectional sample of the Iranian infertile men. Basic Clin Androl. (2021) 31:1–8. doi: 10.1186/s12610-021-00147-3
91. Almassinokiani F, Khodaverdi S, Solaymani-Dodaran M, Akbari P, Pazouki A. Effects of vitamin D on endometriosis-related pain: a double-blind clinical trial. Med Sci Monit. (2016) 22:4960–6. doi: 10.12659/MSM.901838
92. Pazhohan A, Danaei-Mehrabad S, Mohamad-Rezaeii Z, Amidi F, Khodarahmian M, Shabani Nashtaei M, et al. The modulating effects of vitamin D on the activity of β-catenin in the endometrium of women with endometriosis: a randomized exploratory trial. Gynecol Endocrinol. (2021) 37:278–82. doi: 10.1080/09513590.2020.1858780
93. Bakhshalizadeh S, Amidi F, Shirazi R, Shabani Nashtaei M. Vitamin D3 regulates steroidogenesis in granulosa cells through AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) activation in a mouse model of polycystic ovary syndrome. Cell Biochem Funct. (2018) 36:183–93. doi: 10.1002/cbf.3330
94. Kyei G, Sobhani A, Nekonam S, Shabani M, Ebrahimi F, Qasemi M, et al. Assessing the effect of MitoQ10 and vitamin D3 on ovarian oxidative stress, steroidogenesis and histomorphology in DHEA induced PCOS mouse model. Heliyon. (2020) 6:e04279. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04279
95. Hosseinirad H, Novin MG, Hosseini S, Nazarian H, Amidi F, Paktinat S, et al. Effect of 1,25(OH)2-vitamin D3 on expression and phosphorylation of progesterone receptor in cultured endometrial stromal cells of patients with repeated implantation failure. Acta Histochem. (2020) 122:151489. doi: 10.1016/j.acthis.2019.151489
96. Ghanavatinejad A, Rashidi N, Mirahmadian M, Rezania S, Mosalaei M, Ghasemi J, et al. Vitamin D3 controls TLR4- and TLR2-mediated inflammatory responses of endometrial cells. Gynecol Obstet Invest. (2021) 86:139–48. doi: 10.1159/000513590
97. Carrelli A, Bucovsky M, Horst R, Cremers S, Zhang C, Bessler M, et al. Vitamin D storage in adipose tissue of obese and normal weight women. J Bone Miner Res. (2017) 32:237–42. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.2979
98. Chen YH, Fu L, Hao JH, Yu Z, Zhu P, Wang H, et al. Maternal vitamin D deficiency during pregnancy elevates the risks of small for gestational age and low birth weight infants in Chinese population. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. (2015) 100:1912–9. doi: 10.1210/jc.2014-4407
99. Morales E, Rodriguez A, Valvi D, Iñiguez C, Esplugues A, Vioque J, et al. Deficit of vitamin D in pregnancy and growth and overweight in the offspring. Int J Obes. (2015) 39:61–8. doi: 10.1038/ijo.2014.165
100. Li P, Li P, Liu Y, Liu W, Zha L, Chen X, et al. Maternal vitamin D deficiency increases the risk of obesity in male offspring mice by affecting the immune response. Nutrition. (2021) 87–88:111191. doi: 10.1016/j.nut.2021.111191
101. Li S, Hu L, Zhang C. Urinary vitamin D-binding protein as a marker of ovarian reserve. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. (2021) 19:80. doi: 10.1186/s12958-021-00762-9
102. Dul AJ, Kowaleczko E, Che K, Kurzawa R. Vitamin D as a follicular marker of human oocyte quality and a serum marker of in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. (2018) 25:1265–76. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1179-4
103. Blomberg Jensen M, Jørgensen A, Nielsen JE, Bjerrum PJ, Skalkam M, Petersen JH, et al. Expression of the vitamin D metabolizing enzyme CYP24A1 at the annulus of human spermatozoa may serve as a novel marker of semen quality. Int J Androl. (2012) 35:499–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2605.2012.01256.x
104. De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Ansary A, Regina K, Peña-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2012) 2:CD008873. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008873.pub2
105. Gernand AD, Schulze KJ, Stewart CP, West KP, Christian P. Micronutrient deficiencies in pregnancy worldwide: health effects and prevention. Nat Rev Endocrinol. (2016) 12:274–89. doi: 10.1038/nrendo.2016.37
106. De-Regil LM, Palacios C, Lombardo LK, Peña-Rosas JP. Vitamin D supplementation for women during pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2016) 134:274–5. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.20161343T2
107. Lerchbaum E, Obermayer-Pietsch B. Vitamin D and fertility: a systematic review. Eur J Endocrinol. (2012) 166:765–78. doi: 10.1530/EJE-11-0984
108. Harvey NC, Holroyd C, Ntani G, Javaid K, Cooper P, Moon R, et al. Vitamin D supplementation in pregnancy: a systematic review. Health Technol Assess (Rockv). (2014) 18:1–190. doi: 10.3310/hta18450
109. Thorne-Lyman A, Fawzi WW. Vitamin D during pregnancy and maternal, neonatal and infant health outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis Andrew. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. (2012) 26, Suppl 1:75–90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2012.01283.x
110. Crozier MK Sr., Harvey NC, Gale CR, Dennison EM, Boucher BJ, Arden NK, et al. Princess Anne Hospital Study Group. Maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and childhood bone mass at age 9 years: a longitudinal study. Lancet. (2006) 367:36–43. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)67922-1
111. Gale CR, Robinson SM, Harvey NC, Javaid MK, Jiang B, Martyn CN, et al. Europe PMC funders group maternal vitamin D status during pregnancy and child outcomes. Eur J Clin Nutr. (2008) 62:68–77. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602680
Keywords: vitamin D, vitamin D deficiency, pregnancy, bibliometric analysis, reproductive health, marker
Citation: Lu Y, Zhang X, Wu S, Zhang S and Tan J (2022) A bibliometric analysis of global research on vitamin D and reproductive health between 2012 and 2021: Learning from the past, planning for the future. Front. Nutr. 9:973332. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.973332
Received: 20 June 2022; Accepted: 12 August 2022;
Published: 08 September 2022.
Edited by:
Sergej M. Ostojic, University of Agder, NorwayReviewed by:
Malcolm Koo, Tzu Chi University of Science and Technology, TaiwanTetyana Pimonenko, Sumy State University, Ukraine
Copyright © 2022 Lu, Zhang, Wu, Zhang and Tan. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
*Correspondence: Jichun Tan, dGpjempoQDE2My5jb20=
†These authors have contributed equally to this work and share first authorship