Skip to main content

MINI REVIEW article

Front. Nutr., 05 July 2022
Sec. Nutrition and Metabolism
This article is part of the Research Topic Metabolic Consequences of Malnutrition: How to Balance Nutrients and Genes View all 15 articles

Applications of Machine Learning Models to Predict and Prevent Obesity: A Mini-Review

\nXiaobei Zhou,Xiaobei Zhou1,2Lei Chen,,Lei Chen1,2,3Hui-Xin Liu,,
Hui-Xin Liu1,2,3*
  • 1Health Sciences Institute, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 2Liaoning Key Laboratory of Obesity and Glucose/Lipid Associated Metabolic Diseases, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
  • 3Institute of Life Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Research on obesity and related diseases has received attention from government policymakers; interventions targeting nutrient intake, dietary patterns, and physical activity are deployed globally. An urgent issue now is how can we improve the efficiency of obesity research or obesity interventions. Currently, machine learning (ML) methods have been widely applied in obesity-related studies to detect obesity disease biomarkers or discover intervention strategies to optimize weight loss results. In addition, an open source of these algorithms is necessary to check the reproducibility of the research results. Furthermore, appropriate applications of these algorithms could greatly improve the efficiency of similar studies by other researchers. Here, we proposed a mini-review of several open-source ML algorithms, platforms, or related databases that are of particular interest or can be applied in the field of obesity research. We focus our topic on nutrition, environment and social factor, genetics or genomics, and microbiome-adopting ML algorithms.

Introduction

Obesity is considered to be a chronic progressive disease caused by a combination of multiple determinants, including biological, genetic, social, environmental, and behavioral factors (1, 2). Research on obesity and related diseases has received attention from government policymakers; interventions targeting nutrient intake, dietary patterns, and physical activity are deployed globally. Considerable current effort has been made by the computer community and industry to apply artificial intelligence (AI) technology in the field of biology and biomedicine (3, 4); a possible solution is to use modified machine learning (ML) algorithms to detect obesity disease biomarkers or discover intervention strategies to optimize the weight loss results. ML is seen as part of AI, allowing software applications to predict outcomes without being interpretable (5). ML models can be summarized as two categories: (I) supervised learning models relying on labeled data to train a function that can finish the prediction tasks, and (II) unsupervised learning models focusing on summarizing the characteristics of data, such as dimensionality reduction analysis.

Machine learning models have been successfully used in many studies on obesity to predict obesity rates and identify the risk factors in samples of interest (69). In the field of ML research, it is important and necessary to share the code used in research to check the reproducibility of a related work. In addition, open-source tools could greatly improve the efficiency of similar studies by other researchers. However, these studies ignored one significant thing: They did not share their ML methodologies and frameworks with the public for use by other researchers. At this stage, obesity-related research is considered a public health field and is mostly published in certain professional or medical journals, and these journals do not have strict requirements on the openness of the algorithms or frameworks used in the manuscripts, which are far less than the requirements for data sharing. After matching the keyword “github” (which is the world's most popular public code repository) in 491 abstract texts of obesity-ML-related research [using the PubMed search strategy “Obesity and Machine Learning and” (“1990/01/ 01” [PDAT]: “2022/04/01” [PDAT])], only one related paper was found. Open-source tools are tools for which the original source code is freely available and can be redistributed and modified (10). As a new and booming branch of computer science, ML inherits the tradition of open sharing in the computer community; relevant top journals or conferences have requirements for code sharing of published papers, and most researchers are also willing to upload their codes to the software source code repository.

Several existing reviews focused on the detailed illustration of the status (including the fundamentals, strength, limitation, and evaluation metric) of ML methods in obesity, while ignoring the discussion on the openness of algorithms (7, 1113). To address this point, we proposed a mini-review for collecting open-source ML algorithms or platforms particularly focusing on the field of obesity research or that could be used in related problems in this article. Since the etiology and pathogenesis of obesity are extremely complex, we set the starting point of our study on the prior knowledge of the current authoritative study of obesity epidemiology (14). The traditional approach to epidemiological obesity research is to study numerous risk citations for obesity through specialized cohorts or epidemiological surveys (14). These customized ML tools for these specialized studies did not take our interest because of their low generality. We focused on ML algorithms related to obesity into several segments, including diet and nutrition, physical activity, geographic environment, genetics or genomics, and microbiome, in which the required data of ML models are available from the database (e.g., GEO database) or public platform (Google Map) without special input (Figure 1). In addition, we collected detailed information of 25 open-source ML algorithms or models applied in obesity or that could be used in related filed, including the project name, the relative website, applicable data types, and the simplified description of usage (Table 1).

FIGURE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 1. Possible machine learning (ML) applications according to risk factors leading to obesity.

TABLE 1
www.frontiersin.org

Table 1. Detailed information on these ML algorithms.

Methods

We designed a custom semi-automated data collection method incorporating data mining techniques for this mini-review. The PubMed and Google Scholar databases were searched from the inception until March 2022. The search terms used were: “obesity AND machine learning”; “nutrigenetics AND machine learning”; “food recommendation AND machine learning”; “obesity AND geographic information system”; “mhealth” AND (“smartphones” OR “mobile app” OR “mobile applications”) AND (“platform” OR “framework”)”; “(Genetics OR Genomics) AND machine learning”; “microbiome AND machine learning.” The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) the abstract text contains the keyword “github” (text mining (TM) technology); (2) studies applying at least one ML algorithm focusing on predicting obesity and obesity-related diseases, preventing the obesity prevalence, or conducting the relationship between obesity and obesity risk factors [manually screening (MS)]; (3) the algorithms or frameworks in the studies must be suitable for a common data format, such as fasta or fastq format (MS). Articles excluded were the following: (1) the main text of studies was not available in the English language (TM technology); (2) review papers and papers not considered original studies (TM technology). The PRISMA flowchart of assessment of the literature is illustrated in Figure 2.

FIGURE 2
www.frontiersin.org

Figure 2. PRISMA flowchart of the review.

Results

In summary, we included 25 open-source ML algorithms or models applied in obesity in this mini-review. In the following sections, we discuss each algorithm and describe its applications.

Personalized Food Recommender

A recommendation system can be considered a specified ML model predicting the “rating” or “preference” when given certain information about the user. Deep learning approaches based on the embedding models are now popularly used in modern recommendation systems (15). The core utility of the food recommendation system is to provide recipe retrieval (16). PFoodReq is a novel question-answering food recommendation system based on a large-scale food knowledge base/graph (17). In general, PFoodReq will follow the user's question, such as “What's good with bread for breakfast?”, and then output all recipes from the model. The ingredients in these recipes are then rated for suitability and the top-rated recipes are recommended. FlavorGraph is a knowledge graph (KG) system by relations extracted from food recipes and information on flavor molecules from food databases (18). The two main usages of FlavorGraph are predicting compound food relationships and selecting or optimizing food pairings. Yum-me is a nutrition-based meal recommender that integrates state-of-the-art food image analysis models (19). Its input variables rely on two parts: (I) a survey of user dietary restrictions and nutritional expectations and (II) a visual interface that represents the user's food preferences. DeepFood, based on a deep learning approach, can recognize multi-item (food) images by detecting candidate regions or using a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) for food classification tasks (20). Market2Dish focused on the extension utility of user health profiling and health-aware food recommendation (21).

Nutrigenetic Model

Nutrigenetics is the science of studying the interaction between nutrition and gene information. LC-N2G is a novel statistical method inheriting genetic algorithm for ranking and identifying combinations of nutrients with gene expression (22). NutriGenomeDB is a nutrigenomics data platform based on the GSEA algorithm, which collects signature gene information of nutrigenomics experimental expression data obtained from the gene expression omnibus (GEO) (23).

Geographic Information System (GIS) Model

Studying obesity-related issues through GIS data and methods is one of the hotspots in current public health research. A US team pioneered the use of deep learning techniques to assess obesity levels by identifying key patterns in the built environment from satellite imagery (24). The key idea is to extract thousands of hidden features from satellite images and identify the potential relationship between the hidden features and the body mass index (BMI). Unfortunately, the framework is not open to the public. MapMetadataEnrichment, a deep learning–based approach that can automatically generate labeled training map images using GIS data, is highly recommended as an alternative framework (25). Without a deep learning approach, spatial models could not be directly used to analyze GIS data to study obesity (26). In this article, we recommend the GWmodel, which is a widely used R-based package that implements geographically weighted models for exploring spatial heterogeneity (27). A classic use case of the application of the GWmodel can be found in a recent study in which a geographically weighted regression (GWR) model (based on the GWmodel package) was adopted to analyze the relationship between socioeconomic factors, obesity, and air temperature and unhealthy behaviors in the USA (28).

mHealth Platform

Recently, digital technologies that can monitor and manage our physical and mental health in our daily lives have rapidly developed and are being used to solve obesity-related problems (29, 30). Mobile health applications denoted mHealth apps have become increasingly popular with researchers and clinicians as effective tools for improving health behaviors. Several open-source mHealth platforms are available, including schema (31), mHealthDroid (32), and MobileCoach (33). These platforms are mentioned here since they can cooperate with ML models in the situation where the model uses the data provided by the platform. The mHealhDroid platform is designed to facilitate the fast and easy development of mHealth and biomedical applications; the schema platform is a lightweight cross-platform mobile application focused on mobile health monitoring and intervention research; the MobileCoach platform provides a one-stop solution for fully automated digital interventions.

Genetic Model

Genetics studies genes and the way certain traits or conditionsare passed from one generation to the next. The polygenic score (PGS) database collects published PGS information that provides the community with an open platform for PGS research. (34). PRS estimates an individual's genetic risk for complex diseases based on many genetic variants across the genome. In fact, a polygenic risk score (PRS) could be considered a specified regression model; there are many obesity PRS models available in the PGS database, such as PGP000017 and PGP000211. Impute.me is the first non-commercial platform for using data from direct-to-consumer genetic testing to calculate and interpret polygenic risk scores (35). DeepVariant was launched by Google, which uses deep neural networks to fast and accurately identify variation sites from DNA sequencing data (36). The NeuralCVD-based deep survival machine algorithm can estimate the cardiovascular risk for coronary heart disease prevention (37). DeepCOMBI uses AI for analysis and discovery in genome-wide association studies (38).

Microbiome Model

The gut microbiome is closely related to overall health. More and more studies suggest that obesity is associated with specific changes in the composition and function of the human gut microbiome (39, 40). Any study of the gut microbiome associated with obesity cannot skip the step of taxonomic classification to infer the relative abundance of different taxa. Typical ML taxonomic classifiers are DeepMicro (41), DeepMicrobes (42), SortMeRNA (43), q2-feature-classifier (44), swarm (45), etc. We mentioned that q2 feature classifier has been implemented in QIIME 2 which is the most popular microbiome analysis platform (46). ML models [GEDFN (47), MDeep (48), TaxoNN (49), and MetaPheno (50)] can also be used to predict patient phenotype or obesity from their microbiome sequence data. MIPMLP provides a reproducible preprocessing ML pipeline for a microbiome analysis (51).

Limitations

Obesity, with its complex etiologies, is difficult to describe with a single theoretical model. The current trend in obesity research is to integrate health and medical big data and use high-throughput sequencing technology for multi-omics joint research. In general, the current ML models and algorithms for obesity research are separated from a single field, and no model can span multiple fields or integrate multiple types of data across platforms for a joint analysis of homologous and heterogeneous data. For the nutrigenetic model, the development of open-source models is far behind the industry. Several startups have launched genetics-based food recipes and recommendation systems, while their models are “black box.” A major limitation of genetic models of obesity is weak evidence from small sample sizes due to small variants of genetic mutations. For the mHealth platforms, we could not find open-source ML models in obesity, although we believe that ML models in obesity must be existing in commercial mobile APPs. For the open-source mHealth platform, we were unable to find an open-source ML model related to obesity, although we believe that such ML models already exist in commercial mobile apps.

Perspective

Machine learning algorithms are a powerful analytic tool that enables us to conceptualize and study metabolic disorders within a fundamentally novel framework. In contrast to conventional statistical methods assessing single modality predictors, ML methods are capable of integrating multiple data types and sources to inform predictive models. Nonetheless, ML algorithms are limited by the type of data captured, the quality of available data, the conceptual frameworks algorithms are applied to, and the underlying assumptions. The use of ML algorithms in obesity will dramatically increase in the future, and a large number of ML algorithms will be implemented on a few specific platforms such as QIMME 2 to facilitate rapid application and collaborative work between multiple algorithms. Presently, most of the ML algorithms used in obesity-related research are isolated in a single field or the factor that causes obesity; in the future, the algorithms will work together across platforms or data types. Future research vistas are to optimize and prospectively test predictive models using external datasets.

Author Contributions

All authors listed have made a substantial, direct, and intellectual contribution to the work and approved it for publication.

Funding

This research received financial support from the General Project of the Liaoning Provincial Department of Education under Grant No. LJKZ0758 and the Liaoning Provincial Natural Science Foundation (2021-MS-194).

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Publisher's Note

All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article, or claim that may be made by its manufacturer, is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

References

1. Apovian CM. Obesity: definition, comorbidities, causes, and burden. Am J Manag Care. (2016) 22(7 Suppl.):s176–85.

PubMed Abstract | Google Scholar

2. Kyle TK, Dhurandhar EJ, Allison DB. Regarding obesity as a disease: evolving policies and their implications. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. (2016) 45:511–20. doi: 10.1016/j.ecl.2016.04.004

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

3. Ching T, Himmelstein DS, Beaulieu-Jones BK, Kalinin AA, Do BT, Way GP, et al. Opportunities and obstacles for deep learning in biology and medicine. J R Soc Interface. (2018) 15:20170387. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0387

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

4. Zhao Z, Woloszynek S, Agbavor F, Mell JC, Sokhansanj BA, Rosen GL. Learning, visualizing and exploring 16S rRNA structure using an attention-based deep neural network. PLoS Comput Biol. (2021) 17:e1009345. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009345

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

5. Mitchell TM. Machine Learning. 1st ed. McGraw-Hill, Inc. (1997).

Google Scholar

6. Chatterjee A, Gerdes MW, Martinez SG. Identification of risk factors associated with obesity and overweight-a machine learning overview. Sensors. (2020) 20:2734. doi: 10.3390/s20092734

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

7. Colmenarejo G. Machine learning models to predict childhood and adolescent obesity: a review. Nutrients. (2020) 12:2466. doi: 10.3390/nu12082466

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

8. Duran I, Martakis K, Rehberg M, Semler O, Schoenau E. Diagnostic performance of an artificial neural network to predict excess body fat in children. Pediatr Obes. (2019) 14:e12494. doi: 10.1111/ijpo.12494

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

9. Safaei M, Sundararajan EA, Driss M, Boulila W, Shapi'i A. A systematic literature review on obesity: Understanding the causes & consequences of obesity and reviewing various machine learning approaches used to predict obesity. Comput Biol Med. (2021) 136:104754. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104754

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

10. Corbly JE. The free software alternative: freeware, open-source software, and libraries. Inform Technol Librar. (2014) 33:65–75. doi: 10.6017/ital.v33i3.5105

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

11. Chimunhu P, Topal E, Ajak AD, Asad W. A review of machine learning applications for underground mine planning and scheduling. Resour Policy. (2022) 77:102693. doi: 10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.102693

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

12. DeGregory KW, Kuiper P, DeSilvio T, Pleuss JD, Miller R, Roginski JW, et al. A review of machine learning in obesity. Obes Rev. (2018) 19:668–85. doi: 10.1111/obr.12667

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

13. Triantafyllidis A, Polychronidou E, Alexiadis A, Rocha CL, Oliveira DN, da Silva AS, et al., Computerized decision support and machine learning applications for the prevention and treatment of childhood obesity: A systematic review of the literature. Artif Intell Med. (2020) 104:101844. doi: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101844

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

14. Pan XF, Wang L, Pan A. Epidemiology and determinants of obesity in China. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. (2021) 9:373–92. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(21)00045-0

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

15. Zhang S, Yao L, Sun A, Tay Y. Deep learning based recommender system: a survey and new perspectives. ACM Comput Surv. (2017) 52:1–35. doi: 10.1145/3285029

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

16. De Croon R, Van Houdt L, Htun NN, Štiglic G, Vanden Abeele V, Verbert K. Health recommender systems: systematic review. J Med Internet Res. (2021) 23:e18035. doi: 10.2196/18035

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

17. Chen Y, Subburathinam A, Chen CH, Zaki MJ. Personalized food recommendation as constrained question answering over a large-scale food knowledge graph. In: WSDM '21: The Fourteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery. (2021). doi: 10.1145/3437963.3441816

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

18. Park D, Kim K, Kim S, Spranger M, Kang J. FlavorGraph: a large-scale food-chemical graph for generating food representations and recommending food pairings. Sci Rep. (2021) 11:931. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-79422-8

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

19. Yang L, Hsieh C-K, Yang H, Pollak JP, Dell N, Belongie S, et al. Yum-Me: a personalized nutrient-based meal recommender system. ACM Trans Inf Syst. (2017) 36:7. doi: 10.1145/3072614

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

20. Jiang L, Qiu B, Liu X, Huang C, Lin K. DeepFood: food image analysis and dietary assessment via deep model. IEEE Access. (2020) 1–1. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2973625

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

21. Wang W, Duan LY, Jiang H, Jing P, Song X, Nie L. Market2Dish: health-aware food recommendation. ACM Trans Multimedia Comput Commun Applic. (2021) 17:1–19. doi: 10.1145/3418211

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

22. Xu X, Solon-Biet SM, Senior A, Simpson SJ, Fontana L, Mueller S, et al. LC-N2G: a local consistency approach for nutrigenomics data analysis. BMC Bioinformatics. (2020) 21:530. doi: 10.1186/s12859-020-03861-3

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

23. Martín-Hernández R, Reglero G, Ordovás JM, Dávalos A. NutriGenomeDB: a nutrigenomics exploratory and analytical platform. Database. (2019) 2019:baz097. doi: 10.1093/database/baz097

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

24. Maharana A, Nsoesie EO. Use of deep learning to examine the association of the built environment with prevalence of neighborhood adult obesity. JAMA Netw Open. (2018) 1:e181535. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2018.1535

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

25. Hu Y, Gui Z, Wang J, Li M. Enriching the metadata of map images: a deep learning approach with GIS-based data augmentation. Int J Geogr Inform Sci. (2021) 36:1–23. doi: 10.1080/13658816.2021.1968407

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

26. Kamel Boulos MN, Peng G, VoPham T. An overview of GeoAI applications in health and healthcare. Int J Health Geogr. (2019) 18:7. doi: 10.1186/s12942-019-0171-2

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

27. Cao S, Zheng H. A POI-based machine learning method for predicting residents' health status. In: The International Conference on Computational Design and Robotic Fabrication. Singapore: Springer. (2021). doi: 10.1007/978-981-16-5983-6_13

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

28. Lotfata A. Using geographically weighted models to explore obesity prevalence association with air temperature, socioeconomic factors, and unhealthy behavior in the USA. J Geovisualiz Spatial Anal. (2022) 6:1–12. doi: 10.1007/s41651-022-00108-y

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

29. Goldstein SP, Thomas JG, Foster GD, Turner-McGrievy G, Butryn ML, Herbert JD, et al. Refining an algorithm-powered just-in-time adaptive weight control intervention: a randomized controlled trial evaluating model performance and behavioral outcomes. Health Informatics J. (2020) 26:2315–31. doi: 10.1177/1460458220902330

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

30. Stein N, Brooks K. A fully automated conversational artificial intelligence for weight loss: longitudinal observational study among overweight and obese adults. JMIR Diabetes. (2017) 2:e28. doi: 10.2196/diabetes.8590

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

31. Shatte ABR, Teague SJ. Schema: an open-source, distributed mobile platform for deploying mhealth research tools and interventions. BMC Med Res Methodol. (2020) 20:91. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-00973-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

32. Banos O, Garcia R, Holgado-Terriza JA, Damas M, Pomares H, Rojas I, et al. mHealthDroid: A Novel Framework for Agile Development of Mobile Health Applications. Cham: Springer International Publishing (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-13105-4_14

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

33. Kowatsch T, Volland D, Shih I, Rüegger D, Künzler F, Barata F, et al. Design and evaluation of a mobile Chat App for the open source behavioral health intervention platform MobileCoach. In: International Conference on Design Science Research in Information System and Technology. Cham: Springer. (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-59144-5_36

CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

34. Lambert SA, Gill L, Jupp S, Ritchie SC, Xu Y, Buniello A, et al. The Polygenic Score Catalog as an open database for reproducibility and systematic evaluation. Nat Genet. (2021) 53:420–5. doi: 10.1038/s41588-021-00783-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

35. Folkersen L, Pain O, Ingason A, Werge T, Lewis CM, Austin J. Impute.me: an open-source, non-profit tool for using data from direct-to-consumer genetic testing to calculate and interpret polygenic risk scores. Front Genet. (2020) 11:578. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2020.00578

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

36. Yun T, Li H, Chang PC, Lin MF, Carroll A, McLean CY. Accurate, scalable cohort variant calls using DeepVariant and GLnexus. Bioinformatics. (2021) 36:5582–9. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa1081

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

37. Steinfeldt J, Buergel T, Loock L, Kittner P, Ruyoga G, Belzen JU, et al. Neural network-based integration of polygenic and clinical information: development and validation of a prediction model for 10-year risk of major adverse cardiac events in the UK Biobank cohort. Lancet Digit Heal. (2022) 4:e84-94. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(21)00249-1

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

38. Mieth B, Rozier A, Rodriguez JA, Höhne MMC, Görnitz N, Müller KR. DeepCOMBI: explainable artificial intelligence for the analysis and discovery in genome-wide association studies. NAR Genom Bioinform. (2021) 3:lqab065. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqab065

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

39. Aoun A, Darwish F, Hamod N. The influence of the gut microbiome on obesity in adults and the role of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics for weight loss. Prev Nutr Food Sci. (2020) 25:113–23. doi: 10.3746/pnf.2020.25.2.113

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

40. Davis CD. The gut microbiome and its role in obesity. Nutr Today. (2016) 51:167–74. doi: 10.1097/NT.0000000000000167

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

41. Oh M, Zhang L. DeepMicro: deep representation learning for disease prediction based on microbiome data. Sci Rep. (2020) 10:6026. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-63159-5

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

42. Liang Q, Bible PW, Liu Y, Zou B, Wei L. DeepMicrobes: taxonomic classification for metagenomics with deep learning. NAR Genom Bioinform. (2020) 2:lqaa009. doi: 10.1093/nargab/lqaa009

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

43. Kopylova E, Noé L, Touzet H. SortMeRNA: fast and accurate filtering of ribosomal RNAs in metatranscriptomic data. Bioinformatics. (2012) 28:3211–7. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts611

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

44. Bokulich NA, Kaehler BD, Rideout JR, Dillon M, Bolyen E, Knight R, et al. Optimizing taxonomic classification of marker-gene amplicon sequences with QIIME 2's q2-feature-classifier plugin. Microbiome. (2018) 6:90. doi: 10.1186/s40168-018-0470-z

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

45. Mahé F, Rognes T, Quince C, de Vargas C, Dunthorn M. Swarm: robust and fast clustering method for amplicon-based studies. PeerJ. (2014) 2:e593. doi: 10.7717/peerj.593

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

46. Bolyen E, Rideout JR, Dillon MR, Bokulich NA, Abnet CC, Al-Ghalith GA, et al. Reproducible, interactive, scalable and extensible microbiome data science using QIIME 2. Nat Biotechnol. (2019) 37:852–57. doi: 10.1038/s41587-019-0209-9

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

47. Zhu Q, Jiang X, Zhu Q, Pan M, He T. Graph Embedding deep learning guides microbial biomarkers' identification. Front Genet. (2019) 10:1182. doi: 10.3389/fgene.2019.01182

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

48. Wang Y Bhattacharya T, Jiang Y, Qin X, Wang Y, Liu Y, et al. A novel deep learning method for predictive modeling of microbiome data. Briefings Bioinformatics. (2020) 22:bbaa073. doi: 10.1093/bib/bbaa073

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

49. Sharma D, Paterson AD, Xu W. TaxoNN: ensemble of neural networks on stratified microbiome data for disease prediction. Bioinformatics. (2020) 36:4544–50. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btaa542

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

50. LaPierre N, Ju CJT, Zhou G, Wang W. MetaPheno: a critical evaluation of deep learning and machine learning in metagenome-based disease prediction. Methods. (2019) 166:74–82. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.03.003

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

51. Jasner Y, Belogolovski A, Ben-Itzhak M, Koren O, Louzoun Y. Microbiome preprocessing machine learning pipeline. Front Immunol. (2021) 12:677870. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.677870

PubMed Abstract | CrossRef Full Text | Google Scholar

Keywords: nutrition, obesity, machine learning, algorithm, genetics, environment

Citation: Zhou X, Chen L and Liu H-X (2022) Applications of Machine Learning Models to Predict and Prevent Obesity: A Mini-Review. Front. Nutr. 9:933130. doi: 10.3389/fnut.2022.933130

Received: 30 April 2022; Accepted: 19 May 2022;
Published: 05 July 2022.

Edited by:

Lei Zhou, Guangxi University, China

Reviewed by:

Haitham Nobanee, Abu Dhabi University, United Arab Emirates
He Ma, Northeastern University, China

Copyright © 2022 Zhou, Chen and Liu. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

*Correspondence: Hui-Xin Liu, bGl1aHgmI3gwMDA0MDtjbXUuZWR1LmNu

Disclaimer: All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.